Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264346 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And steel isn't fire resistant?
I made a woodburning stove that lasted for around 30 years.
LMFAO, Are you really that stupid, your stove was made and formed through fire, fire made it soft and mailable, ALL FIRES DO NOT BURN AT THE SAME TEMP RACIST DIDDLER,, sorry, that concept mey be way over your head.!
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#264347 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you are assigning a quality to a whole race via color of skin RACIST DIDLER!
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
And yet another strike against him.....a Truther, racist, and pervert.......wonderful....rea l friggin wonderful.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264348 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You have been out-dealt by 4 facts to one opinion.
NIST's spokesman clearly debunked your ass when he said,“WTC 7 collapsed primarily due to fire”
Do you know what the word "primarily" by fire means? That was the main reason, if none of the towers burned, even with structural damage, none likely would have fallen.The fires clearly initiated all three collapses since they did not fall on impact.

And on WTC7, if there was no DEBRIS from WTC1 it would not have fell, for the Racist Diddling impaired I shall repeat a line below.

"BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse"

THE NIST RACIST DIDDLER!

21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?

The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—SEVERING SEVEN EXTERIOR COLUMNS—BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. THE DEBRIS IMPACT DAMAGE DID PLAY A SECONDARY ROLE IN THE LAST STAGES OF THE COLLAPSE SEQUENCE, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264349 Jan 4, 2014
Yea, Typical low life uneducated loser who appears to pimp out his daughters for his own jollies.

onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Every black guy wants to knock-up a white girl.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
onemale wrote:
I made it very clear to my kids at a very early age: THERE WILL BE BLACK BOYFRIENDS!!!
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...

SO DIDDLER, We know your views on incest, did you participate or just watch?
MUQ

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#264350 Jan 4, 2014
Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11(Part-9)

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports

Gregg Roberts and Staff

46. Deceptive presentation further damaged FEMA’s credibility. Tom Lackey, who designs bridges for the Vermont Agency of Transportation, cites the Minneapolis Bridge collapse study as the “kind of analysis and straightforward explanation” the WTC needs.

47. FEMA’s reports stack up poorly. Some of its graphics “omit the cores altogether,” says Scott, and some depict columns half as wide and twice as far apart as they actually were. Scott decries “attempts to distort important technical information.” The Australians use more colorful terminology: Mason says we have been “taken for suckers;” Genitsaris says we’ve been “stooged.”

Truncated and Fudged Computer Model Undermines NIST Report (2005)

48. NIST’ s $20 million report is generally believed, by those who haven’t read its 10,000 pages, to explain how fires and plane impacts destroyed the WTC.“The report not only fails to explain why and how the towers completely collapsed,” Brookman points out,“but it states that the collapse became inevitable without any further explanation.”

49. He asks why NIST “considered conservation of energy and momentum principles only up to the moment prior to collapse.” NIST stopped its computerized models before the onset of collapse,” Scott complains.“No work was done to calculate what happened during the failure.

50. Why are we content with this?” Ron Brookman adds:“The complete collapse mechanism ... cannot be ‘omitted for brevity’ in any comprehensive analysis.” NIST’ s claim that a kinetic “attack” exceeded the building’s reserve strength is not supported by any calculations or “by any evidence whatsoever or any serious structural analysis,” states Anders Björkman.

51. While NIST fails to show essential work on central issues, its numerous volumes are packed with distracting trivia. Huebner, whose twenty-five years of structural engineering experience includes forensic investigation of structural collapses, compares NIST’ s effort to a “college paper where you just keep adding [stuffing] to make the paper longer. Lots of pages of nothing! Definitely trying to cover up something.”

52. Brookman asked NIST investigators to explain the “complete pulverization of building materials and contents” and “visibly explosive clouds of dust, ash, and debris.” He received no reply.“I believe in the laws of physics,” wrote Brookman,“and rely on them every day.” NIST ’s reports “seem to require multiple leaps of faith in highly improbable events,” wrote Pasternack.

53. Computer models using NIST ’s best estimates of temperature and damage could not even generate a collapse, Scott points out. They’d “simply adjust the input until the desired outcome is achieved.” NIST probably overestimated core column damage, Scott believes, almost certainly overestimated steel temperatures, and definitely overestimated damage to fire protection.

54. So important an inquiry should “rely on logical deduction, reason and first-principle analysis,” Scott says,“not circular reasoning and adjusting models to get agreement with a preconceived explanation.”
MUQ

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#264351 Jan 4, 2014
All these endless discussions, could be laid to rest, if they re-create 9/11 scene by making a scale model of WTC Towers and see how it falls.

Instead of doing the right thing in the right manner, people are engaged in endless debates about this and that.

The fall cannot be explained by normal analysis, so making a model is obviously the best way.

But it is strange that most US people think that Riddle has been solved and there is no pending issue.

And this is where the Media comes in....they fail to educate the people about the big holes in Govt theory and do not push for testing in on scale models.

If people start this demand, the Govt would have to give in...
Pegasus

Philadelphia, PA

#264352 Jan 5, 2014
MUQ wrote:
All these endless discussions, could be laid to rest, if they re-create 9/11 scene by making a scale model of WTC Towers and see how it falls.
Instead of doing the right thing in the right manner, people are engaged in endless debates about this and that.
The fall cannot be explained by normal analysis, so making a model is obviously the best way.
But it is strange that most US people think that Riddle has been solved and there is no pending issue.

And this is where the Media comes in....they fail to educate the people about the big holes in Govt theory and do not push for testing in on scale models.
If people start this demand, the Govt would have to give in...
Go ahead and make some twin tower scale models in your backyard and get yourself a radio controlled jet (good luck finding a mini-jet engine) right down to the hydraulics, avionics, everything real and scaled.

Make sure you repetitiously say Allah Akbar well above a whisper as you put your scene together and when you fly jets into your models yell ALLAH AKBAR at the top of your lungs so the neighbors will hear you, they'll call the cops and the cops can drop you off at a psych-ward where you should be.
Doctor REALITY

North Little Rock, AR

#264353 Jan 5, 2014
The September 11 attack on the twin towers of New York will go down as the most diabolical, most dastardly acts of evil in human history. 4 REAL.

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#264356 Jan 5, 2014
Doctor REALITY wrote:
The September 11 attack on the twin towers of New York will go down as the most diabolical, most dastardly acts of evil in human history. 4 REAL.
Agreed https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumight... and https://www.google.com/search...
andet1987

Chicago, IL

#264357 Jan 5, 2014
Timesten wrote:
hi X10 :) you seldom post nowadays ?

“Google Operation Northwoods”

Since: Aug 10

** 9-11 was an inside job **

#264358 Jan 5, 2014
andet1987 wrote:
<quoted text>
hi X10 :) you seldom post nowadays ?
been busy on the BMB event https://sites.google.com/site/thefactsofthebb...
And also got sick of the trolls spewing ignorance and childish sarcasms How's it going with you friend? Happy Holidays.
Question

Nashville, TN

#264359 Jan 5, 2014
When was the last time you heard a president say [weapons of mass destruction[?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#264360 Jan 5, 2014
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing you post waste of water makes any sense, just gibberish jibber-jabber. But coming from You THAT makes sense! LOL
WTF Huh Eh !
Sorry you are so mentally challenged. I'm sure it would appear so to someone so lacking in critical thinking skills. ROTFLMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#264361 Jan 5, 2014
Doctor REALITY wrote:
The September 11 attack on the twin towers of New York will go down as the most diabolical, most dastardly acts of evil in human history. 4 REAL.
What do you mean will go down? It already has thank you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#264362 Jan 5, 2014
MUQ wrote:
All these endless discussions, could be laid to rest, if they re-create 9/11 scene by making a scale model of WTC Towers and see how it falls.
Instead of doing the right thing in the right manner, people are engaged in endless debates about this and that.
The fall cannot be explained by normal analysis, so making a model is obviously the best way.
But it is strange that most US people think that Riddle has been solved and there is no pending issue.
And this is where the Media comes in....they fail to educate the people about the big holes in Govt theory and do not push for testing in on scale models.
If people start this demand, the Govt would have to give in...
It's been done already numerous times.

Yes it can. It has been established that the floor trusses deflected pulling the outer skeleton inward by around 5' causing the sides to fail.

Not strange at all given all the pertinent facts available.

Models have been built.

Seems like you need to bone up on things a bit my friend.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#264363 Jan 5, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know what the word "primarily" by fire means? That was the main reason, if none of the towers burned, even with structural damage, none likely would have fallen.The fires clearly initiated all three collapses since they did not fall on impact.
And on WTC7, if there was no DEBRIS from WTC1 it would not have fell, for the Racist Diddling impaired I shall repeat a line below.
"BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse"
THE NIST RACIST DIDDLER!
21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?
The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—SEVERING SEVEN EXTERIOR COLUMNS—BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. THE DEBRIS IMPACT DAMAGE DID PLAY A SECONDARY ROLE IN THE LAST STAGES OF THE COLLAPSE SEQUENCE, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.
Exactly.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264364 Jan 5, 2014
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>Can you stay focused?
Can you stay on one subject?
You dropped the scale model routine like a bad habit, drop Woods too.
It is all tied together, 9/11 was the excuse to take away our constitutional rights.
It is so obvious, but you are so blind you can't see any farther than to the end of your nose.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264365 Jan 5, 2014
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you go hook up with Judy the lush....she appears 3 sheets to the breeze, and boy you'll gobble up anything that moron claims.
You calling anybody mentally challenged is a joke to say the least....if you're not brainwashing yourself with dopes like her you are showing your deviant way on other ridiculous waste product threads.
Yes, Yes I know you know more than all the architects, engineers, scientist and all the experts.
People like you are miserable bastards, it makes you feel better to put others down, even the experts with credentials that outweigh yours by a factor of 1000 to none.
Once again, why in the blue hell would I listen an idiot like you???
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264366 Jan 5, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
They DO RACIST DIDDLER? GOD, What is like being a total retard.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth DEBUNK JUDY WOOD
Conclusion
WE DO NOT SUPPORT the DEW hypothesis because it is not supported by the available evidence. In contrast, the explosives/incendiaries hypothesis for the WTC destruction is well supported by the evidence. In addition, we believe the DEW theory raises far more questions than it answers, such as the energy requirements and other issues outlined in the suggested references listed below.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
Yes, Yes I know you know more than all the architects, engineers, scientist and all the experts.
People like you are miserable bastards, it makes you feel better to put others down, even the experts with credentials that outweigh yours by a factor of 1000 to none.
Once again, why in the blue hell would I listen an idiot like you???

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#264367 Jan 5, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It is all tied together, 9/11 was the excuse to take away our constitutional rights.
It is so obvious, but you are so blind you can't see any farther than to the end of your nose.
Americans traded freedom for security and safety. Was it worth it? One of my questions is this. Why do we need the Department of Homeland Security? Suppose the CIA handles off-shore security issues and the FBI internal security issues. Why can't that be done within the existing agencies? Why create more agencies?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 18 min RiccardoFire 2,804
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 45 min Pokay 119,280
man for anal play and jerking for woman on skyp... 1 hr oldhorny 1
filters on the new "USAJOBS.gov" site is REAL C... 1 hr Doctor REALITY 1
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr Michael 679,315
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 4 hr Holy Child Jehowa... 46,219
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 5 hr Tony 6,277
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 10 hr nanoanomaly 982,144
More from around the web