Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#266423 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
What is pancake speed?
It is the time it takes to pancake floor by floor.
The resistance of each floor would slow the fall.
Some experts say it would take as long as 96 seconds for a real pancake for the north tower.
At my former workplace a (metal stock) rack pancaked but it didn't come straight down and the vertical beams remained standing, and the person who was under it saw it coming and had time to escape death. He ran half way across the plant before he stopped and looked back. It wasn't one big boom, it was a loud calamity that seemd like (at the moment) it was never going to end.
Aside from the fact that you're dumb as a bloody stump, have you figured out yet that the final conclusion did not involve "pancake collapse" so your entire shtick is about as useless as the logical fallacy generating mush enclosed inside the pumpkin that sits atop your shoulders.

Oh and,

For those not prone to heavy drooling,

http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/



http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphy...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eag...

http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm

http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king...

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page

http://11-settembre.blogspot.ca/2007/04/engli...

http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php...

http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2012/...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#266424 Mar 6, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
I had the crab souffle this morning! Delicious. None of that bad tasting irony pigboy is so fond of.

Huh Eh !
That's funny given that you're always gorging on bullshit then regurgitating it here.

Oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!
Toms Child Bride

Lincoln, NE

#266425 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
At my former workplace a (metal stock) rack pancaked but it didn't come straight down and the vertical beams remained standing, and the person who was under it saw it coming and had time to escape death. He ran half way across the plant before he stopped and looked back. It wasn't one big boom, it was a loud calamity that seemd like (at the moment) it was never going to end.
WOW MOMMY DIDLER, Dat is some sitntifcical thinkin' was it built just like the WTC?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266426 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
Commissioned and Non-commissioned Officers in the U.S. military for 9/11 Truth.
http://www.mo911truth.org/
It would be quicker to just type "Appeal To Authority" five times a day.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266427 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>I
I assume you do know I didn't write the article???
Out of the 24 facts you pick only one to ponder on.
The rest you call debunked because you disagree.
False MOMMY DIDDLER, Pick one or spin your son around and pick the one his wang points to, OR ARE YOU A CHICKEN MOMMY'S BOY!(Don't answer the second part)
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266428 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're going to crash land a jet like a missle, altitude would not be a factor.
Yea, Actually it would, you can only dive so fast or the wings come off, not to mention lining up for an much easier approach insuring successes.

I though even people would loved their mom in that very special way knew this.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266429 Mar 6, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, Actually it would, you can only dive so fast or the wings come off, not to mention lining up for an much easier approach insuring successes.
I though even people would loved their mom in that very special way knew this.
You are the one who believes a 757 can run over 500 mph at low altitudes, when numerous airline pilots say it is impossible.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266430 Mar 6, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
False MOMMY DIDDLER, Pick one or spin your son around and pick the one his wang points to, OR ARE YOU A CHICKEN MOMMY'S BOY!(Don't answer the second part)
When nothing worth saying about the post, you always return to your childish ridicule. Who do you think you are fooling?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266431 Mar 6, 2014
Toms Child Bride wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW MOMMY DIDLER, Dat is some sitntifcical thinkin' was it built just like the WTC?
That wasn't the point, it was meant for an example of the resistance involved in a real pancake. But go ahead and believe in fabricated computer simulations like the rest of the dwunkers..

“Wrath”

Since: Dec 10

Is revenant

#266432 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one who believes a 757 can run over 500 mph at low altitudes, when numerous airline pilots say it is impossible.
If you don't think 200,000 lbs driven by 80,000 lbs thrust can't descend at over 500 mph you are dumber than dirt. It has a cruise speed of 80% the speed of sound, that means it could well exceed the speed of sound in a dive, so a well under sub sonic speed would be easily attainable.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266433 Mar 6, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
As Commissioned and Non-commissioned Officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force. Therefore it is not just our responsibility as citizens, it is our duty as officers to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us.
We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed.
It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes.
It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies and military actions resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.
We join with others, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Veterans for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, and Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and millions of individual citizens in demanding a thorough, impartial, open and transparent reinvestigation of the terrorist acts of 9/11.
Numbers are not important. The mere fact that some military officers and other educated people are aware that the official Bush Administration's story of 9/11 is total hogwash and dare to speak up and question the party line is significant. Despite what pigboy says in dismissal of these brave men and women and their search for the TRUTH of 9/11.
http://www.mo911truth.org/
How bout it pigboy what do you have to say?
Uh Huh Eh !
Interesting the dwunkers ignore this one.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266434 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one who believes a 757 can run over 500 mph at low altitudes, when numerous airline pilots say it is impossible.
Any proof of that, LINK or Lie mommy banger.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266435 Mar 6, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Aside from the fact that you're dumb as a bloody stump, have you figured out yet that the final conclusion did not involve "pancake collapse" so your entire shtick is about as useless as the logical fallacy generating mush enclosed inside the pumpkin that sits atop your shoulders.
Oh and,
For those not prone to heavy drooling,
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jC3JgWkNNIQXX
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphy...
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eag...
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writings/911/king...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page
http://11-settembre.blogspot.ca/2007/04/engli...
http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php...
http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2012/...
More govie BS
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266436 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
That wasn't the point, it was meant for an example of the resistance involved in a real pancake.
But it was not a pancake and I agree, apples and oranges, it's irreverent mother didler!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266437 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
When nothing worth saying about the post, you always return to your childish ridicule. Who do you think you are fooling?
You won't pick one of the others for me to debunk, are you scared, just like incest laws frighten you.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#266438 Mar 6, 2014
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>If you don't think 200,000 lbs driven by 80,000 lbs thrust can't descend at over 500 mph you are dumber than dirt. It has a cruise speed of 80% the speed of sound, that means it could well exceed the speed of sound in a dive, so a well under sub sonic speed would be easily attainable.
Technically, if you don't understand how ground effects work on a plane traveling at 500 mph at 10 feet agl, then you are as dumb as the dirt you claim others are.

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266439 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
More govie BS
Any proof of that or is that the level of your debating skills?
onemale wrote:
I consider myself as straight, but let a guy give me a bj and it was the best I ever had. It was a one time thing, he just wanted to know what it was like. No, I did NOT return the favor.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/T7HGJ9UHL...

PS: STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO PICK ONE FROM YOUR LINK SO I CAN DEBUNK IT MOMMY DIDDLER!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266440 Mar 6, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're going to crash land a jet like a missle, altitude would not be a factor.
Thousands of people saw what happened. There are numerous pictures proving their stories to be correct.

You lose. Proves what an ignoramus you are.

BTW I have already posted the links. You are debunked before you even get started.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266441 Mar 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically, if you don't understand how ground effects work on a plane traveling at 500 mph at 10 feet agl, then you are as dumb as the dirt you claim others are.
Insults Are Easier
Debunked long ago.

Guess insults are all you have huh?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266442 Mar 6, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Technically, if you don't understand how ground effects work on a plane traveling at 500 mph at 10 feet agl, then you are as dumb as the dirt you claim others are.
Insults Are Easier
It came in at an angle so it was higher than that till the last second and pilots disagree due to the AFDS!

----

In addition, many modern airliners are not directly flown by the pilot but by automated systems. Most newer aircraft even use fly-by-wire (FBW) systems that take control inputs from the pilot, process them by computer, and automatically make adjustments to the control surfaces to accomplish the pilot's commands. Though the 757 is not equipped with a fully digital FBW system, it does carry a flight management computer system (FMCS), digital air data computer (DADC), and autopilot flight director system (AFDS) that provide sophisticated control laws to govern the plane's control surfaces.

THE AFDS NOT ONLY CONTROLS THE PLANE WHEN THE AUTOPILOT IS ENABLED, BUT BOEING RECOMMENDS THAT THESE COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS ALWAYS BE IN OPERATION TO ADVISE THE PILOTS ON HOW TO BEST FLY THE AIRCRAFT. THE PRIMARY ADVANTAGE OF COMPUTERIZED CONTROL SYSTEMS IS THAT THEY CAN MAKE CORRECTIONS TO AN AIRCRAFT'S FLIGHT PATH AND HELP PREVENT THE PILOT FROM ACCIDENTALLY PUTTING THE PLANE INTO AN UNCONTROLLABLE CONDITION. THE 757'S FLIGHT AUGMENTATION SYSTEM IS ALSO DESIGNED TO DAMP OUT AERODYNAMIC INSTABILITIES, AND COMPUTERIZED CONTROL SYSTEMS OFTEN AUTOMATICALLY ACCOUNT FOR GROUND EFFECT BY MAKING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PLANE'S CONTROL SURFACES TO CANCEL IT OUT.

THESE FACTORS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT GROUND EFFECT COULD NOT HAVE PREVENTED A BOEING 757 FROM STRIKING THE PENTAGON IN THE WAY THAT FLIGHT 77 DID ON SEPTEMBER 11. Nevertheless, we are still left with the claim that the pilot Hanjour flew a suspiciously "perfect" flight path on his approach to the Pentagon despite his lack of skill. It is unclear what has prompted this belief since very few eyewitnesses even describe how well the aircraft flew. The majority instead focus on the impact and aftermath. Even so, those few who did make statements regarding pilot ability indicate that Hanjour flew in a somewhat erratic manner as one would expect.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 6 min Dr Banonator 64,325
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min Just Think 654,273
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 43 min pusherman_ 973,914
does any kids want to be completely naked for 2... 57 min girls united states 3
What color will Taylor Swift's baby be? 1 hr Johnny 4
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 hr X Pendable 183,192
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr Truth Teller 106,580
first gay experience? (Sep '14) 9 hr andy 46
More from around the web