Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270685 May 20, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh and how many jet explosions have you seen?
Uh Huh Eh !
There are many on YouTube. Makes no difference though, the fact remains flight 77 ended at the Pentagon.

Here are some pertinent facts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airline...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270686 May 20, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. In both instances the govie is a proven liar.
Uh Huh Eh !
Proved by what moron?

You remind me of the old vigilante days. We have a government and courts. You have nothing to bring to the Grand Jury sniveler.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270687 May 20, 2014
Like the shifting winds of idiocy, WasteOfTime has always sounded sure of herself.

This was her brain.
WasteWater 2012 wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidence is the testimony of people who were there and experts. They all agree that the official story is horse shit.
This is her brain on drugs.
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>There are many on YouTube. Makes no difference though, the fact remains flight 77 ended at the Pentagon.

Here are some pertinent facts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airline...
Any questions?

Insults Are Easier
onemale

Charleston, IL

#270691 May 20, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is the missile mother banger!
I asked you first, where is the Boeing.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#270692 May 20, 2014
Question:
Why did the FBI confiscate the video from the Citgo Station across the street from the Pentagon? That would have proved a Boeing hit it! When the station got the video back the impact part had been removed.
They wouldn't have anything to hide would they???
After all, pussy Charlie is hiding behind his monitor.
burrow owl

Modesto, CA

#270693 May 20, 2014
Anyone seen that Jimmy Werfer kid?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270694 May 20, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Like the shifting winds of idiocy, WasteOfTime has always sounded sure of herself.
This was her brain.
<quoted text>
This is her brain on drugs.
<quoted text>
Any questions?
Insults Are Easier
Is this your pathetic attempt to prove my post false?

HUGE FAIL

Keep sniveling.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270695 May 20, 2014
onemale wrote:
Question:
Why did the FBI confiscate the video from the Citgo Station across the street from the Pentagon? That would have proved a Boeing hit it! When the station got the video back the impact part had been removed.
They wouldn't have anything to hide would they???
After all, pussy Charlie is hiding behind his monitor.
Prove it.

Makes not difference though. There is a substantial amount of evidence proving that flight 77 ended at the Pentagon. Like DNA, hard evidence, and hundreds of witnesses.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270696 May 20, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean stylized facts. Not pertinent at all. Proves nothing.
Where is the proof of these stylized facts?
Uh Huh Eh !
Nope.

DNA, hundreds of witnesses, and hard evidence.

Go fish.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270697 May 20, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Like the shifting winds of idiocy, WasteOfTime has always sounded sure of herself.
This was her brain.
<quoted text>
This is her brain on drugs.
<quoted text>
Any questions?
Insults Are Easier
So I was a lying douche-bag Twoofer like you.

I wised up.

Keep sniveling pathetic loser.

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#270698 May 20, 2014
You sunk my Battleship!
onemale

Charleston, IL

#270702 May 20, 2014
People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11

http://demolitionexpertsquestion911.blogspot....

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#270703 May 20, 2014
Let me tell you about Mr.Tickles,when he was hungry he would swim up o the top of the water and make those "pop, pop,,pop" noise, he ws a good eater...

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270704 May 20, 2014
So... does anyone believe WasteOfTime 'wised' up?

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270706 May 21, 2014
onemale wrote:
People with demolition expertise questioning 9/11
http://demolitionexpertsquestion911.blogspot....
Jesse Ventura

38th Governor of Minnesota 1999 - 2003. Member of U.S. Navy Underwater Demolition Team 12 (precursor to SEAL)

Hey you are right, From your link, HE LIED ABOUT BEING A SEAL.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270707 May 21, 2014
onemale wrote:
Question:
Why did the FBI confiscate the video from the Citgo Station across the street from the Pentagon?
Because it evidence mother banger.

So your wang loving son work worked for the Commander and Chief, Bush, head of the NWO?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270708 May 21, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked you first, where is the Boeing.
As as I said, where is the missile, we have neither, it's not definitive, so we go to the eyewitnesses, none of which saw a missile,

PS: Did your son also try to bang his mom?

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#270713 May 21, 2014
CUT TO: Dr Zipperhead desperately trying to Google if MVA Scientific Consultants has ANY governmental connections ..... Hey MORON, how did Harrit get dust samples if according to you all the evidence was quickly removed !?!?!?!?!?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
.
.
.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors:
Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
Abstract
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper.
These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.
The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present.
The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite.
Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.
http://aneta.org/NielsHarrit_org/index.htm
So who is lying? Who has the means, motive and opportunity to deceive?
Does the govie need to back up their official story? Has the govie ever lied to the American public before?
Or do Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen et al want desperately to derail their lifetime careers trying to prove the govie wrong?
Uh Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270714 May 21, 2014
Did you miss RAD's point...

"There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite."

Care to explain why a key element is missing.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
.
.
.
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors:
Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
Abstract
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper.
These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.
The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present.
The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite.
Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.
http://aneta.org/NielsHarrit_org/index.htm
So who is lying? Who has the means, motive and opportunity to deceive?
Does the govie need to back up their official story? Has the govie ever lied to the American public before?
Or do Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen et al want desperately to derail their lifetime careers trying to prove the govie wrong?
Uh Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270716 May 21, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Where is the proof of your claims of DNA, hundreds of witnesses, and hard evidence.
If you have posted it before, it shouldn't be too much trouble to simply do it again.
Let's see your proof.
Uh Huh Eh !
Evidence at a trial for starters. The passengers were still in their seats but badly charred. Ever heard of dental records?

NUT

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 31 min Thinking 49,008
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 43 min Rosa_Winkel 971,740
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 hr CHURCHINGALING 646,717
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 1 hr KellyP in Jersey 2,085
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 445,726
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Steve III 44,702
gay at ghaziabad (Jul '14) 2 hr gaurav 13
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr Rosa_Winkel 105,635
More from around the web