Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260090 Oct 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Good going sorry charlie. Now get to work smearing and besmirching the rest of these educated disbelievers in the official govie story.
When you're done I will find a few thousand more for you.
Huh Eh !
Believers? Exactly because they have no tangible evidence to support those beliefs. You don't find that odd?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#260091 Oct 1, 2013
Exactly what tangible, empirical evidence exists to support the 9/11 Commission Report, or the NIST report?

And what is your expertise in anything?

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#260092 Oct 1, 2013
Hypocrisy and paranoia are interesting things, especially when mixed together. WasteOfWater needs to pretend others are afflicted with paranoia so she doesn't feel it, as she ignores Dudley's hypocrisy by his unwillingness to really address my criticisms of him. He admitted when hes wrong? Where? Did you ever see it? NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate."

Whats more paranoid then thinking every poster you ever disagreed with is named Tom, or Momma Insanity? And whats more hypocritical then accusing others of what you do?

And 2 hours a day reading Topix is insane, and considering his propensity to lie through his teeth, 8 hours a day is much more likely. Chances are, this is his job, and Porkpie Hat is not Dudley's only topix name. Barring him developing some integrity that he has so far shown he's incapable of, this will never occur.

Do you think WasteWater is an R. Kelly fan? Is that the type of waste water a person without dignity enjoys?

I'm tired of doing it to her, as its really not something I find interesting.

Nebraska meth is here after spending all day yesterday looking for copies to paste for his smear campaign. Fun, fun, fun.

Insults Are Easier

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260093 Oct 1, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Hypocrisy and paranoia are interesting things, especially when mixed together. WasteOfWater needs to pretend others are afflicted with paranoia so she doesn't feel it, as she ignores Dudley's hypocrisy by his unwillingness to really address my criticisms of him. He admitted when hes wrong? Where? Did you ever see it? NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate."
Whats more paranoid then thinking every poster you ever disagreed with is named Tom, or Momma Insanity? And whats more hypocritical then accusing others of what you do?
And 2 hours a day reading Topix is insane, and considering his propensity to lie through his teeth, 8 hours a day is much more likely. Chances are, this is his job, and Porkpie Hat is not Dudley's only topix name. Barring him developing some integrity that he has so far shown he's incapable of, this will never occur.
Do you think WasteWater is an R. Kelly fan? Is that the type of waste water a person without dignity enjoys?
I'm tired of doing it to her, as its really not something I find interesting.
Nebraska meth is here after spending all day yesterday looking for copies to paste for his smear campaign. Fun, fun, fun.
Insults Are Easier
Let's address the issues one at a time.

How about the idea that thermite was used for demolition?

People talk about successive explosions. This can only be caused by failures or directed charges.

1. It has never been established that thermite can be used to cut through I-beams. It so, it would be a slow process similar to using a cutting torch.

2. Demolition proponents wrongly showed such an I-beam which was actually cut by a cutting torch.

3. Directed charges require steel plate on each side of the charge to direct it inward to sever I-beams at joints. It is a highly complicated and invasive procedure using tons of steel plate.

Conclusion. The use of thermite is absurd.

Yea, we know. Insults are easier for you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260094 Oct 1, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Hypocrisy and paranoia are interesting things, especially when mixed together. WasteOfWater needs to pretend others are afflicted with paranoia so she doesn't feel it, as she ignores Dudley's hypocrisy by his unwillingness to really address my criticisms of him. He admitted when hes wrong? Where? Did you ever see it? NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate."
Whats more paranoid then thinking every poster you ever disagreed with is named Tom, or Momma Insanity? And whats more hypocritical then accusing others of what you do?
And 2 hours a day reading Topix is insane, and considering his propensity to lie through his teeth, 8 hours a day is much more likely. Chances are, this is his job, and Porkpie Hat is not Dudley's only topix name. Barring him developing some integrity that he has so far shown he's incapable of, this will never occur.
Do you think WasteWater is an R. Kelly fan? Is that the type of waste water a person without dignity enjoys?
I'm tired of doing it to her, as its really not something I find interesting.
Nebraska meth is here after spending all day yesterday looking for copies to paste for his smear campaign. Fun, fun, fun.
Insults Are Easier
Other than childish insults, the only issue you bring to the table here is "free fall speed."

1. Huge chunks of the towers fell at free fall speed. The towers fell as a slower rate of speed.

2. WT7 also fell at less than free fall speed.

Free fall has been completely debunked by numerous sources.

Free-fall speed is an absurd and false claim.

Looks like insults are easier when all you have are absurd opinions.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260095 Oct 1, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate."
It can be determined with all other variables in place, it is not a set speed, sorry a basic concept is WAY OVER YOUR HEAD!

Near the surface of the Earth, an object in free fall in a vacuum will accelerate at approximately 9.8 m/s², independent of its mass. With air resistance acting upon an object that has been dropped, the object will eventually reach a terminal velocity, around 56 m/s (200 km/h or 120 mph) for a human body. Terminal velocity depends on many factors including mass, drag coefficient, and relative surface area and will only be achieved if the fall is from sufficient altitude. A typical skydiver in a spread-eagle position will reach terminal velocity after about 12 seconds, during which time they will have fallen around 450 m (approx 1,500 ft).[1]
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#260097 Oct 1, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of the news, could you link us to this LIE OF YOURS HOGSNIFFER!
<quoted text>
So far all the reports I found these hijackers who are alive are keeping a low profile for fear of being killed by the CIA. After all it would blow the hell out of the offical story.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#260098 Oct 1, 2013
WHY WE WILL LOSE WORLD WAR 3

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260099 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So far all the reports I found these hijackers who are alive are keeping a low profile for fear of being killed by the CIA. After all it would blow the hell out of the offical story.
Except that claim has already been proven false. Why would the hijackers train to be pilots and never fly the planes? This is absurd.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#260100 Oct 1, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>Its the flouridated water, aluminum in antiperspirants, floride toothpaste, iodized salt, etc. The major ingredient in Prozac is flouride. The Illuminati wants us docile like the jews in 1930s Germany. I hate Big Brother.
Impeach the Kenyan-born Antichrist!
John 3:16 & Ephesians 6:12
www.WND.com
www.physics911.org
Nice rant bro. Did you forget to take your meds today?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#260101 Oct 1, 2013
15 of the 19 alleged hijackers are Saudi Arabian.
How did they have ties with Bin Laden in a cave in Afghanistan?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260102 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
So far all the reports I found these hijackers who are alive are keeping a low profile for fear of being killed by the CIA. After all it would blow the hell out of the offical story.
LMFAO! Liar

A: You said they WERE ON TV, IS THAT A LOW PROFILE?

B: If you keep a low profile you don't expose your so called lie and are are at risk of being kill so you don't expose it. Go on national TV and death equals exposure.(You did not do it and when you went public saying so you were killed.
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260103 Oct 1, 2013
onemale wrote:
15 of the 19 alleged hijackers are Saudi Arabian.
How did they have ties with Bin Laden in a cave in Afghanistan?
WELL, WHERE IS YOUR PROOF OF THE BELOW DIAPER SNIFFER! In front of Cameras 6 weeks after 9-11? LMFAO and YOU HAVE NO LINK?
onemale wrote:
6 weeks later Mohamed Atta stood up and was alive in front of cameras at a Saudi Arabia television station!!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#260104 Oct 1, 2013
Congratulations, ReThink911 Supporters!

We did it. Together we raised $25,000 in just three days to keep our 54’ tall billboard in Times Square for yet another month – thanks to you!

Now we must work together to ensure that the news coverage expands. Stay tuned for a detailed action plan, and get ready to get involved. With thousands of emails to key news outlets, we can make it happen.

http://rethink911.org/

51% of those Canadians ...

Huh Eh !

The Truth is alive ... it's alive !

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#260105 Oct 1, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>It can be determined with all other variables in place, it is not a set speed, sorry a basic concept is WAY OVER YOUR HEAD!

Near the surface of the Earth, an object in free fall in a vacuum will accelerate at approximately 9.8 m/s², independent of its mass. With air resistance acting upon an object that has been dropped, the object will eventually reach a terminal velocity, around 56 m/s (200 km/h or 120 mph) for a human body. Terminal velocity depends on many factors including mass, drag coefficient, and relative surface area and will only be achieved if the fall is from sufficient altitude. A typical skydiver in a spread-eagle position will reach terminal velocity after about 12 seconds, during which time they will have fallen around 450 m (approx 1,500 ft).[1]
It's quite humorous to watch him think he has a point but be so completely clueless as to why he doesn't.

Gross mentions free fall speed at (IIRC) 5.4 seconds into collapse. This is a specific reference to velocity.

Here's the twoofer version which is a completely bogus and meaningless statement, "WTC 7 fell at free fall speed".

The difference is between having a clue and not understanding what a clue is.

[His] Ignorance is [His] Bliss

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#260106 Oct 1, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Congratulations, ReThink911 Supporters!

We did it. Together we raised $25,000 in just three days to keep our 54’ tall billboard in Times Square for yet another month – thanks to you!

Now we must work together to ensure that the news coverage expands. Stay tuned for a detailed action plan, and get ready to get involved. With thousands of emails to key news outlets, we can make it happen.

http://rethink911.org/

51% of those Canadians ...

Huh Eh !

The Truth is alive ... it's alive !
A 54' tall STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

Wow, dats sum reel gud twoofing!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260107 Oct 1, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
It's quite humorous to watch him think he has a point but be so completely clueless as to why he doesn't.
Gross mentions free fall speed at (IIRC) 5.4 seconds into collapse. This is a specific reference to velocity.
Here's the twoofer version which is a completely bogus and meaningless statement, "WTC 7 fell at free fall speed".
The difference is between having a clue and not understanding what a clue is.
[His] Ignorance is [His] Bliss
We are left with a bucket full of flunkies.

This level of understanding (Free Fall) by no means takes a degree, just reading comprehension, since we have rest to motion, a valid initial free fall speed could easily be 1/16 of an inch per year.

NOW TO BLOW THEIR MINDS!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260108 Oct 1, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Did you ever see it? NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate."
An object in the technical sense of free fall may not necessarily be falling down in the usual sense of the term. An object moving upwards would not normally be considered to be falling but if it is subject to the force of gravity only, it is said to be in free fall. The moon thus is in free fall.

In a uniform gravitational field, in the absence of any other forces, gravitation acts on each part of the body equally and this is akin to weightlessness, a condition which also obtains when the gravitational field is zero such as when far away from any gravitating body. A body in free fall experiences "0-g".
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#260109 Oct 1, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
NIST lead investigator John Gross says the term "free fall speed", yet others who say it are "scientifically illiterate!
An object in the technical sense of free fall may not necessarily be falling down in the usual sense of the term. An object moving upwards would not normally be considered to be falling but if it is subject to the force of gravity only, it is said to be in free fall. The moon thus is in free fall.

In a uniform gravitational field, in the absence of any other forces, gravitation acts on each part of the body equally and this is akin to weightlessness, a condition which also obtains when the gravitational field is zero such as when far away from any gravitating body. A body in free fall experiences "0-g".

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#260110 Oct 1, 2013
Wow pig that's sum reel gud bwunkin wif ridicule and sum cleverly mispelled wirds.

Ever wonder why its You who gets flamed?

I didn't think so.

Hey sorry charlie you got those other 100 or so names smeared, dismissed and belittled yet? I can find more for ya. Get on with it brother bwunker!

Huh Eh!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing (Mar '17) 7 min Repub Family Values 47,111
Why are Europeans a race of savages, thieves, a... (Jun '15) 55 min Paul really is dead 475
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 1 hr DJ Crazee 39,286
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr Aerobatty 990,701
LeBron James: Should he STAY or should he GO?? 2 hr MWHAHAHAHAHHA 8
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 3 hr kent 692,113
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 5 hr MWHAHAHAHAHHA 619,846
More from around the web