That's not what we're referring to though who.<quoted text>Thermal measurements were taken by helicopter each day and showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ÂºF to more than 2,800ÂºF.
would you like a link or something?
He claims the firefighters measured the temps of the molten material they witnessed and this plus colour in ambient lighting proves its steel.
That's bs for multiple reasons.
One would be that the site was not a lab or foundry and there's no way to expect any material to be homogenous.
Another would be that there's zero proof the material was ever measured for temperature.
Another would be that it's completely irrelevant due to the fact that even had molten steel existed, it proves absolutely nothing.
Yet another would be that reports of molten steel in fires is common and I've proven that by posting news article after news article in support of that.
Until twoof can come up with a mechanism that isn't laughably stupid like nanothermite for molten steel weeks after the event it's just another idiotic twoofer talking point that has no scientific validity.
Meanwhile there are scientifically valid reasons why there may have been molten steel present and until twoof can show a mechanism with greater probability than those scientifically valid ones they, don't have a leg to stand on.