Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269694 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Any sane person can see how WTC 7 went down it was a CD.
A very silent one!

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269695 Apr 29, 2014
because Twoof thinks building fires and collapses should be an unvarying event
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Here's a hint for the morons of 911 twoofyness and stupidity,
"Do you have another drawing that shows what happened to the beams/girders/columns/connecti ons surrounding the connection in question due to uneven heating and cooling as well as catastrophic events like the collapses of the east and west penthouses?
And yet another that proves the stresses transferred by those events had no effect on the girder and connection you're speaking of?
If not, why are you here claiming fraud?
LSSBB's comment on the fact that the system did catastrophically fail and that had to be the result of NIST's model is pretty relevant, no?"
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php...
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269698 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Even going into a few seconds of freefall acceleration.
And this proves what again other than the building was not a solid cube where resistance would be consistent and all encompassing?

Watch, No answer from Gloop AKA John The Retardonator .

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269699 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>pigboy you continually overestimate your level of competence and expertise all the while trying desperately to ridicule the experts whose words are posted here by truth seekers who simply do not believe the official fairy tale of 9/11.

You speak as a non-expert trying to shout down more educated people with real expertise.

pigboy your cognitive bias respective to the official “scientific” story is most evident. It is as if you pigboy could not believe you could ever possibly be wrong, especially with the proven lying govie to back you up.

Your narcissistic ego driven and artificially inflated sense of self esteem is evident throughout your posts to a nauseating extent.

Let’s have more SPAM and mumbo jumbo from Mr Magic and his band of merry pranksters over at JREF and their favorite, the truly geeky modelbenders club to tell us how it all happened on 9/11. LOL

UhHuh Eh !
No elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. Gullible, you underestimate your massive, morbid ignorance and incompetence.

And again, the garbage you losers find so convincing doesn't require a PhD or degree to debunk...and the reason your charlatan masters are still pandering to mental midgets like yourself on the interwebs rather than making a difference is because it takes almost nothing to convince scientifically illiterate dolts that their delusions are justified.

Good luck with that and next time try addressing the actual argument!

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269700 Apr 29, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Btw Ignorance, still waiting for you to post one article about plated steel melting in fires...oh right, you were just lying because lies are all you have to defend twoof...the big lie.
Why Porkypie Lies That I Lied Are Just Another Lie To Promote NISTs Lies About The Lie That Is 9/11

The PNAC Documents

In the mid 90's the political think tank PNAC set forth its world domination agenda. PNAC was made up entirely of Neocons who took power when Bush became President, where they immediately got the catalyzing event of 9/11 they wanted for the 'New Pearl Harbor' required for their agenda.

PNAC is no longer a website on the web, showing things are removed and how talking about PNAC now does not make it a lie.

More lies from Porkypie's No Proof Lie

Proof is in the cover-up that immediately destroyed evidence, failed to follow fire investigation protocols to chemically check for explosives - Proof is NIST claiming nobody reported molten steel, when the dust that blanketed Manhattan had molten iron-spheres, along with numerous accounts from firefighters seeing molten steel. Thermal imaging from NASA showing abnormally high temps for weeks in the rubble, and photographic evidence.

No Real Scientific Investigation Required

In response to the question about the destruction of evidence, the Mayor of New York stated evidence is not required given todays computing power. In this statement, the official agenda to not truly investigate was admitted, and was verified by the methods used by NIST.

The Lie of Extraordinary Evidence Required To Prove Extraordinary Events

The standard for proving any event is the same, as science is science. This lie produces a mindset to not believe anything one is not conditioned to believe, and no facts presented can dispel their beliefs.

More Lies From Liars Who Lie Supported By That Dudley Guy

In order to justify the destruction of evidence and lack of scientific honesty, NIST claims 100 lbs of thermite is required to cut each column. This experiment shows that to be off by a factor of 100 to 1, and thermate is more powerful form of thermite.

http://youtu.be/kscTVnEcPMk

It also shows an explosive sound, due to the pressure build up in the delivery device that surrounds it. So arguing about what is or isn't an explosive is a lie to cover even thermate can make explosive sounds.

Thermate produces no seismographic fingerprint, so the claim that seismographic data proves airliners flown by terrorists is a lie.

So if you want to keep promoting the lie that claims I lied, go ahead and continue to lie, and thats why

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269701 Apr 29, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thermate produces no seismographic fingerprint,.
And no evidence of it's use what so ever such as cut beams or residue. but hey, only 267 stories were rigged with it according to team twoof so one would not expect any remaining evidence.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269702 Apr 29, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
In the mid 90's the political think tank PNAC set forth its world domination agenda.
SHOW ANY PROOF OF WORLD DOMINATION MOONBAT, They said that the military was underfunded, public support for more funding was not present and only a galvanizing incident such as a New Pearl Harbor would lead to public support for more defense spending.

You don't get it because it's a logical assumption.

Proof of nothing but the imaginary dots of a twoofers thought process!
who

Reading, UK

#269704 Apr 29, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
SHOW ANY PROOF OF WORLD DOMINATION MOONBAT, They said that the military was underfunded, public support for more funding was not present and only a galvanizing incident such as a New Pearl Harbor would lead to public support for more defense spending.
You don't get it because it's a logical assumption.
Proof of nothing but the imaginary dots of a twoofers thought process!
Charles......only a Muppet would regard defence spending as irrelevant.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269705 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
And it did indeed lead to public support for more defense spending. 9/11 was of course the "New Pearl Harbor" conceived of by the PNAC.
That's a conclusion, any proof of that or world domination moonbat?

SHOW ANY PROOF OF WORLD DOMINATION MOONBAT, They said that the military was underfunded, public support for more funding was not present and only a galvanizing incident such as a New Pearl Harbor would lead to public support for more defense spending.

You don't get it because it's a logical assumption.

Proof of nothing but the imaginary dots of a twoofers thought process!
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269706 Apr 29, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thermate produces no seismographic fingerprint, so the claim that seismographic data proves airliners flown by terrorists is a lie.
YAWN!

And no evidence of it's use what so ever such as cut beams or residue. but hey, only 267 stories were rigged with it according to team twoof so one would not expect any remaining evidence.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269707 Apr 29, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
Charles......only a Muppet would regard defence spending as irrelevant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =PX_qAtwMDFkXX
No one said it was, the amount is the question, the typical guns vs butter economic debate.

The statement about a "New Pearl Harbor" is irreverent as proof of anything other than conservatives favor guns over butter to a greater extent than liberals (or in this case the general public.).
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269711 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Cat food commercials or baby food recipes would be more effective than simply repeating your lugubrious posts sorry charlie.
Uh Huh Eh !
YAWN! So you made up the world domination claim, ANOTHER LIE FOR TEAM TWOOF!

SHOW ANY PROOF OF WORLD DOMINATION MOONBAT, They said that the military was underfunded, public support for more funding was not present and only a galvanizing incident such as a New Pearl Harbor would lead to public support for more defense spending.

You don't get it because it's a logical assumption.

Proof of nothing but the imaginary dots of a twoofers thought process!
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269712 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
No wonder your "practice" is failing. You don't know the difference between irrelevant and irreverent.
Sure I do, You would be the the first, any evidence of that world domination claim.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269713 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Cat food commercials and baby food recipes
Are you making a list of things that get Onemale hard?
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269714 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
No wonder your "practice" is failing. You don't know the difference between irrelevant and irreverent.
Uh Huh Eh !
PS: Notice I was gone for a bit, LMFAO $372,732.00.(divide by three, it was contingent upon a win)

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269715 Apr 29, 2014
I thought you guys said it was the Jews! No wait! It was Halliburton and other defence contractors! No wait! It was the Rothschild's !!!! No wait! It was the Illuminati! No Wait it was the Carlyle Group !?!?!?!?!?
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
And it did indeed lead to public support for more defense spending. 9/11 was of course the "New Pearl Harbor" conceived of by the PNAC. Plotted and put into action by the govie that needed a galvanizing incident to create a reason to invade the Middle East.
The US is still at war 13 years later because of it.
Uh Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269716 Apr 29, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Why Porkypie Lies That I Lied Are Just Another Lie To Promote NISTs Lies About The Lie That Is 9/11

The PNAC Documents

In the mid 90's the political think tank PNAC set forth its world domination agenda. PNAC was made up entirely of Neocons who took power when Bush became President, where they immediately got the catalyzing event of 9/11 they wanted for the 'New Pearl Harbor' required for their agenda.

PNAC is no longer a website on the web, showing things are removed and how talking about PNAC now does not make it a lie.

More lies from Porkypie's No Proof Lie

Proof is in the cover-up that immediately destroyed evidence, failed to follow fire investigation protocols to chemically check for explosives - Proof is NIST claiming nobody reported molten steel, when the dust that blanketed Manhattan had molten iron-spheres, along with numerous accounts from firefighters seeing molten steel. Thermal imaging from NASA showing abnormally high temps for weeks in the rubble, and photographic evidence.

No Real Scientific Investigation Required

In response to the question about the destruction of evidence, the Mayor of New York stated evidence is not required given todays computing power. In this statement, the official agenda to not truly investigate was admitted, and was verified by the methods used by NIST.

The Lie of Extraordinary Evidence Required To Prove Extraordinary Events

The standard for proving any event is the same, as science is science. This lie produces a mindset to not believe anything one is not conditioned to believe, and no facts presented can dispel their beliefs.

More Lies From Liars Who Lie Supported By That Dudley Guy

In order to justify the destruction of evidence and lack of scientific honesty, NIST claims 100 lbs of thermite is required to cut each column. This experiment shows that to be off by a factor of 100 to 1, and thermate is more powerful form of thermite.

http://youtu.be/kscTVnEcPMk

It also shows an explosive sound, due to the pressure build up in the delivery device that surrounds it. So arguing about what is or isn't an explosive is a lie to cover even thermate can make explosive sounds.

Thermate produces no seismographic fingerprint, so the claim that seismographic data proves airliners flown by terrorists is a lie.

So if you want to keep promoting the lie that claims I lied, go ahead and continue to lie, and thats why

Insults Are Easier
Twoof Rule #10: When you can't address the subject matter being discussed, change the subject and pretend its relevant.

Ignorance, if you can't address what I've said, then stay silent. You and I have been around the bend on your idiotic thermite crap already with you being backed into corners you simply can't think your way out of.

Citing PNAC and stupid twoofer bs regarding thermite is nothing but desperation by you to avoid supporting anything you say (even if your source is self debunking) and quite boring.

If that's the best you have, I'll just copy paste my old posts where I've already addressed your dumb crap.
Pegasus

Philadelphia, PA

#269717 Apr 29, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
PS: Notice I was gone for a bit, LMFAO $372,732.00.(divide by three, it was contingent upon a win)
$$$$$$$CHA CHING$$$$$$$
Zip wouldn't make over 100g's in 5 years as the "Fry Master"......and 10 years for Onedope.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269718 Apr 29, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
When you say "ignore" do you mean continually adding your inane comments to all the sensational, opinionated stuff lacking any basis in fact and evidence that you always find on this, your favorite forum to add your stupid comments to?
Huge projection. There is plenty of tangible evidence supporting what actually happened. The is nothing to support the nefarious government conspiracy.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269719 Apr 29, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Why Porkypie Lies That I Lied Are Just Another Lie To Promote NISTs Lies About The Lie That Is 9/11
The PNAC Documents
In the mid 90's the political think tank PNAC set forth its world domination agenda. PNAC was made up entirely of Neocons who took power when Bush became President, where they immediately got the catalyzing event of 9/11 they wanted for the 'New Pearl Harbor' required for their agenda.
PNAC is no longer a website on the web, showing things are removed and how talking about PNAC now does not make it a lie.
More lies from Porkypie's No Proof Lie
Proof is in the cover-up that immediately destroyed evidence, failed to follow fire investigation protocols to chemically check for explosives - Proof is NIST claiming nobody reported molten steel, when the dust that blanketed Manhattan had molten iron-spheres, along with numerous accounts from firefighters seeing molten steel. Thermal imaging from NASA showing abnormally high temps for weeks in the rubble, and photographic evidence.
No Real Scientific Investigation Required
In response to the question about the destruction of evidence, the Mayor of New York stated evidence is not required given todays computing power. In this statement, the official agenda to not truly investigate was admitted, and was verified by the methods used by NIST.
The Lie of Extraordinary Evidence Required To Prove Extraordinary Events
The standard for proving any event is the same, as science is science. This lie produces a mindset to not believe anything one is not conditioned to believe, and no facts presented can dispel their beliefs.
More Lies From Liars Who Lie Supported By That Dudley Guy
In order to justify the destruction of evidence and lack of scientific honesty, NIST claims 100 lbs of thermite is required to cut each column. This experiment shows that to be off by a factor of 100 to 1, and thermate is more powerful form of thermite.
http://youtu.be/kscTVnEcPMk
It also shows an explosive sound, due to the pressure build up in the delivery device that surrounds it. So arguing about what is or isn't an explosive is a lie to cover even thermate can make explosive sounds.
Thermate produces no seismographic fingerprint, so the claim that seismographic data proves airliners flown by terrorists is a lie.
So if you want to keep promoting the lie that claims I lied, go ahead and continue to lie, and thats why
Insults Are Easier
Proves nothing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 6 min Anthony MN 641,973
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 11 min RiversideRedneck 38,779
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 17 min pusherman_ 970,122
What's the most embarrassing thing you have done? 34 min Thelordofdogtown 22
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr Steve III 44,471
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 1 hr Ricky F 618,443
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr Just Think 104,771
More from around the web