Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269426 Apr 24, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>It's all easily proved, PH, for people of sufficient intellect - which is why the Anti-Triuth contingent ITT is comprised of nothing but sub-intellectual blockheads.

If you genuinely can't see the FBI complicity in the 1993 WTC Bombing after being exposed to all the facts, you're simply an idiot. And if you can't understand what it means that elements of our own government had tried and failed, 8 years prior to 9/11, to bring down those towers, then you are the intellectual equivalent of a wooden spoon in a drawer full of razor blades.

If you think Tower 7 fell controlled-demolition-style because it was on fire, you are well-qualified to run for President of the Idiots.

If you really believe that 9/11/01 brought us not only the deadliest attack on U.S. soil, but also the incredible aviation milestone of the first two passenger jets in aviation history to disintegrate beyond recognition on impact, back-to-back, well then, you've been PWND,

If you think the Military-Industrial Complex your President warned you about just went away because the media suddenly stopped talking about them after the JFK assassination, you have the abstract thinking skills of a gnat.

And if you honestly don't understand that the USA's centuries-long tradition of one false-flag incident after another, after another, after another, ad nauseum, doesn't AUTOMATICALLY render the 9/11 attacks highly-suspect, even aside from all the other evidence, then you are quite literally insane.

You are a brainwashed moron, PH - a mouth-breather. You should definitely consider another career besides your current dual role of Failed Musician/Failed U.S. Government Advocate.

They are hiring where I work, and they do hire like, retards and stuff to do the janitorial. I would put in a good word for you if you can sweep, but you'll have to assure me that you won't eat any garbage or swallow any chemicals.
You gotta know that the unsupported mindless drivel you spew isn't worth reading for the simple fact that it's a combination of bare assertion and logical fallacies culminating in meaningless word salad.
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#269427 Apr 24, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
... and by the way, what sort of PIECE OF SHIT, SCUMBAG are you that you would make fun of people who are mentally challenged …. It’s really sad that LOSERS like you exsist
Well hey, if the mentally challenged want to come onto an internet forum and argue against 9/11 Truth, then you're asking for it.

“The Biggest Liar on Topix”

Since: Jan 11

Pittsfield, MA

#269428 Apr 24, 2014
I just woke up from a 10 year coma and I even know 9/11 was an inisde job

Since: Feb 11

THE WORLD IS MY OYSTER

#269429 Apr 24, 2014
Mexican jumping beans ask Captain John O Dung "How High"?
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#269430 Apr 24, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
You gotta know that the unsupported mindless drivel you spew isn't worth reading for the simple fact that it's a combination of bare assertion and logical fallacies culminating in meaningless word salad.
Translation:
Porkpie Hat wrote:
I have no rebuttal to any of those irrefutable points, so I am going to pretend to know what a logical fallacy is and toss "word salad" out there for the 4,823rd time ITT.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269431 Apr 24, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>Translation:

Porkpie Hat wrote, "I have no rebuttal to any of those irrefutable points, so I am going to pretend to know what a logical fallacy is and toss "word salad" out there for the 4,823rd time ITT."
If you actually said something other than general assertions with no supporting documentation, there would be something to rebut.

As it is you use a lot of words to say nothing of consequence and your only attempt to support your claims was self debunking.

Here's a rational response to your idiotic rants;

For those not prone to heavy drooling,

http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/



http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphy...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eag...

http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm

http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king...

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page

http://11-settembre.blogspot.ca/2007/04/engli...

http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php...

http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2012/...

You've been debunked.
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#269432 Apr 24, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually said something other than general assertions with no supporting documentation, there would be something to rebut.
As it is you use a lot of words to say nothing of consequence and your only attempt to support your claims was self debunking.
Here's a rational response to your idiotic rants;
For those not prone to heavy drooling,
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jC3JgWkNNIQXX
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphy...
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eag...
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page
http://11-settembre.blogspot.ca/2007/04/engli...
http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php...
http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2012/...
You've been debunked.
Sorry pal, not interested in the same propaganda that got you into this sorry state of affairs: a Canadian who apparently cares so much about the U.S. Government fairy tale-version of 9/11 that he is willing to spend all day making a fool of himself on their behalf.

Here's a list of media sources I consider reliable, at least to the extent that I'm aware they do the most fact-checking, have the most valid history of reporting news whether or not it agrees with the preferred government version of events, and actually care about their reputation for journalistic integrity:

The New York Times

Now, if you can post me some links to some NYT articles that somehow "debunk" 9/11 Truth, I'll be happy to click on them and comment on them.

But I'm not the YouTubed, Blogspotted, SuperPAC-sponsored baby bird you think I am, PH. I am literally so much smarter than you, the only analogy that comes to mind is that you are the Barney Fife to my Andy Taylor.

You take 9/11 Truth debate to such a low-level of evidence-ignoring snivelry, intellectual cowardice, ill-humored jokes, poorly-considered counterarguments, and juvenile asshattery, that you are, without question, the best evidence I could possibly present that Anti-Truthers may actually be retarded.

Now, gimme that bullet.
Pegasus

Brooklyn, NY

#269433 Apr 24, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>
I've enjoyed your transformation, Pegged, from semi-literate dingbat to foul-mouthed, off-topic, ad hominem spammer (a'la Charlie Sheen).
But I should probably point out that, among the innumerable "factoids" floating around haphazardly in your head is one in which you have me mixed up with some racist in some other argument you're losing. I'm not the Stormfront/Skindhead guy.
Also, "the cats ass" is not a saying.
Don't worry, Pegged, someday you'll fit in just fine - at that state-run old folks' home with the rest of the senile old farts.
Well you understood me and thats all that matters.

Evidence.......Proof......get some!!!!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#269434 Apr 24, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry pal, not interested in the same propaganda that got you into this sorry state of affairs: a Canadian who apparently cares so much about the U.S. Government fairy tale-version of 9/11 that he is willing to spend all day making a fool of himself on their behalf.

Here's a list of media sources I consider reliable, at least to the extent that I'm aware they do the most fact-checking, have the most valid history of reporting news whether or not it agrees with the preferred government version of events, and actually care about their reputation for journalistic integrity:

The New York Times

Now, if you can post me some links to some NYT articles that somehow "debunk" 9/11 Truth, I'll be happy to click on them and comment on them.

But I'm not the YouTubed, Blogspotted, SuperPAC-sponsored baby bird you think I am, PH. I am literally so much smarter than you, the only analogy that comes to mind is that you are the Barney Fife to my Andy Taylor.

You take 9/11 Truth debate to such a low-level of evidence-ignoring snivelry, intellectual cowardice, ill-humored jokes, poorly-considered counterarguments, and juvenile asshattery, that you are, without question, the best evidence I could possibly present that Anti-Truthers may actually be retarded.

Now, gimme that bullet.
Again, your ignorant word salads aren't worth wasting the time to fully read.

If the best you can do is reference a self debunking newspaper article perhaps you should look for a hobby that doesn't require thinking.

Maybe remedial basket weaving. At least then you wouldn't have to lie about being a productive member of society.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269435 Apr 24, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>And you've processed any evidence Ignorance?

Is that how you came to the conclusions that;

Molten metal = cd

Free fall [speed]= cd

Firefighters used thermal measuring devices to determine molten materials at gz were steel.

There was a stand down order.

Da ebil US gub'ment invented al Qaeda.

Steel when plated has a lower melting point than....steel.

You know Ignorance, all those claims you attempt to use as proof of your beliefs but utterly fail to support using the scientific method or any other valid methodology based on sound reasoning and logic.

But then,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss
Poor cartoon thinking Dudley, he's such a liar he only believes lies, he can't even tell the difference between a lie or a mistake, perception from his misperception.

You have not one single instance where I have ever lied, you only have your own lies that ignore my explanations and present my words out of context.

WasteOfWater is a habitual liar and idiot, and you try to protect her because you share exactly the same traits.

So for probably for the 52nd time, free fall speed equals no resistance, no resistance equals explosives, explosives equal inside job because they were never checked for.

Plated steel equals what is commonly mistaken as melted steel in office fires, and fireman don't testify to it running down channel rails like a foundry.

The FLIR video was possibly a mistake by me, yet an honest mistake given all the other facts about 9/11 that point to explosives used at WTC to bring down the towers.

Theoretical science is different then experimental science or forensics.

p=mv is only relevant if outward explosive force was not clearly observed as the towers fell.

You are a liar who speaks in cartoon jibberish, because you are a smear merchant, and

Insults Are Easier

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269436 Apr 24, 2014
"According to the seismic data there is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," ~ Arthur Lerner Lam , Asscociate Director, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

Now you can ignore that, you can make believe it doesnt exsist, you can stick your head in the sand BUT those are the facts .... but then again ... IGNORANCE is YOUR BLISS
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor cartoon thinking Dudley, he's such a liar he only believes lies, he can't even tell the difference between a lie or a mistake, perception from his misperception.
You have not one single instance where I have ever lied, you only have your own lies that ignore my explanations and present my words out of context.
WasteOfWater is a habitual liar and idiot, and you try to protect her because you share exactly the same traits.
So for probably for the 52nd time, free fall speed equals no resistance, no resistance equals explosives, explosives equal inside job because they were never checked for.
Plated steel equals what is commonly mistaken as melted steel in office fires, and fireman don't testify to it running down channel rails like a foundry.
The FLIR video was possibly a mistake by me, yet an honest mistake given all the other facts about 9/11 that point to explosives used at WTC to bring down the towers.
Theoretical science is different then experimental science or forensics.
p=mv is only relevant if outward explosive force was not clearly observed as the towers fell.
You are a liar who speaks in cartoon jibberish, because you are a smear merchant, and
Insults Are Easier

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269437 Apr 24, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
<quoted text>"According to the seismic data there is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," ~ Arthur Lerner Lam , Asscociate Director, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University

Now you can ignore that, you can make believe it doesnt exsist, you can stick your head in the sand BUT those are the facts .... but then again ... IGNORANCE is YOUR BLISS
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for. They compared it only to a commercial controlled demolition, when what we saw at wtc was a military controlled destruction meant to shock the public into giving up their own constitutional rights.

Your ignorance is my bliss, catfish. And you are so unoriginal you can only copy somebody else's insults, loser.

Porkies wife is a fat hog, because

Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269438 Apr 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean you processed all the evidence in the same opposite method in which you believe planes can turn at low speed the same as high speed? Then that explains you advocating the conspiracy before you switched and advocated the official one. You must be the only person in history dumb enough to work that way.
Bizarro chic, get a boyfriend!
Insults Are Easier
Nope. The internet is full of half-baked 9/11 conspiracy nonsense, none of which is based upon hard facts and evidence. I got taken in until I looked for the real facts and evidence. Are you making a proposition? LMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269439 Apr 24, 2014
BTW, the plane hit the Pentagon.

End of story. Obviously those claiming it couldn't be done are ignorant of the facts.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#269440 Apr 24, 2014
themitic explosive force was not accounted for ???? REALLY IGNORAMUS ????

But you idiots are always going on about the FDNY hearing explosions .... they were loud enough to be heard but not loud enough to be picked up on a seismograph !?!?!??!?!

Do you just make this shit up as you go along ?????
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for. They compared it only to a commercial controlled demolition, when what we saw at wtc was a military controlled destruction meant to shock the public into giving up their own constitutional rights.
Your ignorance is my bliss, catfish. And you are so unoriginal you can only copy somebody else's insults, loser.
Porkies wife is a fat hog, because
Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269441 Apr 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats because themitic explosive force was not accounted for. They compared it only to a commercial controlled demolition, when what we saw at wtc was a military controlled destruction meant to shock the public into giving up their own constitutional rights.
Your ignorance is my bliss, catfish. And you are so unoriginal you can only copy somebody else's insults, loser.
Porkies wife is a fat hog, because
Insults Are Easier
Pure nonsense. High-rise demolition requires tons of steel plating and specialized skill. Besides, both the trade towers were constructed with the bulk of the structural load in the outer skin. Such a demolition is pure nonsense. It is a well established fact that the outer structural members failed due to deflection of the floor trusses. Your demolition fantasy is very funny. Thanks for the laughs.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#269442 Apr 24, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
themitic explosive force was not accounted for ???? REALLY IGNORAMUS ????
But you idiots are always going on about the FDNY hearing explosions .... they were loud enough to be heard but not loud enough to be picked up on a seismograph !?!?!??!?!
Do you just make this shit up as you go along ?????
<quoted text>
Indeed. He is a broken record of half-baked nonsense.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#269443 Apr 24, 2014
Observe the logic-less presence of WasteOfWater, she 'thinks' a plane can destroy a building by damaging a couple of floors, yet 'believes' it would take explosives to be placed in
all of the floors to destroy a building.

Why is that, WasteOfWater?

Is it because

Insults Are Easier
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#269444 Apr 24, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Observe the logic-less presence of WasteOfWater,..
Forget about logic, IAE, these morons are in a world well beyond logic. Call it Fairy Dust Land, call it Brainwashed City, call it Just Plain Stupidville, but wherever it is, it is beyond our reach.

It's like trying to teach a cat about Jesus. The cat may nod its head. The cat may smile. The cat may snuggle up to the bottom of your leg while you're talking. The cat might even snarl at you a little.

But at the end of the conversation, the cat just goes right back to shitting in a box, licking its own ass, lying around like a bum all day, and utterly failing to repent of its numerous sins.

All you can really do to affect the Anti-Truthers ITT is apply massive head trauma every time they're stupid enough to reply to you directly. Then again, they've already been thumped so hard they don't even realize they're still in a thread right now, they think they're at the Hallmark Store looking for a Mother's Day card.

Their mothers are going to be very disappointed in a few weeks.(As if they weren't already)
Pegasus

Brooklyn, NY

#269445 Apr 24, 2014
Timeten wrote:
I just woke up from a 10 year coma and I even know 9/11 was an inisde job
Go take another nap for about 50 yrs then your childrens, children can fill your shoes.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Future of Politics in America 4 min UIDIOTRACEMAkeWOR... 195
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min True Truth 977,267
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 12 min Al Capone 3,385
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 32 min MUQ2 88,046
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 38 min X Pendable 184,716
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 43 min truth 665,278
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 47 min MUQ2 45,817
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 54 min Bongo 99
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 3 hr nanoanomaly 525
More from around the web