Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262620 Nov 22, 2013
Hi Tom!
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You pig boy along with everybody else here watched 9/11 unfold on your TV. TV is is also where they announced who did it and within hours flashed pictures of the alleged muslim fanatics who they claim were the perpetrators of the dastardly deed.
Since you were in a panic and could not contact miss piggy who was visiting NY at the time, you were in a panic, fit to be tied and thus was born your passion of hatred for the muslims that caused such a travesty, and your profound belief in the official govie story of 9/11 you first heard about on the morning TV.
Yes indeed if its on TV it must be true.
Only in little uneducated pig minds like yours.
Huh Eh !
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#262621 Nov 22, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
You pig boy along with everybody else here watched 9/11 unfold on your TV. TV is is also where they announced who did it and within hours flashed pictures of the alleged muslim fanatics who they claim were the perpetrators of the dastardly deed.
Since you were in a panic and could not contact miss piggy who was visiting NY at the time, you were in a panic, fit to be tied and thus was born your passion of hatred for the muslims that caused such a travesty, and your profound belief in the official govie story of 9/11 you first heard about on the morning TV.
Yes indeed if its on TV it must be true.
Only in little uneducated pig minds like yours.
Huh Eh !
Good, so what I thought was the Patriots losing to the Panthers really did'nt happen on tv like you said.

I like this concept of what is real and what is not.

There is only one problem......TRUTH gets in the way.

On second thought I think I'll stick to reality.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262622 Nov 22, 2013
Yes TRUTH indeed does get in the way of what you see on TV.

Thanks for agreeing with me.

In the meantime, stick to the reality you see on TV and don't let TRUTH get in the way.

Huh Eh !
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#262624 Nov 22, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Yes TRUTH indeed does get in the way of what you see on TV.
Thanks for agreeing with me.
In the meantime, stick to the reality you see on TV and don't let TRUTH get in the way.
Huh Eh !
There you then we did infact see two different jet airliners kamikaze into the trades, one rip through the Pentagon, and too bad the evil gubbamint did not have a camera in the field or up in a tree to see the jet in Shanksville.

We agree....what we see is what we get.
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#262625 Nov 22, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, They said they saw a streak of light a minute or two after the plane exploded, I don't challenge this.
Meant to get back to you on that missile bit.

To see the tail end action weather permitting, at least 20/20 vision, moonless night, and your field of vision happening to catch it.

I have seen rocket fire before at night and near the coast because of the cooling of night time air you have like a high fog that creeps its way down as the night wears on.

Anyway you don't have to have perfect conditions but damn good conditions.
Rick not in Kansas yet

Salina, KS

#262627 Nov 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
April, 2000 NTSB Missile Visibility Test Eglin AFB, Florida states clearly:
Same or better visibility conditions
Observers up to 14 miles from launch
All observers saw the launch
Appeared like a rapidly rising light
Anyone who has launched a bottle rocket and has any common sense know this to be true.
Keyword: Common Sense
Insults Are Easier
Missiles are visible objects, no one is disputing that, that I've read anyways. The dispute is in the reality of whether or not there was even a missile to be seen.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#262628 Nov 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>Some people are not meant to know and I guess you are one of them.

Take care.

Insults Are Easier
Of course!

You and the grey box moron "Manyfails" are just speshul.

That explains everything!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#262629 Nov 22, 2013
visualize whirled peas wrote:
<quoted text>Oooohhhh my, So impressive, you can say stuff like: "rant against reality", looniverse", and "not so much".

No, I did not mean that. It is sarcasm and you are a shit for brains troll.
Impressive would be you or one of your many, many socks getting something right for once.

In other words, you're really not impressive.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262630 Nov 22, 2013
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>Meant to get back to you on that missile bit.
To see the tail end action weather permitting, at least 20/20 vision, moonless night, and your field of vision happening to catch it.
I have seen rocket fire before at night and near the coast because of the cooling of night time air you have like a high fog that creeps its way down as the night wears on.
Anyway you don't have to have perfect conditions but damn good conditions.
I follow you, I am wondering about the 10 miles out issue at night. Could one see anything more than a streak from 10 miles away at night which was the closest wittiness I know about?(With the naked eye)
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262631 Nov 22, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
April, 2000 NTSB Missile Visibility Test Eglin AFB, Florida states clearly:
Same or better visibility conditions
Observers up to 14 miles from launch
All observers saw the launch
Appeared like a rapidly rising light
Anyone who has launched a bottle rocket and has any common sense know this to be true.
Keyword: Common Sense
Insults Are Easier
Yes but what did they see, as you say
Insults Are Easier wrote:
All observers saw the launch
Appeared like a rapidly rising light
So none saw a missile, they saw a trail of light.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#262632 Nov 22, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, A nutcase and a liar!
<quoted text>
Link or LIE?
It is a sure sign of weakness... when this is all you have to debunk a link.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#262633 Nov 22, 2013
visualize whirled peas wrote:
<quoted text>
Oooohhhh my, So impressive, you can say stuff like: "rant against reality", looniverse", and "not so much".
No, I did not mean that. It is sarcasm and you are a shit for brains troll.
You seem to know the pig quite well.
He thinks insults debunks and proves everything.
No one really takes him seriously, but he does give a good laugh
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#262634 Nov 22, 2013
The story of the 5 kings who rule America
America is no longer for the people by the people



Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262635 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a sure sign of weakness... when this is all you have to debunk a link.
It's a sign of a person with no moral compass when you must lie and pretend it's the twoof!

onemale wrote:
<quoted text> 6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!
Link or LIE?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262636 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
The story of the 5 kings who rule America
America is no longer for the people by the people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5sWecRfLov4XX
You could have just wrote I am nuts and poster this again Panty Sniffer.
onemale wrote:
George Bush Face On $20 Bill Watermark
After using a new $20 Bill as a bookmark in a bible book overnight the President Jackson watermark changed into President Bush's face with a devil horn in his forehead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

PS: FOOL, That is on all bills of that series if you look close enough. NOTHING CHANGED!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262637 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to know the pig quite well.
He thinks insults debunks and proves everything.
No one needs to debunk your "evidunce!"
onemale wrote:
The jet engine found at the Pentagon does not match that of 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!

LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!

FROM YOUR LINK!

In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.

The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.

There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262638 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to know the pig quite well.
He thinks insults debunks and proves everything.
No need to with you!
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
AND DUMBMALE SELF DEBUNKS AGAIN, FROM YOUR LINK!

DO YOU EVEN READ WHAT YOU USE AS A LINK?

This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77.

The key features of the wreckage--including the number, size, and shape of the cutouts and bolt attachments--perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, as illustrated in the above comparison. None of the wheels of the Global Hawk, A-3, or 737 match the debris, which is not surprising since all of these aircraft weigh considerably less than the 757 and use correspondingly smaller wheels of differing design.
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#262639 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a sure sign of weakness... when this is all you have to debunk a link.
Oh yeah youre a real..........ATTA boy!!!!!!!!!!

Sap

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#262640 Nov 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
The story of the 5 kings who rule America
America is no longer for the people by the people
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =5sWecRfLov4XX
What people are you talking about?
It sure isn't my people you speak of.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#262641 Nov 23, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a sign of a person with no moral compass when you must lie and pretend it's the twoof!
<quoted text>
Link or LIE?
Once again, how does debunking me or insulting me debunk the link??? What part of the question did you not understand???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 8 min truth 687,174
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 23 min another viewer 987,155
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 26 min Clearwater 30,719
Popcorn time for movies and shows using VPN 3 hr clayvligon 2
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 7 hr LAWEST100 184,840
Anthony Bragg 8 hr Oic yes 28
Clinton Foundation Scandals 11 hr Hiddn Numbrz 2
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 23 hr Here For Now 619,788
More from around the web