Okay you seem to know alot of info on these cameras . Please provide a link or peer reveiwed document where these 12 cameras operate on an auto switcher , motorized sweeper . What purpose would cameras be if they only recorded the "auto switched" camera currently in view? Surveilance has been around along time , 7-11 had 240 hour vcrs back in 1984 . Certainly the d.o.d. could afford to spend a couple hundred bucks out of the 2.3 TRILLION unaccounted for tax money they stole from american citizens.<quoted text>
Or if it is the common autoswitcher of the day, one would have to wait till it cycled through 4 to 16 cameras displaying one camera at a time, then there are motorized sweepers, since very few of these 85 Cameras were not located at the Pentagon no big shock.
And still we have 100's of witnesses that say the plane, many right down to impact and the AA markings and no reports of missiles what so ever.
Why do you suggest a missle when at no time have I ever insinuated , accused , or even given some sort of validity to your statement of a missle ? Could this be some sort of an attempt to apply the "twoofer" mind set to my question ? Please keep your silly attempts to give me a "twoofer status" label coming . I enjoy the humor . Although try a little harder cause when I get bored I tend to find more holes in the "official " story . The nist report is such a swiss cheese style book of bullshit with plausible deniability of responsibilty stated in the disclaimer poking holes is not difficult. Once again reading comprehension through grammatical structure has everything to do with interpretation.
I don't use any 9-11 conspiracy "twoofer videos" found on you tube for my information but I don't mind veiwing them.