No, you continuously attempt to fit square pegs into round holes. I don't need to pretend to know anything because I have done the requisite schooling to understand why the dumbed down garbage you find so convincing is nothing more that fallacious nonsense.<quoted text>I only seek the truth... you do not... you only want to win an argument.
You claim to know everything about everything, I do not.
I listen to the experts in their field, you do not.
You are not an architect or instructional engineer, but you claim to know more than thousands combined.
I'm not buying into that kind of arrogance.
You've proven the exact opposite of yourself.
And you ignore everything that doesn't suit your desired conclusion. Claiming you're only interested in truth is about as convincing as a cat telling the bird it only wants to be friends.
I'd have no problem accepting the US government was complicit in the 911 attacks if the evidence could stand up to scrutiny, nothing twoof has presented to date nothing convincing and the fact that you will accept anything regardless of how stupid it is proves you're full of crap.
I've said many times that people should speak with relevant professionals in their area and not trust everything they read on the Internet.