Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

55,132 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255239 Apr 27, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, Shocking 2 110 story buildings fall in NYC, a part gets wedged a few stories up in a 1 foot "alley" and was not spotted and out of millions of debris they missed a few things.
My god, I think that makes them human.
My "bubble" wasn't burst by your realization of the lack of thoroughness of investigators....that is to say.....lack of thoroughness in conducting a real and comprehensive investigation of the entire crime scene and all the evidence....as was advertised to the public, you have just realized with your statement what I have said all along.

Checkmate.

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255240 Apr 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you are going to say the men in black planted the Boeing landing gear.
You would be wrong...but I suppose you knew that already.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255242 Apr 27, 2013
Ted Olson's 9/11 story contradicts itself 3 times
Barbara Olsen's photos before and after plastic surgery

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255243 Apr 28, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
<quoted text>
You would be wrong...but I suppose you knew that already.
I am so glad we agree on that point.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255244 Apr 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
Ted Olson's 9/11 story contradicts itself 3 times
Barbara Olsen's photos before and after plastic surgery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YarIJ_xfktsXX
His wife died when the plane crashed into the Pentagon. End of story.

“"Tanners Flat" U dummy”

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#255245 Apr 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I am so glad we agree on that point.
Yeah???....Where?

Your cognitive dissonance is showing.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255246 Apr 28, 2013
It appears the fed pulled the first story, too much damning evidence,
but I found this one.
Ted Olson contradicts himself 3 times on 9/11.


onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255247 Apr 28, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
His wife died when the plane crashed into the Pentagon. End of story.
Opinions with no evidence

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#255248 Apr 28, 2013
Insults Are Easier wrote:
Oh I get it, shills believe in finite elemental investigative analysis by the destruction of evidence to produce the desired results of preconceived conclusions that masquerade as science and proper investigations.

X+Y=2 means the conclusion is already reached, so manipulate the X and the Y, or more simply the NIST report.

Then conduct a smear campaign against anyone who can think.

Insults Are Easier
Seems you've been asked for proof that anything was "manipulated" in the models cited by NIST but never could.

You also claimed the data and software wasn't available to the public but you were proven wrong about that too.

I take it your current claim should be filed along with steel plating, free fall=cd, symmetry=cd and a whole host of other claims you've made as just more unsupported junk you spew because,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

Lie on Wayne!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255249 Apr 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Opinions with no evidence
No it's a well know fact she died in the crash. You are the one making a baseless opinion.

1. Olsen's wife boarded the plane, was on the passenger manifest, and aboard flight 77.

2. Olsen's wife passed through airport security and was checked onto the plane by American Airlines personnel.

3. Olsen's wife made phone calls from flight 77 describing what was happening.

4. Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.

You must be kidding me.
Head Twoofer

Santa Cruz, CA

#255250 Apr 28, 2013
onemale wrote:
It appears the fed pulled the first story, too much damning evidence,
but I found this one.
Ted Olson contradicts himself 3 times on 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =EJA2zH1gc1QXX
Biased BS
Alfonso

Campos, Brazil

#255251 Apr 28, 2013
September 11 was US government black operation
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255253 Apr 28, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems you've been asked for proof that anything was "manipulated" in the models cited by NIST but never could.
You also claimed the data and software wasn't available to the public but you were proven wrong about that too.
I take it your current claim should be filed along with steel plating, free fall=cd, symmetry=cd and a whole host of other claims you've made as just more unsupported junk you spew because,
[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss
Lie on Wayne!
\

What is your source of information?
I need more evidence than just your word, as
all your posts are totally biased, for whatever reason.
onemale

Tower Hill, IL

#255254 Apr 28, 2013
Head Twoofer wrote:
<quoted text>
Biased BS
What eveidence do you have to back that up???
oh the irony

Charleston, WV

#255255 Apr 28, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
The twoofer motto, when in a hole, keep digging.
delicious...keep digging

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Canada

#255256 Apr 29, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>\

What is your source of information?
I need more evidence than just your word, as
all your posts are totally biased, for whatever reason.
You accept nothing but the ravings of charlatans and lunatics.

You've been given evidence contrary to crap you've posted many times and have completely ignored it just posting more long debunked garbage rather than addressing posts that debunk you.

Go back and address the posts debunking your fictitious stand down order, then maybe we'll talk.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255257 Apr 29, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
<quoted text>
Not to mention the best probable explanation does not lose credibility by pointing out it is "probable", logic dictates one must prove there is a more "probable" alternative.
So far in the world of structural engineering the twoofers think that can be done theologians and architects
Logic doesn't dictate anything. probable means it is possible ,not the only or even the best solution to solving a problem , but possibly.
After all if every possible scenario has not been entered into an equation to solve the problem then the answer is incomplete.
Its a matter of grammatical structuring . Understanding the literal meaning of the words and using them to confuse the reader . But anyone with a fourth grade education can actually look them up to yield their absolute definition .Not "probable " definition . Yes some words can mean different things when used in different contexts but it doesn't make a bit of difference how you use the word probable it will always mean it is possible and nothing more. I can give you a more probable alternative , Two planes hit the towers setting off a chain of brilliantly placed demolition charges causing the buildings to collapse into rubble. But this scenario was not included in the nist ncstar 1 report nor the building 7 report making these incomplete .
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255258 Apr 29, 2013
911 was an inside job wrote:
<quoted text>
What's extraordinary about this claim?
911 was an inside job wrote:
"Every part of the plane that made it through the Towers means
those parts' energies *AT EXIT* were not available for
severing/deforming the steel columns in the building."
I'll let you chew on that for awhile, little pup.
Yea, But energy at exit is not relevant LMFAO, and you are still wrong, parts flew quite a ways, how do you know they did not have the energies *AT EXIT* were not available for
severing/deforming the steel columns!

TWOOFER LOGIC!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255259 Apr 29, 2013
Yellow Star Seed is Back wrote:
<quoted text>
My "bubble" wasn't burst by your realization of the lack of thoroughness of investigators
You mean they missed a few parts out of endless ones, in the maze of New Youk cities maze of alleys, crevices and rooftops.

And that proves what again? Weak!
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#255260 Apr 29, 2013
LMAO, A new record in lunacy ... and to think no one around her noticed. Stop sniffing the glue.
onemale wrote:
Ted Olson's 9/11 story contradicts itself 3 times
Barbara Olsen's photos before and after plastic surgery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =YarIJ_xfktsXX

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jehovah's Witnesses are true disciple of Jesus ... (Mar '07) 3 min Steve III 44,305
Moroccan men have the largest penis (Oct '13) 4 min Moroccan horse 87
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 9 min Bongo 969,917
The Christian Atheist debate (Jun '15) 13 min Bongo 37,856
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 16 min Steve III 618,360
Why do white men hate white women who want blac... (May '11) 27 min Amandapanda19 4,075
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 45 min truth 641,244
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 3 hr Anna 104,617
More from around the web