Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#257935 Jul 30, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
<quoted text>He didn't lie, he simply made a conclusion different than than the author of 1, and used 3 other studies to back up his conclusion.

A lie would be what you did saying the Iranian government was responsible for his paper. Another lie would be you claiming hes a racist.

You are so illiterate, you don't even know the difference, kid.

Insults Are Easier
He lied about the conclusions the authors made in their paper and that's exactly the response the authors gave.

I understand your unwillingness to accept reality since reality always makes such a fool of you.

And as always, your ability to comprehend is limited to the failed logic which guides everything you say.

I never claimed the Iranian government was responsible for his paper, since he's solely responsible for the lies he tells. I said pressTV is a state run publication, which it is.

Which makes all this even more hilarious since posters like yourself have made similar claims about MSM in western countries and have stated disbelief because of that.

It all amounts to one thing,

[Your] Ignorance is [Still][Your] Bliss

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#257936 Jul 30, 2013
And still no proof from Ignorance that fire fighters measured the temps of the molten material.

But he has tried to avoid that, once again, by his current meaningless tangent.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#257937 Jul 30, 2013
And then there's the issue of his beloved Kevin Barrett.

In Kevins own words,

"However one feels about Green's perspective, and whatever the facts about WWII, it seems tragic that systematic Zionist Big Lies (we just want a homeland, not our own state; the Arabs started it; it was a land without people for a people without land; the Germans hated Jews for no reason whatsoever, just like the Arabs do now; the Palestinians left voluntarily in 1948 under orders of the Nazi Mufti of Jerusalem; most of the so-called Palestinians were not really from Palestine; the Arabs started the 1967 war; allegations of disproportionate Jewish influence in the American academic, media and financial sectors are false and anti-Semitic; the attack on the Liberty was a mistake; the Iraq war is about democracy or Saddam or US security or Peak Oil or anything except Israel, etc. etc.) have cast legitimate doubt upon ANYTHING Jews say about Jews and their recent history, including the Holocaust. As a rational person who is not a specialist in the subject of WWII, but who has studied the history of Zionist Big Lies vis-a-vis Palestine, I cannot possibly dismiss the arguments of people like Green, Irving, and even Zundel. And even if the 6-million-deliberately-murdere d-for-purely-ethnic-reasons figure is correct--which it very well may be; I have grown agnostic on that after studying the Big Lies of Zionism-- I would still have to characterize the Holocaust as it is taught in the US as a hideously destructive myth.(A myth is a sacred, worldview-inaugurating story its users believe to be true.)

The upshot: nobody in the debate should be boycotted or vilified; nobody should be arrested for expressing honestly-held opinions; all voices should be heard; and the destructive myths and mind-numbing censorship imposed by Zionism must be swept clean so an honest assessment of history can emerge--at which point the Holocaust revisionists may very well be proven incorrect. And even if they are, they obviously should not be harassed or vilified, much less jailed!!

In the meantime, voices like Green and AFPN should be heard and subjected to rational criticism, not vilified or silenced. And the use of state power to enforce Holocaust Fundamentalism must end!"

Hmmm...gee, he doesn't sound much like a rabid antisemite...in twooferdumb that is.

The old adage, "scratch a twoofer, find a bigot", is alive and well.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#257938 Jul 30, 2013
time tells-truth prevails wrote:
hi pig - hi everyone
so pig is in Canada now?
pig why are you in Canada now? you know there's a lot of Gate's genetically modified blue green algae up there. you've got to go further north, to the Antarctic if you are running from biological hazards.
Jeez oh elevator boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS, I could hardly recognize you hiding behind that proxy software....

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#257939 Jul 30, 2013
And then there's PressTV, the kooks go to source for "unbiased" reporting,

"Iran expands role in media, via satellite and in English

TEHRAN — Iran on Monday put into operation a 24-hour English-language satellite television channel to extend its global reach during a period of growing pressure from the United States.

The satellite channel, called Press TV, is sponsored by Iran's state-run television operation, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting."

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#257940 Jul 30, 2013
And of course, Barrett is just a swell guy, as long as you aren't related to him,

"A Libertarian Party candidate for Congress who charges the World Trade Towers were destroyed by government explosives, not hijacked planes, faces

disorderly conduct charges after a domestic incident last week.

His wife has asked for domestic and child abuse restraining orders against him because she fears she is in danger of physical harm and their children are at risk of physical and emotional harm.

Kevin J. Barrett, 49, of rural Spring Green appeared in Sauk County Circuit Court on Friday on a misdemeanor count of disorderly conduct. If he is convicted, the charge carries a maximum penalty of 90 days jail time and a $1,000 fine.

On Sept. 10, a Sauk County detective wrote in a report that he spoke with Barrett's wife and she described an incident that took place the day before, according to court records. Barrett's wife said about 8 a.m., the couple's 13-year-old son told their 11-year-old boy to turn down the TV. Barrett was in bed, became upset because he was trying to sleep and ran out of the bedroom with his fist raised, saying "That's it," according to court records.

The wife said Barrett struck the older boy on his back and she saw marks there, according to the records.

The detective interviewed the boy, who said his father hit him on the back several times, records show.

In petitions for a restraining order that would prevent Barrett from having contact with herself or the two boys, Barrett's wife claims she is in "imminent danger of physical harm."

In the past month, Barrett has been getting angry frequently and has grabbed her arm and hair, causing her pain, her petition states. Barrett has shown a history of abusive and threatening behavior over the years, she says.

For example, in a conversation about Barrett's brother and his ex-wife, Barrett made comments along the lines that he would have shot the woman and the judge should have given his brother a knife to kill her, Barrett's wife states.

In July 2005, Barrett's wife alleges Barrett pulled her to the floor and tried to smash her head against floor tiles. Barrett's abusive words and actions were at times witnessed by their children, his wife states in the petition.

In 2005, Barrett's wife filed for restraining orders against him in both Sauk and Dane counties. She also began divorce proceedings in Dane County court, but the case was dismissed a month later.

During the Sept. 9 primary election, Barrett won the Libertarian Party nomination to challenge incumbent District 3 U.S. Congressman Ron Kind of La Crosse. He received 332 votes, Ben Olson III of Wisconsin Dells got 227. National Libertarian Party officials have condemned Barrett as being unrepresentative of their views.

Barrett first came to public attention in 2006 when he taught a class at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in which he expressed skepticism about whether Osama bin Laden and 19 hijackers were responsible for the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

During an August interview with Wisconsin Public Radio, Barrett said it was impossible the planes could have been hijacked and flown into the World Trade Towers and Pentagon without being intercepted. Instead, he said the buildings were destroyed by explosives and U.S. government officials are responsible.

Efforts to reach Barrett by phone Monday afternoon were unsuccessful and he did not return an e-mail message sent to his campaign Web site.

Barrett is due in court Thursday for a hearing on whether the court should impose a restraining order against him on behalf of his wife and children.

His next hearing on the disorderly conduct charge is Oct. 16."

Twoof sure knows how to pick 'em!

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Okotoks, Canada

#257941 Jul 30, 2013
Poor twoof, they can pick pick a fight.

They just can't win one...
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#257942 Jul 30, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would they? It's quite obvious that it came down due to damage. It is quite clear that a huge chunk of WTC 1. So much for controlled demolition huh? WTC 1 tilted into the hole cut by the airliner and then broke apart on the way down. Obvious stuff huh?
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
Don't look now, but you have reaffirmed that WTC 1 was brought down with explosives.
Figure it out...
WTC 7 was two football fields away form tower 1
Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building.
In other words you walked on your own dick.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#257943 Jul 30, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>It's absolutely incredible how disingenuous twoofers are to a man!

First, the point of 1/4" fillets was to make you understand how dumb your comment was...I know, you don't get it.

Second, your post claimed pancaking was impossible for the given geometry....prove it.

Because what you said, in effect, was that placing a beam on a ledge makes that joint infinitely able to withstand any compressive force regardless of materials or how large the force.

That's just plain stupid and obviously wrong but gives an idea of how a) dumb twoofers are or b) how willingly they lie.

You choose.

And here's some reading material for you by real professionals,

"Failure of connections, as a result of overloading, occurred
within the heat-affected zone of the base metals"

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...

I know, you'll ignore it in favour of your delusions regardless of the fact that you quite obviously have no clue what you're talking about.
Don't look now manyfails but you're still avoiding reality!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#257944 Jul 30, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
According to witnesses and fire fighters there were molten steel in the basement for weeks. But NIST denies any of this... and you still believe NIST?
Can you show me one test that proves it was Steel, and if it was what kept it molten for weeks, what would that even prove?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#257945 Jul 30, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't look now, but you have reaffirmed that WTC 1 was brought down with explosives.
Figure it out...
WTC 7 was two football fields away form tower 1
Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building.
Show your math?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#257946 Jul 30, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>Don't look now, but you have reaffirmed that WTC 1 was brought down with explosives.
Figure it out...
WTC 7 was two football fields away form tower 1
Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building.
In other words you walked on your own dick.
So now that you've thrown all your sources that claim the buildings fell into their own footprints under the bus, lets discuss your current failure to understand physics...of course your neither your input or cooperation is necessary.

1) To launch multi-ton structural beams hundreds of feet requires an input of energy.

2) Severing columns as in a true controlled demolition requires an input of energy.

3) Energy used for hurling beams cannot be used for severing beams and the energy required to do both must be included in any calculation.

4) A body falling in an arc will travel along the "x" and "y" axis terminating at ground level. It will land a distance from its origin as determined by the arc.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#257948 Jul 30, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>Show your math?
1+4=twoof

That's about the size of it.

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#257949 Jul 30, 2013
over 1 Million square feet of aluminum at WTC but of course none of that molten stuff could be aluminum !?!?!?!?!?
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you show me one test that proves it was Steel, and if it was what kept it molten for weeks, what would that even prove?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#257950 Jul 30, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
1+4=twoof
That's about the size of it.
LMAO, Seriously, is this guy a troll, he never backs up anything, makes things up and consonantly repeats things over and over that he has been proven wrong on.

I'm not even talking about the kind of things a lame twoofer might keep contesting but how many times has this joker been shown the NIST report on 7 only once again to claim a week latter it does not exist.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#257951 Jul 30, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't look now, but you have reaffirmed that WTC 1 was brought down with explosives.
Figure it out...
WTC 7 was two football fields away form tower 1
Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building.
In other words you walked on your own dick.
"Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building."

Prove it.

I say disintegration, geometry, physics and momentum were enough to make it happen. Besides you are talking about two entirely different things. Building demolition take inward directed charges at key structural points. This is done using steel plating place on each side of a structural member. Where was all the steel plating and triggering mechanisms?

Hey watch this video.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#257952 Jul 30, 2013
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#257955 Jul 30, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
"Explosives is the only way multi-ton beams can be thrown that far and that hard to damage a steel frame building."
Prove it.
I say disintegration, geometry, physics and momentum were enough to make it happen. Besides you are talking about two entirely different things. Building demolition take inward directed charges at key structural points. This is done using steel plating place on each side of a structural member. Where was all the steel plating and triggering mechanisms?
Hey watch this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =J9HaT23b-xcXX
What's to prove?
You said WTC 7 fell due to damage for the WTC 1 ?
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#257957 Jul 30, 2013
A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people!

“DECEPTION = MOST POWERFUL ”

Since: Jul 11

POLITICAL FORCE ON THE PLANET

#257958 Jul 30, 2013
The Gloop wrote:
^ Gloop.
I see the Gloop is still alive. Huh Eh !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 13 min guest 670,351
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 24 min Elerby 100,534
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 hr another viewer 980,168
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 2 hr Jehowa Witness 46,179
Treating others with respect 3 hr UnderstandPeople 14
Do any attractive cougars or milfs want to trad... (Dec '11) 5 hr Seejay 4
God is REAL - Miracles Happen! (Jun '11) 6 hr Peter Ross 6,147
More from around the web