Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#264139 Dec 27, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the self debunking liar and wussy! You hand yourself you own azz!
LMFAO!
<quoted text>
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!
LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!
FROM YOUR LINK!
In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.
The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.
There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.
So what!
.
Too bad that there is absolutely no evidence collected that would prove that the circular engine disk debris you are talking about came from the very Boeing 757 that you claim allegedly crashed into the Pentagon.
.
It could have easily been previously planted or dropped by the C-130 that buzzed the Pentagon just before the big explosion.
.
Epic FAIL ! LOL
.
Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264140 Dec 27, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
It could have easily been previously planted or dropped by the C-130 that buzzed the Pentagon just before the big explosion.
Any evidence of that, nope, did endless people see a plane impact the Pentagon, Yes, Thanks for the report from fantasy land Commander Gloop!

PS: LMFAO, You might want to take this up with the diddler, it's his evidence. Your buddy dumbmale put up the link that concluded that it was 757 that hit the Pentagon TO PROVE A 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON!

Go Twwoof!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#264141 Dec 27, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Any evidence of that, nope, did endless people see a plane impact the Pentagon, Yes, Thanks for the report from fantasy land Commander Gloop!
PS: LMFAO, You might want to take this up with the diddler, it's his evidence. Your buddy dumbmale put up the link that concluded that it was 757 that hit the Pentagon TO PROVE A 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON!
Go Twwoof!
You got any names to go with the endless people you say saw a plane impact the Pentagon? I didn't think so.

LINK or LIE sorry charlie LOL

Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#264142 Dec 27, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Any evidence of that, nope, did endless people see a plane impact the Pentagon, Yes, Thanks for the report from fantasy land Commander Gloop!
PS: LMFAO, You might want to take this up with the diddler, it's his evidence. Your buddy dumbmale put up the link that concluded that it was 757 that hit the Pentagon TO PROVE A 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON!
Go Twwoof!
So when you can not refute the evidence that the engine parts alleged found amid the wreckage were never identified to any aircraft let alone the one YOU claim hit the Pentagon, YOU change the subject and instead start talking about endless people YOU claim say they saw it hit.
.
Please provide some kind of evidence to the fact that the plane parts found were from the same Boeing 757 that YOU say allegedly hit the Pentagon or STFU you fuhking lying bwunker, who's single solitary achievement in life is to sit endlessly at a keyboard trying to lie his way through life. What do you get out of being a lying bwunker?
.
LINK or LIE sorry charlie
.
Is your shift over for the day? See you at 0400 when you get up to do it all over again.
.
Huh eh !

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264143 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You got any names to go with the endless people you say saw a plane impact the Pentagon? I didn't think so.
Here you go commander bunny!

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blfligh...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264144 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
It could have easily been previously planted or dropped by the C-130 that buzzed the Pentagon just before the big explosion.
So LOL, Any eyewitnesses on the above, any evidence at all that masterminds of an iniside job took a C-130 ... AND DUMPED OUT THE WRONG PARTS IN BROAD DAYLIGHT.

Gloop, Are you trying to be onemales sidekick, THE MINI DIDDLER?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264145 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So when you can not refute the evidence that the engine parts alleged found amid the wreckage were never identified to any aircraft let alone the one
Sorry, MiNi DiDDler, Onemale says you are wrong, though he though he was saying you were right.
onemale wrote:
The jet engine found at the Pentagon does not match that of 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!

LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!

FROM YOUR LINK!

In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.

The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.

There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264146 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So when you can not refute the evidence that the engine parts alleged found amid the wreckage were never identified to any aircraft let alone the one YOU claim hit the Pentagon,
MiNi DiDDler, CAPTAIN DIDDLER SAYS YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN!
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
AND DUMBMALE SELF DEBUNKS AGAIN, FROM YOUR LINK!

DO YOU EVEN READ WHAT YOU USE AS A LINK?

This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77.

The key features of the wreckage--including the number, size, and shape of the cutouts and bolt attachments--perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, as illustrated in the above comparison. None of the wheels of the Global Hawk, A-3, or 737 match the debris, which is not surprising since all of these aircraft weigh considerably less than the 757 and use correspondingly smaller wheels of differing design.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264147 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So when you can not refute the evidence that the engine parts alleged found amid the wreckage were never identified to any aircraft let alone the one YOU claim hit the Pentagon, YOU change the subject and instead start talking about endless people YOU claim say they saw it hit.
.
Please provide some kind of evidence to the fact that the plane parts found were from the same Boeing 757 that YOU say allegedly hit the Pentagon or STFU you fuhking lying bwunker, who's single solitary achievement in life is to sit endlessly at a keyboard trying to lie his way through life. What do you get out of being a lying bwunker?
.
LINK or LIE sorry charlie
.
Is your shift over for the day? See you at 0400 when you get up to do it all over again.
.
Huh eh !
Only a PAID govie operative could afford to sit at a keyboard all day and type all the BS Charlie Dippy spews. Most of us have a life, but not Charlie Dippy, he lives for this, and this is his greatest ambition in life... if we could even call it a life? What a miserable life Charlie must live... I suppose we should feel sorry the miserable bast__ d. If he really does have a real job,,, he appears to be a f__ k off deadbeat.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#264148 Dec 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a PAID govie operative could afford to sit at a keyboard all day and type all the BS Charlie Dippy spews. Most of us have a life, but not Charlie Dippy, he lives for this, and this is his greatest ambition in life... if we could even call it a life? What a miserable life Charlie must live... I suppose we should feel sorry the miserable bast__ d. If he really does have a real job,,, he appears to be a f__ k off deadbeat.
With his next welfare check he's gonna get himself a wheelchair ramp so's he can go outside his double wide out there on the Nebraska plains.

Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264149 Dec 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a PAID govie operative could afford to sit at a keyboard all day and type all the BS Charlie Dippy spews.
LOL, Like this?

“wanting my oldest sister”
onemale wrote:
There is nothing wrong when it involves two consenting adults and it is kept in private.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TN6LAC3QJ...

“i wanna have sex with my mom”
onemale wrote:
If she is a single mother without a boyfriend you may have a chance.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/T4V4NMBAV...
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't condone incest but what two consenting adults do is their business. No doubt she is on birth control.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/TKKE804TD...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264150 Dec 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a PAID govie operative could afford to sit at a keyboard all day and type all the BS Charlie
The wonders of owning your own companies, HEY DIDDLER, ever find the link to this?

onemale wrote:
<quoted text> 6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!
Link or LIE?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264151 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
With his next welfare check he's gonna get himself a wheelchair ramp so's he can go outside his double wide out there on the Nebraska plains.
Huh Eh !
Lincoln is on the plains, you learn something everyday.
Pegasus

Philadelphia, PA

#264152 Dec 28, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You got any names to go with the endless people you say saw a plane impact the Pentagon? I didn't think so.
LINK or LIE sorry charlie LOL
Huh Eh !
You have the names of the supposed perps who you and your pack of rats claim pulled off the demo/chaos of 911?

No I didn't think so.

Keep doing what you do best...lie.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264153 Dec 28, 2013
Pentagon attack - exit hole analysis
"Anything large enough going fast enough to break a hole in the wall here, wouldnt stop at this point, and leave nothing behind."

http://911review.org/brad.com/pentagon/exit_h...

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#264154 Dec 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Lincoln is on the plains, you learn something everyday.
They DO have double wides in Nebraska don't they corn-holer.

Huh EH!
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#264155 Dec 28, 2013
The Smoking Gun
The first and third photo compares the rotor found at the Pentagon to the rotor on a 757:
http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonPlaneRotor....

This photo shows the size of the rotor found at the Pentagon:
http://www.kathymcmahon.utvinternet.com/wag/w...
who

Reading, UK

#264156 Dec 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you go commander bunny!
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blfligh...
None of those eyewitness accounts in your link have the name of the person who was supposed to have said it........just saying.
who

Reading, UK

#264157 Dec 28, 2013
Dr Z asked you for names.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#264158 Dec 28, 2013
who wrote:
<quoted text>
None of those eyewitness accounts in your link have the name of the person who was supposed to have said it........just saying.
Imagine that, A twoofer only reads the first sentence and forms their faith based opinion.

"FRANK PROBST, an information management specialist for the Pentagon Renovation Program, left his office trailer near the Pentagon's south parking lot at 9:36 a.m. Sept. 11. Walking north beside Route 27, he suddenly saw a commercial airliner crest the hilltop Navy Annex. American Airlines Flight 77 reached him so fast and flew so low that Probst dropped to the ground, fearing he'd lose his head to its right engine."
- "A Defiant Recovery." The Retired Officer Magazine, January 2002

" USAToday.com EDITOR JOEL SUCHERMAN saw it all: an American Airlines jetliner fly left to right across his field of vision as he commuted to work Tuesday morning. It was highly unusual. The large plane was 20 feet off the ground and a mere 50 to 75 yards from his windshield. Two seconds later and before he could see if the landing gear was down or any of the horror-struck faces inside, the plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon 100 yards away.'My first thought was he's not going to make it across the river to [Reagan] National Airport. But whoever was flying the plane made no attempt to change direction,' Sucherman said.'It was coming in at a high rate of speed, but not at a steep angle-almost like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto its target and staying dead on course.'"
- "Journalist Witnesses Pentagon Crash." eWeek.com , 13 Sep 2001

"'I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon,' EYEWITNESS MIKE WALTER said of the plane that hit the military complex.'Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards,' he said."
- "Witnesses and Leaders on Terrorist Attacks." CNN, 11 Sep 2001

"'(The plane) was flying fast and low and the Pentagon was the obvious target,' said FRED GASKINS, who was driving to his job as a national editor at USA Today near the Pentagon when the plane passed about 150 feet overhead.'It was flying very smoothly and calmly, without any hint that anything was wrong.'"
- "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 1 hr Mnbvc 30,865
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Wardaddy99 987,315
Anthony Bragg 3 hr Eyes open Smh 29
SEALS vs. "Green Berets"...who would win? (Jan '08) 3 hr USSF 184
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr KENTUCKY CATHOLIC 687,223
I LOVE my new LG V20 smartphone!!! 6 hr Doctor REALITY 5
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 7 hr Seentheotherside 619,790
More from around the web