Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277763 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Why dont you go outside Sheen and do something productive with your day ?
<quoted text>
Stop crying, you lie Pedo Tommy, because you don't want people to know about your 14 year old child bride!
JudgeNJury wrote:
So tell me Sheen, why do I only post in this forum and not in any of the others Tom started ..... You are not very inquisitive are you Sheen ?
<quoted text>
More of the Pedo's LIES!

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/TKD...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TCC3TPN...

AND ON AND ON!

FOUGERA!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#277764 Aug 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The roof line of the North Tower of the World Trade Center is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared.
A downward acceleration of the falling upper block implies a downward net force, which requires that the upward resistive force was less than the weight of the block.
Since the lower section of the building was designed to support several times the weight of the upper block, the reduced force exerted by the falling block was insufficient to crush the lower section of the building.
Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a CONSEQUENCE of, not the CAUSE of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.
So where is the "piledriver?" There was none.
Most large building controlled demolitions start at the bottom, when structural elements are removed by explosives, and gravity takes over.
The key here is the word "controlled". There are other ways to demolish a building to make it look like a top down event.
This is what was in play on 9/11. It was "controlled".
Uh Huh Eh !
Disappear? It disintegrated as it broke apart into large chunks.

Yes it was designed to support static loads. Once the upper part started to move, all bets were off.

Really? The once the upper part started to move, gravity took over. It is obvious by watching any video.

The towers started at the damaged section which moves first.

You call wiping out the whole Trade Center "controlled?"

GLAD I COULD HELP

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#277765 Aug 12, 2014
it's amazing all of the out of work structural engineers on this forum
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Disappear? It disintegrated as it broke apart into large chunks.
Yes it was designed to support static loads. Once the upper part started to move, all bets were off.
Really? The once the upper part started to move, gravity took over. It is obvious by watching any video.
The towers started at the damaged section which moves first.
You call wiping out the whole Trade Center "controlled?"
GLAD I COULD HELP

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#277766 Aug 12, 2014
Oh but you expect me to tell you the real name of my bio-tech company ???..... thats rich
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Irrelevant. None of your business.
No, but you sure are.
GLAD I COULD HELP
ANY MORE STUPID QUESTIONS?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#277767 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
<quoted text>Why dont you go outside Sheen and do something productive with your day ?
Which is quite ironic given that you respond every time he posts.

You really suck at this moron!

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#277768 Aug 12, 2014
Over 38 posts so far today from Sheen that's over 13,000 posts a year ...... when does this guy have time to do lawyer work ??

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#277769 Aug 12, 2014
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you summarize your bs mumbo jumbo into something that resembles truth?
Of course you can't oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. I knows science gud!
And yes doorknob, gravity pulls down. Now can you prove the only way for free fall to occur is by use of explosives?
No, because it's a fallacy and has zero merit.

“SHEEN IS A LIAR”

Since: Dec 10

Lincoln, NE

#277770 Aug 12, 2014
You've got it wrong Huckleberry, Sheen always response to my posts ..... now go back to sleep shill
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Which is quite ironic given that you respond every time he posts.
You really suck at this moron!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277771 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!<quoted text>
I just call you a liar pedo Tommy!
JudgeNJury wrote:
So tell me Sheen, why do I only post in this forum and not in any of the others Tom started ..... You are not very inquisitive are you Sheen ?
<quoted text>
Pedo Tommy, Why do you lie?

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/islam/TKD...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TVMURRF...

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TCC3TPN...

AND ON AND ON!

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277772 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!<quoted text>
Why debate a known liar Pedo Tommy?
JudgeNJury wrote:
Too bad I dont live in Massachusetts Sheen ...... once again, your point is moot
<quoted text>
Gosh Pedo Tommy, Where does it say you are from right here!

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277773 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!<quoted text>
Yup, Trying to lie to try and cover up your 14 year old child bride!
JudgeNJury wrote:
Yawn Sheen ...... a 14 year old can't be legally married in the USA ..... YOU WOULD THINK A LAWYER WOULD KNOW THAT ...... but then again you aren't a lawyer are you ??<quoted text>
TOMMY, They talk about you right here, the Law Review Article is even called Child Brides!

----------

MASSACHUSETTS LAW UPDATES
FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT LAW LIBRARIES
CHILD BRIDES

In Massachusetts, under MGL c.207, s. 25, a person under eighteen cannot marry without parental consent . MASSACHUSETTS DOES NOT HAVE A LAW SPECIFYING THE MINIMUM AGE AT WHICH A PERSON CAN MARRY WITH A PARENT’S CONSENT. The process requires court approval, so whether or not to authorize the marriage of a particular minor is within a judge’s discretion.

THE NOTION OF A MINIMUM AGE OF 14 FOR BOYS AND 12 FOR GIRLS COMES FROM AN 1854 CASE, PARTON V. HERVEY, 67 MASS. 119.

Presumably, the concept that the minimum age is sixteen for both males and females comes from that same notion, that a minor above the age of consent may have a valid marriage. Massachusetts does not have a general age of consent for all things (for example, consent to medical treatment or kidnapping are different). For sexual matters, though, sixteen is generally called the “age of consent,” because sex with a person under sixteen is prohibited by MGL c.265 s.23. And so some websites state that you can marry here with parental consent at sixteen, and without it at eighteen.

BUT JUST THE LAW DOES NOT LIST A MINIMUM AGE OF TWELVE, IT DOESN'T GIVE A MINIMUM AGE OF SIXTEEN EITHER.

The truth is both simpler and more murky. In Massachusetts, if a parent consents to a minor child’s marriage, authorization must still be obtained from the Probate or District Court. The judge will use his or her discretion to determine if the marriage is in the child’s best interest. AS FAR AS WE CAN DETERMINE, THERE IS NO MINIMUM AGE; THERE ALSO IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT THE JUDGE APPROVE ANY REQUEST. EACH CASE IS SIMPLY DECIDED ON ITS OWN MERITS.
GO HERE!

http://masslawlib.blogspot.com/

Type In “Child Brides” under “Search This Blog”

FOUGERA!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#277774 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
<quoted text>That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Translation: "wah wah wah blubber boo hoo hoo wah! I want everything my way and nothing else will do!"

Quit crying you blubbering moron, you're accusing many people of mass murder and many others of covering it up based on easily debunked garbage that can't stand up to the least bit of scrutiny.

Oh and pedo-tommy is a pedo....just google it!
Sorry dummy but unless you idjits can support one of the main premises your delusions rely on, everything you say just sounds like more whining and snivelling.

Try again.

Fougera!

Hahahaha!!!

You silly loser!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277775 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!<quoted text>
Tommy, Why do you lie in every post, Oh well, A failure in life can pretend his is a big man on the net!

----------
JudgeNJury wrote:
Thats right Govie Shill , I WAS ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF A BIOTECH COMPANY CALLED FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, it was bought by Novartis Pharmaceuticals in 2012
<quoted text>
So you are over 160 years old, that makes your love of 14 year old girls even creepier!

----------

Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.has been serving the pharmaceutical industry for over 160 years,

--https://www.linkedin.com/com pany/nycomed-us—

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277776 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
That’s right people, because when someone says something you don't agree with make sure to call them stupid, moron, retard, and a child because there can be no debate or discussion, PorkShill is right and you are all wrong ...... PorkShill another arrogant, self important govie sociopath !!!<quoted text>
Pedo Tommy loves the Jews, Hold on, HE'S LYING AGAIN!

TIMESTEN WHY DO YOU LIE?
JudgeNJury wrote:
I have no issues with the Jews and support their right to exist and defend themselves from Hamas .... I actually did a lot of work with businesses in Israel ...some of my best customers
<quoted text>
You sure about that TOM!
JudgeNJury wrote:
nobody cares what you have to say you jew loving govie shill
go troll somewhere else
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TEIL98P...
JudgeNJury wrote:
why dont you register with topix you zio jew loving govie shill<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277777 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Oh but you expect me to tell you the real name of my bio-tech company ???..... thats rich <quoted text>
You already did Pedo Tommy!
JudgeNJury wrote:
Thats right Govie Shill , I WAS ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF A BIOTECH COMPANY CALLED FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, it was bought by Novartis Pharmaceuticals in 2012
<quoted text>
So you are over 160 years old, that makes your love of 14 year old girls even creepier!

----------

Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.has been serving the pharmaceutical industry for over 160 years,

--https://www.linkedin.com/com pany/nycomed-us—

FOUGERA!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#277778 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
<quoted text>You've got it wrong Huckleberry, Sheen always response to my posts ..... now go back to sleep shill
You really are dumb as a stump!

You're here, all day responding to him too then chiding him for being here all day.

You fail at logic dirty sock.

Fougera!

Hahahahaha!!!!

You bloody loser!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277780 Aug 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh BTW thanks for agreeing with me that "free-fall acceleration did occur.
Heard it before Doc Bunny!

Dr_Zorderz claiming WTC 1 & 2 were in full freefall but the calculations that say otherwise are wrong because they omitted air resistance.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, resistance of the air. That always slows down falling buildings. Just look at any controlled demolition. See how the air slows down the falling debris?
So you are saying there is no air outside the building where these objects are falling faster than the building?

http://www.tampabay.com/resources/images/dti/...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277781 Aug 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Therefore the falling block could not have acted as a "pile driver." The downward acceleration of the upper block can be understood as a CONSEQUENCE of, not the CAUSE of, the disintegration of the lower section of the building.
One Picture proves your wrong Doc Bunny, Why is the lower part of the building FULLY INTACT if disintegration of the lower section of the building was the reason the upper block fell. Was this not on youtube?

http://www.debunking911.com/pivot.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eseZnv0GB5g/TmYsA_g...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#277782 Aug 12, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
it's amazing all of the out of work structural engineers on this forum
<quoted text>
What's really amazing is how people can come to the wrong conclusion about things which are perfectly obvious. Take the towers for example. Those shots where the towers fell were broadcast over and over. Many YouRube Videos also show the towers collapsing. It is very easy to see the part above the point of collision move first initiating the collapse.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277786 Aug 12, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You've never heard of sarcasm or don't recognize it when you read it, is that what's going on here ?!?!?!?!?
What a lying cherry picking moron you are sorry charlie.
Uh Huh Eh !
Sure Doc Bunny

When twoofers are morons they claim sarcasm, how about here, more sarcasm?

----------

A lot of the 9-11 Deniers like to point out that the first chapter of Thomas Kean and LEE HAMILTON'S BOOK WITHOUT PRECEDENT WAS ENTITLED "SET UP TO FAIL". OF COURSE, THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE TRUTHERS INABILITY TO READ (perhaps that is why they like videos so much?). I borrowed the book from the local library the other day and will be giving my thoughts over the next few days.

WHY WAS THE COMMISSION SET UP TO FAIL? THE BOOK (PAGE 15) EXPLAINS:

"Both of us were aware of grumbling around Washington that the 9/11 Commission was doomed--if not designed--to fail: the commission would splinter down partisan lines; lose its credibility by leaking classified information; be denied the necessary access to do its job; or alienate the 9/11 families who had fought on behalf of its creation."

BUT THE PARAGRAPH CONTINUES:

"WHAT WE COULD NOT HAVE ANTICIPATED WERE THE REMARKABLE PEOPLE AND CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WOULD COALESCE WITHIN AND AROUND THE 9/11 COMMISSION OVER THE COMING TWENTY MONTHS TO ENABLE OUR SUCCESS."

Uh Huh Eh !

(PS: You quote below where you say it's not from ANY BOOK, states it was from a BOOK!)
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
"LEE AND I WRITE IN OUR BOOK, that uh, we think that the Commission in many ways was set up to fail."
Direct quote from Thomas H. Kean, 9/11 Commission Chairman at the National Press Club 9/11/2006.
https://www.youtube.com/watch ...
There is no context here. THIS IS NOT FROM ANY BOOK.
You can not deny he said this on camera.
Sure he might have said words before and after he said this sentence.
Uh Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 51 min scienceanswersall 688,411
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 57 min scienceanswersall 35,939
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr scienceanswersall 988,348
How did black people get here ( economically) 2 hr LEAVE AMERICA 42
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr RFD 619,808
What was the Vegas mass murderer's REAL problem? 2 hr RFD 12
Chinese are dishonest, greedy and cold-blooded. (Jan '14) 8 hr Doctor REALITY 55
More from around the web