Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269807 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>The piggy found something he can do... to be an answering machine.
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>It's obvious you're not very bright.
Really, really obvious.

Did you know that 180mph is slower than 500mph?

Of course you don't, you're far too stupid to understand that simple fact.

E=1/2m(v*v) ring a bell?

Of course it doesn't, you're a scientifically illiterate fool.

Now would E increase with velocity?

No manyfails, I'm not asking you since you're just too stupid to understand.

[email protected] empty

E=1/2*55,580kg(80m/s*80m/s)=17 7,856kJ

[email protected] empty

E=1/2*57,840kg(223m/s*223m/s)= 1,438,162kJ

Oh look! Of course you never bothered to verify anything you "read" (see
mindlessly regurgitated) and you're dead wrong about the energy of impact.
BTW, a the lightest 767 is heavier than the heaviest 707 you moron.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_707#Speci...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767#Speci...

(My calculations are based on a 757 is your best case scenario to win the
argument and you still lose by a landslide!)

The good news is, with friends like you twoof needs no enemies.

The bad news is, you are every bit as dumb as I thought.

But hey, good luck with that!
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269808 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
In the aftermath of WTC7's destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered:
1.FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
2.Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses
3.Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples
This is according to over 2,000 architects and engineers
LINK OR LIE, Show me all 2000 that believe the above,(not just a site where a few of the so called 2,000 make that claim).

And picks of your mom, and they guy that blew you!
who

Reading, UK

#269809 May 1, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
No me neither, well not on page 51 anyway, although the new Pearl Harbour quote is real enough
I'm intrigued to know whether the quote about reordering the Middle East is true or not, it could be that I've stepped in some bullshit..
I've got a long weekend ahead of me so I'll read through the whole PNAC document and see if it's in there some where.
Either way I'll get back to you and let you know.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269810 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Is that the best you have as evidence that 9/11 wasn't an inside job???
United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui
Criminal No. 01-455-A

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/mou...

As opposed to twoof of inside jobbity, jobbity job....which has exactly zero proof.
who

Reading, UK

#269811 May 1, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Compare what we as America does with what the Russians do...and will do .
What are they doing now?
Then you can shup you stupid imbecile , we aren't the perfect bunch , but at least we are
will to consider everyone else.
You will not find this anywhere else but with NATO, considering them as people too.
You really should wave your flag at someone who gives a shit....instead of me.
You'd be surprised at what your establishment has gotten up to over the years with one thing or another. But you wouldn't know about it as you're a bovine, cud munching, dickhead, and always will be.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269812 May 1, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
No me neither, well not on page 51 anyway, although the new Pearl Harbour quote is real enough
To tell you it was an inside job, LMAO, Read the thing, the whole thing, it's a simple think tank paper, you are connecting endless no existent dots.(and basing much of your opinion on false information, such as the above.

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269813 May 1, 2014
The majority of those Bozos are elctrical, aerospace and landscape engineers

FYI there are over 140,000 civil engineers in ASCE
onemale wrote:
There are over 2000 architects and engineers who have signed the petition at www.AE911Truth.org since 2006, with Professional Engineer, Civil Engineer, and PhD degrees, from such top universities as Harvard, Yale, MIT, and the University of California at Berkeley.
The first signer was Richard Gage in April of 2006. Like most people, for 4.5 years, he believed the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT). Since then, the number of Petition signers has grown quickly. The following graph shows the growth since September 11, 2001.
http://www.aneta.org/AE911Truth/petition/summ...
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269814 May 1, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
1) SO WHAT
2) WRONG .....Prove it was steel and not other metals like aluminum and copper, Prove there was "TONS" of it
3) WRONG ...... Tests by James R. Millette, Ph.D. at MVA Scientific Consultants proves no thermite/thermate in WTC dust sample
<quoted text>
Molten Aluminum is not a reddish orange like steel (and like we saw flowing from the towers). Molten aluminum is a silver color similar to the color when it cool.
Fightfighters were recorded saying there were pools of moten steel 6 weeks after the destruction of the towers.

Images for molten steel 9/11
https://www.google.com/search...

More images for molten steel 911
https://www.google.com/search...

Workers Reported Molten Metal in Ground Zero Rubble
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/molt...

Molten Metal - a 9/11 Smoking Gun
http://moltenmetalsmokinggun.blogspot.com/

onemale

Charleston, IL

#269815 May 1, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
How many of these are making computer simulations to get the desired results?
Why won't NIST dubunk the truthers by releasing their computer simulations program they used?
That's alright I don't expect an intelligent answer.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269816 May 1, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
The majority of those Bozos are elctrical, aerospace and landscape engineers
FYI there are over 140,000 civil engineers in ASCE
<quoted text>
Assuming this is true,
How many are supporting the official story?
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269817 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Molten Aluminum is not a reddish orange like steel (and like we saw flowing from the towers). Molten aluminum is a silver color similar to the color when it cool.
YAWN MOTHER BANGER!

The color means nothing. The color can be misleading, and because it can be misleading, it means nothing as evidence. This is not aluminum in a foundry which hasn't mixed with anything. This is a cocktail of whatever was on the plane and in the towers which happens to come together. It wouldn't be unreasonable to suspect Aluminum and some other properties has changed its color.

http://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/s...
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269818 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
How many of these are making computer simulations to get the desired results?
None, How many times have you wacked it to photos of your mother sick freak!
who

Reading, UK

#269819 May 1, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
To tell you it was an inside job, LMAO, Read the thing, the whole thing, it's a simple think tank paper, you are connecting endless no existent dots.(and basing much of your opinion on false information, such as the above.
I'm not saying it proves anything other than the fact that the papers authors recognised a need for a new Pearl Harbour in order to speed things up......I just find it interesting
I'll get back to you in the near future, Charles.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269820 May 1, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>The majority of those Bozos are elctrical, aerospace and landscape engineers

FYI there are over 140,000 civil engineers in ASCE
So all 140,000 of these ASCE engineers have studied the WTC destruction and agreed with all aspects of the official story?

Wheres your logic, catfish?

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269821 May 1, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not saying it proves anything other than the fact that the papers authors recognised a need for a new Pearl Harbour in order to speed things up......I just find it interesting
I'll get back to you in the near future, Charles.
Fair.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269822 May 1, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So all 140,000 of these ASCE engineers have studied the WTC destruction and agreed with all aspects of the official story?
Wheres your logic, catfish?
It's a belief held by a very, very small percentage of the craft, and as PP pointed out, by many who are not experts in the field (landscape engineers, architects)
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269823 May 1, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Assuming this is true,
How many are supporting the official story?
You for one!
onemale wrote:
The jet engine found at the Pentagon does not match that of 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!

LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!

FROM YOUR LINK!

In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.

The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.

There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269824 May 1, 2014
This is FURTHER proof of how clueless Twoofers are. What was flowing out of the 81st floor of WTC 2 was melting batteries from the massive UPS System Fuji Bank had .... smarten up Twit
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Molten Aluminum is not a reddish orange like steel (and like we saw flowing from the towers). Molten aluminum is a silver color similar to the color when it cool.
Fightfighters were recorded saying there were pools of moten steel 6 weeks after the destruction of the towers.
Images for molten steel 9/11
https://www.google.com/search...
More images for molten steel 911
https://www.google.com/search...
Workers Reported Molten Metal in Ground Zero Rubble
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/molt...
Molten Metal - a 9/11 Smoking Gun
http://moltenmetalsmokinggun.blogspot.com/

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269825 May 1, 2014
SO why aren't they members of AE 9/11 MORON
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So all 140,000 of these ASCE engineers have studied the WTC destruction and agreed with all aspects of the official story?
Wheres your logic, catfish?
Insults Are Easier

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269826 May 1, 2014
and WHY are no members of the FDNY who were at the WTC on 9/11 members of FireFighters for 9/11 Twoof !?!?!??!?!

Duhhhhhh Twoof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 6 min Buck Crick 100,591
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 16 min confrinting with ... 670,351
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 17 min Joe Fortuna 980,174
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 8 hr Sky Writer 31 184,288
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 11 hr Jehowa Witness 46,179
Treating others with respect 12 hr UnderstandPeople 14
Do any attractive cougars or milfs want to trad... (Dec '11) 14 hr Seejay 4
More from around the web