..well according to the chairmen anyway.
"Set up to fail" I believe they said, same goes for the credibility of that report too.
YOU WRITE.. THE FIRST CHAPTER OF THE BOOK IS 'THE COMMISSION WAS SET UP TO FAIL.'- my goodness, for the critics - who suggest that it was indeed set up to fail as some kind of obfuscation - you certainly dangled a juicy piece of bait out there in the river. Why do you think you were set up to fail?
SO THERE WERE ALL KINDS OF REASONS WE THOUGHT WE WERE SET UP TO FAIL. WE DECIDED THAT IF WE WERE GOING TO HAVE ANY SUCCESS, WE HAD TO HAVE A UNANIMOUS REPORT, OTHERWISE THE COMMISSION REPORT WOULD SIMPLY BE FILED.
I DO NOT KNOW AT THIS POINT OF ANY FACTUAL ERROR IN OUR REPORT, THAT I WOULD ABSOLUTELY SAY 'WE JUST PLAIN MISSED IT.' NOW, MAYBE I NEED TO REVIEW IT MORE CAREFULLY, BUT I CANNOT RECALL RIGHT NOW AT THIS INSTANCE ANY FACT THAT WE JUST PLAIN MISSED.