Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264867 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You let the wang inspector serve under the NWO, you know, the commander and chief being selected by the Illuminati and all.
It's miserable bast__ds like you who makes themselves feel better by cutting people down to your lowlife level. Like the saying, misery likes company.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264868 Jan 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah by a sufficient amount. according to this poll, by a factor of over 3.5 to 1
LMFAO, Racist Diddler, you don't even know what a scientific poll is!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264869 Jan 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It's miserable bast__ds like you who makes themselves feel better by cutting people down to your lowlife level. Like the saying, misery likes company.
Are you crying you incest freak?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264870 Jan 24, 2014
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>
They called him....."Bob".......
I wonder whats next for Onefool.......cross dressing forums?
I bet youngmale had a friend name Neil, Neil and Bob, that's their names and that's what they like to do.
who

Reading, UK

#264871 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
So the fire investigators are lying? God, Is everyone in the world in on this?
The fact is the Churchill Plaza building suffered zero structural damage.
Now you claim that this is because there was more air circulating around the fire which rendered it a "cool fire".
So I'll ask you this Charles......did the fire in WTC7 burn vastly hotter than the fire in Churchill Plaza because it had less oxygen?
And do blacksmiths use bellows to increase or decrease the intensity of the fires heat?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264872 Jan 24, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is the Churchill Plaza building suffered zero structural damage.
Now you claim that this is because there was more air circulating around the fire which rendered it a "cool fire".
No, The fire inspectors said that, not me, and it was limited to a few floors, and how long did it burn? Are the UK FD in on it too?

Does this look like two floors?

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/WTC7_Sm...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264873 Jan 24, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact is the Churchill Plaza building suffered zero structural damage.
False, The floor had stared to separate from the beams, it was a matter of time unless the fires were put out, unless you are calling the inspectors liars!

In places, the dovetail steel decking showed some signs of debonding from the concrete floor slab. This had also been observed in the Broadgate fire.

The fire was believed to be comparatively `cool' because the failed glazing allowed a cross wind to increase the ventilation. The protected connections showed no deformation.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#264874 Jan 24, 2014
who wrote:
I'd like to talk about the Churchill Plaza fire and the fact that despite the obvious comparisons there were two polar opposites in terms of the results.
One collapsed like a pack of cards while the other had no structural damage of note.
Two office fires....two polar outcomes.
Here are some pictures.
http://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/wp-con...
http://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/wp-con...
Here's part of the text that goes with those pictures,

"In summary, where the steel frame was fire protected, it survived a complete burnout. Where the columns were not protected, they collapsed, together with some internal concrete columns. This supports evidence from a number of major fires, including the Churchill Plaza fire in Basingstoke, where a protected steel frame survived complete burnout on two floors with little or no structural damage. It also supports the results of the steel construction sectors’ own tests."

http://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/steel-...

Looking at pictures and making generalizations that don't apply in the real world isn't going to make much of an impact away from forums like this.

Try discussing "why" one building will fail and why one doesn't with some engineers.
who

Reading, UK

#264875 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
No, The fire inspectors said that, not me, and it was limited to a few floors, and how long did it burn? Are the UK FD in on it too?
Does this look like two floors?
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/WTC7_Sm...
It burned for around 4 hours..and your link doesn't work.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264876 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you crying you incest freak?
I like the way you always prove my case.
who

Reading, UK

#264877 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
False, The floor had stared to separate from the beams, it was a matter of time unless the fires were put out, unless you are calling the inspectors liars!
In places, the dovetail steel decking showed some signs of debonding from the concrete floor slab. This had also been observed in the Broadgate fire.
The fire was believed to be comparatively `cool' because the failed glazing allowed a cross wind to increase the ventilation. The protected connections showed no deformation.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2
That link is has nothing to do with it either.
Are you really suggesting that the cross wind cooled the fire?
Post the link you're quoting.
who

Reading, UK

#264878 Jan 24, 2014
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's part of the text that goes with those pictures,
"In summary, where the steel frame was fire protected, it survived a complete burnout. Where the columns were not protected, they collapsed, together with some internal concrete columns. This supports evidence from a number of major fires, including the Churchill Plaza fire in Basingstoke, where a protected steel frame survived complete burnout on two floors with little or no structural damage. It also supports the results of the steel construction sectors’ own tests."
http://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/steel-...
Looking at pictures and making generalizations that don't apply in the real world isn't going to make much of an impact away from forums like this.
Try discussing "why" one building will fail and why one doesn't with some engineers.
The building survived a four hour fire with complete burnout on two floors with minimal structural damage, WTC 7 did this.


If you're ever in the US, stay out of high rise buildings....they're friggin death traps.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264879 Jan 24, 2014
Sorry Charlie Boy and his gang, but over 2000 experts agree no highrise steel framed building has ever completely collapsed due to fire, but on 9/11 THREE did what had never happened in history. And the building you are debating didn't completely collapse either.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264880 Jan 24, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
It burned for around 4 hours..and your link doesn't work.
His link didn't work?
What else is new?
who

Reading, UK

#264881 Jan 24, 2014
Anyway I can't be arsed with you Muppets tonight...it's Friday, and you know what ole who gets up to on a Friday night.

I'll get back to you tomorrow.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264882 Jan 24, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LMFAO, Racist Diddler, you don't even know what a scientific poll is!
Scientific Poll?
Explain that one.
When you start losing you hide behind something you know nothing about.
According to you, the 2000 experts knows nothing about science... goes to show what you don't know. I'll admit I know very little about science, but smart enough to listen to the experts, not an insulting crackpot like you. Stick with insults it's all you are capable of.

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264883 Jan 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I like the way you always prove my case.
That you are a freak?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264884 Jan 24, 2014
onemale wrote:
Sorry Charlie Boy and his gang, but over 2000 experts agree no highrise steel framed building has ever completely collapsed due to fire, but on 9/11 THREE did what had never happened in history. And the building you are debating didn't completely collapse either.
But Diddling Father, You said they were all wrong and that Judy Wood was right!
onemale wrote:
DR. JUDY WOOD IS AN ENGINEER WHO IS ENDING ALL SPECULATION OF 9/11
Her credentals:
* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.
This is a very long clip but well worth the view.
IF YOUR WILLING TO LISTEN TO THE SAME 911 STORY FOR OVER A DECADE, YOU SHOULD BE WILLING TO HEAR ALL NEW EVIDENCE BACKED UP BY A 500 PAGE BOOK THAT HAS NEVER BEEN CHALLENGED OR REDACTED . THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU SHE IS THE REAL DEAL AND IS A TRUE PATRIOT WHO IS DEMONIZED BUT NEVER DISCUSSED BY 9/11 COMMUNITY, BUT I CAN ASSURE YOU THOSE DAYS ARE LIMITED.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sRlYwyqDA3YXX
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264885 Jan 24, 2014
Shocking Gun Control History Lesson
This is very hard to watch, but it is real life history, and a must see:

To understand your past is to see your future. I plead with you to watch this video, understand that the history that you'll see shows you the future of what our nation could be, but only if we allow it.

This is a wake-up call, and most people do not understand the full implications that gun control could entail. As always... it's the train you don't see is the one that kills you.





Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264886 Jan 24, 2014
who wrote:
<quoted text>
The building survived a four hour fire with complete burnout on two floors with minimal structural damage, WTC 7 did this.
.
And it was a cool fire, While WTC7 was not limited to 2 floors or four hours, not even close.

Does this look like 2 floors, I know it's a leap but all fires are not the same, at least in the US.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/uploads/ats27...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 min Sojurner D Truth 26,282
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min RCC sikfux 2BurnL... 685,768
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 min Gabriel 985,703
News Gov. Abbott suggests 'bathroom bill' is likely ... 1 hr nanoanomaly 5
David Duke: "We're going to take our country ba... 4 hr Doctor REALITY 58
to Maria Chapelle-Nadal: it's time to ROLL, sista' 5 hr Doctor REALITY 1
I hate Haiti (Jan '10) 6 hr Anne Nonymiss 109
More from around the web