Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

MUQ

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#266131 Feb 23, 2014
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>Freefall acceleration was discussed and dismissed numerous times already.
But feel free to beat a dead horse .
no evidence, hence no proof so it goes in the land of Twoof.
If people act as blind, what evidence they get?

The fall time itslef is evidence, forget all other things!!
Pegasus

Detroit, MI

#266133 Feb 24, 2014
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
If people act as blind, what evidence they get?
The fall time itslef is evidence, forget all other things!!
We have to discuss some moron Truthers idea that the building free fell.

The only way you could acheive proper free fall acceleration and terminal velocity is for the entire bldg to have been dropped from a calculated height.

What part of that don't you understand?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266135 Feb 24, 2014
FBI Documents Contradict 9/11 Commission Report

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_c...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266136 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right free fall speculation is nonsense.
.
Free fall acceleration is a fact not nonsense.
.
The only reason You think you know what happened is that's what you saw on TV and that's what the MSM told you. You never talked to anyone who was there. Even the people who were there don't really know what happened.
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
Controlled demolition is the most likely cause of all three buildings falling down.
Huh Eh !
There was no actual free fall.

There was no controlled demolition. The fact is, controlled demolition is a highly complicated process. It is also highly invasive. The Trade Towers could not be demolished that way. Prove it if you can. So far you are not even close.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266137 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST says that the bldg was in free fall acceleration for 2.5 seconds. What part of that official govie fact don't you understand?
It's obvious from any video you choose to look at, WTC bldg 7 was standing and then the entire structure started moving down at once. The top floor did not drop onto the second floor, and then those floors dropped onto the next floor. Sure the penthouse dropped and tilted a little as the whole thing started to go down. That could only happen if the supporting structure below that section was suddenly removed.
It basically let go all at the same time. There was no pancaking, no piledriver. Only sudden onset of downward movement.
Huh Eh !
A piece of the building fell after the three trusses failed in building 7. You are correct, the building failed below the seventh floor due to extreme damage caused by the Trade Tower chunk slicing through it and damaging some outer columns. Con Edison transformers also over loaded the structure at the seventh floor. If you did any homework, you would see exactly what happened. Studying the testimony of firemen who were there, and structural analysis reveals what actually happened. Conspiracy Theory films have already been debunked every way to Sunday.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#266138 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooo how do you explain that NIST itself admitted 2.5 seconds of freefall acceleration. They surely didn't use Chandlers suspect papers, they have their own extremely suspect method to falsify whatever suits them.
Oh and by the way every govie report on 9/11 is not even good for toilet paper. They send it down under to the old penal colony for the inmates like you to use on your craggy assholes.
Have another pint mate!
Huh eh !
Its how are you going to explain NIST 2.5 seconds of freefall acceleration now that you know that the evidence you using against the NIST is a deliberately concocted hoax.
Every single truth site that has a WTC 7(bar the nuke,space beam,other yet to be invent weapon twoofers) section uses the backed by A&E Chandler lie.

That's 99.9% of your material

What are you going to do?
Hand wave it away and keep using the same lie.

Ill just pull the Chandler lie card and trump it every time.Thats what the government will do if Richard Gage ever takes time of from selling A&E merchandise and has a investigation.
But we both known he doesn't want that,and we both know why

So here goes
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST itself admitted 2.5 seconds of freefall acceleration
So what,what have you got?

Sites you cant use now as they use the A&Es WTC 7 lie
The new scam site of A&E
Rethink911
http://rethink911.org/evidence/building-7/fre...
and
http://www.ae911truth.org/

This one is going to hurt
infowars
http://www.infowars.com/building-7-implosion-...
911blogger
http://911blogger.com/topics/wtc-7-free-fall
remember building 7
http://rememberbuilding7.org/free-fall-collap...
911 Research
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7...
911truth.org
http://www.911truth.org/two-seconds-that-will...
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266140 Feb 24, 2014
Experts Speak Out
Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/57-news-releas...
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266142 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, False, How can you claim something defies the laws of physics when you don't even understand the basics, Stick to things you know like mama banging.
You don't need any basic physic knowledge to know the farther something falls the faster it will accelerate. That is why meteorites/rocks burn up in the atmosphere because of the rate of acceleration with air resistance becomes so great it gets hot and burns up.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266143 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
FBI Documents Contradict 9/11 Commission Report
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_c...
Retard, Just because your mommy diddling azz never leaves home does not mean others are bedridden.

The following does not mean they were at that address at that time, it only means they likely lived there when they were in town!

"According to the timeline, the two men resided in Apartment 152 at Parkwood Apartments, San Diego, from Jan. 15 through Feb. 2, 2000. "

Epic Mama banging fail!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266144 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't need any basic physic knowledge to know the farther something falls the faster it will accelerate.
Retarded Mommy diddler, the reason why is air resistance from no oxygen to a oxygen rich atmosphere,

The terminal velocity of a falling object is the velocity of the object when the sum of the drag force (Fd) and buoyancy equals the downward force of gravity (FG) acting on the object. The terminal velocity of a falling object is the velocity of the object when the sum of the drag force (Fd) and buoyancy equals the downward force of gravity (FG) acting on the object. SINCE THE NET FORCE ON THE OBJECT IS ZERO, THE OBJECT HAS ZERO ACCELERATION.

As the speed of an object increases, the drag force acting on the object, resultant of the substance (e.g., air or water) it is passing through, increases. At some speed, the drag or force of resistance will equal the gravitational pull on the object (buoyancy is considered below). AT THIS POINT THE OBJECT CEASES TO ACCELERATE AND CONTINUES FALLING AT A CONSTANT SPEED called terminal velocity (also called settling velocity).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocit...

GOOD TO SEE YOU ARE STILL STUPID MOMMY BANGER, THE ENTERTAINMENT VALUE IS HUGE!
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266145 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Retard, Just because your mommy diddling azz never leaves home does not mean others are bedridden.
The following does not mean they were at that address at that time, it only means they likely lived there when they were in town!
"According to the timeline, the two men resided in Apartment 152 at Parkwood Apartments, San Diego, from Jan. 15 through Feb. 2, 2000. "
Epic Mama banging fail!
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266146 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't need any basic physic knowledge to know the farther something falls the faster it will accelerate. That is why meteorites/rocks burn up in the atmosphere because of the rate of acceleration with air resistance becomes so great it gets hot and burns up.
Can a meteorite dropping fireball be observed all the way to impact with the ground?

No. At some point, usually between 15 to 20 km (9-12 miles or 48,000-63,000 feet) altitude, the meteoroid remnants will decelerate to the point that the ablation process stops, and visible light is no longer generated. This occurs at a speed of about 2-4 km/sec (4500-9000 mph).

FROM THAT POINT ONWARD, THE STONES WILL RAPIDLY DECELERATE FURTHER UNTIL THEY ARE FALLING AT THEIR TERMINAL VELOCITY, WHICH WILL GENERALLY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 0.1 AND 0.2 KM/SEC (200 MPH TO 400 MPH). Moving at these rapid speeds, the meteorite(s) will be essentially invisible during this final “dark flight” portion of their fall.

http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/faqf/#12

LOL MOMMY BANGER, IT ACTUALLY SLOWS DOWN DUE TO AIR DRAG,
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't need any basic physic knowledge to know the farther something falls the faster it will accelerate.
I GUESS YOU DO, STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW, LIKE THAT WANG ENTHUSIAST SON OF YOURS, DID YOU KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY AND RETURN THE FAVOR?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266147 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
The fact that if one has a residence that does not mean they are home is exposing ignorance not ignoring it.

Any thoughts on TERMINAL VELOCITY?

Or your Mama?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266148 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can a meteorite dropping fireball be observed all the way to impact with the ground?
No. At some point, usually between 15 to 20 km (9-12 miles or 48,000-63,000 feet) altitude, the meteoroid remnants will decelerate to the point that the ablation process stops, and visible light is no longer generated. This occurs at a speed of about 2-4 km/sec (4500-9000 mph).
FROM THAT POINT ONWARD, THE STONES WILL RAPIDLY DECELERATE FURTHER UNTIL THEY ARE FALLING AT THEIR TERMINAL VELOCITY, WHICH WILL GENERALLY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 0.1 AND 0.2 KM/SEC (200 MPH TO 400 MPH). Moving at these rapid speeds, the meteorite(s) will be essentially invisible during this final “dark flight” portion of their fall.
http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/faqf/#12
LOL MOMMY BANGER, IT ACTUALLY SLOWS DOWN DUE TO AIR DRAG,
<quoted text>
I GUESS YOU DO, STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW, LIKE THAT WANG ENTHUSIAST SON OF YOURS, DID YOU KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY AND RETURN THE FAVOR?
A controlled demolition of a high-rise building falls at free fall so it won't tip over, the impact can be felt but no one is injured.
In Russia a house sized meteorite hit the ground injuring 1000 people? It didn't seem to be going so slow.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266149 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can a meteorite dropping fireball be observed all the way to impact with the ground?
No. At some point, usually between 15 to 20 km (9-12 miles or 48,000-63,000 feet) altitude, the meteoroid remnants will decelerate to the point that the ablation process stops, and visible light is no longer generated. This occurs at a speed of about 2-4 km/sec (4500-9000 mph).
FROM THAT POINT ONWARD, THE STONES WILL RAPIDLY DECELERATE FURTHER UNTIL THEY ARE FALLING AT THEIR TERMINAL VELOCITY, WHICH WILL GENERALLY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 0.1 AND 0.2 KM/SEC (200 MPH TO 400 MPH). Moving at these rapid speeds, the meteorite(s) will be essentially invisible during this final “dark flight” portion of their fall.
http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/faqf/#12
LOL MOMMY BANGER, IT ACTUALLY SLOWS DOWN DUE TO AIR DRAG,
<quoted text>
I GUESS YOU DO, STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW, LIKE THAT WANG ENTHUSIAST SON OF YOURS, DID YOU KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY AND RETURN THE FAVOR?
So there's no difference between jumping off a 10' cliff to a 1000' cliff the air resistance will slow you down???

“Seventh son”

Since: Dec 10

Will Prevail

#266151 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WTC Bldg 7 still endured 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration, no matter what kind of sexual behavior occurs between sorry charlie's autistic sister and his protagonistic nemesis onemale.
Uh Huh Eh !
So what do you think that means? Do you think that it proves CD?
Because then were back to (Hushbooms™) Your favorite!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266153 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
A controlled demolition of a high-rise building falls at free fall so it won't tip over, the impact can be felt but no one is injured.
In Russia a house sized meteorite hit the ground injuring 1000 people? It didn't seem to be going so slow.
Terminal velocity does not mean it is going slow, it just means it's speed does not increase unlike your thrusts into your mama.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266154 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So there's no difference between jumping off a 10' cliff to a 1000' cliff the air resistance will slow you down???
LMFO, No it will reach a speed and no longer accelerate mommy diddler!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266155 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
You are right, Your link acknowledges the hijackers!

YOU DEBUNKED ALL YOUR CLAIMS THE HIJACKERS WERE PEOPLE OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL LIST MAMA BANGER, LMAO!

---------

.. raise fresh questions about the role of Saudi government officials in connection to the hijackers.
----

Thompson believes that the possible motive for the Commission to alter the dates is to obscure official Saudi ties to the hijackers.

----

But also important is that it strongly suggests that the hijackers already had a support network in Southern California before they arrived, Thompson continued.

YOUR LINK FATHER OF THE WANG ENTHUSIAST!

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_c...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266156 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
protagonistic nemesis onemale.
Did he ever return the favor?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 3 min River Tam 48,396
Play "end of the word" part 2 (Dec '15) 4 min KellyP_Onuandher 2,030
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Rosa_Winkel 971,624
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 20 min Toby 105,571
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 42 min Frank Merton 445,709
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 51 min guest 646,497
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 1 hr Voyeur 38,749
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 9 hr Freebird USA 182,639
More from around the web