Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#261847 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
But what happened to nine of the wheels???
You positively identified one
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira ...

This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77. The key features of the wreckage perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200,

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261848 Nov 4, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
It's easy to say it, but you can't prove it. Now can you pig boy?

The fdr information came from the FBI. The same organization that confiscated all the video cameras in the name of national security.

Oh but you certainly believe them without question don't you? They spoon feed you the same old shit and you lap it up. Its easier than having your own opinion about things you know nothing about.

Huh Eh ! pig boy
Oh but oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS, your personal incredulity is worth absolutely nothing.

This is where the twoof twain always derails, the point where you actually prove the information we have is all fake.

Sure in twooferdumb all you have to do is make empty claims but here in reality those empty claims are useless.

The convergence of evidence which includes everything from witnesses seeing a passenger jet hit the Pentagon to photos of debris consistent with the type of plane (not) in question all supports exactly what the fdr says.

Couple all that with inflight calls from loved ones relating their real world experience (as opposed to your fantasy world) and it's no wonder you dance and twitch rather than "prove".

Then there's the plane sized hole in the Pentagon...oh but that's not important anymore, is it.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261849 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>But what happened to nine of the wheels???
The tires could have burned but metal does not burn.
Around 30 years ago I made a wood burning stove, all that has been changed are the liners the rest if the stove is still in use today.
Your idiotic analogy aside, there isn't now nor will there ever be a requirement to satisfy the incredulity of kooks like you by supplying pictures of even the smallest piece of wreckage when the entire body if evidence already proves AA 77 hit the Pentagon.

But like you morons all claiming the entry hole was >20' wide, it's just you desperation to avoid reality that forces you to play the constant fool.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261850 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
Hey pig, since you and your buddies made this site into an insult contest:
How about that pig roast? You'll be the guest of honor. Guaranteed!!!
*yawn*

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261852 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>And you are the one who said the hole in the Pentagon was the exit hole when there was nothing big enough to make the hole. That in itself debunks you your ass.
Oh Manyfails, you do realize how easily I can prove you're lying right?

Interesting though, after you put up such a fight based on your own obtuseness, you're now taking the exact opposite position in your inept attempt to insult me...which only serves to prove that you were lying to begin with when you claimed the entry hole was less than 20' wide.

More self debunking, too frikking funny !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261853 Nov 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>Hello Magnesium, Titanium and aluminum all burn, very hot too.
In fact metal fires are the worst, because water excites it and makes it worse.
Now don't go confusing him with facts!
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261854 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
ou can't find any link debunking him so you make something up.
Really, DID YOU EVER FIND A LINK TO THIS?

onemale wrote:
<quoted text> 6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261855 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Moreover the link debunks your ass.
SO TRUE BUT You are so shallow in intellect you did not even notice.
onemale wrote:
The jet engine found at the Pentagon does not match that of 757.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
DUMBMALE SELFDEBUNKS WITH A LINK!

LMFO! PANTYSNIFFER, DO YOU EVEN READ!

FROM YOUR LINK!

In summary, we have studied two key pieces of wreckage photographed at the Pentagon shortly after September 11 and found them to be entirely consistent with the Rolls-Royce RB211-535 turbofan engine found on a Boeing 757 operated by American Airlines.

The circular engine disk debris is just the right size and shape to match the compressor stages of the RB211, and it also shows evidence of being attached to a triple-shaft turbofan like the RB211.

There is simply no evidence to suggest these items came from any other engine model than the RB211-535, and the vast majority of these engines are only used on one type of plane--the Boeing 757.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261856 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Moreover the link debunks your ass.
YEA, If one actually read them first this would not happen.
onemale wrote:
The landing gear found at the Pentagon does not match that of a 575
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspira...
AND DUMBMALE SELF DEBUNKS AGAIN, FROM YOUR LINK!

DO YOU EVEN READ WHAT YOU USE AS A LINK?

This investigation indicates that the only wheel matching that found at the Pentagon is the main gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, the same model as American Airlines Flight 77.

The key features of the wreckage--including the number, size, and shape of the cutouts and bolt attachments--perfectly match those found in a main landing gear wheel of a Boeing 757-200, as illustrated in the above comparison. None of the wheels of the Global Hawk, A-3, or 737 match the debris, which is not surprising since all of these aircraft weigh considerably less than the 757 and use correspondingly smaller wheels of differing design.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261857 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So what are your credentials?
I'll trust a true patriotic with 3 degrees in engineering.
With over a thousand of experts like this, why in the blue hell do you think I would listen to you???
EVEN When they have mutually exclusive theories, you are not looking for the truth, you are just looking for anything that fits your pre determined conclusion which is limited to THE GOVERNMENT AND THE JEWS DID IT, no real reason to weigh any evidence.
onemale wrote:
Dr. Judy Wood is an engineer who is ending all speculation of 9/11
Her credentals:
* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.
This is a very long clip but well worth the view.
If your willing to listen to the same 911 story for over a decade, you should be willing to hear all new evidence backed up by a 500 page book that has never been challenged or redacted . That alone should tell you SHE IS THE REAL DEAL and is a true patriot who is demonized but never discussed by 9/11 community, but i can assure you those days are limited.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sRlYwyqDA3YXX
----------

WELL THEN ALL THOSE EXPERTS YOU LIKE TO QUOTE ARE WRONG PANTYSNIFFER!

ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH DEBUNK JUDY WOOD

Fortunately, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have recently made their position very clear on this matter regarding Directed Energy Weapon theories. A new article written by Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts shows many of the absurdities of Judy Wood's claims. The article is reproduced here, with some extra links I have added:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261858 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And the government controls the news
Yea, That is what Nixon said during Watergate and Obama did about the Health Care Website, that the press was printing what they wanted!

WHO am I kidding, that was never said and you remain blinding stupid.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261859 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it would seem so, but under Ford and Carter it was Top Secret, so obviously we never heard of it until Reagan.
If the Star Wars program was Secret under Ford and Carter how do you know about it, LINK! OR LIE!
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261860 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
One 5/8 bolt doesn't hold up each floor.
According to a drawing at least 200 bolts were used on each floor.
DID I SAY one, Or are you just retarded?

"Yes, They were 5/8 inch bolts much of a tilt would snap them, it's not going to fall over like a tree."
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261861 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You are notorious for putting down people who severed in the armed forces... shame on you f___ ing bastard! I don't appreciate it one damn bit and I'm sure many others doesn't either.
Show me one example where I did, now if you served I would be glad to point out you were too mentally unstable to serve.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261862 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Dr. Robert Bowman PhD. flew 101 combat missions over Vietnam.
You are notorious for putting down people who severed in the armed forces... shame on you f___ ing bastard! I don't appreciate it one damn bit and I'm sure many others doesn't either.
LINK OR LIE, Show me one case where I have done so!
Pegasus

United States

#261863 Nov 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Jet fuel won't burn Titanium.
Many, many years ago when aluminum was cheap, I threw a piece of sheet aluminum into a brush fire and it didn't cause a raging inferno, it just slowly melted.
Next time blast some free-air at your little brush fire with a leaf blower and squirt a couple good jiggers of Kingsford charcoal lighting fluid on that brush fire.....keep that air flowing just above the embers..........on second tbought scratch all that......seeing bow moronic you are you will have the neighborhood ablaze if not yourself or both.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261864 Nov 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LINK OR LIE, Show me one case where I have done so!
Did you go to the link? Dr. Bowman is the same as those phony "experts" who always appear in court proceedings. They try to get you to believe them by touting a big list of irrelevant credentials. It always gets down to the old line, "Trust me, I'm a doctor," routine. I always take them with a grain of salt. When I get on a jury, during deliberations, I always become a leader because others want to get done with the case and get on with their lives after listening to so much boring shit. I help them to organize everything they heard and rate it accordingly. Is it factual, tangible, etc. The experts are always at the bottom of the list. Fore example, suppose you have the word of an "expert" against the word of a coroner. The coroner actually examined a piece of tangible evidence; the "expert" only made an opinion. Which is more relevant? Yep. Bottom of the list. I would put Bowman at the bottom of the list wearing a tin foil hat. He jumped to several conclusions without examining the evidence.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261865 Nov 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
LINK OR LIE, Show me one case where I have done so!
Of course. Not only that, the reply is a specious ad hominem straw man argument of the weakest kind. It is laughable.
Charlie Sheen

Weeping Water, NE

#261866 Nov 4, 2013
No but I have been there many times. Sounds like your experience in Court is all about justice and organization. Since I have more than one job I pick the ones that move me but for the full timers with iffy cases you are their worst nightmare, they want a jury that runs on emotion and takes two experts and does not weigh them but lets them cancel each other out so it's not evidence of anything.

Typical Tactic. If you think you got it in the bag ask for a bench trial so the judge decides as he or she uses your method.

If the case is iffy get a jury and appeal to emotion and not the facts.
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you go to the link? Dr. Bowman is the same as those phony "experts" who always appear in court proceedings. They try to get you to believe them by touting a big list of irrelevant credentials. It always gets down to the old line, "Trust me, I'm a doctor," routine. I always take them with a grain of salt. When I get on a jury, during deliberations, I always become a leader because others want to get done with the case and get on with their lives after listening to so much boring shit. I help them to organize everything they heard and rate it accordingly. Is it factual, tangible, etc. The experts are always at the bottom of the list. Fore example, suppose you have the word of an "expert" against the word of a coroner. The coroner actually examined a piece of tangible evidence; the "expert" only made an opinion. Which is more relevant? Yep. Bottom of the list. I would put Bowman at the bottom of the list wearing a tin foil hat. He jumped to several conclusions without examining the evidence.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261867 Nov 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
No but I have been there many times. Sounds like your experience in Court is all about justice and organization. Since I have more than one job I pick the ones that move me but for the full timers with iffy cases you are their worst nightmare, they want a jury that runs on emotion and takes two experts and does not weigh them but lets them cancel each other out so it's not evidence of anything.
Typical Tactic. If you think you got it in the bag ask for a bench trial so the judge decides as he or she uses your method.
If the case is iffy get a jury and appeal to emotion and not the facts.
<quoted text>
Exactly. I use it both ways. If I want to get on a case I usually can. Otherwise, I just play it and get kicked out. I was on one case where the pictures gave the whole story right from the start. All I needed to do was explain the physics of how it happened. The two experts did a good job of confusing the issues involved. If I have been the prosecution expert, it would have been a slam-dunk case. OTOH, if I hadn't been on the jury or been an alternate, it would have ended in a hung jury for sure. To think they almost kicked me out. Too bad for them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 1 min Holy Jehowa Witness 445,832
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 2 min inbred Genius 2,112
What Your Church Won't Tell You by Dave and Gar... (Apr '10) 3 min Holy Jehowa Witness 33,209
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 3 min UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 184,816
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 5 min Holy Jehowa Witness 678,575
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 38 min UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 118,535
preparing to make slaves of all "human" americans 42 min UidiotRaceUMAKEWO... 8
More from around the web