Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

labrador

Padre Island Ntl Seashor, TX

#262043 Nov 7, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL!
STFU sheen ur boring and damn shill u post nothing credable GTFO already!

“Taste great in milk!”

Since: Aug 08

.

#262044 Nov 7, 2013
Hi.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#262045 Nov 8, 2013
Commander Bunny wrote:
Hi.
Hey sock bunny.

Where's gloop these days?

Did he retire to your rich fantasy life somewhere in nice warm neuron?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#262046 Nov 8, 2013
And the self licking ice cream cone of twoof perpetuates it's pathetically inept existence for another day!

Poor Manyfails has been left holing a bag of sht his masters told him was the golden chalice of twoof!

go
twoof
gone...

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262047 Nov 8, 2013
You pig boy and all your bwunker buddies act like you belong to a herd of timid and industrious animals (sheep) of which the govie is the shepherd.

Huh Eh !

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#262048 Nov 8, 2013
No it wasn't.
Pegasus

Hyattsville, MD

#262049 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
You pig boy and all your bwunker buddies act like you belong to a herd of timid and industrious animals (sheep) of which the govie is the shepherd.
Huh Eh !
We own this board truth-twit........beat it!!!!!

Those polls are are a reflection of over votes on your part......power in numbers.....OUR numbers.
who

Reading, UK

#262050 Nov 8, 2013
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>We own this board truth-twit........beat it!!!!!
Those polls are are a reflection of over votes on your part......power in numbers.....OUR numbers.
Personally I can't be arsed with you muppets....you've changed no minds.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262053 Nov 8, 2013
As for WTC 7:

NIST claims that the collapse of their one key column led to a progressive collapse of the entire interior of the building leaving only a hollow shell.

The collapse of the building, seen in numerous videos, is described by NIST as the collapse of the "facade," the hollow shell. They have no evidence for this scenario, however, and a great deal of evidence contradicts it. After the collapse of the east penthouse there is no visible distortion of the walls and only a few windows are broken at this time. Had the failure of interior columns propagated throughout the interior of the building, as asserted by NIST, it would surely have propagated to the much closer exterior walls and distorted or collapsed them.

(Major crumpling of the exterior walls, by the way, is exactly what is shown in the animations produced by NIST's computer simulation of the collapse.)

But the actual videos of the building show that the
exterior remained rigid during this early period.

At the onset of collapse you can see in the videos that the entire building suddenly goes limp, like a dying person giving up the ghost. The limpness of the freefalling structure highlights by contrast the earlier rigidity.

http://911speakout.org/Freefall.pdf

Huh Eh !
Pegasus

Hyattsville, MD

#262054 Nov 8, 2013
who wrote:
<quoted text>
Personally I can't be arsed with you muppets....you've changed no minds.
Whatever blows your hair back bloke......you sure are not changing mine

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262055 Nov 8, 2013
Furthermore, there are huge pyroclastic flows of dust, resembling a volcanic eruption, that poured into the streets following the final collapse of the building.

If what we saw was only the collapse of the facade, why was the pyroclastic flow not triggered earlier when NIST claims the collapse of the much
more voluminous interior occurred?

And why did the west penthouse remain to fall with the visible exterior of the building? Its supporting structure clearly remained to the very end and was "taken out" along with the rest of the building support all at once. NIST is scrambling to find a plausible scenario that will allow it to escape the consequences of what is plainly visible.

(If you have not seen the collapse of Building 7, find it on YouTube and watch for yourself. For most people simply watching it collapse is all it takes.

Most people are not stupid. Most people can recognize the difference between a demolition and a natural building collapse with nothing more being said.



http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

If you have never seen the collapse of Building 7 you might also stop and ask yourself why the mainstream media did not repeatedly show you this most bizarre event as it did the Twin Towers.)

http://911speakout.org/Freefall.pdf

Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262056 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Furthermore, there are huge pyroclastic flows of dust,
A volcano took out the towers and oddly the flow did not burn people on the streets alive?

A pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of hot gas and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).[2] The gas can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F). Pyroclastic flows normally hug the ground and travel downhill, or spread laterally under gravity. Their speed depends upon the density of the current, the volcanic output rate, and the gradient of the slope. They are a common and devastating result of certain explosive volcanic eruptions
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262057 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
And why did the west penthouse remain to fall with the visible exterior of the building? Its supporting structure clearly remained to the very end and was "taken out" along with the rest of the building support all at once.
The structural supports are not the outer walls.

This evidence supports the NIST contention that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns were weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.

As for Building 7 and the evidence for Controlled Demolition, let's review the evidence...

What we do have for sure.

1) Fireman saying there was "a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors." "I would say it was probably about a third of it".

2) A laymen officer the fireman was standing next to said, "that building doesn’t look straight." He then says "It didn’t look right".

3) They put a transit on it and afterward were "pretty sure she was going to collapse."

4) They "saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13".

5) Photographic evidence of a fire directly under the penthouse which collapsed first.

6) The penthouse fell first, followed by the rest of the building shortly after.

7) The collapse happened from the bottom.

8) Photographic evidence of large smoke plumes against the back of B7. Plumes of smoke so large you can't see the entire rear of the 47 story office building.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262058 Nov 8, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You always fall back on the "p=mv"
Do you even know what it means.
If you do explain it.
How about you either link to this or admit you were lying first!

onemale wrote:
<quoted text> 6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262059 Nov 8, 2013
After the east penthouse collapsed, several seconds elapsed, then the west penthouse began to collapse, at nearly the same time the roofline of the building developed a kink near the center, then all support across the entire width of the building was suddenly removed, a vertical swath of windows under the west penthouse were simultaneously blown out, the building suddenly went limp, and (within a fraction of a second) it transitioned from full support to freefall.

I am not using the term "freefall" loosely here. I used a video analysis tool to carefully measure the
velocity profile of the falling building using CBS video footage from a fixed camera aimed almost
squarely at the north wall. A video detailing this measurement is available at YouTube/user/ae911truth.

I calibrated my measurements with the heights of two points in the building provided in the NIST
Building 7 report released in August 2008, so I know the picture scale is good. My measurements
indicate that with sudden onset the building underwent approximately 2.5 seconds of literal freefall.

This is equivalent to approximately 8 stories of fall in which the falling section of the building
encountered zero resistance. For an additional 8 stories it encountered minimal resistance, during which it continued to accelerate, but at a rate less than freefall. Only beyond those 16 stories of drop did the falling section of the building interact significantly with the underlying structure and decelerate.

http://911speakout.org/Freefall.pdf

Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#262060 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
As for WTC 7:
NIST claims that the collapse of their one key column led to a progressive collapse of the entire interior of the building leaving only a hollow shell.
The collapse of the building, seen in numerous videos, is described by NIST as the collapse of the "facade," the hollow shell. They have no evidence for this scenario, however, and a great deal of evidence contradicts it. After the collapse of the east penthouse there is no visible distortion of the walls and only a few windows are broken at this time. Had the failure of interior columns propagated throughout the interior of the building, as asserted by NIST, it would surely have propagated to the much closer exterior walls and distorted or collapsed them.
(Major crumpling of the exterior walls, by the way, is exactly what is shown in the animations produced by NIST's computer simulation of the collapse.)
But the actual videos of the building show that the
exterior remained rigid during this early period.
At the onset of collapse you can see in the videos that the entire building suddenly goes limp, like a dying person giving up the ghost. The limpness of the freefalling structure highlights by contrast the earlier rigidity.
http://911speakout.org/Freefall.pdf
Huh Eh !
The firemen who were there tell the whole story. Your theory is false.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#262061 Nov 8, 2013
A big FUHK YOU to pig boy, sorry charlie and all their so-called debwunker friends who inhabit this site and try to debwunk the facts and evidence posted here with ridicule. Oh and FUHK YOU and the horse you rode in on You know who you are.

Huh Eh !

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#262062 Nov 8, 2013
Here is what the fire chief said.

"Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area --(Q. A collapse zone?)-- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed." - Chief Cruthers

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#262063 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
A big FUHK YOU to pig boy, sorry charlie and all their so-called debwunker friends who inhabit this site and try to debwunk the facts and evidence posted here with ridicule. Oh and FUHK YOU and the horse you rode in on You know who you are.
Huh Eh !
Very intelligent post......NOT.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#262064 Nov 8, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
encountered zero resistance. For an additional 8 stories it encountered minimal resistance, during which it continued to accelerate, but at a rate less than freefall.
Yea, That should tell you something, there was resistance, NO CD!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min TRUE CATHOLIC her... 690,499
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 3 min Trump is a joke 42,247
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min Gabriel 989,763
God......do You enjoy wacthing me SUFFER?? 16 min Paul McCartney is... 20
I absolutely HATE my LG V20 smartphone!!! 2 hr Doctor REALITY 1
Slop your Hogs again please God!!! 3 hr 1967 is calling 2
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 6 hr Nacked Truth 619,844
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 7 hr Rabbis on the Run 140
Bring the jobs back to the USA! 12 hr Paul is dead 632
More from around the web