There were not test, there is no evidence of molten steel, but even if there was, what does that prove?<quoted text>
For me it's not about page numbers, it's more to do with the way they investigated the incident.
NIST failed to check for explosives despite multiple reports of secondary explosions, a number of reports of molten steel and a shit load of pulverized concrete. I've even seen a NIST muppet claim that he knew of no reports of molten steel, but I can find several.
The man was lying......why?
As far as I'm concerned the above diminishes the credibility of the entire report.
The 911 commission was bollocks too........well according to the chairmen anyway.
"Set up to fail" I believe they said, same goes for the credibility of that report too.
Maybe you're just easy to please Charles.
Pulverized concrete, did you expect anything else from 110 floor slamming into each down on the lower one over and over.
As far as explosives, half of NYC would have heard it and the only report from Willie about the one in the basement, it just depends on which day you ask him, one day it was jet fuel, one day it's a bomb.