Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269622 Apr 27, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they did, however when they switched off the transponders and changed directions.
Only after much review and deduction was it known what exactly happened and what plane was what.
In short hindsight is 20/20 , however in the confusion. There was no real way of knowing what every blip was on the radars.
"One" is busy debunking himself. Rather ironic I would say.
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269623 Apr 27, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Says the scientifically illiterate moron who can't do science yet "thinks" he can discern good science from bad!
No (intelligent) comment on my post over at JREF?
Oh right, you don't have a handy copy/paste to mindlessly regurgitate!
Oh elevator-boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. Gullible!
You have yet to show you know anything about science.
You haven't explained anything using science.
Thus far you're merely a scientist wanna be,
it's time to come back from piggy land and back to earth.
So far you've only proved the word "moron" is at the top of your vocabulary .
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269624 Apr 27, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
They did not track the entire path of the flight 77 because it dropped below radar. Flights 11 and 175 were tracked but the transponders were turned off. Inconsistencies mean nothing. Three planes reached their targets. Demolitions and missiles are pure nonsense.
You bwunkers ignore what you want to:
Did you not notice the transponders that came back on?
Though they lost two of the planes for a short while they came back on the radar.
The only way a plane falls from radar if it has land or fly very low below the radar.
And the air traffic controller said fight 93 was NOT shot down.
Why did Donald Rumsfeld lie???
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269629 Apr 27, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
I thought you said NORAD STOOD down ?!?!?!?!?!<quoted text>
You can find a copy of that document in the book called "63 documents the government don't want you to read".

onemale

Charleston, IL

#269630 Apr 27, 2014
It's very evident, when stories doesn't match someone is lying and that brings up another question... WHY?
It's not so much of matter or who lied but... WHY?
If it looks like a cover up and smells like a cover up it most likely a cover up...
What are they hiding?
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269631 Apr 27, 2014
We were told they lost the jets because the transponders were shut off, but we now know they tracked them on radar.
Therefore, we now know that losing the jets was a lie.
One of the jets changed their transponder code and the air traffic controller caught it.
How would a terrorist know how to change the transponder code?
And why would they?
Why would they shut off the transponder, then turn it back on?

When the two jets went off of the radar, they landed, then they found them on radar again... We know the transponder can be changed so what jets replaced the original ones? And where are the passengers?

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopoliti...
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269634 Apr 27, 2014
Convince Me 9/11 was NOT an Inside Job

onemale

Charleston, IL

#269638 Apr 28, 2014
Is there anything new on the 4 planes that were supposedly crashed on 9/11?

It appears that the aircraft used for UA flight 93 (tail number N591UA, see http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-09... ) is still listed as
"valid" in the FAA Aircraft Registry, as is the aircraft used for UA175 (N612UA). See http://162.58.35.241/acdatabas e/defimg.asp

(select "N-number" and type in the tail number without the "N")

My understanding is that the FAA rules call for prompt removal from the registry as soon as it is ascertained that the aircraft has been destroyed.

The other two 9/11 aircraft (N334AA / AA11 and N644AA / AA77) are marked as destroyed.

So, the two AA planes #11 and 77 not only have no government record of being scheduled to fly that day, but they are on record of having been destroyed???

http://sydney.indymedia.org/front.php3... ...

Whereas the two United flights #93 (Pennsylvania),#175 (2nd Tower) are still on the registry. Cleveland????

But there are also many new questions about some "200 passengers" of that day...

Perhaps. According to the published passenger lists (see links below) there were a total of 257 (or 266) people on board on the four 9/11 flights: 199 passengers, 32 crew members, and 26 (or 35) persons not accounted for.

Maybe this does not mean anything, maybe it does. This is just basic data mining, the kind that the US govt uses when trying to sort out potential terrorists.

The links:

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center... ...
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center... ...
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center... ...
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center... ...

Source: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/...
onemale

Charleston, IL

#269639 Apr 28, 2014
The 9/11 Commission’s Incredible Tales:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-9-11-commiss...

Scroll down to:
The First Version of the Official Story
then to:
The Second Version of the Official Story

As Charlie boy would say... they didn't lie they just told the truth two different ways.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#269640 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to show you know anything about science.
You haven't explained anything using science.
Thus far you're merely a scientist wanna be,
it's time to come back from piggy land and back to earth.
So far you've only proved the word "moron" is at the top of your vocabulary .
*yawn*
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>It's obvious you're not very bright. Really, really obvious.
Did you know that 180mph is slower than 500mph?
Of course you don't, you're far too stupid to understand that simple fact.
E=1/2m(v*v) ring a bell?
Of course it doesn't, you're a scientifically illiterate fool.
Now would E increase with velocity?
No manyfails, I'm not asking you since you're just too stupid to understand.
[email protected] empty
E=1/2*55,580kg(80m/s*80m/s)=17 7,856kJ
[email protected] empty
E=1/2*57,840kg(223m/s*223m/s)= 1,438,162kJ
Of course you never bothered to verify anything you "read" (see mindlessly regurgitated) and you're dead wrong about the energy of impact. BTW, the lightest 767 is heavier than the heaviest 707 you moron.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_707#Speci...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_767#Speci...
(My calculations are based on a 757, your best case scenario to win the argument and you still lose by a landslide!)
The good news is, with friends like you twoof needs no enemies.
The bad news is, you are every bit as dumb as I thought.
But hey, good luck with that!
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#269641 Apr 28, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
I challenge you to spend the next few weeks finding them all and type them here for all the world to see.
Uh Huh Eh !
*yawn*

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#269642 Apr 28, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
pigboy it doesn't insult you because its de Twoof! You're "not" fazed cause that's really how you live your miserable life.
Do you call truth seeking posters who question the official fairy tale at JREF morons and imbeciles? Maybe they are all run off by Mr. Magic himself?
Uh Huh Eh !
LOL!

"truth seeking posters"

Uh huh....

We now know you don't have a mirror handy because this obviously has nothing to do with truth for you morons.

Oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. Gullible!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#269643 Apr 28, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me where you Thought I said NORAD stood down! Are you able to Think these days?
I did say rummy said flight 93 was shot down. I even provided many links.
Tell us again what you Thought I said? When did I say this that you Thought I said ?
I didn't think so.
Uh Huh Eh !
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!

Oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS aka Mr. Gullible!

Now that's funny!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Calgary, Canada

#269644 Apr 28, 2014
Pegasus

Hollywood, FL

#269645 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
The 9/11 Commission’s Incredible Tales:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-9-11-commiss...
Scroll down to:
The First Version of the Official Story
then to:
The Second Version of the Official Story
As Charlie boy would say... they didn't lie they just told the truth two different ways.
I forgot how you post through the night to yourself as you diddle in your own warped little world.
Did you happen to find some rock solid Youtube evidence of Atta on that Saudi Arabian version of TMZ showing him alive and well after 911.
Hmmm.....maybe Atta parachuted out of the airliner as it cranked along at 480 knots......that would leave a mark, especially when you hit the rear fin and if you don't break you back ...."it would be all down hill from there".
I'm sure I read something about Atta bailing out.
That will blow you hair back hey Boo Boo.?
LOL
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269646 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to show you know anything about science.
Well, Other than all those formulas he puts up while you babel about your gas oven mother diddler.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269647 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Though they lost two of the planes for a short while they came back on the radar.
The only way a plane falls from radar if it has land or fly very low below the radar.
False, A cut transponder take one completely off the grid of the most used radar in the US, Secondary radar, it's non reflective.

But hey, If I have any incest questions I will be sure and ask you.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269648 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You can find a copy of that document in the book called "63 documents the government don't want you to read".
Did you ever find that interview with Atta after 9-11 that was on the BBC, LINK OR LIE!
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269649 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
We were told they lost the jets because the transponders were shut off, but we now know they tracked them on radar.
After 9-11 through NORAD and other PRIMARY radar tapes, Just like M770, Or was the Malaysian event an inside job too?

What is it' a month, cut transponder and they still don't know where it went down mother banger.
Charlie Sheen

Mooresville, NC

#269650 Apr 28, 2014
onemale wrote:
Convince Me 9/11 was NOT an Inside Job
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =yCgMCw2-aJ0XX
Convince me you are not a mother and son banging pervert.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Dr Banonator 55,967
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Steve III 649,805
ye olde village pub (Jun '07) 17 min Flower-Child 53,840
how long after taking the Vivitrol shot can i f... (Nov '12) 28 min Danielle 171
Black gay brothers drop your BBM pins 29 min from uk 2
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 50 min Toby 972,384
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 1 hr Toby 106,052
Moms having sex with their sons (Aug '12) Fri Noname 69
More from around the web