Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

I Know U

San Antonio, TX

#255731 May 19, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You're dippy.
It is the credibility of the ones on the video.
Anyone with half a brain can tell if conservations have been alerted, to separate the BS from the truth.
As the women continue to flee from you.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255732 May 19, 2013
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
If it wasn't forced down , or held up, wouldn't it have fallen freely?
Does this question have any relevance?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255733 May 19, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Not only are you still a prick, you're dippy.
It is the credibility of the ones on the video.
Anyone with half a brain can tell if conservations have been alerted
ad hominem fallacy dismissed
courteous europhobe

Plymouth, NH

#255734 May 19, 2013
henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Capitalism and wars are twins!
then try socializzzzzm

The Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, has sent 3,000 troops on to the streets of the capital, Caracas, to crack down on rampant crime which has made the country one of the most dangerous in the world.

The "secure fatherland" plan is a new effort to lower violent crime following close to 20 similar attempts during the 14-year rule of the late socialist leader Hugo Chávez.

"Our armed forces are taking the streets to protect the people," Maduro said in a speech to military police and troops that was broadcast live on state television.

"I call on you to serve your country," he said.

"It must be more than just patrolling. It must a commitment of conscience, passion and love."

The plan will create around 500 checkpoints in the coming months around the city – 9,000 new police officers are currently in training and 1,600 National Guard officers will later join the programme.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255735 May 19, 2013
I Know U wrote:
<quoted text>
As the women continue to flee from you.
Hum, very weak response and has nothing to do with topic
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255736 May 19, 2013
I Know U wrote:
<quoted text>
As the women continue to flee from you.
Carry on in your own little world of make believe.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255737 May 19, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
ad hominem fallacy dismissed
Another weak response
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255738 May 19, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Does this question have any relevance?
It begs the question:
NIST's own report says the bottom part of the building was undamaged... so once again... how did it cave in on itself???

The core columns were designed to hold up three times it's weight.
The core columns were where the stairwells and elevators were...
therefore nothing there flammable.
NIST's own report says the jet fuel burnt off very quickly.

When a building collapses it never falls straight down, it is totally ridiculous to think it is possible.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255739 May 19, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Another weak response
Dismissed
NEXT

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255740 May 19, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It begs the question:
NIST's own report says the bottom part of the building was undamaged... so once again... how did it cave in on itself???
The core columns were designed to hold up three times it's weight.
The core columns were where the stairwells and elevators were...
therefore nothing there flammable.
NIST's own report says the jet fuel burnt off very quickly.
When a building collapses it never falls straight down, it is totally ridiculous to think it is possible.
Which building? The core columns in both trade towers were severed by the impact. The fact is, that the exterior carried a substantial part of the load. Both structures were damaged by impact and fire. Sure the jet fuel burned off but also started a structure fire that burned on for hours. Another fact is that a pellet stove fire reaches 1,000 degrees F within minutes. A high-rise structure fire reaches more than 3,000 degrees F given the updrafts which is more than enough to destroy the floor trusses. Of course buildings fall straight down. You can watch the video and see it happen.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#255741 May 19, 2013
When a building collapses it never falls straight down because as we all know GRAVITY doesn't work in a downward direction !??!?!?!?!

I realize that Twoofers are STUPID , but I never realized just how stupid
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It begs the question:
NIST's own report says the bottom part of the building was undamaged... so once again... how did it cave in on itself???
The core columns were designed to hold up three times it's weight.
The core columns were where the stairwells and elevators were...
therefore nothing there flammable.
NIST's own report says the jet fuel burnt off very quickly.
When a building collapses it never falls straight down, it is totally ridiculous to think it is possible.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255742 May 19, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
When a building collapses it never falls straight down because as we all know GRAVITY doesn't work in a downward direction !??!?!?!?!
I realize that Twoofers are STUPID , but I never realized just how stupid
<quoted text>
Of course. A tree falls over because the trunk maintains it's structural integrity. When a building goes into failure mode, it's structural integrity is compromised.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#255743 May 20, 2013
and a tree trunk is SOLID , while a building is mostly OPEN SPACE
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course. A tree falls over because the trunk maintains it's structural integrity. When a building goes into failure mode, it's structural integrity is compromised.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255744 May 20, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Does this question have any relevance?
Please explain your reason for there demise .Only this time instead of repeating what you've "heard" from everyone, tell me why you think it didn't fall freely. A parrot recites learned words , a real person knows what they mean. I'm just curious as to why you feel these buildings fell so uniformly and completly.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255745 May 20, 2013
I Know U wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are some of the so called 85 videos, see, if it is various people showing up and filming after the impact ....they should have caught the impact on tape?
Someday may they find a cure for stupid.


They already have a cure . You should have listened in grade school instead of playing with your pud. If you were in sports ,I apoligize , stupid was instilled in your lesson plan and you had no choice,the no child left behind law . Not saying all atheletes are stupid but lets look at the stats . How many professional atheletes actually continue to make money after there sports carreer by using their "education"?
The real reason they demand so much money is not talent , it's fear of having to use something they don't have .... inteligence.
Don't get me wrong there are exceptions , but most wind up drug addicted , dog fighting , burdens of society.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255746 May 20, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Which building? The core columns in both trade towers were severed by the impact. The fact is, that the exterior carried a substantial part of the load. Both structures were damaged by impact and fire. Sure the jet fuel burned off but also started a structure fire that burned on for hours. Another fact is that a pellet stove fire reaches 1,000 degrees F within minutes. A high-rise structure fire reaches more than 3,000 degrees F given the updrafts which is more than enough to destroy the floor trusses. Of course buildings fall straight down. You can watch the video and see it happen.
You really need to read the nist report before you try to debunk anyone. How many core columns were actualy severed? How many core columns were used? ncstar 1 states the damage to these columns did not cause the collapse of the wtc towers 1, 2 , or 7.
The planes "knocked " the fire proofing insulation off some of the trusses , allowing them heat up from the office furniture fires, which caused them to buckle , eventually pulling them inward away from there outside anchoring.This is said to cause the " global collapse". Of course this is all just a "PROBABLE COLLAPSE SEQUENCE" and not a verified by peer reveiw collapse sequence.

Please do some research and get your facts straight or your gonna show how stupid most idiots believing the "official" story really are. Unless you really are an idiot. If thats the case , please don't vote , we have enough fools in congress as it is.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#255747 May 20, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>It begs the question:
NIST's own report says the bottom part of the building was undamaged... so once again... how did it cave in on itself???

The core columns were designed to hold up three times it's weight.
The core columns were where the stairwells and elevators were...
therefore nothing there flammable.
NIST's own report says the jet fuel burnt off very quickly.

When a building collapses it never falls straight down, it is totally ridiculous to think it is possible.
Buildings are designed to withstand static loads.

When a mass is moving, it's a dynamic load.

Your brain is designed for unlimited loads of ignorance and stupidity.

Try education over conspiratardation next time.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255748 May 20, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Buildings are designed to withstand static loads.
When a mass is moving, it's a dynamic load.
Your brain is designed for unlimited loads of ignorance and stupidity.
Try education over conspiratardation next time.
Amazing, now you think you are a physicist.
I listen to real physicists.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255749 May 20, 2013
RADEKT wrote:
When a building collapses it never falls straight down because as we all know GRAVITY doesn't work in a downward direction !??!?!?!?!
I realize that Twoofers are STUPID , but I never realized just how stupid
<quoted text>
How does the sound part of the building collapse???
The top broke off of one of the towers so where was the weight to bring it down???
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255750 May 20, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Which building? The core columns in both trade towers were severed by the impact. The fact is, that the exterior carried a substantial part of the load. Both structures were damaged by impact and fire. Sure the jet fuel burned off but also started a structure fire that burned on for hours. Another fact is that a pellet stove fire reaches 1,000 degrees F within minutes. A high-rise structure fire reaches more than 3,000 degrees F given the updrafts which is more than enough to destroy the floor trusses. Of course buildings fall straight down. You can watch the video and see it happen.
According to architects you are wrong on all accounts.
The towers were designed to prevent any upward drafts.
As always I listen to the experts certainly not your crackpot comments.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 1 min Jedi Mind Master 87,827
Christians cannot debate with ATHEISTS 16 min Liamm 416
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 22 min hojo 665,081
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 52 min New Age Spiritual... 977,171
Poll Is the price is right fixed for blacks? (Jun '12) 52 min Antonio 176
The Future of Politics in America 1 hr Nohweh 122
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Rider on the Storm 184,649
More from around the web