Wow, I guess foilers are the only ones who haven't heard that chemical weapons are WMDs. I'll admit, Bush was probably playing on the fact that when most people hear "WMD" they immediately think "nukes", but there's good reason why the US believed Iraq had chem weapons; THEY BLOODY WELL GAVE IRAQ THE CAPABILITY during the Reagan years.<quoted text>
"WMD's" ? donald Scumfield, Prick chaney, cumdolesa's price, paul twoofawitz, colon powell, are only a few players in this show . Bush jr is just an idiot puppet front boy not directly involved for obvious reasons....
Let's take a quick look at two snapshots in this little play.
Reagan: Happy Birthday Saddam. Use it in good faith against Iran.
The UN:*facepalm* Aw geez, what the hell did you do that for??
Dubya: Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. We must go in and neutralize them and Saddam.
The UN: Hey wait a minute, you can't just go invading a sovereign state on a whim. So, we'll argue back and forth for a couple of weeks to give Saddam time to "clean up" and then WE'LL go see if he has any WMDs.
To be honest, the only objection I had was when Bush said "if you aren't with us, you're against us". The way I see it, the US sure as hell didn't ask anyone about them giving Iraq the ability to produce chemical weapons so they really had no right expecting anyone to help them clean up the mess THEY helped make.