Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258025 Aug 1, 2013
911 Investigators and Witnesses are Being Killed!.mp4
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
And your argument is again based solely on fallacy.
If you can't say what's wrong with papers written by and accepted by relevant professionals about the collapses (like the one I've most recently posted), then how did you determine that a small handful of signatures on a silly petition over rules the actual science?
Twoofers spout off every day...nothing.
Richard Gage makes a living bilking the stupid about the WTC collapses...nothing.
Alex Jones has thrived on making the dumb dumber by claiming the government is guilty of all kinds of heinous acts...nothing.
David Ray Griffin has wrote book after book implicating the government...nothing.
When asked to support anything your response is....nothing.
Prove professionals have been killed for saying anything about the 911 attacks...

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#258026 Aug 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Mostly they killed eyewitnesses that wouldn't keep quiet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =bvay28lZiHUXX
It's amazing how gullible and stupid twoofers are.

Barry Jennings never supported twoof and was overweight and a diabetic. There was nothing mysterious about his death and he'd already told his story...which still doesn't support twoof.

Beverly Eckert was not a witness to anything. Had fought for a reform of intelligence agencies and had nothing to do with twoof nor was she in any way supportive of the idiocy you advocate for.

She died in a plane crash that was investigated.

You haven't proven the government killed anyone to "silence" them and killing them BEFORE they talk would be much more effective.

So, any proof the government has killed anyone for speaking out or is this just like your other claims filed under "confirmed bs"?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#258027 Aug 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>911 Investigators and Witnesses are Being Killed!.mp4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =UpCDp68kbdgXX
Prove they're being killed you idjit.

Seriously, are you that delusional?
KittyKat

Chico, CA

#258028 Aug 2, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove they're being killed you idjit.
Seriously, are you that delusional?
Seriously you must be a spam bot on these threads EVERY FCUKING DAY FOR 5 YEARS responding to EVERY poster who questions the govie theory/false flag/coup that is 9-11. WHO HAS THAT MUCH TIME? Obvious much you ignorant pig?
KittyKat

Chico, CA

#258029 Aug 2, 2013
in 5...
4..
3..
2..
1;

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#258030 Aug 2, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove they're being killed you idjit.
Seriously, are you that delusional?
pork pig pie fits the bill here

5. Sidetrack opponents with baby talk, name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as kooks, sexual deviates, birfers, twoofers, right-wing, liberal, left-wing, terrorists, conspiracy buffs, radicals, militia, racists, religious fanatics, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.

10. Associate opponents charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

If the pig fits .....Huh Eh !
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258032 Aug 2, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove they're being killed you idjit.
Seriously, are you that delusional?
You don't have to be half smart to figure out they would cover their tracks. It seems so strange that so many witnesses just happen to commit suicide. It just so happens suicides aren't investigated.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258033 Aug 2, 2013
Dr_Zorderz wrote:
<quoted text>
pork pig pie fits the bill here
5. Sidetrack opponents with baby talk, name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as kooks, sexual deviates, birfers, twoofers, right-wing, liberal, left-wing, terrorists, conspiracy buffs, radicals, militia, racists, religious fanatics, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
10. Associate opponents charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
If the pig fits .....Huh Eh !
Well said, well said indeed.
Porkie would argue that shit doesn’t stink, and want proof that it does.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258034 Aug 2, 2013
The official story is that the North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed due to gravity. This has been critiqued in an analysis by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, and in a related analysis…

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
&fe ature=player_embedded

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#258035 Aug 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
911 Investigators and Witnesses are Being Killed!.mp4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =UpCDp68kbdgXX
<quoted text>
Are you a 911 Investigator?

It was nice meeting you...bye

“Turn left at pub Number 42”

Since: Dec 08

Homehill,QLD

#258036 Aug 2, 2013
onemale wrote:
The official story is that the North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed due to gravity. This has been critiqued in an analysis by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, and in a related analysis…
What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NiHeCjZlkr8XX&feature=pla yer_embedded
Can you show a clip of a hammer being forced down "By a hand" hitting the towers?
WTF...I want some of those seeds of that weed you been smoken.

Comments are disabled for this video..I dont know why,nothing wrong there
your wet dream is over

Plymouth, NH

#258037 Aug 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
The official story is that the North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed due to gravity. This has been critiqued in an analysis by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti, and in a related analysis…
What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =NiHeCjZlkr8XX&feature=pla yer_embedded
You can wake up now!

----------

Hi Porkpie! Crusty here, still having a hard time getting beyond the thermite thing././??? Are they??

LOL
globalreports

AOL

#258038 Aug 3, 2013
.

ISRAEL Dissolving MUSLIM Dome of Rock --

www.youtube.com/watch...

.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#258039 Aug 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It just so happens suicides aren't investigated.
You just totally make this up don't you, they are ALWAYS investigated for signs of foul play.

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#258040 Aug 3, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You just totally make this up don't you, they are ALWAYS investigated for signs of foul play.
And who told you that? Do you watch CSI much?

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#258041 Aug 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said, well said indeed.
Porkie would argue that shit doesn’t stink, and want proof that it does.
pork pig pie has lived his whole life under the delusion that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. What is funny about that is he thinks he knows which end is clean.

Huh eh !
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258042 Aug 3, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You just totally make this up don't you, they are ALWAYS investigated for signs of foul play.
A man three blocks away form my home was found hanging from a rafter in his garage and there was no investigation.
Not to far from my home, a man was found in the lake with his hands tied behind his back and both feet tied together with two concrete blocks. Police said it was an apparent suicide.
Police doesn't investigate anything that they can get away with because there is no money in that. They much rather pick on law abiding citizens because there is money involved with fines and their chances of being shot is much reduced.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#258043 Aug 3, 2013
This is off topic but very dangerous to this country.

The Federal Reserve is printing money like there is no tomorrow...
America is on a financial collision course to becoming a bankrupted has been of a nation.
Please sign the online petition.
Remember, AFTER the bankruptcy... it will be too late.

http://www.chooseliberty.org/audithouse1.aspx...

Since: Nov 11

Location hidden

#258044 Aug 4, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
The case is long since closed.
You kooks failed in every way to make any meaningful impact.
Solely because you can't support anything you say. And as we can see by your like minded twoofer brethren's posts, twoofers aren't exactly rational.
Oh and OBL admitted his role in the attacks.
Oh yeah, case closed.

But wait, how do you explain his denials?

No cancel that, I'm really not interested in your point of view. Thanks for being a dick... this is your natural home. Enjoy!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#258046 Aug 4, 2013
pig you can NOT prove OBL had any role in 9/11.

Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 5 min Catcher1 110,395
News Plurality of Americans think Trump is failing 7 min Ronald 107
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 15 min PadMark 675,748
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 24 min Gabriel 982,097
I know there are ladies here who love married men 1 hr Kojak3141 1
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 2 hr UIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR... 184,756
My NEW SPECULATION about the mystery vehicle an... 2 hr andet1987 17
More from around the web