created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,329 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure
Comments
237,121 - 237,140 of 256,660 Comments Last updated 6 min ago
yTube

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255323
May 1, 2013
 
.

P R O O F __1.5 BIL MUSLIMS TO SHORTLY DIE

http://youtu.be/n7ok0g8iwJI

.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255324
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
FBI Spokesman Richard Kolko in a 2007 statement
"As the FBI has said since 9/11, bin Laden was responsible for the attack," Kolko said in a statement. "In this latest tape, he again acknowledged his responsibility. This should help to clarify for all the conspiracy theorists, again the 9/11 attack was done by bin Laden and al-Qaida."
http://classic-web.archive.org/web/2007121319...
PS: You rarely charge someone in a high profile case until after they are captured, if there is charges, they must be given their Miranda rights immediately, a common and basic prosecution tactic that does not relate to innocence.


This verbal statement is not verifiable proof he was charged in the events of 911. This is merely a statement . A warrant , indictment , or actual charges are required to make his statement true. So your saying High profile people get special treatment in the courts of law where all men are created equal? What a moron! Miranda rights Ha! I guess they read obl his Miranda rights before allegedly murdering and dismembering his body before dumping it in the ocean? Or maybe they dropped these rights from an airplane before bombing innocent villagers with "smart bombs" . I do not agree with you about Miranda rights being related to innocence, they are to protect the innocent from jackass people of "authority" who think they are better than the very public they are supposed to protect.If a prosecutor convicts an innocent person of a crime by withholding key evidence that would help prove innocence and this person is incarcerated do you think this prosecutor , arresting officer, detective, and any other person involved in the false imprisonment should be prosecuted ?

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255325
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That I actually totally agree with, it makes my job harder.
Lol ! I think a a couple of lessons on criminal justice should be a required to become an officer paid to enforce any laws where the public is concerned . Only thing is most cops wouldn't be a very productive enforcer if they knew how many laws they usually break in the "due process" part of an investigation. When an individual being detained knows more about the law than the officer it tends to cause animosity . This only makes the police look stupid and violates any code of ethics. And yes if you are involved in the prosecution tends to make a conviction more difficult.Good luck with that.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255326
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
This verbal statement is not verifiable proof he was charged in the events of 911. This is merely a statement . A warrant , indictment , or actual charges are required to make his statement true. So your saying High profile people get special treatment in the courts of law where all men are created equal?
NOPE, Your reading comprehension is suffering. ONCE AGAIN!

PS: You rarely charge someone in a high profile case until after they are captured, if there is charges, they must be given their Miranda rights immediately, a common and basic prosecution tactic that does not relate to innocence.

PPS: High profile, any serious crime such as felonies, low profile, jaywalking.

Exhaustive government and independent investigations have concluded otherwise, of course, and bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders have proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings. FBI officials say the wanted poster merely reflects the government's long-standing practice of relying on actual criminal charges in the notices. "There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point.... There is a logic to it."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

The former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when Mr. bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, David Kelley, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to September 11 on the official wanted poster. Mr. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant. "It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," Mr. Kelley, now in private practice, said. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."
http://www.nysun.com/national/bin-ladens-most...
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255327
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Please provide a link stating how Osama Bin Laden,... was directly involved in the 911 tragedies.
Bin Laden: Yes, I did it

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml...

BIN LADEN ADMITS 9/11 RESPONSIBILITY, WARNS OF MORE ATTACKS

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_...

From the links

He said he was first inspired to attack the United States by the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon in which towers and buildings in Beirut were destroyed in the siege of the capital.

"While I was looking at these destroyed towers in Lebanon, it sparked in my mind that the tyrant should be punished with the same and that we should destroy towers in America, so that it tastes what we taste and would be deterred from killing our children and women," he said.

The al-Qaeda leader said the hijackers had planned to have all the attacks take place within 20 minutes because they were sure the Americans would react quickly and start shooting down errant airplanes.

Bush's delay "gave us three times the required time to carry out the operations, thanks be to God," bin Laden said.

In planning the attacks, bin Laden said he told Mohammed Atta, one of the hijackers, that the strikes had to be carried out "within 20 minutes before Bush and his administration noticed."

It is significant that throughout the video he uses the personal pronouns "I" and "we" to claim responsibility for the attacks. In the past, he has spoken of the attackers only in the third person.

"We decided to destroy towers in America," he said. "God knows that it had not occurred to our mind to attack the towers, but after our patience ran out and we saw the injustice and inflexibility of the American-Israeli alliance toward our people in Palestine and Lebanon, this came to my mind." .

Bin Laden Claims Responsibility for 9/11

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00...

http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/1...

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004...

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255328
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
That's not evidence, it's an essay, well, it is evidence you are into some really lame music (unless you are 14 or under).
<quoted text>
Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of my last paragraph.Actually I think I was around 14 when this "primitive" group became mainstream. So to speak. The first amendment is a wonderful thing when it is understood and allowed. This bands lyrics proves It has to be .
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255329
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol ! I think a a couple of lessons on criminal justice should be a required to become an officer paid to enforce any laws where the public is concerned . Only thing is most cops wouldn't be a very productive enforcer if they knew how many laws they usually break in the "due process" part of an investigation. When an individual being detained knows more about the law than the officer it tends to cause animosity . This only makes the police look stupid and violates any code of ethics. And yes if you are involved in the prosecution tends to make a conviction more difficult.Good luck with that.
Bingo!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255330
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Please refer to the disclaimer at the end of my last paragraph.Actually I think I was around 14 when this "primitive" group became mainstream. So to speak. The first amendment is a wonderful thing when it is understood and allowed. This bands lyrics proves It has to be .
That's why I have a ACLU card in my back pocket.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255331
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually you would be wrong, all investigations start AFTER THE COMMISSION OF A CRIME.
No you are mistaken here . I can see you have never been pulled over because you look suspicious. No crime has been commissioned .
Only the thought of an officer has been committed. Suspicion of an unknown crime is not "after the commission of a crime" , it is profiling.Or to be honest I see this as "criminal negligence". It being a crime to assume guilt before a trial or even any evidence being provided is terrorism at its finest.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255332
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Bin Laden: Yes, I did it
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml...
BIN LADEN ADMITS 9/11 RESPONSIBILITY, WARNS OF MORE ATTACKS
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/binladen_...
From the links
He said he was first inspired to attack the United States by the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon in which towers and buildings in Beirut were destroyed in the siege of the capital.
"While I was looking at these destroyed towers in Lebanon, it sparked in my mind that the tyrant should be punished with the same and that we should destroy towers in America, so that it tastes what we taste and would be deterred from killing our children and women," he said.
The al-Qaeda leader said the hijackers had planned to have all the attacks take place within 20 minutes because they were sure the Americans would react quickly and start shooting down errant airplanes.
Bush's delay "gave us three times the required time to carry out the operations, thanks be to God," bin Laden said.
In planning the attacks, bin Laden said he told Mohammed Atta, one of the hijackers, that the strikes had to be carried out "within 20 minutes before Bush and his administration noticed."
It is significant that throughout the video he uses the personal pronouns "I" and "we" to claim responsibility for the attacks. In the past, he has spoken of the attackers only in the third person.
"We decided to destroy towers in America," he said. "God knows that it had not occurred to our mind to attack the towers, but after our patience ran out and we saw the injustice and inflexibility of the American-Israeli alliance toward our people in Palestine and Lebanon, this came to my mind." .
Bin Laden Claims Responsibility for 9/11
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00...
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/1...
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004...
Still no charges from the fbi , cia, nsa, or any other alphabet agency? Television is not proof of guilt. BBC reported building 7 collapse before it crumpled . Does this prove a scripted news ?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255333
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
No you are mistaken here . I can see you have never been pulled over because you look suspicious. No crime has been commissioned .
Only the thought of an officer has been committed. Suspicion of an unknown crime is not "after the commission of a crime" , it is profiling.Or to be honest I see this as "criminal negligence". It being a crime to assume guilt before a trial or even any evidence being provided is terrorism at its finest.
How do you investigate a non existent crime, you make no sense.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255334
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why I have a ACLU card in my back pocket.
Right on ! The law works for everyone that wishes to know it. No matter who you are, or your occupation. Knowledge is a powerful thing when used properly.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255335
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you investigate a non existent crime, you make no sense.

That is my very point. I as well as many other citizens have been targeted by certain factions of law enforcement for strictly being somewhere these agencies assumed illegal activity was taking place. Hence your" After the crime" statement is incorrect.What is a preemptive war? I consider it down right terrorism. Looking "suspicious " is not a crime.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255336
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
That is my very point. I as well as many other citizens have been targeted by certain factions of law enforcement for strictly being somewhere these agencies assumed illegal activity was taking place. Hence your" After the crime" statement is incorrect.What is a preemptive war? I consider it down right terrorism. Looking "suspicious " is not a crime.
Profiling is not an investigation of a crime, it is an Unconstitutional method of determining if there is any crime to investigate.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255337
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
NOPE, Your reading comprehension is suffering. ONCE AGAIN!
PS: You rarely charge someone in a high profile case until after they are captured, if there is charges, they must be given their Miranda rights immediately, a common and basic prosecution tactic that does not relate to innocence.
PPS: High profile, any serious crime such as felonies, low profile, jaywalking.
Exhaustive government and independent investigations have concluded otherwise, of course, and bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders have proudly taken responsibility for the hijackings. FBI officials say the wanted poster merely reflects the government's long-standing practice of relying on actual criminal charges in the notices. "There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point.... There is a logic to it."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
The former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when Mr. bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, David Kelley, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to September 11 on the official wanted poster. Mr. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant. "It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," Mr. Kelley, now in private practice, said. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."
http://www.nysun.com/national/bin-ladens-most...
Reading comprehension..."the wanted poster merely reflects the government's long-standing practice of relying on actual criminal charges in the notices. "

Thanks for providing exactly what I said. OBL was not charged with 911. An alleged tv admission of guilt is not a charge .

Next would be the involvement of Iraq , Afghanistan, and Iran.
Where these countries charged with a crime?

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255338
May 1, 2013
 
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Profiling is not an investigation of a crime, it is an Unconstitutional method of determining if there is any crime to investigate.

Oh I see , An investigation , investigating whether an investigation is warranted or a crime was possibly committed.
That's kinda saying because you leave a bank with a bag of money and enter a vehicle waiting at the curb then speed away it is probable you just robbed the bank. Unconstitutional is putting it mildly...Terrorism is what it is.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255339
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I see , An investigation , investigating whether an investigation is warranted or a crime was possibly committed.
That's kinda saying because you leave a bank with a bag of money and enter a vehicle waiting at the curb then speed away it is probable you just robbed the bank. Unconstitutional is putting it mildly...Terrorism is what it is.
Your defenition of terrorism is strange, while a USC 1983 violation could be terrorism it rarely is, normally it is a simple violation of civil rights, wrong, yes, terrorism, no.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255340
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Reading comprehension..."the wanted poster merely reflects the government's long-standing practice of relying on actual criminal charges in the notices. "
Wrong, And this says it all, get back to me once you are a 3L and you will understand.

The former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when Mr. bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, David Kelley, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to September 11 on the official wanted poster. Mr. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant. "It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," Mr. Kelley, now in private practice, said. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."
http://www.nysun.com/national/bin-ladens-most ...

Once again, you don't want to file charges till you have him in custody since he is wanted on other charges, you want him to keep confessing in the media like he did. Also you use other trials to bolster yours, if he had went on trial for the Cole, known associates, act and so for are automatically admissible when new charges are filled in the newly files charges, no need for discovery, no need to do endless interviews of witnesses. It already happens in the first case (Cole) thus saving taxpayer money.

You most often see this with serial killers and different jurisdictions, pick the easiest provable murder first and after that trial your iffy case in another jurisdiction can become a cakewalk due to information gained in the first.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255342
May 1, 2013
 
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>Actually the post your referring to does not state what I think happened to the towers . It doesn't make a bit of difference what I think. It only gives another probable cause that should've been included in the investigations , if only for the sole purpose of ruling it out. An incomplete report does not necessarily provide the best solution , just a possible one.

The official story is much more plausible than what I wrote earlier. Plausibility is used to deceive perception .

Grammatical comprehension would be the reason for my post . Obviously , not a strong point for some people posting on this thread.. I figured you would understand by the way it was said.
My point was that your example isn't possible and should not have been included in a list of plausible collapse scenarios. It fails at the most basic level which is a simple application of logic and reason.

When scientists are asked to solve a problem they don't consider solutions outside of rationality.

Your main issue seems to be the word "plausible" which is no more nebulous than the word "theory".

A theory is simply the best explanation for an event given the available data and NIST's use of the word "plausible" is no different.

And lets be honest, if the collapse sequence changed tomorrow due to new information, it wouldn't change the most plausible explanation for a collapse mechanism.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#255343
May 1, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
I do NOT claim to be a physicist... this comes from people who are.
Although, like usual some idiot on here will dispute the experts.

MATHEMATICS OF 9/11: THE LAWS OF PHYSICS

http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/po...
That's hilarious!

You just cited what looks to be elevator boy-sheep's blog.

1) The first video is bunk because the "expurt" claims the "official story" says jet fuel was the cause of collapse.

That's a load of crap and not supported by the NIST report.

2) The second video shows Jeff King (an EE) claiming that "squibs" prove the use of explosives yet the timing of the "squibs" are suspiciously silent with no audible signature on any videos.

Plus it doesn't take a genius to understand that as you compress something like a building, air with find a way to escape.

3) If this is honestly what you find convincing then you should really do something to improve your knowledge of the physical sciences because what you have now is pure gullibility.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

673 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 2 min An NFL Fan 115,295
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 min Liam 532,930
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 8 min It aint necessarily so 721,161
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 9 min Larry 599,096
Nine Eleven 12 min passing by 19
I Hate Satan [believers only} (Nov '08) 16 min Zazz 83
Tamil vs Kannada. Which one is the oldest langu... (Oct '12) 46 min shyam 503
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 8 hr bad bob 172,474
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 17 hr kalei 79
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••