Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266147 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
The fact that if one has a residence that does not mean they are home is exposing ignorance not ignoring it.

Any thoughts on TERMINAL VELOCITY?

Or your Mama?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266148 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can a meteorite dropping fireball be observed all the way to impact with the ground?
No. At some point, usually between 15 to 20 km (9-12 miles or 48,000-63,000 feet) altitude, the meteoroid remnants will decelerate to the point that the ablation process stops, and visible light is no longer generated. This occurs at a speed of about 2-4 km/sec (4500-9000 mph).
FROM THAT POINT ONWARD, THE STONES WILL RAPIDLY DECELERATE FURTHER UNTIL THEY ARE FALLING AT THEIR TERMINAL VELOCITY, WHICH WILL GENERALLY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 0.1 AND 0.2 KM/SEC (200 MPH TO 400 MPH). Moving at these rapid speeds, the meteorite(s) will be essentially invisible during this final “dark flight” portion of their fall.
http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/faqf/#12
LOL MOMMY BANGER, IT ACTUALLY SLOWS DOWN DUE TO AIR DRAG,
<quoted text>
I GUESS YOU DO, STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW, LIKE THAT WANG ENTHUSIAST SON OF YOURS, DID YOU KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY AND RETURN THE FAVOR?
A controlled demolition of a high-rise building falls at free fall so it won't tip over, the impact can be felt but no one is injured.
In Russia a house sized meteorite hit the ground injuring 1000 people? It didn't seem to be going so slow.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266149 Feb 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can a meteorite dropping fireball be observed all the way to impact with the ground?
No. At some point, usually between 15 to 20 km (9-12 miles or 48,000-63,000 feet) altitude, the meteoroid remnants will decelerate to the point that the ablation process stops, and visible light is no longer generated. This occurs at a speed of about 2-4 km/sec (4500-9000 mph).
FROM THAT POINT ONWARD, THE STONES WILL RAPIDLY DECELERATE FURTHER UNTIL THEY ARE FALLING AT THEIR TERMINAL VELOCITY, WHICH WILL GENERALLY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 0.1 AND 0.2 KM/SEC (200 MPH TO 400 MPH). Moving at these rapid speeds, the meteorite(s) will be essentially invisible during this final “dark flight” portion of their fall.
http://www.amsmeteors.org/fireballs/faqf/#12
LOL MOMMY BANGER, IT ACTUALLY SLOWS DOWN DUE TO AIR DRAG,
<quoted text>
I GUESS YOU DO, STICK TO THINGS YOU KNOW, LIKE THAT WANG ENTHUSIAST SON OF YOURS, DID YOU KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY AND RETURN THE FAVOR?
So there's no difference between jumping off a 10' cliff to a 1000' cliff the air resistance will slow you down???

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#266151 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
WTC Bldg 7 still endured 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration, no matter what kind of sexual behavior occurs between sorry charlie's autistic sister and his protagonistic nemesis onemale.
Uh Huh Eh !
So what do you think that means? Do you think that it proves CD?
Because then were back to (Hushbooms™) Your favorite!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266153 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
A controlled demolition of a high-rise building falls at free fall so it won't tip over, the impact can be felt but no one is injured.
In Russia a house sized meteorite hit the ground injuring 1000 people? It didn't seem to be going so slow.
Terminal velocity does not mean it is going slow, it just means it's speed does not increase unlike your thrusts into your mama.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266154 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So there's no difference between jumping off a 10' cliff to a 1000' cliff the air resistance will slow you down???
LMFO, No it will reach a speed and no longer accelerate mommy diddler!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266155 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you pick and one little thing and ignore everything else.
You are right, Your link acknowledges the hijackers!

YOU DEBUNKED ALL YOUR CLAIMS THE HIJACKERS WERE PEOPLE OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL LIST MAMA BANGER, LMAO!

---------

.. raise fresh questions about the role of Saudi government officials in connection to the hijackers.
----

Thompson believes that the possible motive for the Commission to alter the dates is to obscure official Saudi ties to the hijackers.

----

But also important is that it strongly suggests that the hijackers already had a support network in Southern California before they arrived, Thompson continued.

YOUR LINK FATHER OF THE WANG ENTHUSIAST!

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/FBI_documents_c...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#266156 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
protagonistic nemesis onemale.
Did he ever return the favor?
Space Lizardberg

Lincoln, NE

#266157 Feb 24, 2014
OFF-DUTY COP RESCUES MAN FROM BURNING CAR, A 'CHRISTMAS DAY MIRACLE'

A bomb squad officer on his way to work and two civilians helped PULL A TRAPPED MAN FROM A BURNING STATION WAGON ON THE NORTHBOUND 405 FREEWAY IN SHERMAN OAKS ON WEDNESDAY, SAVING HIS LIFE, AUTHORITIES SAID.

Los Angeles Police Department Officer Don Thompson was southbound on the 405 on his way to work in the LAX area just before 2 p.m. when he saw the station wagon traveling on the northbound side crash into the center divider near the Ventura Boulevard exit, said LAPD spokesman Lt. Andy Neiman.

Thompson pulled over to the center median on the southbound side, jumped over the guardrail, opened the door of the car AND SAW A MAN IN HIS MID-TO-LATE 60S UNCONSCIOUS IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT.

"THE FIRE WAS STARTING TO SPREAD INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT," NEIMAN SAID. "HE WAS ABLE TO CUT THE SEAT BELT WITH HIS KNIFE, PULLED THE GENTLEMAN OUT OF THE VEHICLE, AND TWO CITIZENS WHO ALSO STOPPED CAME UP AND ALSO ASSISTED IN PULLING THE DRIVER FURTHER AWAY FROM THE VEHICLE."

THE CAR WAS FULLY ENGULFED IN FLAMES SHORTLY AFTERWARD.

The driver, who has not been identified, was transported to a hospital with moderate injuries, officials said.

Thompson, who wasn't on duty yet but in uniform, sustained first- and second-degree burns, abrasions to his hands and knees and suffered from smoke inhalation during the rescue. The 26-year department veteran was treated at the scene and then taken to an urgent care facility for his serious injuries.

"NOBODY WOULD HAVE SURVIVED THAT VEHICLE BASED ON WHAT THE (LOS ANGELES) FIRE DEPARTMENT OBSERVED WHEN THEY ARRIVED," Neiman said. "It truly is a Christmas Day miracle. It's the best gift that Officer Thompson and the gentleman in that car could have received that day."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/26/man-...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266158 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
The building took much longer to fall down than what would be considered free fall. For 2.5 seconds a portion did appear to free fall. Is there any point to this? It is a well know fact that the WTC7 fell down due to considerable damage, loading, and irregular construction design.

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#266159 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
Is that all you got now that your spin doctors have been exposed.

Im not disputing the NIST,you are

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266162 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Question:
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
<quoted text>
You bwunkers sound like Bill Murray playing a lawyer wearing a cervical collar, talking to a judge about his fictitious accident.
What part of YES or NO don't you understand?
Just answer the question YES or NO. You can even have another default winners trophy to take home and gingerly place on the mantle with all the rest of them you've won.
Uh Huh Eh !
No building fell at free fall speed or even close. That is the claim. Regardless of the source, the free fall claim has already been completely debunked. Are you daft?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266163 Feb 24, 2014
9/11 Foreknowledge Is Indisputable:
If the government knew about it, did nothing to stop it, and helped cover it up and use it for political gain...what other conclusion does that leave except that the government carried it out?





onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#266164 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST says 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration. I say NIST says 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration.
Where is the dispute?
What part of the word "dispute" don't you understand?
Oh I forgot you're the drunken Aussie who lives behind Pub # 42.
Well have another pint on me mate.
Uh Huh Eh !
It's about like trying to give traffic directions to a blind-man.
They dispute the NIST report statements, the very report they believe in.
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#266165 Feb 24, 2014
Truthers find a new angle or something the free fall bunk is dead move on to your next ass whipping.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#266168 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is it?
Did a portion of the building fall at free fall acceleration or NOT?
What part of "NOT" do you not understand?
Uh Huh Eh !
What a wasted waste of good water you are!?!?!?!?!?
Uh Huh Eh !
For 105 feet, but what does that mean huh eh? I mean Dr Zoder?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266169 Feb 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It's about like trying to give traffic directions to a blind-man.
They dispute the NIST report statements, the very report they believe in.
Not really.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#266170 Feb 24, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So what is it?
Did a portion of the building fall at free fall acceleration or NOT?
What part of "NOT" do you not understand?
Uh Huh Eh !
What a wasted waste of good water you are!?!?!?!?!?
Uh Huh Eh !
No building actually fell down at free fall speed. A portion doesn't count. Besides, in the case of WTC7, that statement only proves the structural failure below the 7th floor. It's already been covered. There was no demolition nor does the statement imply such.
Pegasus

United States

#266171 Feb 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Shut The Fuhk Up ponyboy!
Uh Huh Eh !
That a boy Squirt concede in defeat.

LMAO!!!!!!!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#266172 Feb 25, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Did NIST admit 2.5 seconds of free fall acceleration respective to bldg 7 ?
YES
or
NO
Pick one.
Uh Huh Eh !
Of course they "admit" it oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

It's irrelevant since all it really proves is what the report already says, the interior of the building had experienced catastrophic failure leaving the facade unsupported. That can be seen by the failure of both mechanical penthouses.

Has twoof come up with some sort of argument that free fall means cd yet?

Have your charlatan masters shown that known cd's fall at free fall?

Of course not, you as a scientifically illiterate fool just mindlessly regurgitate their idiotic canards because it's all you have.

Good luck with that oh elevator boy-sheep-DNA 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

Oh and btw, it was one spot on the north face in a building that fell 40% slower than free fall over all...wow!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Michael 695,343
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 5 min Understanding 200 59,128
Enough is Enough. Jehovahs Witnesses is a incid... (Oct '15) 1 hr No Soliciting 3
MESSAGE to Adam Lanza IN HELL 1 hr How Do You Know 14
Fischbach army depot-NATO site 67 (Mar '07) 2 hr John B 472
1z0-808 Real Exam Dumps 2 hr jhoniliver 1
1z0-808 Dumps Questions 2 hr addison 1
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 hr Feb 2018 994,022
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 6 hr youareaperv 446,240
More from around the web