created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,432 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure
Comments
240,541 - 240,560 of 259,139 Comments Last updated 4 min ago
KittyKat

Paradise, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259103
Sep 12, 2013
 
9/11: Twelve Years of War, Lies and Deception

in Breaking News 18 hours ago
Twelve years after the 9/11 attacks, no credible independent investigation has been done to find out what really happened on that day and who was responsible. Independent journalists and researchers have demonstrated, however, that the official version of the event is nothing but a cover-up, an opinion shared by the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, who declared the Commission was “set up to fail”.

In fact, 9/11 was a starting point for even more atrocities and was used as a pretext for numerous wars in which too many people have lost their lives or their loved ones. A horrendous theater of the absurd has ensued over the years; as strange as it may seem, today the U.S. is openly supporting Al Qaeda offshoots in the Middle East to further its imperial design, as we have seen in Libya and Syria.

SELECTED ARTICLES

THE 9/11 READER – The September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks

The tragic events of September 11, 2001 constitute a fundamental landmark in American history, a decisive watershed. 9/11 opens up an era of crisis, upheaval and militarization of American society.

Commemorating September 11, 2001: Too Many Years Of Lies. From Mossadeq to 9/11, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, September 11, 2013
http://rinf.com/alt-news/breaking-news/911-tw...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259104
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittyKat wrote:
<quoted text>
Seismic evidence of large underground explosions beneath the Twin Towers
LMFAO! Not a seismologist in sight!

Craig T. Furlong (AM)
Quantitative Methods, Business Administration

Gordon Ross (AM)
Mechanical engineering, Production engineering

----------

Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)
Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross (Member, Scholars for 9/11 Truth)© 2006

BUT HEY, If you want to expand your small business, Craig may be able to help!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259105
Sep 12, 2013
 
KittyKat wrote:
however, that the official version of the event is nothing but a cover-up, an opinion shared by the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, who declared the Commission was “set up to fail”.
That's odd, I don' see them saying there was a cover up here, could you link me to that quote Dumplin?

Hamilton: Well, at the top of my list happens to be a personal one, and that is, I could never figure out why these 19 fellas did what they did. We looked into their backgrounds. In one or two cases, they were apparently happy, well-adjusted, not particularly religious - in one case quite well-to-do, had a girlfriend. We just couldn’t figure out why he did it. I still don’t know. And I think one of the great unanswered questions - a good topic for investigative reporters - would be: why did these 19 do what they did? We speculated in the report about why the enemy hates us, but we simply weren’t able to answer the questions about the 19.

Kean on bin Laden: "We had him"
Main article: 9/11 Commission Report

In December 2003, Kean said that the September 11 attacks could have been prevented, stating: "As you read the report, you're going to have a pretty clear idea what wasn't done and what should have been done. This was not something that had to happen."[18]

On April 4, 2004, Kean again stated that the September 11 attacks could have been prevented, saying that the United States government should have acted sooner to dismantle al-Qaeda and responded more quickly to other terrorist threats. "When we actually saw bin Laden on the ground, using the Predator or other means, did we have...actionable intelligence? Should we have sent a cruise missile into a site where he was at that point? I think those early opportunities are clear. We had him. We saw him. I think maybe we could have done something about it.

MR. KEAN: Absolutely right. If we had been able to put those people on the watch list for the airlines, the two who were in this country; again, if we'd stopped some of these people at the borders, if we had acted earlier on al-Qaeda when al-Qaeda was smaller and just getting started even before bin Laden went to Afghanistan, there were times we could have gotten him, there's no question. Had we gotten him and his leadership at that point, the whole story might have been different.

MR. RUSSERT: Congressman, you think September 11th could have been prevented?

MR. HAMILTON: Well, there's a lot of ifs. You can string together a whole bunch of ifs. And if things had broken right in all kinds of different ways, as the governor has identified, and many more, and, frankly, if you'd had a little luck, it probably could have been prevented. But we'll make a final judgment on that, I believe, when the commission reports.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259107
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I bet we can keep sorry charlie at his computer all day trying to combat the doubters of the govie fairy tale of how the WTC towers came down and whether the 9/11 Commission Report is factual or not.

All day long! He has nothing better to do. It's his whole life.

Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259108
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

The plain, sad reality is that The 9/11 Commission Report, despite the vast quantity of labor behind it, is a cheat and a fraud.

It stands as a series of evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience, transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities that demand immediate inspection and confrontation.

Because it is continuously engaged in scotching all attempts to distinguish better from worse leadership responses, the Commission can't discharge its duty to educate the audience about the habits of mind and temperament essential in those chosen to discharge command responsibility during crises.

Article titled,'Whitewash as Public Service:

How The 9/11 Commission Report defrauds the nation,' Harper's Magazine writer Benjamin DeMott 2004

Huh Eh !

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259109
Sep 12, 2013
 
Bernard Gwertzman, of the Council on Foreign Relations, stated of the report:

Again, one of the great problems in the commission report is that it looked at exactly one issue — counterterrorism — and none of the others.

Huh Eh !

Can you elaborate sorry charlie?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259110
Sep 12, 2013
 
Hey pig , you banging that eight ball again?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259112
Sep 12, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Again, one of the great problems in the commission report is that it looked at exactly one issue — counterterrorism — and none of the others.
Actually it looked at terrorism but thanks for staying uninformed.

EH!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259113
Sep 12, 2013
 
LOL, Nice essay with no facts, you could at least put 20 fake pilots in there and pretend you have facts.
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
The plain, sad reality is that The 9/11 Commission Report, despite the vast quantity of labor behind it, is a cheat and a fraud.
It stands as a series of evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience, transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities that demand immediate inspection and confrontation.
Because it is continuously engaged in scotching all attempts to distinguish better from worse leadership responses, the Commission can't discharge its duty to educate the audience about the habits of mind and temperament essential in those chosen to discharge command responsibility during crises.
Article titled,'Whitewash as Public Service:
How The 9/11 Commission Report defrauds the nation,' Harper's Magazine writer Benjamin DeMott 2004
Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259114
Sep 12, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Hey pig , you banging that eight ball again?
Your mom's nickname is 8 ball, that's kind of odd. She a trucker?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259115
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Dr_Zorderz wrote:
NIST’s final collapse initiation step states that, after all of these unscientific manipulations,“instability spread” around the entire building. Since the buildings came down uniformly into their footprints, and did so in approximately 10 seconds, there was precious little time for instability spread.

We do know the actual instability spread horizontally in a very rapid fashion on the order of half a second.

For that to have originated from one point naturally the instability would have had to move at nearly twice the speed of sound. That is, of course, not realistic.

After providing a false collapse initiation sequence, NIST left us to ponder the idea that “global collapse ensued.”

With this statement, NIST avoided analyzing the actual collapse dynamics. We are left to wonder if they avoided analyzing the actual collapse sequences because they knew the observed phenomena violated everything we know about physics and the performance of steel skyscrapers, unless the use of explosives is allowed for consideration.

Whaaat .... explosives !?!?!?!?!?

http://rethink911.org/evidence/twin-towers/im...

http://rethink911.org/evidence/twin-towers/im...

http://rethink911.org/evidence/twin-towers/im...
Closer to 20 seconds but hey, what's a few little lies for the sake of twoof right oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS!

And of course any deviation from the time free fall should have taken can only be explained by resistance so....oh right, we shouldn't mention that!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259116
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bill wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, and too bad the towers were exempt from the laws of physics, too.

Oh wait.

No. No, I guess they couldn't possibly be exempt from the laws of physics. So that means those were three demolitions! Holy sh!t!!

(And then there's all the other stuff we know about 9/11 that also indicates a false-flag operation...)
And which laws would those be "bill"?

Ones twoofers invented to justify their ignorance?

Yup.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259117
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, So everything is a controlled demolition! Slow, fast, top first, bottom first.

Talk about obtuse.
Interesting how twoofers can accept that mutually exclusive observations can all be explained by the same thing.

It's majiks!

But it only works in twooferdumb.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259118
Sep 12, 2013
 
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>HE MUST be a Freemason puppet?
www.forcingchange.org
Great Link!

Each month a new publication is added to the Store area that you can purchase individually for $4.95 - or you can apply for a membership and have complete access to all Forcing Change editions,(including all back-issues), access to a host of other specialty reports, audio files, video feeds, a library of source documents, and more; all complete with the cost your membership!

Check out our back-issue list below! The topics are vast, articles well-documented, and the subjects are absolutely vital to our day and age. Remember, Forcing Change isn't a news-source, it's an education - one that gives you the tools to understand our changing world.

Collect the whole set, It will change you life, act now and only pay separate shipping and handling.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259119
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

KittyKat wrote:
Here you fckin traitors, fair warning,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =gbO2_077ixsXX
Oh such irony!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259120
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Dr_Zorderz wrote:
pig ...

Do you have to heat steel to soften it?

What a revelation!

Is that the extent of your analysis?

Weak, very weak
Oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS, do you know steel starts losing strength at 250C and increasing that temp has a direct relationship to increased loss of strength?

The fact is your mindless copy/paste crap is, as always, a misrepresentation of what the report actually says and you're as clueless about that as you are materials and their behaviour under any conditions.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259121
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Say pig how would you know it was soft unless you pushed your hand into it?

Er your hoof. You know, your hog trotters!

Huh Eh !
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259122
Sep 12, 2013
 
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting how twoofers can accept that mutually exclusive observations can all be explained by the same thing.
It's majiks!
But it only works in twooferdumb.
Yea, I'd call it self debunking, they find it to be proof. Any evidence can be used to reach a set conclusion.
Gee Gee Grovanni

Oklahoma City, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259123
Sep 12, 2013
 
Here's an idea, since you guys insist on going back and forth back and forth day in and day out, why not just sign up with pal talk and have an online debate and upload the sh*t on YouTube, and be done with this endless bickering. How the f*ck can any of you people do anything productive in a day when all you do is spend your time on this comment board. Some of you have been on this same friggin topic for years arguing for and against this. A bunch of grown a$$ women and men going back and forth like a bunch of teenagers texting. WTF.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#259124
Sep 12, 2013
 
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
Say pig how would you know it was soft unless you pushed your hand into it?

Er your hoof. You know, your hog trotters!

Huh Eh !
Well oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS, if you had a clue, and you most obviously don't, you'd know that the change in "softness" (hardness) at around 250C wouldn't be perceptible by simply feeling it ( ignoring the fact that you'd burn your poor slurpee making hands) so you'd need an instrument like a telebrineller or spring and ball type hardness tester.

Once you've (not you, you're too stupid) measured hardness in either HB or HR you can easily translate that value to confirm tensile strength (not you, you're too stupid).

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••