Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264332 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I'm dealing the mentally challenged...
Judy Wood was trying to explain building 6, how the middle didn't collapse but was totally GONE.
DON'T LIE, DIDDLER did you even watch the video, why yes you did! WOODS CLEARLY CLAIMS A SPACE BASED WEAPON HIT THE TOWERS.

You said they were wrong and Judy Wood was right, MAKE UP YOUR MIND SPACE BEAMING DIDDLER!
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
DR. JUDY WOOD IS AN ENGINEER WHO IS ENDING ALL SPECULATION OF 9/11
Her credentals:
* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.
This is a very long clip but well worth the view.

IF YOUR WILLING TO LISTEN TO THE SAME 911 STORY FOR OVER A DECADE, YOU SHOULD BE WILLING TO HEAR ALL NEW EVIDENCE BACKED UP BY A 500 PAGE BOOK THAT HAS NEVER BEEN CHALLENGED OR REDACTED

. THAT ALONE SHOULD TELL YOU SHE IS THE REAL DEAL AND IS A TRUE PATRIOT WHO IS DEMONIZED BUT NEVER DISCUSSED BY 9/11 COMMUNITY, BUT I CAN ASSURE YOU THOSE DAYS ARE LIMITED.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264333 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I'm dealing the mentally challenged...
Judy Wood was trying to explain building 6, how the middle didn't collapse but was totally GONE.
The architects and engineers are staying with the technology as they know it today.
In all cases your argument is totally irrelevant their credentials outweigh yours by a factor of 1000 to none.
SO THEN YOUR CLAIM THAT JUDY WAS RIGHT IS TOTALLY FALSE BY 1000 to NONE? MAKE UP YOUR MIND DIDLER!

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood
Posted by Adam Taylor
Earlier this year, Dr. Judy Wood put out her new book titled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264334 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for bringing up the Windsor building, it proves,the WTC buildings could have collapsed in the fashion that we are told.
So true!

The building totalled 32 storeys, with 29 floors above ground and three below. A concrete core and concrete frame supported the first 16 floors. Above that was a central support system of concrete columns, supporting concrete floors with steel perimeter columns. An additional feature was the presence of two 'technical floors'- concrete floors designed to give the building more strength. One was just above the ground level and the other at the 17th floor.
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp...

No reliance on steel frames here, the core was mostly concrete. And what happened to the steel that it did include?

The steel columns above the 17th floor suffered complete collapse, partially coming to rest on the upper technical floor.
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp...

Yes, it failed. Other photos reveal how the concrete was all that was left on the upper floors.

So what does the Madrid Windsor Tower fire show? That steel columns will collapse in a fire, that concrete is more fire-resistant.

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/madrid_...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264335 Jan 4, 2014
Was the Windsor tower hit by a huge chunk of the North tower or a large fuel laden jet?
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you twist everything around to the support the government no matteer what the evidence???
1. The Windsor building burned like a gaint torch for 26 hours, and most of the building was still standing.
2. The Windsor did not have the fireproofing like the WTC buildings
2. The WTC 7 just fires on just a few floors.
3. It took almost 3 hours for the Windsor for any collaspe
4. So much for, just taking one support and the entire building.
Once again... with over 1000 architiects and engineers why in the blue hell do you think I would listen to you???
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264336 Jan 4, 2014
More of onemales racist sexual perversion.
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Every black guy wants to knock-up a white girl.
You won't catch Sickle Cell Anemia, but it could be passed on to your brircial childern.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264337 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
More of onemales racist sexual perversion.
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
The site you are referring to is extremely racist.
As it clearly states:
“Blacks are more superior than whites":

1.) According to several health publications black males are the hardest hit with HIV and AIDS: http://www.webmd.com/content/article/118/1130...
2.) Seven deadly diseases that strikes blacks the most : http://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-...
3.) Sickle Cell Anemia in the United States, very prevalent among dark skinned people and almost completely absent in "white" populations. People with Sickle Cell are born with the disease. It is inherited when parents pass it on to their children:
http://www.netwellness.org/healthtopics/sickl...



onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264338 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
Was the Windsor tower hit by a huge chunk of the North tower or a large fuel laden jet?
<quoted text>
You have been out-dealt by 4 facts to one opinion.
NIST's spokesman clearly debunked your ass when he said,“WTC 7 collapsed primarily due to fire”
He didn't bother to mention any secondary reasons.
Face it, you stepped on your own dick.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264339 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
So true!
The building totalled 32 storeys, with 29 floors above ground and three below. A concrete core and concrete frame supported the first 16 floors. Above that was a central support system of concrete columns, supporting concrete floors with steel perimeter columns. An additional feature was the presence of two 'technical floors'- concrete floors designed to give the building more strength. One was just above the ground level and the other at the 17th floor.
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp...
No reliance on steel frames here, the core was mostly concrete. And what happened to the steel that it did include?
The steel columns above the 17th floor suffered complete collapse, partially coming to rest on the upper technical floor.
http://www.concretecentre.com/main.asp...
Yes, it failed. Other photos reveal how the concrete was all that was left on the upper floors.
So what does the Madrid Windsor Tower fire show? That steel columns will collapse in a fire, that concrete is more fire-resistant.
http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/madrid_...
And steel isn't fire resistant?
I made a woodburning stove that lasted for around 30 years.

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264340 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
SO THEN YOUR CLAIM THAT JUDY WAS RIGHT IS TOTALLY FALSE BY 1000 to NONE? MAKE UP YOUR MIND DIDLER!
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood
Posted by Adam Taylor
Earlier this year, Dr. Judy Wood put out her new book titled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
The over 1000 architicts and Judy Wood says the same thing, the towers did not collapse as we are being told.
What part of that can't you understand???
Once again with so many experts debunking your ass, why in the blue hell would I listen to you???

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264341 Jan 4, 2014
Despite all the fear-mongering, emotionalism, and deceptive propaganda surrounding the issue of firearms, the principle that matters most is quite simple.


Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#264342 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The over 1000 architicts and Judy Wood says the same thing, the towers did not collapse as we are being told.
What part of that can't you understand???
Once again with so many experts debunking your ass, why in the blue hell would I listen to you???
Why don't you go hook up with Judy the lush....she appears 3 sheets to the breeze, and boy you'll gobble up anything that moron claims.

You calling anybody mentally challenged is a joke to say the least....if you're not brainwashing yourself with dopes like her you are showing your deviant way on other ridiculous waste product threads.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264343 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The over 1000 architicts and Judy Wood says the same thing, the towers did not collapse as we are being told.
They DO RACIST DIDDLER? GOD, What is like being a total retard.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth DEBUNK JUDY WOOD

Conclusion

WE DO NOT SUPPORT the DEW hypothesis because it is not supported by the available evidence. In contrast, the explosives/incendiaries hypothesis for the WTC destruction is well supported by the evidence. In addition, we believe the DEW theory raises far more questions than it answers, such as the energy requirements and other issues outlined in the suggested references listed below.

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264344 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
The site you are referring to is extremely racist.
Actually you are assigning a quality to a whole race via color of skin RACIST DIDLER!
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Every black guy wants to knock-up a white girl.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#264345 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
Despite all the fear-mongering, emotionalism, and deceptive propaganda surrounding the issue of firearms, the principle that matters most is quite simple.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =20RoAfflGCMXX
Can you stay focused?

Can you stay on one subject?

You dropped the scale model routine like a bad habit, drop Woods too.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264346 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And steel isn't fire resistant?
I made a woodburning stove that lasted for around 30 years.
LMFAO, Are you really that stupid, your stove was made and formed through fire, fire made it soft and mailable, ALL FIRES DO NOT BURN AT THE SAME TEMP RACIST DIDDLER,, sorry, that concept mey be way over your head.!
Pegasus

Warwick, RI

#264347 Jan 4, 2014
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you are assigning a quality to a whole race via color of skin RACIST DIDLER!
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
And yet another strike against him.....a Truther, racist, and pervert.......wonderful....rea l friggin wonderful.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264348 Jan 4, 2014
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You have been out-dealt by 4 facts to one opinion.
NIST's spokesman clearly debunked your ass when he said,“WTC 7 collapsed primarily due to fire”
Do you know what the word "primarily" by fire means? That was the main reason, if none of the towers burned, even with structural damage, none likely would have fallen.The fires clearly initiated all three collapses since they did not fall on impact.

And on WTC7, if there was no DEBRIS from WTC1 it would not have fell, for the Racist Diddling impaired I shall repeat a line below.

"BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse"

THE NIST RACIST DIDDLER!

21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?

The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—SEVERING SEVEN EXTERIOR COLUMNS—BUT THIS STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DID NOT INITIATE THE COLLAPSE. THE FIRES INITIATED BY THE DEBRIS, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. THE DEBRIS IMPACT DAMAGE DID PLAY A SECONDARY ROLE IN THE LAST STAGES OF THE COLLAPSE SEQUENCE, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264349 Jan 4, 2014
Yea, Typical low life uneducated loser who appears to pimp out his daughters for his own jollies.

onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Every black guy wants to knock-up a white girl.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...
onemale wrote:
I made it very clear to my kids at a very early age: THERE WILL BE BLACK BOYFRIENDS!!!
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TORRF9RQI...

SO DIDDLER, We know your views on incest, did you participate or just watch?
MUQ

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#264350 Jan 4, 2014
Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11(Part-9)

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports

Gregg Roberts and Staff

46. Deceptive presentation further damaged FEMA’s credibility. Tom Lackey, who designs bridges for the Vermont Agency of Transportation, cites the Minneapolis Bridge collapse study as the “kind of analysis and straightforward explanation” the WTC needs.

47. FEMA’s reports stack up poorly. Some of its graphics “omit the cores altogether,” says Scott, and some depict columns half as wide and twice as far apart as they actually were. Scott decries “attempts to distort important technical information.” The Australians use more colorful terminology: Mason says we have been “taken for suckers;” Genitsaris says we’ve been “stooged.”

Truncated and Fudged Computer Model Undermines NIST Report (2005)

48. NIST’ s $20 million report is generally believed, by those who haven’t read its 10,000 pages, to explain how fires and plane impacts destroyed the WTC.“The report not only fails to explain why and how the towers completely collapsed,” Brookman points out,“but it states that the collapse became inevitable without any further explanation.”

49. He asks why NIST “considered conservation of energy and momentum principles only up to the moment prior to collapse.” NIST stopped its computerized models before the onset of collapse,” Scott complains.“No work was done to calculate what happened during the failure.

50. Why are we content with this?” Ron Brookman adds:“The complete collapse mechanism ... cannot be ‘omitted for brevity’ in any comprehensive analysis.” NIST’ s claim that a kinetic “attack” exceeded the building’s reserve strength is not supported by any calculations or “by any evidence whatsoever or any serious structural analysis,” states Anders Björkman.

51. While NIST fails to show essential work on central issues, its numerous volumes are packed with distracting trivia. Huebner, whose twenty-five years of structural engineering experience includes forensic investigation of structural collapses, compares NIST’ s effort to a “college paper where you just keep adding [stuffing] to make the paper longer. Lots of pages of nothing! Definitely trying to cover up something.”

52. Brookman asked NIST investigators to explain the “complete pulverization of building materials and contents” and “visibly explosive clouds of dust, ash, and debris.” He received no reply.“I believe in the laws of physics,” wrote Brookman,“and rely on them every day.” NIST ’s reports “seem to require multiple leaps of faith in highly improbable events,” wrote Pasternack.

53. Computer models using NIST ’s best estimates of temperature and damage could not even generate a collapse, Scott points out. They’d “simply adjust the input until the desired outcome is achieved.” NIST probably overestimated core column damage, Scott believes, almost certainly overestimated steel temperatures, and definitely overestimated damage to fire protection.

54. So important an inquiry should “rely on logical deduction, reason and first-principle analysis,” Scott says,“not circular reasoning and adjusting models to get agreement with a preconceived explanation.”
MUQ

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#264351 Jan 4, 2014
All these endless discussions, could be laid to rest, if they re-create 9/11 scene by making a scale model of WTC Towers and see how it falls.

Instead of doing the right thing in the right manner, people are engaged in endless debates about this and that.

The fall cannot be explained by normal analysis, so making a model is obviously the best way.

But it is strange that most US people think that Riddle has been solved and there is no pending issue.

And this is where the Media comes in....they fail to educate the people about the big holes in Govt theory and do not push for testing in on scale models.

If people start this demand, the Govt would have to give in...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Robert F 692,121
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 6 min June VanDerMark 47,125
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 20 min Big Al 990,687
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 52 min youareadufus 465
TWA Flight 800 (Jul '13) 1 hr Doctor REALITY 7
beware of raymond rotolo / ps inspections llc 1 hr what I think happ... 2
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 14 hr DJ Crazee 39,286
More from around the web