Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#261700 Oct 31, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, in any crime scene they test for everything.
Yes, they always test for explosives in drowning victims.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261701 Oct 31, 2013
onemale wrote:
You and the pig are ignorant.
NIST spokesperson debunks your lies.
NIST Admits, WTC DID NOT Pancake.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZHng42BpHDcXX
Did you watch your own video? This is the best explanation I have heard so far.

The trusses deflected pulling the outside walls inward until they snapped and failed. Then the weight of the upper floors started to move. Of course when that happened, the rest pancaked down.

You have just provided proof of your own idiocy.

Thanks pal.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261702 Oct 31, 2013
AussieBobby wrote:
<quoted text>
Best self debunking link ever.
Why did the tower collapse?
Don't you just love that? An idiot provides one of the best explanations totally debunking himself. I'd say that was a great link wouldn't you?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261703 Oct 31, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Yes, they always test for explosives in drowning victims.
They also test for twoofer dust in the nostrils, especially when it looks like they drowned themselves on purpose.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261704 Oct 31, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>

Nobody says the plot was our people or our government. Our government is incompetent, and that bureaucratic incompetence leads to corruption, and the ability to be manipulated by black ops intelligence operations controlled by treasonous interests, that our themselves controlled by interests that are not American-centric. And you think that same bureaucratic incompetence leads to justice, freedoms, and economic prosperity of the citizens, then you ask me if I'm sane?
FU
Nice rant.

Are insults easier for you?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261705 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
You and the pig are ignorant.
NIST spokesperson debunks your lies.
NIST Admits, WTC DID NOT Pancake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZHng42BpHDcXX
Good grief you're dumb as a stump!

FEMA originally said they thought it was a pancake collapse and that was well before NIST wrote their reports.

NIST concluded it was progressive collapse and the evidence shows it was.

You're just an mindless imbecile Manyfails!
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261706 Nov 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Good grief you're dumb as a stump!
FEMA originally said they thought it was a pancake collapse and that was well before NIST wrote their reports.
NIST concluded it was progressive collapse and the evidence shows it was.
You're just an mindless imbecile Manyfails!
Sorry porky but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261708 Nov 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you watch your own video? This is the best explanation I have heard so far.
The trusses deflected pulling the outside walls inward until they snapped and failed. Then the weight of the upper floors started to move. Of course when that happened, the rest pancaked down.
You have just provided proof of your own idiocy.
Thanks pal.
Sorry but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261709 Nov 1, 2013
INTERNATIONAL CHARGES LEADING TO
OBAMA'S ARREST AND G.W BUSH TRIAL
What you do NOT see on the governmental controlled nightly news.
The rest of the world is NOT buying into the 9/11 official story.



“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261710 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry porky but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
Are you as dumb as you sound Manyfails?

If I could post it in crayon you just might have a chance of understanding it.

FEMA surmised it was a pancake collapse before NIST wrote their report which found it was a progressive collapse that was initiated by the upper block pancaking onto the lower portion of the building.

This exemplifies why you morons could never convince anyone with a clue.

You do understand this is perfect example of why Ignorance is Bliss insulted you right?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261711 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Sorry but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
You haven't got a clue what the "official story" is.

You just regurgitate stupid you see in yourube videos and read on conspirastupid websites.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261712 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
They did pancake after the initial failure. His theory is that the outside skeleton was pulled inward snapping the joints. Then the upper floors started to move downward as a unit. Do you have a point or are you just making another pointless argument? Belief is totally irrelevant.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261713 Nov 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you as dumb as you sound Manyfails?
If I could post it in crayon you just might have a chance of understanding it.
FEMA surmised it was a pancake collapse before NIST wrote their report which found it was a progressive collapse that was initiated by the upper block pancaking onto the lower portion of the building.
This exemplifies why you morons could never convince anyone with a clue.
You do understand this is perfect example of why Ignorance is Bliss insulted you right?
Exactly. Well stated.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#261714 Nov 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a standard investigation protocol for buildings rammed with fully fuelled passenger jets that burn until loss of strength and load bearing capacity causes collapse?
Link Ignorance!
So pig boy, what is the "standard investigation protocol". You claim there is?

Or did you lose it in your Canadian iPhone?

Huh Eh !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261715 Nov 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>So pig boy, what is the "standard investigation protocol". You claim there is?

Or did you lose it in your Canadian iPhone?

Huh Eh !
Well since you're the one making the claim it wasn't followed, you must have read if oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

Oh, you were just debunking yourself by admitting there was no standard investigation protocol for terrorists ramming passenger jets into buildings!

Gotchya!

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#261716 Nov 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you as dumb as you sound Manyfails?
If I could post it in crayon you just might have a chance of understanding it.
FEMA surmised it was a pancake collapse before NIST wrote their report which found it was a progressive collapse that was initiated by the upper block pancaking onto the lower portion of the building.
This exemplifies why you morons could never convince anyone with a clue.
You do understand this is perfect example of why Ignorance is Bliss insulted you right?
Whether it's initiation is called pancake or progressive, doesn't mean a whole lot. But the piece found in the basement dubbed the "Meteorite" showed some pancaking in fact happened.
I think the pancake name doesn't describe it well enough though essentially that's what it was. Because the layers of cake crumbled up and mixed together so much.
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#261717 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, in any crime scene they test for everything.
Everything you say.....at a crime scene.
So if a murder victim of say a stabbing cleary depicts their punctures, slashes, or torn flesh an examination of the deceased is negative for bullet entry wounds you would not conduct swabbing for powder residue.
You know squat about crime scene investigation, infact you would probably be the type that would trapse into a crime area/scene and taint and contaminate the hell out of it.
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#261718 Nov 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
So pig boy, what is the "standard investigation protocol". You claim there is?
Or did you lose it in your Canadian iPhone?
Huh Eh !
WTF do you know about investigation moron.....you can't even find the proper diameter of a jet engine in relation to a known make and model ....inclusive of it's manufactured year.

In short you couldn't find a haystack in a needle factory

You're not fooling anyone azzhole
Pegasus

Norcross, GA

#261719 Nov 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry but the NIST spokesman specifically said "the buildings did not pancake"
Either you believe the official story or you do not, you can't have it both ways.
How's that footage of Atta mingling with the masses post 911?

I just thought I would remind you when Charlie S is not posting.

I just love to watch you dodge and duck.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#261720 Nov 1, 2013
Pegasus wrote:
<quoted text>Everything you say.....at a crime scene.
So if a murder victim of say a stabbing cleary depicts their punctures, slashes, or torn flesh an examination of the deceased is negative for bullet entry wounds you would not conduct swabbing for powder residue.
You know squat about crime scene investigation, infact you would probably be the type that would trapse into a crime area/scene and taint and contaminate the hell out of it.
There is a huge difference between a crime scene, and a landscape of disaster.

The two can only be compared in thought, the cleanup between them is so very different ..the comparison ends there.

To cordon off a small area is possible to study it and solve the crime.

You cannot shut down NYC , even for a day, though 9/11 tested this ...even it could not. So to clean the disaster up was the priority.
Running in place was the collection of evidence. But it had to be done to restore function, of the world markets and the city.
So arguments that enough time and effort were not spent on one task was a odds to the other.

Rock and a hard place, somethings going to suffer, god it was mostly the NY'ers but they had the courage to pull through it and clean it up , while still trying to collect evidence. They should have been awarded a medal for their efforts and courage in the aftermath.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 38 min Russian Amb Grope... 2,630
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 4 hr Trump Worshiper 119,219
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 hr Trump Worshiper 679,164
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 4 hr earthly science f... 445,839
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 4 hr Holy Jehowa Witness 46,214
What Your Church Won't Tell You by Dave and Gar... (Apr '10) 4 hr Trumps worshiper 33,216
Melania Trump's hair shines in Saudi sun 4 hr Trumps worshiper 5
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) Thu UMAKEWORLDPEACEUM... 982,141
More from around the web