Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

53,955 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271579 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
Pilots for 9/11 Truth claim WTC airplanes would be uncontrollable at observed speeds
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/pilots-for-9...
Already proven false NO PLANE, NO BRAINS, not to mention on three of four endless people not only saw them but saw them strike.

You might as that "real scientist" if your sons seed causes "drain bamage"!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271580 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Charlie Dippy stepped on this dick again.
LOL, And what did you do with yours? Since your son has much the same DNA was this a trial run?

Just shot a load into my mouth - any other guys do this ??
onemale wrote:
I did it a couple times out of curiosity, it didn't do much for me.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/T86OMDIRE...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271581 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
Hey Sorry Charlie keep talking about mommy banging and cocks.
I do?

ONEMALE regarding his MOTHER!
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
She would have never do such a thing.... not ever... not in this lifetime or the next.
As a teen, I would have thought I died and went to heaven.
But now that I'm older, I'm glad it never happened.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

FREAK!
Pegasus

Brooklyn, NY

#271582 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-from-p...
Deviation in calibration.....Dingles.
You see at approx 420 knots the super low altitude and very high speed get ahead of the onboard instruments and can equate to as much as + or - 10% in error Because Aircraft of that Nature are NOT Supposed to be flown at that altitude at that Tremendous speed.

If a jet airliner didn't hit the Pentagon.....A...what did?......and B.....prove it.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271583 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
WTC7 exhibited NONE of the characteristics of destruction by fire:
1.Slow onset with large visible deformations
Four hours was not enough for you?
----------

DEPUTY CHIEF PETER HAYDEN
DIVISION 1 - 33 YEARS
...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, WE SAW A BULGE IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER BETWEEN FLOORS 10 AND 13, AND WE HAD PUT A TRANSIT ON THAT AND WE WERE PRETTY SURE SHE WAS GOING TO COLLAPSE. YOU ACTUALLY COULD SEE THERE WAS A VISIBLE BULGE, IT RAN UP ABOUT THREE FLOORS. IT CAME DOWN ABOUT 5 O’CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON, BUT BY ABOUT 2 O’CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON WE REALIZED THIS THING WAS GOING TO COLLAPSE.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271584 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
2.Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
YAWN, SON LOVER!

11. In a video, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free fall, something that would not occur in the structural collapse that you describe. How can NIST ignore basic laws of physics?

In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wt... ), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions. During the public comment period on the draft report, NIST was asked to confirm this time difference and define the reasons for it in greater detail.

To further clarify the descent of the north face, NIST recorded the downward displacement of a point near the center of the roofline from first movement until the north face was no longer visible in the video. Numerical analyses were conducted to calculate the velocity and acceleration of the roofline point from the time-dependent displacement data. The instant at which vertical motion of the roofline first occurred was determined by tracking the numerical value of the brightness of a pixel (a single element in the video image) at the roofline. This pixel became brighter as the roofline began to descend because the color of the pixel started to change from that of the building façade to the lighter color of the sky.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271585 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
4.High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed
NIST spokesman said, WTC 7 collapsed due to fire (period).(end of story)
SO!

8. Why did WTC 7 collapse, while no other known building in history has collapsed due to fires alone?

The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present. These other buildings, including Philadelphia's One Meridian Plaza, a 38-story skyscraper that burned for 18 hours in 1991, did not collapse due to differences in the design of the structural system (see the answer to Question 9).

Factors contributing to WTC 7's collapse included: the thermal expansion of building elements such as floor beams and girders, which occurred at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in current practice for fire-resistance ratings; significant magnification of thermal expansion effects due to the long-span floors in the building; connections between structural elements that were designed to resist the vertical forces of gravity, not the thermally induced horizontal or lateral loads; and an overall structural system not designed to prevent fire-induced progressive collapse.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271586 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
3.Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
24. How hot did WTC 7's steel columns and floor beams get?

Due to the effectiveness of the spray-applied fire-resistive material (SFRM) or fireproofing, the highest steel column temperatures in WTC 7 only reached an estimated 300 degrees Celsius (570 degrees Fahrenheit), and only on the east side of the building did the steel floor beams exceed 600 degrees Celsius (1,100 degrees Fahrenheit). However, fire-induced buckling of floor beams and damage to connections—which caused buckling of a critical column initiating collapse—occurred at temperatures below approximately 400 degrees Celsius (where thermal expansion dominates. Above 600 degrees Celsius (1,100 degrees Fahrenheit), there is significant loss of steel strength and stiffness. In the WTC 7 collapse, the loss of steel strength or stiffness was not as important as the thermal expansion of steel structures caused by heat.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271587 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
Which debunks many of the debwunkers who try to go in other directions, they end up debunking the very story they are attempting to support.
Projection, Stay with what you are good at, Incest!
onemale wrote:
The jet engine found at the Pentagon does not match that of 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!

LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!

FROM YOUR LINK!

In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.

The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.

There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271588 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
Which debunks many of the debwunkers who try to go in other directions, they end up debunking the very story they are attempting to support.
LMAO SONLICKER!
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
AND DUMBMALE SELF DEBUNKS AGAIN, FROM YOUR LINK!

DO YOU EVEN READ WHAT YOU USE AS A LINK?

This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77.

The key features of the wreckage--including the number, size, and shape of the cutouts and bolt attachments--perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, as illustrated in the above comparison. None of the wheels of the Global Hawk, A-3, or 737 match the debris, which is not surprising since all of these aircraft weigh considerably less than the 757 and use correspondingly smaller wheels of differing design.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271589 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Being Sorry Charlie's faithful sidekick really is your greatest ambition in life.
And yours is one notch on the headboard for each member of your family after they provide comfort to your member.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271590 Jun 2, 2014
I call your bluff on your cowardly traitorous son!

Please tell him I said like father like son, in the sense he likes to bone his kids and parents.

Monday May 5
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>You better hope I never tell my son what you saying about him and his grandmother... He will track your ass down and tear off your head and spit in your neck. Can he do it, hell yes he is big enough to be a wrestler and about as strong.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Cops are Heros

Lincoln, NE

#271591 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
This comes from a real scientist with many years of experience:
Lynn Margulis (PhD - Scientist)- 9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =g-GFBEX5bjYXX
REAL, Then why do you disagree with HER onemale, Great job of screening out the moonbats
!
----------

Margulis later argued that "there's no evidence that HIV is an infectious virus"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Margulis

---------
onemale wrote:
onemale
Mattoon, IL
You are wrong AIDS and HIV knows no boundaries.
The gay men deliberately gave AIDS to straight people
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

----------
onemale wrote:
Many health publications have reported that black males are the hardest hit with HIV and AIDS. I never go to bed with a woman who I knowingly have been with a black man. I’m not racist, I just want to guard my health as much as possible
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#271593 Jun 2, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Benghazi is a non-issue.
Guantanamo should have been closed long ago.
You still haven't proven that Obama broke any law.
According to the law, the Executive branch must notify the Legislative branch 30 days prior to movement or release of enemy POW or combatants. According to the law, the Executive branch must notify the Legislative branch 30 days prior to movement or release of enemy POW or combatants. According to the law, the Executive branch must notify the Legislative branch 30 days prior to movement or release of enemy POW or combatants. According to the law, the Executive branch must notify the Legislative branch 30 days prior to movement or release of enemy POW or combatants. Now why doesn't Benghazi matter anymore? Are these 4 lives of Americans including our great Ambassador not worth exposing the Government for failing to take proper action and for making lies about who really did it? Shame on you! Closing Gitmo does not mean releasing the prisoners. If these 4 bad guy released kill anyone, the blood is on Obama's hands. Do you agree with releasing these hitler's?

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#271595 Jun 2, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And Bergdhal is the "Prime Reason" for letting out Five Dreaded Terrorists out of GITMO, five persons krpt in prison, with no proofs and no charges.
This is western Justice!!
Thanks for showing us you are a Terrorist lover. First of all, Five of the Most Dangerous Taliban Commanders were releaseed. These men are responsible for not only killing Amercians, but killing innocent Muslims. Mullah Mohammad Fazl (Taliban army chief of staff): Fazl is “wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiites.........Mullah Norullah Noori (senior Taliban military commander): Like Fazl, Noori is “wanted by the United Nations (UN) for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiite Muslims.”......The prisoners have a history of killing Muslims and MUk approves?

Since: Nov 12

Sacramento, CA

#271596 Jun 2, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Benghazi is a non-issue.
Guantanamo should have been closed long ago.
You still haven't proven that Obama broke any law.
The VA also a non issue? Since it can be passed down to other Presidents. Obama Knew About VA Problems and Did Nothing Can't blame him. LOL

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#271597 Jun 2, 2014
Dr Zippy is a good example of what happens when a P enis is stuck so far up your ass it touches your cerebral cortex
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Also there is simply no evidence to suggest these items were ever positively identified to be from the very Boeing 757 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, no matter what kind of engines they resembled.
Uh Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#271598 Jun 2, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Also there is simply no evidence to suggest these items were ever positively identified to be from the very Boeing 757 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, no matter what kind of engines they resembled.
Uh Huh Eh !
Moron, Do you actually think they Reassembled the Engines? Any proof of that?

Son of one male, a hundred people saw it in broad daylight during rush hour and the passenger DNA matched (so of course it was something else in twoffer world). Go hug your dad, he seems upset.
who

Basingstoke, UK

#271599 Jun 2, 2014
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for showing us you are a Terrorist lover. First of all, Five of the Most Dangerous Taliban Commanders were releaseed. These men are responsible for not only killing Amercians, but killing innocent Muslims. Mullah Mohammad Fazl (Taliban army chief of staff): Fazl is “wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiites.........Mullah Norullah Noori (senior Taliban military commander): Like Fazl, Noori is “wanted by the United Nations (UN) for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiite Muslims.”......The prisoners have a history of killing Muslims and MUk approves?
Maybe there's a bigger picture.
Maybe your government understands that any lasting peace in Afghanistan would require the Taliban to take part in the political process.
Maybe the release of these prisoners was not so much about freeing the American soldier, and more about greasing the wheels of future negotiations with the Taliban.
That's what I reckon anyway.

Since: Aug 11

Scotts Valley, CA

#271600 Jun 2, 2014
onemale wrote:
New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon
http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-study-from-p...
Total BS long ago debunked.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 min Tide with Beach 775,688
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 26 min andet1987 5,115
Wake up, Black America!! (Sep '13) 32 min UnderstandPeople 4,780
Israel's end is near, Ahmadinejad says (Jun '07) 44 min RiccardoFire 37,820
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 45 min karl44 605,053
ChristmasProfits.co Review - Information About ... 59 min theepicbonus 1
Last Word + 2 1 hr andet1987 980
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr June VanDerMark 559,649
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 4 hr Chris Clearwater 175,684
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 5 hr duststorm 441,786
More from around the web