The point I keep making is most people here approached this subject with the illusion of already knowing what happened.....and they don't. I approach the task of learning with an open mind.....<quoted text>
You could apply that yo anything and everything that happens everyday. It doesn't mean anything though and it's exactly what twoof has been trying to do right from September 12 2001.
Miring any discussion in minutia that requires a degree of accuracy not expected for any event just means the arguments are endless.
I tried to explain to one twoofer that an FEA is not infinitely accurate and can't account for the movement of every atom in a chaotic event.
He didn't get it.
Regarding the plane impact at the pentagon, there's just too much eye witness and physical evidence available to deny what happened and miring discussion in minutia is pointless.
Someone could show through modelling that the possibility exists for the plane to cause the damage we can see in pictures taken after the fact, but what's the point?
And it's not like the but cases accept legitimate models anyway...that's already been proven.
PS- You know I'm more upset at the conduct of all US branches of govt after 911......, it was despicable, the press' too. As a result of that conduct, US freedom and liberty suffered more self inflicted damage than any foreign terrorist attack could ever do.
Terrorism is a tactic, and the use of it is not restricted to those who are "officially" labeled as terrorists