Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“e pluribus unum”

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#261385 Oct 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Scroll to 3:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YV0uCwDiGk8XX
That's hardly conclusive, the test would have to use at least 10 people, to see if any of them could.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261386 Oct 25, 2013
Jesse Ventura goes to the Pentagon to get answers, but instead he gets whitewashed:
Scroll to 8:31

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261387 Oct 25, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes it does,an accidental crash will be at a mush less velocity.
This is why the 9/11 crashes lost so many black boxes, ordinary accidental crashes are usually at low speeds because of a crippled plane or damaged plane trying to land, they are most often at take off or landing where the planes are only moving slightly above their stall speeds. The only exception is when one has lost all control at altitude, that doesn't happen very often. No one designs buildings to withstand 4-500 mile per hour impacts and 10,000 gallons of fuel. Because.... that would be impossible.
Technically they however did withstand even the high velocity impact, but the fires caused a catastrophic cascading failure.
Exactly. Flying over 500mph makes a huge difference. Don't you just love the one about jet fuel being too volitile? Hell, ever try lighting a BBQ without starter fluid? Starer fluid is not nearly as hot at jet fuel. Once those building ignited, the updrafts did the rest.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261388 Oct 25, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
According to architects who designed the towers designed them to withstand jet crashes. A jet crash is a jet crash it doesn't change the result if it is purposely or an accident.
Right. I suppose he designed them for a well fueled jetliner to crash into them at 500mph.

Are you kidding me?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261389 Oct 25, 2013
How many buildings did the architect test his theory on? In reality, the buildings did remarkably well to remain standing as long as they did.
A tree

Tracy, CA

#261390 Oct 26, 2013
I'm pretty thirsty, can I get some water please?

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#261391 Oct 26, 2013
A tree wrote:
I'm pretty thirsty, can I get some water please?
With or without mind controlling fluoride parasites ?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261392 Oct 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. I suppose he designed them for a well fueled jetliner to crash into them at 500mph.
Are you kidding me?
Oh yes and you're the expert...
Their opinions outweigh yours, 100 to none.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261393 Oct 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. I suppose he designed them for a well fueled jetliner to crash into them at 500mph.
Are you kidding me?
Of course the figured the jet fuel, how else would the jet get there???
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261394 Oct 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
How many buildings did the architect test his theory on? In reality, the buildings did remarkably well to remain standing as long as they did.
Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#261395 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
According to architects who designed the towers designed them to withstand jet crashes. A jet crash is a jet crash it doesn't change the result if it is purposely or an accident.
Yea, They did, he also said there was not study to determine the results of a fire.

“e pluribus unum”

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#261396 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
What are you talking about? Are you on drugs?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#261397 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
About freefall speed, SO THERE WAS RESISTANCE, that did not come from fine dust.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#261398 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh yes and you're the expert...
Their opinions outweigh yours, 100 to none.
Well, Since these two are mutually exclusive one is wrong, which one!
onemale wrote:
Dr. Judy Wood is an engineer who is ending all speculation of 9/11
Her credentals:
* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.
This is a very long clip but well worth the view.
If your willing to listen to the same 911 story for over a decade, you should be willing to hear all new evidence backed up by a 500 page book that has never been challenged or redacted . That alone should tell you SHE IS THE REAL DEAL and is a true patriot who is demonized but never discussed by 9/11 community, but i can assure you those days are limited.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sRlYwyqDA3YXX
----------

WELL THEN ALL THOSE EXPERTS YOU LIKE TO QUOTE ARE WRONG PANTYSNIFFER!

ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH DEBUNK JUDY WOOD

Fortunately, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have recently made their position very clear on this matter regarding Directed Energy Weapon theories. A new article written by Jonathan Cole, Richard Gage and Gregg Roberts shows many of the absurdities of Judy Wood's claims. The article is reproduced here, with some extra links I have added:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/arch...
Anonymous

Sharon Springs, NY

#261399 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Jessie Ventura's son has some flying experience and when he tried the flight simulator of flying a 757 into the Pentagon, after several tries he couldn't do it, therefore if you have no flying experience it is a safe bet to say you can't do it.
That is so stupid considering eyewitnesses SAW (YEA I SAID SAW LIKE MEANING WITH THEIR TWO&#128064;) a plane clearly hit the pentagon (from some highway into/out of Washington) and security videos also catch the plane barely 10 feet above the ground ram into the pentagon
Anonymous

Sharon Springs, NY

#261400 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
They didn't crumble into fine dust, if they did then none of the tower would remain, yet at least once a month the Port Authority of Albany, and the Port Authority of NY/NJ process pieces of the towers that still come in, as I would know this because my father is a boss at the port authority of albany
Anonymous

Sharon Springs, NY

#261401 Oct 26, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. I suppose he designed them for a well fueled jetliner to crash into them at 500mph.
Are you kidding me?
Well actually he designed them to withstand a crash by a Boeing 767, but as these planes were 787s it was no use
Pegasus

Bronx, NY

#261402 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
"In about freefall speed".

Onemale you really are changing for the better,......you now realize the twins did not drop at freefall speed.
Pay no mind to Dr. Dipshit .....I see you finally caught on to his/her/its grooming tactics.

Soon you will step into the light and all the conspiracy crap will seem like one long bad dream.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261403 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Of course the figured the jet fuel, how else would the jet get there???
Of course you don't really listen to experts, how else would you become a mindless twoofbot!
Insults Are Easier wrote:
The WTC towers were designed withstand the impact of two, count them, two 707's. 707's are considerably smaller then those aircraft that struck the towers, yet not considerably lighter due to the composite materials the newer aircraft are constructed with.
I said,

Porkpie Hat wrote, "<quoted text>
You've been shown time after time that the designer of the buildings did a few calculations to prove the buildings would survive a hit from a slow moving 707 lost in fog and no fuel loading was taken into account.
But then there's the fact that the buildings did survive the impacts..,.d'oh!
"

Leslie Robertson, lead designer of WTC 1 & 2 said,

"The two towers were the first structures outside of the military and nuclear industries designed to resist the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707. It was assumed that the jetliner would be lost in the fog, seeking to land at JFK or at Newark. To the best of our knowledge, little was known about the effects of a fire from such an aircraft, and no designs were prepared for that circumstance. Indeed, at that time, no fireproofing systems were available to control the effects of such fires."

http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/Engine...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261404 Oct 26, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, then suddenly they crumbled into fine dust in mid-air in about free fall speed.
Right, nothing but dust.

Of course you've never done even an image search for ground zero after the buildings fell so that's just another tidbit of stupid you've mindlessly fell for.

Go back to sleep moron.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 min New Age Spiritual... 665,430
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min RiversideRedneck 977,423
Secular Humanism VS Christianity 2 min Lonestar 244
Liberals say INCEST marriage is okay 7 min Guest appearance 2
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 8 min Scaritual 88,323
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 1 hr RiccardoFire 45,844
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Ricky F 184,766
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 2 hr Joe Fortuna 619
More from around the web