Thanks for the link to http://www.consensus911.org .<quoted text>Far from it cumtwat
Update, 12 September 2013
Five New Consensus Points Released September 11, 2013
on SEPTEMBER 12, 2013
The 22-member 9/11 Consensus Panel has conducted three rounds of review, during which the Panelists were blind to one another, to produce five new Consensus Points refuting the official evidence of 9/11:
Seismic evidence of large underground explosions beneath the Twin Towers
Physical and testimonial evidence of explosions beneath the Twin Towers
Molten metal running below the Twin Towers’ debris for weeks after 9/11
The failure — after 7 years of effort — of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to produce a computer simulation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 that matched the visual collapse
A serious problem in the timeline of the famous “Let’s Roll” call from Flight 93, which was used as a call to war
This brings the total number of Consensus Points to 37.
I had forgotten about the glaring problems in the Flight 93 timeline and the testimony from the Moussaoui trial regarding the mysteriously persistent airfone connection allegedly from Todd Beamer. Interesting.
Here is the page describing the irreconcilable contradictions in the official accounts of Flight 93:
Note that the "23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel is building a body of evidence-based research into the events of September 11, 2001. This evidence -- derived from a standard scientific reviewing process -- is available to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution. The Panel regularly features selected excerpts from its Consensus Points, with links to full supporting documentation."
And those Consensus Points map out the various ways that the official fairy tale completely fails to hold together.