created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,318 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure
Comments
243,201 - 243,220 of 256,491 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
Pegasus

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261791
Nov 2, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh really so what are your credentials?
Dr. Robert Bowman PhD. has credentials you and I couldn't have in our wildest dreams.
Speak for yourself moron.

How is that footage of Atta coming along.
Pegasus

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261792
Nov 2, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Your posts have nothing to do with the links posted.
Your posts show you have nothing to debunk the links.
You think debunking me debunks the links???
You are whats called a self-inflicted debunker.......I think you may be the first recorded case.....he he hehe......hehe

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261793
Nov 2, 2013
 
Has anyone gone to the Dr. Bowman link?

The video starts out claiming to have "Explosive Evidence."

The guy anounces himself as "Dr. Bowman," which is supposed to really impress us. Then he goes on to explain about all his combat missions which are totally irrelevant. Then he directed DOD Star Wars programs under Ford and Carter. Equally irrelevant. Then his PhD in aeronautics and nuclear engineering, also irrelevant. He goes on with more academic achievements. Jump ahead, he asked his wife where are the interceptors over and over again. This would be a fair question for a novice, but for a man with the military background which he claims should already have known the answer which is in the chain of command and the length of response times as well as procedural meaning we had no plan of action against hijacked civilian airliners. Rather surprising coming from an ex-military man of his stature.

Then he jumped into talking about the building collapses and the laws of physics. He jumped to a conclusion that it couldn't happen without any examination of the construction or the facts. Simply an unfounded opinion based upon his intellect. He claimed the aircraft and fires could not collapse the buildings based solely upon his opinions. Then he went on like average morons saying that building 7 proved his theory correct. Again, without any examination of evidence or testimony from the people who were there. He signed the petition based upon hearing news broadcasts and his opinions. He fell into what is commonly referred too as the intelligence trap. He never did his homework.

I'm sorry. This guy has been in academics too long. He is a windbag who fails to examine things the way he was probably taught. What a pity. He disgraces the academic world by jumping to false conclusions.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261794
Nov 2, 2013
 
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>You are whats called a self-inflicted debunker.......I think you may be the first recorded case.....he he hehe......hehe
Check out Dr. Bowman. The piece claims "Explosive Evidence" yet provides nothing but an unsubstantiated opinion based upon credentials and prejudice rather than tangible facts and evidence.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261795
Nov 2, 2013
 
WasteWater wrote:
Has anyone gone to the Dr. Bowman link?
The video starts out claiming to have "Explosive Evidence."
The guy anounces himself as "Dr. Bowman," which is supposed to really impress us. Then he goes on to explain about all his combat missions which are totally irrelevant. Then he directed DOD Star Wars programs under Ford and Carter. Equally irrelevant. Then his PhD in aeronautics and nuclear engineering, also irrelevant. He goes on with more academic achievements. Jump ahead, he asked his wife where are the interceptors over and over again. This would be a fair question for a novice, but for a man with the military background which he claims should already have known the answer which is in the chain of command and the length of response times as well as procedural meaning we had no plan of action against hijacked civilian airliners. Rather surprising coming from an ex-military man of his stature.
Then he jumped into talking about the building collapses and the laws of physics. He jumped to a conclusion that it couldn't happen without any examination of the construction or the facts. Simply an unfounded opinion based upon his intellect. He claimed the aircraft and fires could not collapse the buildings based solely upon his opinions. Then he went on like average morons saying that building 7 proved his theory correct. Again, without any examination of evidence or testimony from the people who were there. He signed the petition based upon hearing news broadcasts and his opinions. He fell into what is commonly referred too as the intelligence trap. He never did his homework.
I'm sorry. This guy has been in academics too long. He is a windbag who fails to examine things the way he was probably taught. What a pity. He disgraces the academic world by jumping to false conclusions.
He is also lying, the militarization of space platforms and anti satellite anti ballistic missiles was only conjecture before 1983 and SDI. It was literally promoted by a few physicists and Robert Heinlein in 81- till Reagan made it a reality in 83. Reagan IS the reason it happened, and anything before Reagan was limited to mere research and promotion of the idea.

The only ABM system allowed under treaty before 1983 was a short range nuclear tipped anti ballistic missile battery , designed to protect the Grand Forks ICBM facility. Far from star wars this was low altitude interception, with inaccurate missiles that required a nuclear warhead to destroy incoming missiles.

The Strategic Defense Initiative was created in 83, and the United States Space Command was created in 85 , to develop these weapons.

"U.S. President Ronald Reagan is flanked by physicist Dr. Edward Teller, left, and Lt. Gen. James A. Abrahamson, director of Strategic Defense Initiative, as he arrives to address a conference marking the first five years of his "Star Wars" missile defense program in 1988."
AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS

Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/Sp-Te/Strategic...

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261796
Nov 2, 2013
 
Its was not an inside job
onemale wrote:
You and the pig are ignorant.
NIST spokesperson debunks your lies.
NIST Admits, WTC DID NOT Pancake.
"It was the interplay of impact damage and fire that brought the towers down"
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
And then the next day its a inside job
onemale wrote:
Dr. Robert Bowman PhD.
1.) Lieutenant Colonel, Air force Pilot,
2.) who flew 101 combat missions over Vietnam
3.) who flew the actual military jets that intercept off course aircraft
4.) an aeronautical and nuclear engineer
5.) holds three degrees in engineering.
6.) a Star Wars Scientist
7.) and who was the director of the Star Wars Program under Presidents Ford and Carter.
9/11 Explosive Evidence
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Do you have a mental illness?

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261797
Nov 2, 2013
 
onemale wrote:

Dr. Judy Wood is an engineer who is ending all speculation of 9/11
Her credentals:* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.
This is a very long clip but well worth the view.
If your willing to listen to the same 911 story for over a decade, you should be willing to hear all new evidence backed up by a 500 page book that has never been challenged or redacted . That alone should tell you SHE IS THE REAL DEAL and is a true patriot who is demonized but never discussed by 9/11 community, but i can assure you those days are limited.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
So its a Space beam now

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261798
Nov 3, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,
And this
who

Basingstoke, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261799
Nov 3, 2013
 
AussieBobby wrote:
<quoted text>
So its a Space beam now
If it was a space beam, I know exactly who was behind the attacks.
http://images.spoof-media.com/thespoof/misc/m...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261800
Nov 3, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Okay pig, debunk me, how many bolts were there on each floor???
You really are as dumb as you act.

There's something you'll never be able to debunk...particularly since you're still batting 0%.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261801
Nov 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira ...
This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,

And this

**********

A Boeing 757 has 10 wheels. They claim to have found 1.

Did they match serial numbers of the single found wheel back to extensive ground records always kept of each aircraft?

Where are the other nine such wheels, each with individual serial numbers?

Don't say they burned up in the fire.

And don't say that matching serial numbers is unnecessary because not a lot of 757's crashed that day and they already know what plane it was.

Why in this single case did they deviate from routine established forensic investigation procedures that are performed on each and every plane crash since the establishment of the NTSB?

And don't say prove that forensic investigation is routinely performed on every plane crash.

I'm sure you can wiggle out of this one somehow.

Eh Huh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261802
Nov 3, 2013
 
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> He is also lying, the militarization of space platforms and anti satellite anti ballistic missiles was only conjecture before 1983 and SDI. It was literally promoted by a few physicists and Robert Heinlein in 81- till Reagan made it a reality in 83. Reagan IS the reason it happened, and anything before Reagan was limited to mere research and promotion of the idea.
The only ABM system allowed under treaty before 1983 was a short range nuclear tipped anti ballistic missile battery , designed to protect the Grand Forks ICBM facility. Far from star wars this was low altitude interception, with inaccurate missiles that required a nuclear warhead to destroy incoming missiles.
The Strategic Defense Initiative was created in 83, and the United States Space Command was created in 85 , to develop these weapons.
"U.S. President Ronald Reagan is flanked by physicist Dr. Edward Teller, left, and Lt. Gen. James A. Abrahamson, director of Strategic Defense Initiative, as he arrives to address a conference marking the first five years of his "Star Wars" missile defense program in 1988."
AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/Sp-Te/Strategic...
I'm sure that guy is an embarrassment to many.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261803
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira ...
This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,
And this
**********
A Boeing 757 has 10 wheels. They claim to have found 1.
Did they match serial numbers of the single found wheel back to extensive ground records always kept of each aircraft?
Where are the other nine such wheels, each with individual serial numbers?
Don't say they burned up in the fire.
And don't say that matching serial numbers is unnecessary because not a lot of 757's crashed that day and they already know what plane it was.
Why in this single case did they deviate from routine established forensic investigation procedures that are performed on each and every plane crash since the establishment of the NTSB?
And don't say prove that forensic investigation is routinely performed on every plane crash.
I'm sure you can wiggle out of this one somehow.
Eh Huh !
Nobody says how many were found. Magnesium and tires burn fool.

Serial numbers?

You must be kidding again. Try stand up comedy you may get your big chance.
Pegasus

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261804
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira ...
This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,
And this
**********
A Boeing 757 has 10 wheels. They claim to have found 1.
Did they match serial numbers of the single found wheel back to extensive ground records always kept of each aircraft?
Where are the other nine such wheels, each with individual serial numbers?
Don't say they burned up in the fire.
And don't say that matching serial numbers is unnecessary because not a lot of 757's crashed that day and they already know what plane it was.
Why in this single case did they deviate from routine established forensic investigation procedures that are performed on each and every plane crash since the establishment of the NTSB?
And don't say prove that forensic investigation is routinely performed on every plane crash.
I'm sure you can wiggle out of this one somehow.
Eh Huh !
You should be able to easily zero in on those 18'.....that's right as in 18 feet diameter engines .
You sure do like to use the Pentagon to do your delusional bidding now that you've had your balls clipped every possible way with the WTC Complex.

Why dont you wake your little buddy Onemale up and ask him about that Atta interview........Onemale likes to wriggle around that one like you do with the 18' diameter engines.

I hope you had a good juvenile time with your Commander Bunny bullshit.

You can come up with something better than that......amazing how your rabbit sock pops up and low and behold you show up right after.

Work on those engines will you and tell Onemale to fork over that Atta footage.

LMGDBO!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261805
Nov 3, 2013
 
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody says how many were found. Magnesium and tires burn fool.
Serial numbers?
You must be kidding again. Try stand up comedy you may get your big chance.
No I'm not kidding. To date no serial numbered piece of 9/11 aircraft wreckage has ever been matched back to maintenance records kept of each and every plane in use.

You are nothing but a "pimple on the prick of progress."

Either answer the questions or Shut The Fuhk Up!

Eh Huh !

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261807
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
No I'm not kidding. To date no serial numbered piece of 9/11 aircraft wreckage has ever been matched back to maintenance records kept of each and every plane in use.
You are nothing but a "pimple on the prick of progress."
Either answer the questions or Shut The Fuhk Up!
Eh Huh !
Actually there were , the FDR of flight 77 was identified by serial number by the NTSB, but the FBI sealed the records to it.
They also blocked a request for it to be made public.
"10. By document labeled "Testimony of Marion C. Blakey, Chairman National Transportation Safety Board before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation United States Senate", it is indicated that the N.T.S.B. assisted the F.B.I. with the process of "aircraft parts identification" regarding the said aircraft. A copy of this letter is attached as Exhibit 6."
"Over 60 Safety Board employees worked around the clock in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and at our headquarters in Washington, D. C.,
assisting with aircraft parts identification".

http://factsnotfairies.blogspot.com/2008/04/f...

https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/AAL77_f...

It flight path information and the data were released though.
So If you can't find those serial numbers, it because the FBI doesn't think you need them. Being there was plenty of evidence that flight 77, was indeed flight 77. I'm not sure why you need numbers on a part to prove it in your personal investigation, but it's apparent they don't think you do. lol

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB19...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261808
Nov 3, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
Hey pig I'm willing to let bygones be bygones I'm inviting you to a pig roast.
Our company has one every year at Stampede time.

But sorry, we don't invite mindless losers!
Pegasus

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261809
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
No I'm not kidding. To date no serial numbered piece of 9/11 aircraft wreckage has ever been matched back to maintenance records kept of each and every plane in use.
You are nothing but a "pimple on the prick of progress."
Either answer the questions or Shut The Fuhk Up!
Eh Huh !
Zorderz how many gear struts are there and how many were recognized and recovered.

Flaps up.....gear up ....bat out of hell..contact.

You claim the object was a missile, well surely you can provide some evidence in the wreckage to back that claim.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261810
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira ...
This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,

And this

**********

A Boeing 757 has 10 wheels. They claim to have found 1.

Did they match serial numbers of the single found wheel back to extensive ground records always kept of each aircraft?

Where are the other nine such wheels, each with individual serial numbers?

Don't say they burned up in the fire.

And don't say that matching serial numbers is unnecessary because not a lot of 757's crashed that day and they already know what plane it was.

Why in this single case did they deviate from routine established forensic investigation procedures that are performed on each and every plane crash since the establishment of the NTSB?

And don't say prove that forensic investigation is routinely performed on every plane crash.

I'm sure you can wiggle out of this one somehow.

Eh Huh !
NEWS FLASH FOR MINDLESS TWOOFERS!!!!

The cause of the crash was known therefore an investigation into WHAT caused the crash was POINTLESS!

Just like twoof, POINTLESS!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261811
Nov 3, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>No I'm not kidding. To date no serial numbered piece of 9/11 aircraft wreckage has ever been matched back to maintenance records kept of each and every plane in use.

You are nothing but a "pimple on the prick of progress."

Either answer the questions or Shut The Fuhk Up!

Eh Huh !
To date you've never supported your claim that it's even been a necessity in the crash of a Boeing 757 before.

How many of those go missing everyday again?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

558 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 min EdmondWA 93,708
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 min Chess 532,734
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 4 min number four 224,168
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 26 min Just Think 720,497
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 27 min The Awakener 172,368
Last Word + 2 37 min Richies Cool Man Diary 70
Shock Poll: 40% Still not Sure Obama is America... 49 min WasteWater 19
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr An NFL Fan 115,080
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 6 hr bRB 74
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••