created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,502 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure
Comments
237,081 - 237,100 of 257,997 Comments Last updated 2 min ago

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255373 May 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have no evidence what-so-ever, merely an opinion with nothing support it. Bowman flew those intercept flights many times, he was there, you were not. You're just another moron who wants to slap down our veterens.
My proof is that every person in the military must follow the chain of command. You are an idiot to say or imply otherwise.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255374 May 3, 2013
I hate unholy black men wrote:
That's what they get.
It is a sin to hate.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255375 May 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have no evidence what-so-ever, merely an opinion with nothing support it. Bowman flew those intercept flights many times, he was there, you were not. You're just another moron who wants to slap down our veterens.
You have been asked over and over to link a outright lies you have told and never do, so can you show me an evidence "Every inch of the Pentagon" is filmed?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255376 May 3, 2013
LMFAO! So your evidence of takes the form of a persons eyes now, NOW THAT IS SOME SCIENCE!

Any EVIDENCE what so ever that the Boston Bombings were a conspiracy done by others beyond the shape of someones eyes?
onemale wrote:
George W. Bush has a slip-of-the-tongue and ALMOST says the Boston bombs was a CONSPIRACY.
I never did trust his beady eyes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YfwHYSpoIEsXX
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255377 May 3, 2013
onemale wrote:
I listen to the experts, which you are not.
<quoted text>
You do?
onemale wrote:
George W. Bush has a slip-of-the-tongue and ALMOST says the Boston bombs was a CONSPIRACY.
I never did trust his beady eyes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YfwHYSpoIEsXX
Are you a "beady eyegocolgist"?

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255379 May 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You do?
<quoted text>
Are you a "beady eyegocolgist"?
Just more inventions of your drug fueled imagination. There is no such thing as a "beady eyegocologist", you have bafooned yourself yet again.
onemale

Pana, IL

#255380 May 4, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Bowman never presented any proof for his claim and cited a twoofer website as support rather than official documents.
Oh and he never claimed there was a stand down order either.
Rather than playing your dumb game of "hey, what about this?", why don't you try citing the evidence you claimed to have found proving your beliefs correct?
So far all you've presented is logical fallacy after logical fallacy and run away from addressing others rebuttals of the crap you're shilling.
I trust someone with Bowman's credentials, certainly not your crackpot remarks with NO credentials.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255381 May 4, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
<quoted text>
Just more inventions of your drug fueled imagination. There is no such thing as a "beady eyegocologist", you have bafooned yourself yet again.
You got the wrong guy ....
onemale wrote:
George W. Bush has a slip-of-the-tongue and ALMOST says the Boston bombs was a CONSPIRACY.
I never did trust his beady eyes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YfwHYSpoIEsXX
But I agree, what an idiot!
onemale

Pana, IL

#255382 May 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You do?
<quoted text>
Are you a "beady eyegocolgist"?
You are so predictable always twisting around the point
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255383 May 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so predictable always twisting around the point
You never had a point sockboy and it was your exact quote, you did not trust him because he has "beady eyes". LMFAO!
onemale

Pana, IL

#255384 May 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You have been asked over and over to link a outright lies you have told and never do, so can you show me an evidence "Every inch of the Pentagon" is filmed?
If you are so worried about it research it yourself.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255385 May 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
I trust someone with Bowman's credentials, certainly not your crackpot remarks with NO credentials.
Bowman has beady eyes!
onemale

Pana, IL

#255386 May 4, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
My proof is that every person in the military must follow the chain of command. You are an idiot to say or imply otherwise.
Once again, I trust someone with Bowman's credentials, certainly not your crackpot remarks with no credentials.

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255387 May 4, 2013
What are you attempting to say? I can't see the point your nonsensical ramblings.
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
You got the wrong guy ....
<quoted text>
But I agree, what an idiot!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255388 May 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are so worried about it research it yourself.
I knew you were lying, you are the new MOOBS!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255389 May 4, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, I trust someone with Bowman's credentials, certainly not your crackpot remarks with no credentials.
Do you trust him because of your Beady Eye litmus test?
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255390 May 4, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
What are you attempting to say? I can't see the point your nonsensical ramblings.
<quoted text>
That's just because you are slow Mama!

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255391 May 4, 2013
Keep trying, eventually you'll find success.
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just because you are slow Mama!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255392 May 4, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
Keep trying, eventually you'll find success.
<quoted text>
With one males Beady Eye truth detector, I think not but more power to ya with that one.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255394 May 4, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, And this says it all, get back to me once you are a 3L and you will understand.
The former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when Mr. bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, David Kelley, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to September 11 on the official wanted poster. Mr. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant. "It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," Mr. Kelley, now in private practice, said. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."
http://www.nysun.com/national/bin-ladens-most ...
Once again, you don't want to file charges till you have him in custody since he is wanted on other charges, you want him to keep confessing in the media like he did. Also you use other trials to bolster yours, if he had went on trial for the Cole, known associates, act and so for are automatically admissible when new charges are filled in the newly files charges, no need for discovery, no need to do endless interviews of witnesses. It already happens in the first case (Cole) thus saving taxpayer money.
You most often see this with serial killers and different jurisdictions, pick the easiest provable murder first and after that trial your iffy case in another jurisdiction can become a cakewalk due to information gained in the first.
Okay .... and the trial for the 1998 wtc bombings was on what date ? The cole trial was when? Who represented mr. obl in these cases ? I'm assuming he was in custody for the 1998 wtc , and cole charges to be filed , as these would be high profile cases.

No need for discovery , no need for a jury, judge , witnesses ,or executioner when no charges have been filed. there is no case .

And you seem to think condemning people for serious crimes on "iffy" evidence is okay and falls under what part of " beyond reasonable doubt" ? Any juror convicting someone because of "iffy" evidence is a disgrace to the community and should be considered defiant of the judicial systems code of conduct and a traitor to his peers, and fellow country men.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 2 min Hannah V 4,332
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 2 min River Tam 732,977
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 2 min tamilselvan 5,316
3 Word Game (Feb '12) 3 min repeat offender 4,148
Obama FINALLY Talks About The Beheading 6 min Anon 5
Last Word + 2 21 min Hannah V 505
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 23 min Peace_Warrior 599,908
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 29 min guest 538,950
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 48 min Patrick 226,341
Sims 4 Key Generator (Oct '13) 1 hr Figaro 105
•••
Enter and win $5000

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••