Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#265685 Feb 13, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing rational about a smear campaign, dingy.
Insults Are Easier
If you think that list is valid you are F%&^ing stupid.
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#265687 Feb 13, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So thats your great debate, huh?
You fit in well with the government worship cult of childishness.
Insults Are Easier
That was not a debate, just a proven fact.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#265688 Feb 13, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
All BS: Pick one of the 24 and I will debunk it dirty diddler.
Man can you quit calling people diddlers its freaky.
You pick one there are 24 to choose from.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#265689 Feb 13, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Explosive Evidence:
http://911expertsspeakout.org/the_trailer.htm...
Pure unsubstantiated opinions.

You buy that garbage?

ROTFLMAO Doesn't wash with reality.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#265690 Feb 13, 2014
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So thats your great debate, huh?
You fit in well with the government worship cult of childishness.
Insults Are Easier
Is that what you think repeating the same horseshit endlessly is?

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#265691 Feb 13, 2014
To debunk the thermite theory, one must first understand the evidence for it and then show how all of that evidence is either mistaken or explained by other phenomena.

Here are the top ten categories of evidence for thermite at the WTC.

Molten metal: There are numerous photographs and eyewitness testimonies to the presence of molten metal at the WTC, both in the buildings and in the rubble

No legitimate explanation has been provided for this evidence other than the exothermic reaction of thermite, which produces the temperatures required and molten iron as a product.

The fires at Ground Zero could not be put out for several months. Despite the application of millions of gallons of water to the pile, several rainfall events at the site, and the use of a chemical fire suppressant, the fires would not subside.

Thermal images produced by satellite showed that the temperatures in the pile were far above that expected in the debris from a typical structure fire.

Only thermite, which contains its own oxidant and therefore cannot be extinguished by smothering it, can explain this evidence.

Numerous eyewitnesses who were fleeing the area described the air mass as a hot wind filled with burning particles.

[1] This evidence agrees with the presence of large quantities of thermite byproducts in the air, including hot metallic microspheres and still-reacting agglomerates of thermite.

snipped-

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#265692 Feb 13, 2014
Interesting~ Sorry about this being so long.

Numerous vehicles were scorched or set on fire in the area.

Photographic evidence shows that cars parked within the lower-level garage areas of the WTC complex burned as if impacted by a super-hot wind like that described by the eyewitnesses.

All non-metallic parts of the cars, including the plastic, rubber, and glass, were completely burned off by a hot blast.

There was a distinct “white smoke” present—clearly different from smoke produce by a normal structural fire—as indicated by eyewitnesses and photographic evidence.

[2] The second major product of the thermite reactions is aluminum oxide, which is emitted as a white solid shortly after reaction.

Peer-reviewed, scientific research confirmed the presence of extremely high temperatures at the WTC.

The high temperatures were evidenced by metallic and other microspheres, along with evaporated metals and silicates.

These findings were confirmed by 9/11 investigators and by scientists at an independent company and at the United States Geologic Survey.

The elemental composition of the metallic microspheres from the WTC dust matches that of metallic microspheres produced by the thermite reaction.

The environmental data collected at Ground Zero in the months following 9/11 indicate that violent incendiary fires, like those produced by thermite, occurred on specific dates.

Peer-reviewed scientific analysis of these data show that the components of thermite spiked to extraordinary levels on specific dates in both the air and aerosol emissions at Ground Zero.

Carbon nanotubes have been found in the WTC dust and in the lungs of 9/11 first responders.

Formation of carbon nanotubes requires extremely high temperatures, specific metal catalysts, and carbon compounds exactly like those found in nanothermite formulations.

Researchers have discovered that nanothermite produces the same kinds of carbon nanotubes.

That finding has been confirmed by independent analysis in a commercial contract laboratory.

A peer-reviewed scientific publication has identified the presence of nanothermite in the WTC dust.

One of the critical aspects of that paper has been confirmed by an independent scientist.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#265694 Feb 13, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Building 7 footage you might Not have seen before. Note the synchronized explosions on every floor as pointed out in the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =kqG6v7KZ_s8XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Bwunkers need not comment, this isn't meant for you. No one cares what you think.
Huh Eh !
So were back to hush booms now Dr. Goofus?

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#265695 Feb 13, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Building 7 footage you might Not have seen before. Note the synchronized explosions on every floor as pointed out in the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =kqG6v7KZ_s8XX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Bwunkers need not comment, this isn't meant for you. No one cares what you think.
Huh Eh !
Thanks for posting I am shocked Larry Silverstein said in the video the building had to be pulled I am going to watch the video again in slow mo because it looks like the explosions ripple down.

Have you seen this the video is about burning buildings at the 4:15 mark it shows an interesting building collapse.
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#265697 Feb 13, 2014
-Web wrote:
The environmental data collected at Ground Zero in the months following 9/11 indicate that violent incendiary fires, like those produced by thermite, occurred on specific dates.
Thermite burns of in minutes, so what kept the metal molten, Onedidler, was it put in a Thermos?
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#265698 Feb 13, 2014
-Web wrote:
<quoted text>
Man can you quit calling people diddlers its freaky.
You pick one there are 24 to choose from.
Sure Diddler

From your link:

3) The total collapse of WTC 7 in 6.5 seconds at free fall acceleration (NIST admits 2.25 seconds).

----------

Wrong, 16 to 18 seconds!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#265699 Feb 13, 2014
Twoof: Recycling stupid since September 12 2001.

Thermite has been so debunked its a wonder ever bottom of the barrel twoofers still shill it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#265701 Feb 13, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>Sure Diddler

From your link:

3) The total collapse of WTC 7 in 6.5 seconds at free fall acceleration (NIST admits 2.25 seconds).

----------

Wrong, 16 to 18 seconds!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =G86yuunRBIwXX
Aren't twoofers just so adept at verifying the claims they shill?

What's funny is the lies on that list have been debunked for many years yet idiots still swallow them whole.

Twoof: A lie that can only be defended by telling more lies and told by miscreants and liars.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#265702 Feb 13, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Way to contribute to the thread mythos delirious. You're not so good at doing what you're told either.
Huh Eh !
The only nerf on my bat, is the cushiony shock adsorbing grip.
The rest is space aged memory shaped metal and a solid hardened scientific stainless steel core. Near indestructible and perfect for smashing twoofer zombie cultist brainless heads.
heheheh



Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#265703 Feb 13, 2014
-Web wrote:
To debunk the thermite theory, one must first understand the evidence for it and then show how all of that evidence is either mistaken or explained by other phenomena.
Here are the top ten categories of evidence for thermite at the WTC.
Molten metal: There are numerous photographs and eyewitness testimonies to the presence of molten metal at the WTC, both in the buildings and in the rubble
No legitimate explanation has been provided for this evidence other than the exothermic reaction of thermite, which produces the temperatures required and molten iron as a product.
The fires at Ground Zero could not be put out for several months. Despite the application of millions of gallons of water to the pile, several rainfall events at the site, and the use of a chemical fire suppressant, the fires would not subside.
Thermal images produced by satellite showed that the temperatures in the pile were far above that expected in the debris from a typical structure fire.
Only thermite, which contains its own oxidant and therefore cannot be extinguished by smothering it, can explain this evidence.
Numerous eyewitnesses who were fleeing the area described the air mass as a hot wind filled with burning particles.
[1] This evidence agrees with the presence of large quantities of thermite byproducts in the air, including hot metallic microspheres and still-reacting agglomerates of thermite.
snipped-
There is no evidence of thermite. That is all nonsense. The fires were hot and there was all kinds of metal which could have been melted.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#265704 Feb 13, 2014
Prove the metal was iron. I dare you.

Here is a table of various metals and the melting points.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-tem...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#265705 Feb 13, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't twoofers just so adept at verifying the claims they shill?
What's funny is the lies on that list have been debunked for many years yet idiots still swallow them whole.
Twoof: A lie that can only be defended by telling more lies and told by miscreants and liars.
Yup, 24 four claims in that link, all debunked long ago, it even claims that the so called evidence of Thermite was peer reviewed.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#265706 Feb 13, 2014
WasteWater wrote:
Prove the metal was iron. I dare you.
Here is a table of various metals and the melting points.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-tem...

You mean besides the fact no iron ingot was found?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#265707 Feb 13, 2014
Images for 9/11 thermite evidence

https://www.google.com/search...
Charlie Sheen

Matthews, NC

#265708 Feb 13, 2014
onemale wrote:
Images for 9/11 thermite evidence
https://www.google.com/search...
Timesten style links to a search!

LMFAO!

PS: The first few pictures that show are the famous angle cut beams, the ones where others pictures show a worker cutting the beams with a torch.

Logic is not your forte, stick with what you know, such as diddling your mama.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min Riverside Rednek 46,649
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 min Exposing Devil Lies 990,681
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 16 min Exposing Devil Lies 422
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 25 min Just Think 692,033
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 33 min Classic 4,411
Skype sex? (Feb '15) 10 hr willthis23 24
Is Steve Harvey's 'Family Fued' racially biased?? (Oct '13) 14 hr debi0117 12
More from around the web