Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,505 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#270004 May 5, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You tell me, his college GPA is 3.8
He was on the National Dean's List
What is your college GPA?
You implied he was going to chase down someone across the country, for saying ya momma was a big fat ho.
That doesn't sound like a very smart person, but maybe it's just you who is a dumbski huh?

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#270005 May 5, 2014
I'd like to have a piece of German chocolate cake right now.

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#270007 May 5, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife makes a wicked one of those. With bacon bits inside, bacon frosting and a bacon weave on top. To die for. Yuuuumm!
Uh Huh Eh !
Huh.

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#270008 May 5, 2014
So Doc., what's the deal with Ricky?.....is he still driving cab?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#270009 May 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Haha! Ya, you can't really argue with WasteOfTime's intellect.
Oh well,
Insults Are Easier
Oh the delicious freakin' irony!

Here's a gem!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Now Ignorance goes on to "support" his claim by posting this article;

http://911scholars.ning.com/m/discussion...

Which is actually an article debunking his claim....with more gems like;

"One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume-work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects."

Now go back and parse Ignorance's own words; " themitic explosive force"...

But even though the premise of the article is to debunk his claim and only a complete lack of reading comprehension and a non-observant nature could miss that, Ignorance still insists the article supports him!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#270010 May 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And they said (in their own words) they heard EXPLOSIONS
What part of that can't you understand???
"at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down"

"I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever"

"THAT'S WHEN THAT BUILDING COLLAPSED"

"I THOUGHT IT WAS THAT WHEN I HEARD THAT FRIGGING NOISE, THAT'S WHEN I SAW THE BUILDING COMING DOWN"

There's no part of any discussion beyond wishing your mommy gave you head as a child you'll ever understand Manyfails!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270019 May 6, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Oh the delicious freakin' irony!

Here's a gem!

Insults Are Easier wrote, "<quoted text>
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for.
"

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Now Ignorance goes on to "support" his claim by posting this article;

http://911scholars.ning.com/m/discussion...

Which is actually an article debunking his claim....with more gems like;

"One limitation inherent in any thermite energetic material is the inability of the energetic material to do pressure/volume-work on an object. Thermites release energy in the form of heat and light, but are unable to move objects."

Now go back and parse Ignorance's own words; " themitic explosive force"...

But even though the premise of the article is to debunk his claim and only a complete lack of reading comprehension and a non-observant nature could miss that, Ignorance still insists the article supports him!
So you are sayin WasteOfTime isn't dumb?

My whole point about thermate, that you pounced on without allowing for an explanation as you always do, was it can make an explosive sound as was heard by firefighters and ignored by NIST.

This video clearly shows what I was talking about.

http://youtu.be/kscTVnEcPMk

You are bending the spoon through slight of hand, Dudley, because thats what you must do to support the NIST theory that is passed off as a real investigation.

So answer the question, do you believe WasteOfTime is intelligent?

Or do you believe

Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270022 May 6, 2014
You ever notice how indoctrinated speak in terms of "we" a lot?

Poor people.

Insults Are Easier

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#270023 May 6, 2014
Ever notice how Twoofers always LIE?????

Poor Morons

Duuuuuuhhhh Twoof

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#270024 May 6, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
Ever notice how Twoofers always LIE?????

Poor Morons

Duuuuuuhhhh Twoof
Hey Catfish, is your assertion that billions of dollars were spent investigating 9/11 a lie or a misconception?

You obviously don't understand the difference, because

Insults Are Easier
Pegasus

Miami, FL

#270025 May 6, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
When you say whipped, do you mean he was the pivot man in a circle jerk?
LOL..........I think what really happened is his sonnyboy got rat packed after someone told him to shut up and sonnyboy thought he said stand up.....pow....bing....bang.... boom.....as Joe Pesci would say.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#270026 May 6, 2014
I said BILLIONS of dollars STUPIDO ..... and that's the TRUTH .... something thats VERY foreign to you
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Catfish, is your assertion that billions of dollars were spent investigating 9/11 a lie or a misconception?
You obviously don't understand the difference, because
Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270027 May 6, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
What it shows is you have no intelligent refute for anything any truther posts on this forum but your usual stupid desperate hand waving dismissals over and over again.
You can't learn much from a fool. But you do need to be careful, he might get lucky. In your case not so much! LOL
Uh Huh Eh !
I refuted your paranoid nonsense with actual evidence, witnesses, photos and more.
When are you going to stop whining about it?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270028 May 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is your proof that a 757 did hit the Pentagon?
With all the cameras around the Pentagon and they have yet to show us a 757.
According to the 5 frames shown, whatever hit the Pentagon had a white tail.
Jets do not have a white tall at low altitudes,
So once again. where is the 757???
Here is why jets have a white tail at ONLY high altitudes, and NEVER at low altitudes:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why...
I already posted evidence, photos, and more.

The fireman who dived under the van saw the approaching aircraft.

The man who dived to the ground as the aircraft passed overhead.

The taxi which was hit by a lamp pole knocked down by the low flying aircraft.

Evidence pictures of burned passengers.

Evidence pictures of Pentagon damage.

Mrs. Olsen's phone call.

The C130 pilot.

The Air Traffic Control record.

The American Airlines passenger manifest.

What have you got?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270029 May 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is your proof that a 757 did hit the Pentagon?
With all the cameras around the Pentagon and they have yet to show us a 757.
According to the 5 frames shown, whatever hit the Pentagon had a white tail.
Jets do not have a white tall at low altitudes,
So once again. where is the 757???
Here is why jets have a white tail at ONLY high altitudes, and NEVER at low altitudes:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why...
Pointless.

The plane hit the Pentagon.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#270030 May 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
You ever notice how indoctrinated speak in terms of "we" a lot?
Poor people.
Insults Are Easier
Projection.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270032 May 6, 2014
I was just wondering, did you miss this in your link?

----
The negative guidance is mostly management setting up for another earnings 'surprise' when they report second quarter results. The Dow closed at a record this week and the S&P 500 is just a half percent off from its high. Stronger economic growth in the second quarter should drive sales and there is little reason to expect any more than a minor correction in asset prices.
----
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
We were right on our call last week for a disappointment in the first quarter economic growth, though the weakness surprised even our dismal forecast. GDP growth in the first three months came in at just 0.1% on an annualized basis against a consensus view of 1.1% and our own forecast as low as 0.7% for the quarter.
We wrote earlier in the quarter that the build in business inventories over the last two quarters of last year could significantly hold back growth in the first quarter and that the markets were not ready for the level of potential weakness. We estimated last week that sluggish business investment in the first quarter would detract 0.6% from growth. We also highlighted weakness in trade over the quarter and warned of a hit to GDP on the order of 0.5% for the quarter. Official numbers reported Wednesday showed that weakness in business inventories detracted 0.6% and trade detracted 0.8% from GDP growth
http://www.thedailybell.com/market-commentary...
You have an agenda because your job is to count other peoples money.
When you look at the world through rose colored glasses everything looks rosy.
The US is not too big to fail if that is the plan of TPTB.
Uh Huh Eh !

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#270034 May 6, 2014
that's 2.8 -3.2 % ILLITERATE MORON
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
You're squawking about a "prediction". I was talking about what did happen in the first quarter. 0.1 % growth! Simply amazing for the largest economy on the planet.
The "stronger" growth they are predicting for the second quarter could be as much as 0.22 % or a little more! WOW. Impressive.
Uh Huh Eh !

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#270036 May 6, 2014
Sorry, China is NOT about to be No. 1 economy
Tue, May 6, 2014, 3:33 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 27 mins.
New York Times

Headlines around the world last week trumpeted a watershed moment for the global economy. As the Financial Times put it, "China poised to pass US as world's leading economic power this year." This is a startling development - or it would be if the claim were not essentially wrong. In fact, the United States remains the world's largest national economy by a substantial margin

At market exchange rates, the American economy is still almost double the size of China's (83% larger, to be precise). If the Chinese economy's annual growth rate remains five percentage points higher than that of the US, with no significant change in the exchange rate, it will take another 12 years to catch up in total size.

YOU GOT IT WRONG AGAIN DR ZIPPERHEAD
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#270038 May 6, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
that's 2.8 -3.2 % ILLITERATE MORON
<quoted text>
LMAO, A doom a gloom monetary prediction by a flunkie that does not understand decimals.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Dave Nelson 865,733
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 6 min guest 600,141
What Your Church Won't Tell You by Dave and Gar... (Apr '10) 7 min Great Day of Arma... 33,186
30+ ladies ka sex 12 min Aarav_dlycan 1
The Christian Atheist debate 19 min Rowan 2,052
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 19 min janeebee 6,546
skype sex id luv to try it (Aug '13) 44 min santyy9261 192
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 21 hr Victoria Bologna 7,504
Sleeping with mother (Oct '13) 22 hr andy 45
More from around the web