Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,384 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Dr shrink

Baltimore, MD

#260123 Oct 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? Total waste of time and money except for the billboard company.
run run Forrest run

“Kenyan-born Obama=Antichrist”

Since: Sep 09

Casper, WY

#260124 Oct 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice rant bro. Did you forget to take your meds today?
I never "forget". I don't take them intentionally. Impeach the Kenyan-born Antichrist!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260125 Oct 1, 2013
Dr shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
run run Forrest run
Dope

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260126 Oct 1, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>I never "forget". I don't take them intentionally. Impeach the Kenyan-born Antichrist!
YAWN more boring shit from another paranoid dope
onemale

Pana, IL

#260128 Oct 1, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that claim has already been proven false. Why would the hijackers train to be pilots and never fly the planes? This is absurd.
They never learned to fly a huge commercial 757
onemale

Pana, IL

#260130 Oct 1, 2013
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
onemale

Pana, IL

#260131 Oct 1, 2013
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources
onemale

Pana, IL

#260132 Oct 1, 2013
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources

https://www.google.com/#q=9/11+hijackers+aliv...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260133 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
They never learned to fly a huge commercial 757
They obviously did. Besides, then didn't need to land or take off safely; all they needed to do was reach the target and crash into it. Even I could do that without flying lessons.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260134 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
Nonsense.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260135 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources
https://www.google.com/#q=9/11+hijackers+aliv...
Reputable sources? ROTFLMAO
nwo

Padre Island Ntl Seashor, TX

#260136 Oct 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources
https://www.google.com/#q=9/11+hijackers+aliv...
lies bullsh@t!!!!!

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#260137 Oct 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources
https://www.google.com/#q=9/11+hijackers+aliv...
Did TimesTwit teach you that.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#260138 Oct 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm
Linked at the bottom of the page you posted;

"A five-year-old story from our archive has been the subject of some recent editorial discussion here. The story, written in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, was about confusion at the time surrounding the names and identities of some of the hijackers. This confusion was widely reported and was also acknowledged by the FBI.

The story has been cited ever since by some as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were part of a US government conspiracy.

We later reported on the list of hijackers, thereby superseding the earlier report. In the intervening years we have also reported in detail on the investigation into the attacks, the 9/11 commission and its report.

We’ve carried the full report, executive summary and main findings and, as part of the recent fifth anniversary coverage, a detailed guide to what’s known about what happened on the day. But conspiracy theories have persisted. The confusion over names and identities we reported back in 2001 may have arisen because these were common Arabic and Islamic names.

In an effort to make this clearer, we have made one small change to the original story. Under the FBI picture of Waleed al Shehri we have added the words "A man called Waleed Al Shehri..." to make it as clear as possible that there was confusion over the identity. The rest of the story remains as it was in the archive as a record of the situation at the time."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10...

Thanks for that great display of your mad twoof reesurch skillz Manyfails!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#260139 Oct 2, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>Who cares? Total waste of time and money except for the billboard company.
Exactly.

Twoofer charlatan masters don't want a "new investigation" because that would end their gravy train and they'd have to find another conspiracy to milk where they could con gullible idiots to piss on the graves of murdered victims.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#260140 Oct 2, 2013
Dr shrink wrote:
<quoted text>run run Forrest run
Oh the irony!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260141 Oct 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
9/11 hijackers are still alive
Numerous reports from numerous reputable sources
Any link on this one or were you lying Diaper Sniffer!
onemale wrote:
6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260142 Oct 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
They never learned to fly a huge commercial 757
As I've explained in at least one prior column, Hani Hanjour's flying was hardly the show-quality demonstration often described. It was exceptional only in its recklessness. If anything, his loops and turns and spirals above the nation's capital revealed him to be exactly the shitty pilot he by all accounts was. To hit the Pentagon squarely he needed only a bit of luck, and he got it, possibly with help from the 757's autopilot. Striking a stationary object -- even a large one like the Pentagon -- at high speed and from a steep angle is very difficult. To make the job easier, he came in obliquely, tearing down light poles as he roared across the Pentagon's lawn.

It's true there's only a vestigial similarity between the cockpit of a light trainer and the flight deck of a Boeing. To put it mildly, the attackers, as private pilots, were completely out of their league. However, they were not setting out to perform single-engine missed approaches or Category 3 instrument landings with a failed hydraulic system. For good measure, at least two of the terrorist pilots had rented simulator time in jet aircraft, but striking the Pentagon, or navigating along the Hudson River to Manhattan on a cloudless morning, with the sole intention of steering head-on into a building, did not require a mastery of airmanship. The perpetrators had purchased manuals and videos describing the flight management systems of the 757/767, and as any desktop simulator enthusiast will tell you, elementary operation of the planes' navigational units and autopilots is chiefly an exercise in data programming. You can learn it at home. You won't be good, but you'll be good enough.

"They'd done their homework and they had what they needed," says a United Airlines pilot (name withheld on request), who has flown every model of Boeing from the 737 up. "Rudimentary knowledge and fearlessness."

"As everyone saw, their flying was sloppy and aggressive," says Michael (last name withheld), a pilot with several thousand hours in 757s and 767s. "Their skills and experience, or lack thereof, just weren't relevant."

"The hijackers required only the shallow understanding of the aircraft," agrees Ken Hertz, an airline pilot rated on the 757/767. "In much the same way that a person needn't be an experienced physician in order to perform CPR or set a broken bone."

That sentiment is echoed by Joe d'Eon, airline pilot and host of the "Fly With Me" podcast series. "It's the difference between a doctor and a butcher," says d'Eon.
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/05/1...
d pantz

United States

#260143 Oct 2, 2013
The fact that all the debris was moved over seas and the only have limited security cam footage of the pentagon makes me think that its as far fetched to say it was a conspiracy as it is to say it " slipped through the cracks". Why hide the evidence? Aslo, no sky scrapers have ever collapsed from fire, ever (let alone falling in their own footprint like magic).
d pantz

United States

#260144 Oct 2, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
As I've explained in at least one prior column, Hani Hanjour's flying was hardly the show-quality demonstration often described. It was exceptional only in its recklessness. If anything, his loops and turns and spirals above the nation's capital revealed him to be exactly the shitty pilot he by all accounts was. To hit the Pentagon squarely he needed only a bit of luck, and he got it, possibly with help from the 757's autopilot. Striking a stationary object -- even a large one like the Pentagon -- at high speed and from a steep angle is very difficult. To make the job easier, he came in obliquely, tearing down light poles as he roared across the Pentagon's lawn.
It's true there's only a vestigial similarity between the cockpit of a light trainer and the flight deck of a Boeing. To put it mildly, the attackers, as private pilots, were completely out of their league. However, they were not setting out to perform single-engine missed approaches or Category 3 instrument landings with a failed hydraulic system. For good measure, at least two of the terrorist pilots had rented simulator time in jet aircraft, but striking the Pentagon, or navigating along the Hudson River to Manhattan on a cloudless morning, with the sole intention of steering head-on into a building, did not require a mastery of airmanship. The perpetrators had purchased manuals and videos describing the flight management systems of the 757/767, and as any desktop simulator enthusiast will tell you, elementary operation of the planes' navigational units and autopilots is chiefly an exercise in data programming. You can learn it at home. You won't be good, but you'll be good enough.
"They'd done their homework and they had what they needed," says a United Airlines pilot (name withheld on request), who has flown every model of Boeing from the 737 up. "Rudimentary knowledge and fearlessness."
"As everyone saw, their flying was sloppy and aggressive," says Michael (last name withheld), a pilot with several thousand hours in 757s and 767s. "Their skills and experience, or lack thereof, just weren't relevant."
"The hijackers required only the shallow understanding of the aircraft," agrees Ken Hertz, an airline pilot rated on the 757/767. "In much the same way that a person needn't be an experienced physician in order to perform CPR or set a broken bone."
That sentiment is echoed by Joe d'Eon, airline pilot and host of the "Fly With Me" podcast series. "It's the difference between a doctor and a butcher," says d'Eon.
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/05/1...
okay, that's how he made a near impossible maneuver especially in a commercial airliner. Well according to all pilots any way.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min Al Garcia 837,720
Poll Why does bill clinton hold his mouth wide open? (Feb '08) 5 min set free in truth 14
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 5 min Tony17 443
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 12 min Mike thunkit 589,730
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 15 min set free in truth 176,854
Rajkot gay Topix 16 min Bangingbowl 84
Black people really are dunb!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 27 min Tony17 1
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 hr dollarsbill 4,223
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 8 hr Truths 612,160
More from around the web