Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#260589 Oct 10, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh .. Pantysniffing Liar, because they are pilots, but heck, lets see one pilot that actually trained the highjackers at Huffman Aviation and would know the most of their skill level!
Even though Hanjour showed a federal pilot's license and a log book cataloging 600 hours of flying experience, chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard declined to rent him a plane without more lessons.
BUT THEY GOT MORE TRAINING AND ....
And as Marcel Bernard pointed out, the hijackers wouldn't have required all the skills of a regular pilot:
"Despite Hanjour's poor reviews, he did have some ability as a pilot, said Bernard of Freeway Airport. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it," he said"
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/Newsday_com.h...
Boeing aircaft are designed to be flown mostly by computer.
He hijacker had to know how what buttons to push.


onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#260590 Oct 10, 2013

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260591 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
What flight school did you attend?
Go ahead with your fantasy land, I'll listen to real Pilots
What? Twenty armchair quarter backs who couldn't hit a target the size of the Pentagon?

Where did flight 77 go Twoofer?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260592 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Boeing aircaft are designed to be flown mostly by computer.
He hijacker had to know how what buttons to push.
That's easy. Kill the autopilot stupid.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260593 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I never mnade the assertion, idiot
Ask the pilots who made the assertion
The twenty pilots who couldn't hit the side of a barn? LMAO

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260594 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
Suddenly all the idiots are experts on aircraft.
Why should anyone listen to idiots???
I'll take the word of experienced pilots who have flown the actual aircraft.
I'm not an expert and I don't claim to be but
the idiots criticize ME because I post something creditable from real pilots.
Why should anyone listen to idiots who ignore the obvious?

What plausible explaination is there for any of the flights which did not end where they did?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260595 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
Wastewater at the helm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =tX-aUtqsoDcXX
Once a plane takes off, it is easy to fly and to crash. You didn't know that? Have you ever flown a plane yourself?
KittyKat

Chico, CA

#260596 Oct 10, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should anyone listen to idiots who ignore the obvious?
What plausible explaination is there for any of the flights which did not end where they did?
sewage water asks:"Why should anyone listen to idiots who ignore the obvious?"
Answer:You mean like the 9-11 report or the pathetic NIST report?

The sewer water slurper asks:"What plausible explaination is there for any of the flights which did not end where they did?"
Answer:Inside jobbity jobber

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260597 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
Wastewater at the helm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =tX-aUtqsoDcXX
Here. Check this one out. Experienced pilots stalled the B-52 and crashed. The plane was almost perpendicular to the ground. Forty degrees at over 500mph is perfectly plausible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#260598 Oct 10, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Here. Check this one out. Experienced pilots stalled the B-52 and crashed. The plane was almost perpendicular to the ground. Forty degrees at over 500mph is perfectly plausible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sjFIB1L3BPUXX
Just when you think you can see anything dumber, WasteOfWater strikes again.

Insults Are Easier

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260599 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
What does static and dynamic forces have to with statements of pilots???
Your as dumb as the day is long mid winter in Unuvik!

The pilot, who idioticly came to the conclusion that the flt 77 experienced 57g's(?) too, is making claims based on physics.

The article by aerospace engineers I posted addressed those physics.

You haven't got a snow balls chance in hell of understanding physics.

I know dummy, you still don't get it.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260600 Oct 10, 2013
KittyKat wrote:
<quoted text> sewage water asks:"Why should anyone listen to idiots who ignore the obvious?"
Answer:You mean like the 9-11 report or the pathetic NIST report?
The sewer water slurper asks:"What plausible explaination is there for any of the flights which did not end where they did?"
Answer:Inside jobbity jobber
Where did the planes go if not into the buildings? Prove to me that damaged buildings can't fall down.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260601 Oct 10, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Boeing aircaft are designed to be flown mostly by computer.
He hijacker had to know how what buttons to push.
Are you really so stupid you think it would be adversely difficult to find out where on a 757 panel the autopilot is located and how to set it??

Boeing B757 Technical Specifications....Autopilot Control Panel.......This is a general description of the 757 systems

http://www.google.ca/url...

That took about 10 seconds.

I know dummy, you don't get it.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260602 Oct 10, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Just when you think you can see anything dumber, WasteOfWater strikes again.
Insults Are Easier
Proverbs 26:11
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly.

We know. Insults are easier for you.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260603 Oct 10, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Just when you think you can see anything dumber, WasteOfWater strikes again.
Insults Are Easier
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>Sure, go back and address my posts about "molten steel".
Particularly the ones citing past news stories covering other fires which also mentioned molten steel.
Funny how you refuse to address on topic posts which destroy your delusions then whine about people being off topic eh vulgar-tommy?
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
Except those stories reference steel that is plated and an office fire melted the plating.
And those building didn't symmetrically completely collapse and at no point did they free fall.
And NIST didn't provide a cover up for those investigations as it did for 9/11.
But debunking is hard and
Insults Are Easier
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I never referenced your quoted paper, I referenced my own search on the subject. So pull it up, and re-comprehend what you missed.
Im sure not all Canadians act as you on a daily basis, or have all descended from traitorous sheep. I simply quoted historical fact, and South Park.
Your circular logic escapes me. You quote failed investigations that are shown to not be thorough, then ask for people to cite examples of tests never performed by the un-thorough investigation.
Only a traitorous descendant of anti-freedom refugees can fully explain the Canadian sheep mentality that you possess. With an elitist, name calling, scumbag mentality to boot.
Thats why
Insults Are Easier
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
So in order for that to be a lie , you would have to show steel has never been plated with less corrosive metal and then been involved in a building fire.
Try using logic, Dudley, its a heck of a time saver not needing to look for links on the internet.
Link or Think
Insults Are Easier
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Oh, the delicious irony!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260604 Oct 10, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't even know the black boxes weren't found. If true, then so much for that picture showing a Pentagon airliner passenger's body pretty much intact down to the skin. They claimed they found the engines inside that building with a 14 to 18 foot wide exploded entrance hole, yet couldn't find the black boxes or found them in an unusable state
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Where's the Boeing ?
I heard it was called a big fuhking airplane.
Or did it all go through that magic 20' rabbit hole that you say it did?
Huh Eh?!?!?!?!?!
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5029/07mw8...
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Here's a composite, from a twoofer website no less, that shows the hole in the Pentagon is well over 20',
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis...
And again, one twoofer makes a claim that was utterly ridiculous and unsupportable and all twoofers since mindlessly chant the same mantra like cutists parroting scripture...because twooferdumb has no mechanism for expelling stupid.
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/5029/07mw8...
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04...

Because for twoof, lying is easier.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260605 Oct 10, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Here. Check this one out. Experienced pilots stalled the B-52 and crashed. The plane was almost perpendicular to the ground. Forty degrees at over 500mph is perfectly plausible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =sjFIB1L3BPUXX
There's all kinds of video of pilots fying large jets doing exactly what these losers claim can't be done.

It's the equivilent of claiming the sun rises in the south.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

But then, twoofers are just the modern day equivilent of flat earth.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#260606 Oct 10, 2013
Twooferdumb: Where brains go to die...but the mouth lives on!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260607 Oct 10, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
Twooferdumb: Where brains go to die...but the mouth lives on!
Exactly. Most anyone can fly a plane once it is in the air. Crashing is also very easy. Safe take-offs and landings are another story. It takes little experience to reach a nearby target on visual and crash into it.
awsome dr Shrink

Baltimore, MD

#260608 Oct 10, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Most anyone can fly a plane once it is in the air. Crashing is also very easy. Safe take-offs and landings are another story. It takes little experience to reach a nearby target on visual and crash into it.
he he heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
you are really deceived by zionistic propganda and delusional not existed terrorists?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 7 min Brandy trujillo 980,109
Ring Payments 17 min annaleighanne 1
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 28 min -KENTUCKY- 100,153
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr guest 670,272
Why I’m no longer a Christian (Jul '08) 8 hr Peter Ross 445,651
Any hot teen girl wanna email me (Mar '12) 8 hr idk 8
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 10 hr WildWeirdWillie 184,287
More from around the web