Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,495 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266153 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
A controlled demolition of a high-rise building falls at free fall so it won't tip over, the impact can be felt but no one is injured.
In Russia a house sized meteorite hit the ground injuring 1000 people? It didn't seem to be going so slow.
Terminal velocity does not mean it is going slow, it just means it's speed does not increase unlike your thrusts into your mama.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266154 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So there's no difference between jumping off a 10' cliff to a 1000' cliff the air resistance will slow you down???
LMFO, No it will reach a speed and no longer accelerate mommy diddler!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266155 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
You are right, Your link acknowledges the hijackers!

YOU DEBUNKED ALL YOUR CLAIMS THE HIJACKERS WERE PEOPLE OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL LIST MAMA BANGER, LMAO!

---------

.. raise fresh questions about the role of Saudi government officials in connection to the hijackers.
----

Thompson believes that the possible motive for the Commission to alter the dates is to obscure official Saudi ties to the hijackers.

----

But also important is that it strongly suggests that the hijackers already had a support network in Southern California before they arrived, Thompson continued.

YOUR LINK FATHER OF THE WANG ENTHUSIAST!

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_c...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266156 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
protagonistic nemesis onemale.
Did he ever return the favor?
Space Lizardberg

Lincoln, NE

#266157 Feb 24, 2014
OFF-DUTY COP RESCUES MAN FROM BURNING CAR, A 'CHRISTMAS DAY MIRACLE'

A bomb squad officer on his way to work and two civilians helped PULL A TRAPPED MAN FROM A BURNING STATION WAGON ON THE NORTHBOUND 405 FREEWAY IN SHERMAN OAKS ON WEDNESDAY, SAVING HIS LIFE, AUTHORITIES SAID.

Los Angeles Police Department Officer Don Thompson was southbound on the 405 on his way to work in the LAX area just before 2 p.m. when he saw the station wagon traveling on the northbound side crash into the center divider near the Ventura Boulevard exit, said LAPD spokesman Lt. Andy Neiman.

Thompson pulled over to the center median on the southbound side, jumped over the guardrail, opened the door of the car AND SAW A MAN IN HIS MID-TO-LATE 60S UNCONSCIOUS IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT.

"THE FIRE WAS STARTING TO SPREAD INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT," NEIMAN SAID. "HE WAS ABLE TO CUT THE SEAT BELT WITH HIS KNIFE, PULLED THE GENTLEMAN OUT OF THE VEHICLE, AND TWO CITIZENS WHO ALSO STOPPED CAME UP AND ALSO ASSISTED IN PULLING THE DRIVER FURTHER AWAY FROM THE VEHICLE."

THE CAR WAS FULLY ENGULFED IN FLAMES SHORTLY AFTERWARD.

The driver, who has not been identified, was transported to a hospital with moderate injuries, officials said.

Thompson, who wasn't on duty yet but in uniform, sustained first- and second-degree burns, abrasions to his hands and knees and suffered from smoke inhalation during the rescue. The 26-year department veteran was treated at the scene and then taken to an urgent care facility for his serious injuries.

"NOBODY WOULD HAVE SURVIVED THAT VEHICLE BASED ON WHAT THE (LOS ANGELES) FIRE DEPARTMENT OBSERVED WHEN THEY ARRIVED," Neiman said. "It truly is a Christmas Day miracle. It's the best gift that Officer Thompson and the gentleman in that car could have received that day."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/26/man-...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266158 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
The building took much longer to fall down than what would be considered free fall. For 2.5 seconds a portion did appear to free fall. Is there any point to this? It is a well know fact that the WTC7 fell down due to considerable damage, loading, and irregular construction design.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#266159 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
Is that all you got now that your spin doctors have been exposed.

Im not disputing the NIST,you are

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266162 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Question:
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
<quoted text>
You bwunkers sound like Bill Murray playing a lawyer wearing a cervical collar, talking to a judge about his fictitious accident.
What part of YES or NO don't you understand?
Just answer the question YES or NO. You can even have another default winners trophy to take home and gingerly place on the mantle with all the rest of them you've won.
Uh Huh Eh !
No building fell at free fall speed or even close. That is the claim. Regardless of the source, the free fall claim has already been completely debunked. Are you daft?
onemale

Pana, IL

#266163 Feb 24, 2014
9/11 Foreknowledge Is Indisputable:
If the government knew about it, did nothing to stop it, and helped cover it up and use it for political gain...what other conclusion does that leave except that the government carried it out?





onemale

Pana, IL

#266164 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST says 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration. I say NIST says 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration.
Where is the dispute?
What part of the word "dispute" don't you understand?
Oh I forgot you're the drunken Aussie who lives behind Pub # 42.
Well have another pint on me mate.
Uh Huh Eh !
It's about like trying to give traffic directions to a blind-man.
They dispute the NIST report statements, the very report they believe in.
Pegasus

United States

#266165 Feb 24, 2014
Truthers find a new angle or something the free fall bunk is dead move on to your next ass whipping.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#266168 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is it?
Did a portion of the building fall at free fall acceleration or NOT?
What part of "NOT" do you not understand?
Uh Huh Eh !
What a wasted waste of good water you are!?!?!?!?!?
Uh Huh Eh !
For 105 feet, but what does that mean huh eh? I mean Dr Zoder?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266169 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It's about like trying to give traffic directions to a blind-man.
They dispute the NIST report statements, the very report they believe in.
Not really.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266170 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is it?
Did a portion of the building fall at free fall acceleration or NOT?
What part of "NOT" do you not understand?
Uh Huh Eh !
What a wasted waste of good water you are!?!?!?!?!?
Uh Huh Eh !
No building actually fell down at free fall speed. A portion doesn't count. Besides, in the case of WTC7, that statement only proves the structural failure below the 7th floor. It's already been covered. There was no demolition nor does the statement imply such.
Pegasus

United States

#266171 Feb 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Shut The Fuhk Up ponyboy!
Uh Huh Eh !
That a boy Squirt concede in defeat.

LMAO!!!!!!!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#266172 Feb 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
Of course they "admit" it oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

It's irrelevant since all it really proves is what the report already says, the interior of the building had experienced catastrophic failure leaving the facade unsupported. That can be seen by the failure of both mechanical penthouses.

Has twoof come up with some sort of argument that free fall means cd yet?

Have your charlatan masters shown that known cd's fall at free fall?

Of course not, you as a scientifically illiterate fool just mindlessly regurgitate their idiotic canards because it's all you have.

Good luck with that oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

Oh and btw, it was one spot on the north face in a building that fell 40% slower than free fall over all...wow!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266173 Feb 25, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It's about like trying to give traffic directions to a blind-man.
They dispute the NIST report statements, the very report they believe in.
No one disputes a small portion of WTC7 did not hit resistance for 2.5 seconds, but the rest of the building did for 16 to 18 seconds mommy banger.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266174 Feb 25, 2014
onemale wrote:
9/11 Foreknowledge Is Indisputable:
If the government knew about it, did nothing to stop it, and helped cover it up and use it for political gain...what other conclusion does that leave except that the government carried it out?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WTaU0pfKXWYXX
The junkmale is here!
Jake wrote:
My mom has been giving me oral since I was 16, im now 26
onemale wrote:
You are a lucky little bastard.
Where were moms like that when I was 16?
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TV44BQ17V...
Pegasus

United States

#266175 Feb 25, 2014
That right Zorders lick your wounds and keep the festering wounds from the prior go-around on free.
fall.

You're old enough to know better but still too young to care.

Stick a fork in Twoof.........LOL!!!!!!!!!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266178 Feb 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Some people, who suppose themselves to be both "intelligent" and "rational", dismiss any denial or question of the official story of September 11th as "conspiracy theory".
This not only reveals an absence of (or at least a curious suspension of) thinking ability but also fails to address the fundamental questions: Who planned and carried out the attacks of 9/11? And exactly how did they do it?
Articles on many websites present convincing evidence (to those whose minds are not closed) that what happened on 9/11 (a crime which has never been subjected to a criminal investigation) could not have happened as the Bush administration claims it did.
If so then why should we believe the claim that the operation was planned and carried out by a cabal consisting of a couple of dozen Arabs (armed only with boxcutters)?
Given all the holes in the official story, there is no reason to believe this claim. And if Arabs did not plan and carry out the attacks of 9/11, then who did?
This is the question that those who accept the official story are desperately trying to avoid facing, because to do so threatens their entire set of beliefs about the current nature of American society and the U.S. government.
Faith in the official story is ultimately based on one thing: Fear of the consequences, should it be proven false.
Uh Huh Eh !
Not really. If you were to present something factual with tangible evidence, people would look. So far, nothing you have presented proves anything or disproves what most already know happened.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate 5 min emperorjohn 1,901
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 13 min True Truth 863,674
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 28 min Student 40,844
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 45 min truth 612,887
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 1 hr Halle Berry Sister 2,762
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 hr dollarsbill 6,336
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 1 hr andet1987 6,287
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Tony17 599,312
More from around the web