Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“One For the Money”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#267501 Mar 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
How big is your fridge? From the link!
FBI spokesman Bill Crowley said that the largest piece of plane recovered was a shred of fuselage skin that covered four windows -- a piece seven feet long from a jetliner that was 155 feet long.
Give me a break a 757 Boeing crashes and all the wreckage that is found is half a trash can of debris and a seven ft. shredded piece of fuselage

Some claim witness accounts support the idea that Flight 93 is hit by a missile..
it is worth noting that some passenger planes hit by missiles continued to fly erratically for several minutes before crashing. For instance, a Korean Airline 747 was hit by two Russian missiles in 1983, yet continued to fly for two more minutes.

John Fleegle, a manager at the Indian Lake Marina about 1.5 miles from where Flight 93 crashes, is indoors with some colleagues, watching the televised coverage of the World Trade Center attack. Then, as he later describes,“All of a sudden the lights flickered and we joked that maybe they were coming for us. Then we heard engines screaming close overhead. The building shook. We ran out, heard the explosion and saw a fireball mushroom,” following the crash. When he later describes this incident while on a training course in Atlanta, Fleegle will be told that what happened means Flight 93 “was shot down.”

A man there who says he is a retired Air Force officer will tell Fleegle, When your lights flickered,[it was because] they zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot. Your lights didn’t flicker from the impact—your lights flickered because they zapped the radar system before they shot it.”

But, consistent with Fleegle’s allegation, a number of local residents—including military veterans—say they heard the sound of a missile overhead just before the time of the crash (see Just Before 10:06 a.m. September 11, 2001). Another local resident, Val McClatchey, will report her lights and phone going out around the time of the crash.-Pittsburgh Tribune

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#267502 Mar 24, 2014
-Web wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me a break a 757 Boeing crashes and all the wreckage that is found is half a trash can of debris and a seven ft. shredded piece of fuselage
Some claim witness accounts support the idea that Flight 93 is hit by a missile..
it is worth noting that some passenger planes hit by missiles continued to fly erratically for several minutes before crashing. For instance, a Korean Airline 747 was hit by two Russian missiles in 1983, yet continued to fly for two more minutes.
John Fleegle, a manager at the Indian Lake Marina about 1.5 miles from where Flight 93 crashes, is indoors with some colleagues, watching the televised coverage of the World Trade Center attack. Then, as he later describes,“All of a sudden the lights flickered and we joked that maybe they were coming for us. Then we heard engines screaming close overhead. The building shook. We ran out, heard the explosion and saw a fireball mushroom,” following the crash. When he later describes this incident while on a training course in Atlanta, Fleegle will be told that what happened means Flight 93 “was shot down.”
A man there who says he is a retired Air Force officer will tell Fleegle, When your lights flickered,[it was because] they zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot. Your lights didn’t flicker from the impact—your lights flickered because they zapped the radar system before they shot it.”
But, consistent with Fleegle’s allegation, a number of local residents—including military veterans—say they heard the sound of a missile overhead just before the time of the crash (see Just Before 10:06 a.m. September 11, 2001). Another local resident, Val McClatchey, will report her lights and phone going out around the time of the crash.-Pittsburgh Tribune
Where is your inventory of what was found? Sorry, your personal opinion bears no weight.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#267504 Mar 24, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
<quoted text>
When did I say that.
Of course they had support from ground,your standing on its hot desert sands now.
<quoted text>
To accept the 8 point involves hundreds/thousand of co conspirators without one single leak.Bill Clinton couldn't even get oral sex with out get caught,and there was only one co conspirator.
Just look at the way they are tight lipped about 9/11 investigations?

They are blocking questions asked by any person on 9/11 investigations?

If they were honest, they would probe every angle.....does it not show cover up?

9/11 Commission did not even mentioned about WTC collapse, as it it was a minor incident?

And all of that we are accepted to believe without raising any question or pose any objection?

It is really gullible people of USA who can take that much bullshit.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#267505 Mar 25, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just look at the way they are tight lipped about 9/11 investigations?
They are blocking questions asked by any person on 9/11 investigations?
If they were honest, they would probe every angle.....does it not show cover up?
9/11 Commission did not even mentioned about WTC collapse, as it it was a minor incident?
And all of that we are accepted to believe without raising any question or pose any objection?
It is really gullible people of USA who can take that much bullshit.
Can it be as simple as a few radicalized stooges looking for their 72 virgins and used to fly planes into buildings for other motives?.

The buildings didn't even have to fall,the act alone would have been enough trigger the events that unfolded.
But no,lets probe every single angle at the whim of the Twoof movement.

Want to start off with nukes, space beams or self peered reviewed papers?
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#267506 Mar 25, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
The buildings didn't even have to fall,the act alone would have been enough trigger the events that unfolded.
Wrong, which, BTW, is always redundant when addressing an Anti-Truther.

February 1993: Terrorists on the FBI payroll ( http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bo... ) drive a rented truck into the underground parking garage of WTC Tower 1 and detonate the urea nitrate-hydrogen bomb inside. It fails to fulfill its intended function of bringing the tower down, though it does kill 6 and injure more than 1000.

March 1993: Life goes on as usual in the USA.

Yes, low-information voter, the towers had to be brought down.

And if at first you don't succeed...

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#267507 Mar 25, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>

February 1993: Terrorists on the FBI payroll ( http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bo... ) drive a rented truck into the underground parking garage of WTC Tower 1 and detonate the urea nitrate-hydrogen bomb inside. It fails to fulfill its intended function of bringing the tower down, though it does kill 6 and injure more than 1000.
March 1993: Life goes on as usual in the USA.
Yes, low-information voter, the towers had to be brought down.
And if at first you don't succeed...
Wrong
Bomb Informer's Tapes Give Rare Glimpse of F.B.I. Dealings

But thanks for giving the info that terrorist threats are real within the US "And if at first you don't succeed"

Found any missile parts yet?
John the Revelator

Gallatin, TN

#267509 Mar 25, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
But thanks for giving the info that terrorist threats are real within the US
Of course terrorists are real, they've been around for thousands of years. If they weren't, our government couldn't use them to commit horrific acts against us.

Also, so you'll stop asking the same stupid question over and over, cruise missiles don't leave parts behind after they crash into something and explode. They leave fragments.

Airplanes, on the other hand, leave parts. BIG parts.
RADEKT wrote:
There was NOTHING spectacular about the 93 attack ..... No video of massive explosions, nobody jumping out of buildings, no FDNY people killed ...... It was very unimpressive compared to 9/11
What's your point? You're agreeing with me?

The point of the 1993 attack was not to make a big explosion in the basement of the WTC and kill a handful of people.

The point was to bring Tower 1 down. In fact, the full plan was that it would subsequently fall into Tower 2 and bring both towers down - the bomb was set off in a location intended to achieve precisely that result. The estimated death toll, had it been successful, was more than 10,000.

So funny that people can see nearly-irrefutable evidence that elements of their own government helped bomb the WTC in 1993, but somehow can't grok on the fact that when the towers were successfully brought down 8 years later, it was the same assholes with the same agenda.

Intentional ignorance is the only possible explanation, no one can accidentally be that ignorant.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#267510 Mar 25, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>

Also, so you'll stop asking the same stupid question over and over, cruise missiles don't leave parts behind after they crash into something and explode. They leave fragments.
Airplanes, on the other hand, leave parts. BIG parts.
parade of errors
ERROR:'Aircraft Crashes Always Leave Large Debris'
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/crashdeb...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#267511 Mar 25, 2014
AussieBobby wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong
Bomb Informer's Tapes Give Rare Glimpse of F.B.I. Dealings

But thanks for giving the info that terrorist threats are real within the US "And if at first you don't succeed"

Found any missile parts yet?
What's twoof without hyperbole and misrepresentation of facts?

Answer: a fluffy little bunny.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#267512 Mar 25, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>Of course terrorists are real, they've been around for thousands of years. If they weren't, our government couldn't use them to commit horrific acts against us.

Also, so you'll stop asking the same stupid question over and over, cruise missiles don't leave parts behind after they crash into something and explode. They leave fragments.

Airplanes, on the other hand, leave parts. BIG parts.

RADEKT wrote, "There was NOTHING spectacular about the 93 attack ..... No video of massive explosions, nobody jumping out of buildings, no FDNY people killed ...... It was very unimpressive compared to 9/11"

What's your point? You're agreeing with me?

The point of the 1993 attack was not to make a big explosion in the basement of the WTC and kill a handful of people.

The point was to bring Tower 1 down. In fact, the full plan was that it would subsequently fall into Tower 2 and bring both towers down - the bomb was set off in a location intended to achieve precisely that result. The estimated death toll, had it been successful, was more than 10,000.

So funny that people can see nearly-irrefutable evidence that elements of their own government helped bomb the WTC in 1993, but somehow can't grok on the fact that when the towers were successfully brought down 8 years later, it was the same assholes with the same agenda.

Intentional ignorance is the only possible explanation, no one can accidentally be that ignorant.
So your proof that 911 was an inside jobbity job is your lack of comprehension.

Are you the mayor of twooferdumb?
Charlie Sheen

Waxhaw, NC

#267513 Mar 25, 2014
-Web wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me a break a 757 Boeing crashes and all the wreckage that is found is half a trash can of debris and a seven ft. shredded piece of fuselage
Nope, Much more than that, though a plane nose diving into the ground at 500 mph would be intact in a twoofers mind, oh so much time to think between drive through orders.

STONYCREEK, Pa.-- The FBI said yesterday that it has finished its work at the crash scene of United Flight 93 after recovering about 95 percent of the downed airliner and concluding that explosives were not responsible for bringing it down.

http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/2001092...
Charlie Sheen

Waxhaw, NC

#267514 Mar 25, 2014
-Web wrote:
<quoted text>
A man there who says he is a retired Air Force officer will tell Fleegle, When your lights flickered,[it was because] they zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot. Your lights didn’t flicker from the impact—your lights flickered because they zapped the radar system before they shot it.”
That sounds really well sourced one male, does this man have a name and why would a missile, even if I buy that oh so scientific explanation be aiming at this guys trailer home.

" zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot" LMFAO!
Charlie Sheen

Waxhaw, NC

#267515 Mar 25, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
9/11 Commission did not even mentioned about WTC collapse, as it it was a minor incident?
The commission job was to address the hijackings (the criminal aspects) and how it occurred. The NIST's job was to cover the buildings collapse.

Did you want to invent super crime investigating building inspectors or just tap into two already developed fields of study.
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#267516 Mar 25, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, which, BTW, is always redundant when addressing an Anti-Truther.
February 1993: Terrorists on the FBI payroll ( http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bo... ) drive a rented truck into thoe underground parking garage of WTC Tower 1 and detonate the urea nitrate-hydrogen bomb inside. It fails to fulfill its intended function of bringing the tower down, though it does kill 6 and injure more than 1000.
March 1993: Life goes on as usual in the USA.
Yes, low-information voter, the towers had to be brought down.
And if at first you don't succeed...
The hydrogen enhancers never ignited because the tanks did not rupture.
You may be a big yahoo in your own mind Johnny but I think you have a problem with cognitive association.
Also, you claim a missile strike at the Pentagon so there must be fragments of that missile in the rubble correct?
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#267517 Mar 25, 2014
John the Revelator wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course terrorists are real, they've been around for thousands of years. If they weren't, our government couldn't use them to commit horrific acts against us.
Also, so you'll stop asking the same stupid question over and over, cruise missiles don't leave parts behind after they crash into something and explode. They leave fragments.
Airplanes, on the other hand, leave parts. BIG parts.
<quoted text>
What's your point? You're agreeing with me?
The point of the 1993 attack was not to make a big explosion in the basement of the WTC and kill a handful of people.
The point was to bring Tower 1 down. In fact, the full plan was that it would subsequently fall into Tower 2 and bring both towers down - the bomb was set off in a location intended to achieve precisely that result. The estimated death toll, had it been successful, was more than 10,000.
So funny that people can see nearly-irrefutable evidence that elements of their own government helped bomb the WTC in 1993, but somehow can't grok on the fact that when the towers were successfully brought down 8 years later, it was the same assholes with the same agenda.
Intentional ignorance is the only possible explanation, no one can accidentally be that ignorant.
Nearly irrefutable you say.......so close but no cigar, but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

Nearly irrefutable might stand up in the first circuit of kangaroo court in Twooferland, but not in the real world.

“One For the Money”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#267520 Mar 25, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, Much more than that, though a plane nose diving into the ground at 500 mph would be intact in a twoofers mind, oh so much time to think between drive through orders.
STONYCREEK, Pa.-- The FBI said yesterday that it has finished its work at the crash scene of United Flight 93 after recovering about 95 percent of the downed airliner and concluding that explosives were not responsible for bringing it down.
http://old.post-gazette.com/headlines/2001092...
The first responders described the crater as about 15 feet deep and about 30 feet across. It was irregularly shaped. The wreckage around and inside the crater consisted of largely unrecognizable pieces of twisted metal, pieces of the landing gear of the plane, a tire, the frames of some of the seats, bits of charred paper, and remnants of luggage and clothing. Most of the pieces of wreckage were quite small, the size of a notebook or smaller.

If you research the Moussaoui trial there are eight pictures of the crash site that were introduced as evidence in court.

The pictures show exactly what was left of the crash only tiny fragments.
Charlie Sheen

Waxhaw, NC

#267521 Mar 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
And both were abject failures.
It certainly would be better to develop super crime investigating building inspectors. But let's leave the lying govie out of it this time!
Its time for the incriminating TRUTH and the FACTS to fall where it may.
Uh Huh Eh !
Nice pointless essay.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#267522 Mar 25, 2014
They are blocking questions asked by any person on 9/11 investigations but you NIMRODS are here everyday asking questions ?!?!?!?!?!
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just look at the way they are tight lipped about 9/11 investigations?
They are blocking questions asked by any person on 9/11 investigations?
If they were honest, they would probe every angle.....does it not show cover up?
9/11 Commission did not even mentioned about WTC collapse, as it it was a minor incident?
And all of that we are accepted to believe without raising any question or pose any objection?
It is really gullible people of USA who can take that much bullshit.

“One For the Money”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#267523 Mar 25, 2014
RADEKT wrote:
Explain to us how Flight 93 being hit by a missile proves an inside job ?!?!?!? Because if it was hit by a missile I would say the military did its job <quoted text>
If the decision was made to shoot down the plane, the families of the victims and the American people deserve to know the truth.
Charlie Sheen

Waxhaw, NC

#267524 Mar 25, 2014
-Web wrote:
<quoted text>
If the decision was made to shoot down the plane, the families of the victims and the American people deserve to know the truth.
To prove the Government was trying to stop 9-11.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 2 min Pastor Catcher 47,860
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 49 min truth 646,325
White women leaving their white families in dro... (Aug '09) 53 min Johnny 326
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 56 min Annaleigh 105,574
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 1 hr WasteWater 2,012
Poll White Men, Would You Have A BABY by a Black Woman (Apr '10) 1 hr Breedu 493
jb bohsia yg terbesar (Sep '08) 1 hr Jawaking 43
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr VIKING 971,567
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 7 hr oneear69 38,711
More from around the web