Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

53,630 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Charleston, IL

#277273 Aug 9, 2014
I got busy and haven't been on for awhile and WOW JudgeNJury is really handing the debwunkers asses to them.

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277278 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
It's not too hard ....... they are all so stupid and uneducated
<quoted text>
Oh Timesten, I know it's hard, For a 14 year old girl you pedo!
JudgeNJury wrote:
Yawn Sheen ...... a 14 year old can't be legally married in the USA ..... YOU WOULD THINK A LAWYER WOULD KNOW THAT ...... but then again you aren't a lawyer are you ??<quoted text>
Alabama

If either of you are under eighteen (18), you will need a certified copy of your birth certificate. INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE AGE OF 14 MAY NOT MARRY

New Hampshire

The law is complicated in New Hampshire. Individuals under the age of 18 may not marry in New Hampshire without parental approval and a judicial waiver. BRIDES MUST BE AT LEAST 13 YEARS OF AGE and grooms must be at least 14 years of age before their parents can apply for a judicial waiver.

New York

If you are 16 or 17 years of age, you will need to have a completed parental consent form filled out by both parents. IF YOU ARE EITHER 14 OR 15 YEARS OF AGE, YOU WILL NEED TO SHOW THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF BOTH PARENTS AND A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OR A JUDGE OF THE LOCAL FAMILY COURT. APPLICANTS UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE CANNOT MARRY.

North Carolina
Anyone under 20 years of age will need to show a certified copy of their birth certificate. If you are between 16 and 17 years old, you will have to show parental consent. THOSE WHO ARE 14 TO 15 YEARS OLD, YOU CAN'T GET A MARRIAGE LICENSE WITHOUT A COURT ORDER. ANYONE UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE CANNOT GET MARRIED.

South Carolina
If you are under 18, you will need a certified copy of your birth certificate and a notarized statement of parental consent. THE MINIMUM AGE FOR A FEMALE IS 14 and it is 16 for a male.

http://www.usmarriagelaws.com/search/united_s...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277280 Aug 9, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Hundreds of unreliable eyewitnesses saw it only we don't know their names.
We recovered all the luggage of the passengers only we can't show it to you for reasons of national security.
200 Here, Names in footnotes or in the text!

And it's a twoofer site!

http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/04/911-...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277281 Aug 9, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
There are lots of CC security cameras around, any one of which could have shown exactly what crashed into the Pentagon, only the FBI confiscated them all and won't show the
Yea, The FBI won't generally give you bank robbery security tapes either, unless it is to their benefit in apprehension!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277282 Aug 9, 2014
onemale wrote:
US Officially Drops All Charges Against Bin Laden, Never Indicted For 9/11 No Evidence Presented
Only years of inbreeding would cause one to find the above compelling, Father of a traitor if there was no indictment WHAT CHARGES WERE DROPPED?

More wisdom from the son diddling goof movement.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277283 Aug 9, 2014
TIMESTEN WHY DO YOU LIE?
JudgeNJury wrote:
I have no issues with the Jews and support their right to exist and defend themselves from Hamas .... I actually did a lot of work with businesses in Israel ...some of my best customers
<quoted text>
You sure about that TOM!
JudgeNJury wrote:
nobody cares what you have to say you jew loving govie shill
go troll somewhere else
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TEIL98P...
JudgeNJury wrote:
why dont you register with topix you zio jew loving govie shill<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277284 Aug 9, 2014
TOMMY, Did you ever find proof this exists.

LMFAO Click the link, JudgeNJurys Proof of Mini Nukes via a video game!

----------

The Mini-Doogals Express gatling mini nuke launcher, which fires 20rps, fully automatic, standard mininukes, of course the government doesnt say they have this weapon, but they do !!

http://vimeo.com/6240792

----------

FROM http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TEIL98P...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277285 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
In the hundreds of thousands leaked pager messages evidence emerged that the Secret Service did forward "Angel is next"!
A Secret Service page at 10:32 a.m. warned: "ANONYMOUS CALL TO JOC REPORTING ANGEL IS TARGET." Angel is the Secret Service codeword for Air Force One; JOC means Joint Operations Center. When the president's plane had departed Florida about half an hour earlier, it was en route to D.C. That anonymous threat seems to be what diverted President Bush on a high-speed flight across the country, first to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, and then to an underground command center in Nebraska.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504383_162-577028...
They also feared that Air Force One itself was a target. Cheney told the president there was a credible threat against the plane. Using the code name for Air Force One, Mr. Bush told an aide,“Angel is next.” The threat was passed to presidential pilot Col. Mark Tillman.
We now know that the threat to Air Force One was part of the "Fog of War," a false alarm.
But it had a powerful effect at the time. But Mr. Bush was clearly worried about it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/11/60I...

does this sound like a misunderstanding ???
YES!

FROM YOUR QUOTE ABOVE TIMESTEN!

"We now know that the threat to Air Force One was part of the "Fog of War," a false alarm.
But it had a powerful effect at the time. But Mr. Bush was clearly worried about it."

LMFAO, Can you read-tard?

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277286 Aug 9, 2014
LMFAO, A historical figure is a nuclear device, click you link TIMESTEN!
JudgeNJury wrote:
According to Sheen, things like this dont exsist in his little world
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_ (nuclear_device)
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277287 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
Thats right Govie Shill , I WAS ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF A BIOTECH COMPANY CALLED FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, it was bought by Novartis Pharmaceuticals in 2012
<quoted text>
So you are over 160 years old, that makes your love of 14 year old girls even creepier!

----------

Fougera Pharmaceuticals Inc.has been serving the pharmaceutical industry for over 160 years,

--https://www.linkedin.com/com pany/nycomed-us—

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277288 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
I guess Sheen isn't needed at Sheen Law Inc ....I mean the guy can't even show up to court after being banned for playing with himself in front of the judge !!
I asked this about Shean because who knows.
MrDimitri wrote:
<quoted text>
In all seriousness, I don't have a dog in this hunt but you have been very dishonest in the past, are you kidding or do you have a link to this incident.
The reply….
JudgeNJury wrote:
I will not post it because it contains Sheen's real name and I will not open myself up to a libel suit ..... I made millions selling my biotech comapny and am not going to lose it
<quoted text>
And Shean posts this that can be found all over on line.

Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
WHAT ARE THE ELEMENTS OF A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR LIBEL OR SLANDER?
THE ELEMENTS OF A DEFAMATION SUIT; WHETHER SLANDER OR LIBEL, ARE:
1. A defamatory statement;
2. Published to a third party;
3. WHICH THE SPEAKER KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN WAS FALSE;
4. That causes injury to the subject of the communication
SO JudgeNJury, Shean would not have a case at all if you post a link to your accusations, but you won’t even though Shean has no legal case against you if you post a link, so post it or there is no doubt you are lying AGAIN!

FOUGERA!
----------
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277289 Aug 9, 2014
"There was a memorial held on October 11 for the people who were killed," Bartram notes. "On October 12, we started taking the stone off the building. We took down approximately 2,400 pieces of stone, a lot of which had melted aluminum from the plane embedded in it. We took it all down in about 13 days.

http://www.masonrymagazine.com/8-02/rising.ht...

Wing scars

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/phixe...

http://www.gamelogos.com/temp/starboard-wing....

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/PentWi...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277290 Aug 9, 2014
FORENSIC FEAT IDS NEARLY ALL PENTAGON VICTIMS
WHAT SOME EXPERTS HAVE CALLED "THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE FORENSIC INVESTIGATION IN U.S. HISTORY" ENDED NOV. 16 WITH THE IDENTIFICATION OF 184 OF THE 189 WHO DIED IN THE TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON.

A multidisciplinary team of more than 50 forensic specialists, scientists, and support personnel from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, with headquarters at Walter Reed, played a major role in Operation Noble Eagle investigations, officials said.

Many of the casualties were badly burned and difficult to identify, an official said. Of the 189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon AND 64 WERE PASSENGERS ON AMERICAN AIRLINES FLIGHT 77. Only one of those who died made it to the hospital. The rest were killed on site, and for some, only pieces of tissue could be found.

http://ww2.dcmilitary.com/dcmilitary_archives...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277291 Aug 9, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Witnesses leaving the building claim to have seen fires already starting, and dead bodies.15
Name a single one that claims to have seen a dead body in WTC7!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277292 Aug 9, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Barry Jennings & Michael Hess claim to have seen dead bodies
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008...
Nowhere in your link does it say Hess saw dead bodies in WTC7 and....

"The writer and director of Loose Change, Dylan Avery, told The Conspiracy Files: "The amount of detail that Barry gave us in this interview was unreal. He says he was stepping over dead bodies in the lobby."

BARRY JENNINGS HIMSELF DISAGREES WITH THEIR INTERPRETATION OF HIS WORDS. BARRY JENNINGS TOLD THE BBC: "I DIDN'T LIKE THE WAY YOU KNOW I WAS PORTRAYED. THEY PORTRAYED ME AS SEEING DEAD BODIES. I NEVER SAW DEAD BODIES"

Dylan Avery is adamant that he didn't take anything out of context. He played The Conspiracy Files a recording of Barry Jennings words: "The fire fighter who took us down kept saying do not look down. And I kept saying why.

"He said do not look down. And we're stepping over people and you know you could feel when you're stepping over people."

HOWEVER, BARRY JENNINGS TOLD THE BBC: "I SAID IT FELT LIKE I WAS STEPPING OVER THEM BUT I NEVER SAW ANY.

"And you know that's the way they portrayed me and I didn't appreciate that so I told them to pull my interview."
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277293 Aug 9, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
However it was conceived, the value (purchasing power) of the USD has plummeted 96% in the 100 years since the creation of the Federal Reserve System Central Bank which is totally private and is Federal in name only.
Uh Huh Eh !
No, the dollar did NOT really lose 95% of its value since 1913

There is a chart making the rounds lately, that claims the dollar lost 96.2% of it value since 1900. One of Ron Paul's fav talking points. Though technically true in a very narrow sense, if you look at average incomes during the same period, it is clear why this is deceptive. Additionally, the way the line chart is presented is highly deceptive. It makes it seem that there has been higher inflation in the last 40 years. But if you look at the actual numbers in the chart, that is clearly not the case. See the last 2 paragraphs for more detail.

Let us take at the period from 1913-2006, where we have complete data. So what do they mean, when they say the dollar lost 95.1% of its value in those 93 years? Essentially, an average good/service that cost $1 in 2006, used to be priced at 4.9 cents in 1913. In other words, the average price level of goods/services increased by 1930% since 1913. True, but guess what, average earned income increased by 6560% during the same time period. Average earned income rose from $740/yr in 1913 to $49,300/yr in 2006. Adjusting for inflation,$740/yr in 1913 is $15,000/yr in 2006 dollars. Average incomes, not only kept pace, but beat price inflation by 230%.

So does it make any sense all to say the dollar lost value? In reality, the REAL purchasing power of the average American, has increased by 230% in the past century. Sure, prices were cheap in 1913, but $740/yr doesn't buy you a whole lot, not anymore than 15,000/yr today. Even this statistic doesn't fully capture the quality of life gains of the last century. A household making $15,000/yr today is well below the poverty line, but yet, they are highly likely to have a refrigerator, indoor plumbing, electricity, tv, cell phone and maybe even heating and cooling. They are highly likely to have government help in making ends meet - food stamps, subsidized housing, Medicaid etc:. And yeah, thanks to advances in medicine, they don't have to worry about half their children dying before the age of 5. Their analogue in 1913, making $740/yr had none of these "luxuries". And that was the average income... Can you imagine what the poverty line looked like then?

Anyone who says the dollar lost value, is really trying to sell the false point of view, that somehow things were better off in 1913. Seriously?? Maybe we should send them back in time to live in the slums of New York. Yeah, we had actual slums back then. Update 3/2/2012: Yes, technically, in the parlance of mainstream economics, the dollar dropped in value. But, anytime Ron Paul says the dollar lost 95% of it value, but conveniently ignores the fact that average incomes and average savings beat price inflation, he is deceiving the American public. The fact the incomes and savings beat inflation, it makes the "fall" in the dollar completely irrelevant. What I am saying is we need a change in terminology.
http://realfactbias.blogspot.com/2012/02/no-d...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277294 Aug 9, 2014
BUT DOCTOR BUNNY NEEDS NO EVIDENCE TO REACH A CONLUSION!

Doctor Bunny’s Faith based approach to 9-11.

NO KNOWN EVIDENCE = UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

Typical Twoofer, No Evidence is needed to support a claim!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>THE FACT THAT NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT DOESN'T EXIST, only that it was not discovered, especially if it was not looked or tested for.
THE UNCONDITIONAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE PROPOSITION that there was unusual trading in the option markets leading up to September 11, which is consistent with the terrorists or their associated having traded on advance knowledge of the impending attacks.
Allen M. Poteshman
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277297 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
If you are under 18 years old, you will need a court order from either a probate court or district court in the locale where you live in and  parental consent.in order to just apply for a marriage license
 
So it looks like Sheen little joke is all a lie ...... just like him being a lawyer ..... what a complete loser
.<quoted text>
TOMMY, They talk about you right here, the Law Review Article is even called Child Brides!

----------

MASSACHUSETTS LAW UPDATES
FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT LAW LIBRARIES
CHILD BRIDES

In Massachusetts, under MGL c.207, s. 25, a person under eighteen cannot marry without parental consent . MASSACHUSETTS DOES NOT HAVE A LAW SPECIFYING THE MINIMUM AGE AT WHICH A PERSON CAN MARRY WITH A PARENT’S CONSENT. The process requires court approval, so whether or not to authorize the marriage of a particular minor is within a judge’s discretion.

THE NOTION OF A MINIMUM AGE OF 14 FOR BOYS AND 12 FOR GIRLS COMES FROM AN 1854 CASE, PARTON V. HERVEY, 67 MASS. 119.

Presumably, the concept that the minimum age is sixteen for both males and females comes from that same notion, that a minor above the age of consent may have a valid marriage. Massachusetts does not have a general age of consent for all things (for example, consent to medical treatment or kidnapping are different). For sexual matters, though, sixteen is generally called the “age of consent,” because sex with a person under sixteen is prohibited by MGL c.265 s.23. And so some websites state that you can marry here with parental consent at sixteen, and without it at eighteen.

BUT JUST THE LAW DOES NOT LIST A MINIMUM AGE OF TWELVE, IT DOESN'T GIVE A MINIMUM AGE OF SIXTEEN EITHER.

The truth is both simpler and more murky. In Massachusetts, if a parent consents to a minor child’s marriage, authorization must still be obtained from the Probate or District Court. The judge will use his or her discretion to determine if the marriage is in the child’s best interest. AS FAR AS WE CAN DETERMINE, THERE IS NO MINIMUM AGE; THERE ALSO IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT THE JUDGE APPROVE ANY REQUEST. EACH CASE IS SIMPLY DECIDED ON ITS OWN MERITS.

HTTP://MASSLAWLIB.BLOGSPOT.COM/2007/01/CHILD-...

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277298 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
So Sheen is basically showing what a Bozo he is ...... since he thinks I'm Tom from Massachusetts here are the laws of of the state when it comes to marriage .....
If you are under 18 years old, you will need a court order from either a probate court or district court in the locale where you live in and  parental consent.in order to just apply for a marriage license
 
So it looks like Sheen little joke is all a lie ...... just like him being a lawyer ..... what a complete loser
.<quoted text>
Yea Pedo Tommy, Does it say you can't marry a 14 year old?????

FROM YOUR POST ABOVE!

If you are under 18 years old, you will need a court order from either a probate court or district court in the locale where you live in and parental consent.in order to just apply for a marriage license
----

Pedo Tommy is trying to pretend he never had a 14 year old Child Bride that dumped him.

FOUGERA!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#277300 Aug 9, 2014
JudgeNJury wrote:
So Sheen is basically showing what a Bozo he is ...... since he thinks I'm Tom from Massachusetts here are the laws of of the state when it comes to marriage
Pedo TOMMY!

MASSACHUSETTS LAW UPDATES
FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS TRIAL COURT LAW LIBRARIES
CHILD BRIDES

In Massachusetts, under MGL c.207, s. 25, a person under eighteen cannot marry without parental consent . MASSACHUSETTS DOES NOT HAVE A LAW SPECIFYING THE MINIMUM AGE AT WHICH A PERSON CAN MARRY WITH A PARENT’S CONSENT. The process requires court approval, so whether or not to authorize the marriage of a particular minor is within a judge’s discretion.

THE NOTION OF A MINIMUM AGE OF 14 FOR BOYS AND 12 FOR GIRLS COMES FROM AN 1854 CASE, PARTON V. HERVEY, 67 MASS. 119.

Presumably, the concept that the minimum age is sixteen for both males and females comes from that same notion, that a minor above the age of consent may have a valid marriage. Massachusetts does not have a general age of consent for all things (for example, consent to medical treatment or kidnapping are different). For sexual matters, though, sixteen is generally called the “age of consent,” because sex with a person under sixteen is prohibited by MGL c.265 s.23. And so some websites state that you can marry here with parental consent at sixteen, and without it at eighteen.

BUT JUST THE LAW DOES NOT LIST A MINIMUM AGE OF TWELVE, IT DOESN'T GIVE A MINIMUM AGE OF SIXTEEN EITHER.

The truth is both simpler and more murky. In Massachusetts, if a parent consents to a minor child’s marriage, authorization must still be obtained from the Probate or District Court. The judge will use his or her discretion to determine if the marriage is in the child’s best interest. AS FAR AS WE CAN DETERMINE, THERE IS NO MINIMUM AGE; THERE ALSO IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT THE JUDGE APPROVE ANY REQUEST. EACH CASE IS SIMPLY DECIDED ON ITS OWN MERITS.

GO HERE!

http://masslawlib.blogspot.com/

Type In "Child Brides" under “Search This Blog”

FOUGERA!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 5 min Lyndi 174,203
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 min ChristineM 743,923
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 9 min waaasssuuup 601,429
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 9 min Tim Osman 118,294
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 9 min confrinting with ... 545,098
Is it time for Muslim Internment Camps? 12 min Kid_Tomorrow 14
How to tell when a Topix poster doesn't have a ... 15 min Doctor REALITY 25
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 1 hr Hot Top 2020 979

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE