Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#275610 Jul 24, 2014
Pegasus wrote:
It's already been done. That you don't know that isn't my problem and just proves your ignorance and ineptness.

You morons actually "think" reversing the burden of proof is a valid form of argument and releases you from proving your own weak case based solely on confirmation bias and your own stupidity.

Sorry but it doesn't work like that.

Now, your murderous brethren were identified by their own victims while the planes were still in the air. They left videos bragging about what they planned to do. Their leader bragged about what he had done.

Your argument against that is smoke and mirrors .

Grow up dude, try reality.
Ans.

If that was the case, they would be the FIRST to announce to the world that they have hijacked the planes, let ANY one do what they could.

On one hand they were “so secretive that no one had any clue of what they were doing” and on other hand they were “so careless to leave every thing on their PC s and Lap tops”.

It is the same case of “Dual personality”.

None of the Crew Members notified any Govt. agency or their Airlines what was going on in the planes. Every one in the plane was speaking on Mobiles, except they Crew Members, were they also killed along with the pilots?

It is strange thing with 9/11, everything is special, wherever you touch you find people acting “contrary to what was required by them”.

And instead of knowing the truth and find out who was really responsible, all they do is to point out to a SCAPE GOAT and a RED HERRING.

What was the end of that “master mind and super terrorist”? Could any one imagine that the person they killed in that abandoned house was “Once the Super Terrorist and was Powerful to do what he wanted”?

You people need all growing up and start using your own bread, instead by being spoon fed by CNN, BBC and Fox News.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#275611 Jul 24, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
MUQ1
Why is it ask to investigate the truth about 911,but when it get to close to home you don't like the truth?
You should get to know the truth about what affected your nation, should you not?

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#275612 Jul 24, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it does, but be with the understanding, that the Gulf war had a cause, that wasn't Americas, which led to a second cause for attack. It was noncompliance that cause the second phase if the Iraq war, not what you are saying. Though I believe the noncompliance was jumping the gun, and the real reason was Saddam had pissed Washington off past it's limit.
Now you are writing with the Hindsight, on the eve of attack in 2003, it was claimed by USA:

1. Iraq has WMD and Nuclear capability which is a THREAT to USA!!

2. Iraq has had close link with Al Qaeda, and therefore it is threat to world peace.

Both these charges were false, BEFORE the attack and proven to be false after that attack.

It was only LATER that Democracy and saving country from Saddam were ADDED to save the face.

I know it is very difficult to swallow that your country did a mistake and your President mislead the whole nation, but if you are honest, you should admit that your nation did do mistake and your President lied to his people (knowingly lied, because he would not listen to the truth, only what satisfies his own conviction).

Unless of course you consider your nation as God and believe it could do no wrong.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#275613 Jul 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Insanity is disregarding evidence and still expecting it to be scientific.
Poor Porkie, can't debunk thermite, can't debunk NIST conducting a fraud investigation that disregarded witness testimony and the destruction of evidence, and conducted willful negligence by not following NFPA 921 guidelines calling for the chemical testing for explosives in total building collapses.
Poor, poor Ignorance!

In all his scientific illiteracy, he still can't understand that thermite has never been proven therefore doesn't require debunking....although Basile's claims have been debunked many times over.

Oh and NFPA 921 is a standard ( not law) regarding arson investigations.

Oh and there was visual and PMI inspection of the steel and no mythical thermitic substances found.
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
NIST did not have access to all of the forensic evidence and still chose not to test for explosive residue, a complete dereliction of scientific protocol.
We have prior examples of events other than 9/11, where it is clearly shown the FBI actively engaged in investigative fraud to achieve political objectives.
Late 90's, the TWA Flight 800 investigation, controlled by the FBI, tampered with evidence, misrepresented and pressured witness testimony, and covered up that aircraft was hit by a proximity fuse missile. All these facts came out later in documents and testimony by the lead NTSB investigators who had to wait until they retired to be able to speak out against that FBI cover up.
That investigation, just like the one by NIST, presented a probable scenario based on tampered and lost evidence. It used similar disinfo techniques, such as narrowly focusing on one type of missile to rule it out all types of missiles (much like NIST focusing on the sounds of normal explosives, to rule out exotics and incendiaries.
This is also why
Insults Are Easier
It's just too laughable when an idjit who makes claims of free fall = cd, symmetry = cd, molten steel = cd but completely foregoes the scientific method then claims a respected institution, that has been peer reviewed by the worlds scientists with no complaints of conspiracy, is not acting in a scientific matter.

Oh twooferdumb, why are you so disrespected and ignored!

It's your cultists!

Oh and that,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#275614 Jul 24, 2014
But then, Ignorance is the same two cultist who posted an article debunking thermite to support his claim that thermite (which days ago he claimed was thermite....poor sap doesn't know there's a difference) has explosive force!

----------
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Now Ignorance goes on to "support" his claim by posting this article;

http://911scholars.ning.com/m/discussion...

Which is actually an article debunking his claim....with more gems like;

"One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume-work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects."

Now go back and parse Ignorance's own words; " themitic explosive force"...

But even though the premise of the article is to debunk his claim and only a complete lack of reading comprehension and a non-observant nature could miss that, Ignorance still insists the article supports him!

----------

And this idiot "thinks" he can discern good science from bad!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275615 Jul 24, 2014
Twooferdumb: the only place where failing to move so much as a millimetre in 13 years is deemed a success!

go
twoof
go

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275616 Jul 24, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
<quoted text>After getting debunked by Dr_Zorderz and what seems a growing number within the truth movement,Insults Are Easier will still cling to the thermite fantasy
And at the same time claim sounds of explosions in a building fire proves his conspiracy true....then wonder why people at laughing at him!

"The explosive force of thermite"

Too bloody funny!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275617 Jul 24, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>SELF CLAIMED victory? Huh

What he writes are genuine points, what you post are DENIALS, without any proofs.
He posted a youRube video of people asserting there was thermite.

Twoofers still don't know there's a difference between evidence and opinion!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275618 Jul 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for. They compared it only to a commercial controlled demolition, when what we saw at wtc was a military controlled destruction meant to shock the public into giving up their own constitutional rights.

Your ignorance is my bliss, catfish. And you are so unoriginal you can only copy somebody else's insults, loser.

Porkies wife is a fat hog, because

Insults Are Easier
Porkpie Hat wrote:
"“One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume-work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects."

Wow!

Is that what Ignorance meant by "themitic explosive force"?

It must be since that's from the article he linked to support his assertion!
Hilarity always ensues when Ignorance is Bliss is around!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275619 Jul 24, 2014
And then there's the hypocrisy of his chosen moniker,
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>

Nah, your an idiot who has no idea what hes doing.

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Porkies wife is a fat hog, because

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>

This dummy

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Your wife's a hog, because

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Oh nano means very small like your brain or your character?

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text> you still don't know why you are an idiot and thats why I'm calling you an idiot with the mentality of a child.

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Get a boyfriend.

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Because braindead,

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
But one thing is not a myth, and that is Dudley only eats Spam and that makes his wife ugly, because

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Bur still, Spam is bad for you and makes you fat like Porkies fat wife, and all because

Insults Are Easier
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
And your wife is ugly, because

Insults Are Easier
Wow! Just wow!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#275620 Jul 24, 2014
go
twoof
go

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#275621 Jul 24, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are writing with the Hindsight, on the eve of attack in 2003, it was claimed by USA:
1. Iraq has WMD and Nuclear capability which is a THREAT to USA!!
2. Iraq has had close link with Al Qaeda, and therefore it is threat to world peace.
Both these charges were false, BEFORE the attack and proven to be false after that attack.
It was only LATER that Democracy and saving country from Saddam were ADDED to save the face.
I know it is very difficult to swallow that your country did a mistake and your President mislead the whole nation, but if you are honest, you should admit that your nation did do mistake and your President lied to his people (knowingly lied, because he would not listen to the truth, only what satisfies his own conviction).
Unless of course you consider your nation as God and believe it could do no wrong.

I already said we likely jumped the gun, and yes there were misleading reports taken to congress, by several key players, but the actual legal reason for the invasion was noncompliance.

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2002/SC7564...

But IMHO , it was that Saddam pissed Washington off past it's limit.

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#275622 Jul 24, 2014
That wouldn't happen if they had a cohesive narrative !!!
AussieBobby wrote:
Insults Are Easier the super duper nano thermite Vs Dr_Zorderz the mini-nuker
Twoofer fight

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#275623 Jul 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Insanity is disregarding evidence and still expecting it to be scientific.
Poor Porkie, can't debunk thermite, can't debunk NIST conducting a fraud investigation that disregarded witness testimony and the destruction of evidence, and conducted willful negligence by not following NFPA 921 guidelines calling for the chemical testing for explosives in total building collapses.
NIST did not have access to all of the forensic evidence and still chose not to test for explosive residue, a complete dereliction of scientific protocol.
We have prior examples of events other than 9/11, where it is clearly shown the FBI actively engaged in investigative fraud to achieve political objectives.
Late 90's, the TWA Flight 800 investigation, controlled by the FBI, tampered with evidence, misrepresented and pressured witness testimony, and covered up that aircraft was hit by a proximity fuse missile. All these facts came out later in documents and testimony by the lead NTSB investigators who had to wait until they retired to be able to speak out against that FBI cover up.
That investigation, just like the one by NIST, presented a probable scenario based on tampered and lost evidence. It used similar disinfo techniques, such as narrowly focusing on one type of missile to rule it out all types of missiles (much like NIST focusing on the sounds of normal explosives, to rule out exotics and incendiaries.
This is also why
Insults Are Easier
Thermite is a joke. Too bad you fail to seek reliable information.

False. NIST did a though investigation. Too bad you never read any of the official reports which contain all the pertinent information. Again, you rely on unreliable information.

You can't prove any of your allegations.

That's why, STUPITY IS EASIER

GLAD I COULD HELP

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#275625 Jul 24, 2014
Want to hear two really good jokes?

1. Nano thermite.

2. Pentagon missile theory.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#275629 Jul 24, 2014
Pick your favorite below and I will debunk it or is ya yellow.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Millions of people worldwide are in ready possession of this evidence. Allow me to briefly review this evidence for you.
Physical Evidence for the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7
1. The rapid onset of collapse indicates controlled demolition. Natural collapses begin slowly as the steel deforms (but this has never before led to collapse from office fires).
2. The symmetrical, straight-down nature of the collapse. In a natural collapse, the building would tend to topple or show asymmetries.
3. The time taken by the collapse, approximately 6.5 seconds. This is almost free-fall acceleration and indicates little resistance, which is incomprehensible if natural.
Your theory of a slower collapse within the outer frame of the building is outrageous speculation.
4. The neat, tidy debris pile, a few stories high, with adjoining buildings essentially untouched. Such a debris pile is the main objective and hallmark of a successful controlled demolition.
5. The molten metal and high temperatures observed for weeks afterwards in the debris pile. Only incendiary and explosive materials, such as thermite, thermate, and nano-thermites could produce these temperatures.
Particles found in the dust indicate these materials.
6. The evidence of corroded steel with sulfur found by FEMA. Again, sulfur is a product of a thermate reaction.
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/docs/wyn...
Uh Huh Eh !

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#275630 Jul 24, 2014
^ He's right again.

But then, You guys already knew that, right?
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#275631 Jul 24, 2014
DITTO! Pick your favorite below and I will debunk it or is ya yellow.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Eye-witness Evidence for the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7
1. The testimony of Barry Jennings. Mr. Jennings timeline is crucial and unassailable. The essentials of his story were told to Eye-Witness Channel 7 News shortly after 1 pm on 9/11/01, and later elaborated on in taped interviews. BEFORE either tower fell, he was blown back, by an explosion, from the sixth floor to the eighth floor in a stairwell in WTC 7. The sixth floor landing was destroyed. Help came twice and ran away when each tower collapsed. He was in the dark for several hours. He heard explosions from that time (before 9:58 am) until he was found and led to safety around 1 pm. At that time the lobby of WTC 7 was completely destroyed. None of this could have happened because of the tower collapses. All his eye-witness evidence points to pre-demolition blasts in WTC 7.
2. The video-taped statements of various firemen and policemen before 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 to the effect that WTC 7 was “coming down” or “about to blow up.” This pre-knowledge indicates controlled demolition.
3. The video-taped statement of a witness who overheard a “count-down” for WTC 7 on a worker’s radio.
4. The many videos showing the actual collapse of WTC 7, with various evidences of controlled demolition such as a kink in the roof, exploding charges at upper stories, and so on.
5. Audible explosions heard by eye-witnesses just before and during the collapse of WTC 7.
http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/docs/wyn...
Uh Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#275632 Jul 24, 2014
Commander Bunny wrote:
^ He's right again.
But then, You guys already knew that, right?
He's you but we already knew that. Now lets see if you have enough faith in your cut and paste to pick a single one for me to debunk.

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#275637 Jul 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
He's you but we already knew that. Now lets see if you have enough faith in your cut and paste to pick a single one for me to debunk.
I wouldn't be saying that if I were you.
Let's just leave it at that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min nanoanomaly 123,981
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 21 min nanoanomaly 982,422
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 30 min UnstoppableTrump 8,006
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 46 min Liamm 682,005
News Teacher back in class after Bush-Hitler comparison (Mar '06) 1 hr Johnny 171
Interracial experience-Mexican men and Black women (Jul '12) 1 hr Ese678-9 153
Check Ppl Out 4Free B4 U Rent 2 Them!! 2 hr Plain truth 1
More from around the web