Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261169 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're a professional aircraft accident investigator now eh?
Yet your knowledge of physics is zilch.
Uh huh...
You don't have to be any kind of professional or physicist to look at photos.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261170 Oct 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Once again thanks for proving my case.
It's quite hard to disagree with you being an obtuse imbecile...so you're quite welcome!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261171 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Prove there were anti aircraft missile batteries at the pentagon.

Prove there was a no fly zone over the pentagon.

Prove there were fighter jets dedicated to the defender of the pentagon.

You spewing old debunked myths doesn't help you look any less idiotic.
And thanks for proving mine Manyfails!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#261172 Oct 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>You prove there aren't.
The fact of the matter still stands the Pentagon is the most protected building in the world
No moron, I'm not doing your homework for you.

You claimed there are anti missile sites at the pentagon...since no one can prove a negative it's up to you they exist(ed).

You claim there's no fly zones around the pentagon...your claim, you support it.

You claimed there were fighter jets dedicated to the defence of the pentagon...same as above.

The reality is you're entire list is something you read on a twoofer website and mindlessly accepted without verifying any of it.

That's the definition of a useful idiot...enter you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#261173 Oct 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
What happened to the anti-aircraft missiles the Pentagon is equipped with?
What happened to the no-fly zone over the Pentagon?
What happened to the military jets that protect the Pentagon?
Did they all fail on the same day?
There are none. That is mythology.
http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_De...

The plane was off-course intentionally. It dipped below radar and was spotted by the Air National Guard C130 pilot.

It takes over an hour to scramble fighter pre 9/11. There was no protection possible at the time.

Ditto.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261174 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove there were anti aircraft missile batteries at the pentagon.
Prove there was a no fly zone over the pentagon.
Prove there were fighter jets dedicated to the defender of the pentagon.
You spewing old debunked myths doesn't help you look any less idiotic.
Here's your proof (and a whole lot more) from military commanders, pilots and air traffic controllers etc.





onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261175 Oct 21, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
There are none. That is mythology.
http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_De...
The plane was off-course intentionally. It dipped below radar and was spotted by the Air National Guard C130 pilot.
It takes over an hour to scramble fighter pre 9/11. There was no protection possible at the time.
Ditto.
Here's your proof (and a whole lot more) from military commanders, pilots and air traffic controllers etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261176 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh look, dumb and dumber agree!
Scroll to 9:25 and hit pause...
It debunks your story that the jet exited out the other side:

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#261177 Oct 21, 2013


http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Independent analysis of WTC 7's amount of freefall acceleration.

See for yourself.

Huh Eh !
Doc Real

Portsmouth, VA

#261178 Oct 21, 2013
Most people are not even sufficiently aware of so much else, that is the truth, but is very different than the way things are supposed to be, either.

So, when someone not familiar with those other truths behind the lies, on so many subjects, that go back a long time before 9/11, hear this one big story (9/11), as their introduction to the realities of the big bad world, it is overwhelming, and they cannot handle it (the truth), so they reject it as not fitting in their world view, which is significantly lacking, and most people are significantly deficient of full levels of knowledge and understanding of the truth of the nature of the world, it's power structure of who really controls most things, etc....

This (9/11) is not the only thing that is very different than official stories.

Many other events are very different than the bullshit that gets fed to the masses for the official story put out for public consumption...

But for people who do not know the nature of power in the world and that it is very different than the BS we are taught, well, they can't handle the truth on this one big event (9/11) either, of course....

They can't believe any people would be that bad,(whoever is involved in the government, etc) because they cannot relate to it, themselves.....

And that is part of how the elite ultra rich who actually rule the world get away with their stuff...

Another part is that if anything sounds hard to believe, that is, it sounds crazy (it can be ridiculed compared to conventional wisdom, which is wrong), then that is enough to discredit almost anything.....

Therefore the nonsense that still holds sway is that anything that sounds hard to believe (sounds "crazy" (to a stupid person)), therefore must not be true!

Anything that sounds crazy (hard to believe is true) CAN'T BE TRUE!

What obvious nonsense! But, IT WORKS!

Why don't people learn a little about what the Hegelian Dialectic is?

Why don't more people know what "False flag events" are, and that they are a fact as things that happen?

Because most people do not want to know anything that shakes up their world view.

Any hard to swallow reality,(a hard truth, a hard reality) is something most people willfully ignore.

If it is too hard to take, most people will deny it.

Yes, of course, unless you are a total ninny, you know 9/11 was a huge inside job with a coverup.

The official story is the conspiracy theory that makes no sense.....

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#261179 Oct 21, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
There are none. That is mythology.
http://www.jod911.com/There_Are_No_Missile_De...
The plane was off-course intentionally. It dipped below radar and was spotted by the Air National Guard C130 pilot.
It takes over an hour to scramble fighter pre 9/11. There was no protection possible at the time.
Ditto.
Funny, one Frenchman who wrote a book right after 911 that's full of lies, misrepresentations and delusions...and that's been debunked 9 ways to Sunday claims there were missile batteries around the Pentagon years and years ago and there's still sheep that believe it.

Let's just ignore the fact that this has never been proven to date I guess...not one picture of these static structures in a heavily populated area...not one person who helped install them has ever come forward.

If twoof told Manyfails there was a Walmart hidden behind a tree in his back yard he go running out there with food stamps in hand thinking about shopping sprees.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#261180 Oct 21, 2013
And hen there's the proximity of Ronald Regan International Airport to the Pentagon;

http://www.911myths.com/images/d/dc/Pentagona...

Note the directions of the runways...particularly the one that would either require a landing plane to fly right over the Pentagon or a plane taking off to do the same.

Honestly, do these sheep for twoof like looking like complete imbeciles?

Another one debunked.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#261181 Oct 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's your proof (and a whole lot more) from military commanders, pilots and air traffic controllers etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0OPxDSKY2pEXX
You're once again trying to cover for the lies you tell.

Twoof: A lie that can only be defended by more lies all told by liars.

Twoof on dummy.

Oh btw moron, someone claiming it's true isn't proving a bloody thing...particularly when the evidence tells a vastly difference story.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#261182 Oct 21, 2013
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/mou...

"Evidence" ^^^^^^
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Scroll to 9:25 and hit pause...
It debunks your story that the jet exited out the other side:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0OPxDSKY2pEXX
"Evidunce" ^^^^^

Moron, showing a picture and claiming it proves your idiotic point is just another example of your fallaciously derived, false logic.

Prove those windows aren't broken.

Prove the tail of the plane should have hit there.

Prove the tail of the plane didn't collapse and follow the plane into the building before it could have impacted.

You really have no clue what proof is...no really, you just don't.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261183 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/n otablecases/moussaoui/exhibits /
"Evidence" ^^^^^^
<quoted text>
"Evidunce" ^^^^^
Moron, showing a picture and claiming it proves your idiotic point is just another example of your fallaciously derived, false logic.
Prove those windows aren't broken.
Prove the tail of the plane should have hit there.
Prove the tail of the plane didn't collapse and follow the plane into the building before it could have impacted.
You really have no clue what proof is...no really, you just don't.
Are you really so blind to not see, there is no hole on the opposite of the building??? Meaning the plane never exited out the opposite side.

Pegasus

Silver Spring, MD

#261184 Oct 21, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Funny, one Frenchman who wrote a book right after 911 that's full of lies, misrepresentations and delusions...and that's been debunked 9 ways to Sunday claims there were missile batteries around the Pentagon years and years ago and there's still sheep that believe it.
Let's just ignore the fact that this has never been proven to date I guess...not one picture of these static structures in a heavily populated area...not one person who helped install them has ever come forward.
If twoof told Manyfails there was a Walmart hidden behind a tree in his back yard he go running out there with food stamps in hand thinking about shopping sprees.
Too bad Onemale was busy cleaning the toilets @ Walmart....so he had no time to burn his partial food stamp payday.

As for Zorderz he too was busy working Walmart as well.....he's the Button Guy/greeter at the main entrance.
When those two Bozos get together at WallyWorld the joint is jumping.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#261185 Oct 21, 2013
Dr. Judy Wood is an engineer who is ending all speculation of 9/11
Her credentals:
* Batchlor's degree in Science & Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)
* Master's degree in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics)
* PHD in Materials Engineering Science
With expertise in image analyses, optical methods, applied mechanics and over 35 years experience in this area.

This is a very long clip but well worth the view.

If your willing to listen to the same 911 story for over a decade, you should be willing to hear all new evidence backed up by a 500 page book that has never been challenged or redacted . That alone should tell you SHE IS THE REAL DEAL and is a true patriot who is demonized but never discussed by 9/11 community, but i can assure you those days are limited.

Your Crapulous Creeds

Portsmouth, VA

#261186 Oct 21, 2013
Choose ye an island! Fortify it! Dung it about with enginery of war!
Pegasus

Silver Spring, MD

#261187 Oct 21, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it crumbles on impact if it is going fast enough. If you don't believe me, what crash videos on YouTube.
Check this out. Where is the tail section?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =8A5xRqX8QREXX
The engines are massive so they go into the building. The engines are complex pieces of machinery which are spinning at thousands of RPMs. The virtually disintegrate. The tail section also disintegrates. No part of an airplane is designed to impact other structures and vehicles.
I wish you had not stated that last sentence WW.....Onefool has been making paper airplanes and covering his little paper "jets" with aluminum foil and they just won't crumble.

He has acomplished to tear his rotator cuff and pull ligaments in his shoulder trying to duplicate that flight whipping his creation against his basement wall.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#261188 Oct 21, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Aluminum is a very low carbon steel, therefore it doesn't crumble, it bends easily, there should be large smashed up pieces.
LOL... You're a complete doofus.

You realize they are different elements on the periodic table ?
N/M

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 3 min True Christian-Jew 981,340
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 12 min Chess 104,769
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min waaasssuuup 673,368
Ted Bundy's Daughter (Jul '14) 42 min cval84 8
is god black or white? and why? (Oct '08) 1 hr daniellehurley 452
CNN: Bill Cosby past away today after long batt... (Dec '08) 1 hr True Christian-Jew 84
crooks frauds predators 3 hr anonymous 1
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 4 hr FireyFellow44 445,814
More from around the web