Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,471 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

anon

Minneapolis, MN

#255038 Apr 22, 2013
Hows that $250 mil for al-qaeda "freedom fighters " working out for you?

Hows that liberation of women in middle east working out for you?
Egypt sure did well electing "Muslim brotherhood" hardliners into office.

No talk of "liberating" women in Saudi Arabia....
I wonder if that's because Saudi is our bitch who agreed to only sell oil in u.s. printed currency?

Stupid morons...
there's so many of you out there
onemale

Pana, IL

#255039 Apr 22, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? Still means nothing. The hijacked planes hit the buildings. The buildings eventually collapsed. End of story.
Where are the videos showing a 757 hitting the Pentgon???
What happened to the 100 ton aircraft? With a length of 156', with a wing span of 124' and a tail section four stories high.
With indestructible landing gear, indestructible titanium engines???

The initial hole in the Pentagon was only 16' in diameter, most people don't know that because that video was only aired once.
The wreckage at the Pentagon ls totally inconsistent with the wreckage at the twin towers.


onemale

Pana, IL

#255040 Apr 22, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Still doesn't alter the fact that the hijacked airliners caused the buildings to collapse.
It does show how the Bush Administration lied. Bush wanted to sell us on a war with Iran, after Iran asked to negotiate with the U.S. If Bush is that corrupt, what else are they hiding??? He (and Obama) has lost all credibility. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. The Bush family is blood thirsty satanists.
onemale

Pana, IL

#255043 Apr 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Good grief!
Funny how you call someone a liar in a post where you're spewing lies yourself.
NIST didn't directly test for explosives residues. They did however visually examine the steel as well as do positive material identification.
Saying they didn't check for explosives does nothing but expose your personal ignorance and verifies your need to avoid fact.
In addition too... firefighters reported tons of molten steel. While a NIST spokesperson said their were none. I know these were real firefighters because just before 9/11 a reporter was doing a documentary about the New York firefighters and I recognized the faces.
quible

Austin, TX

#255044 Apr 22, 2013
anon wrote:
<quoted text>
Good grief!
"Visually examine steel" for explosives.
"Nist didn't directly test for explosive residue" which is REQUIRED in all fires in buildings.
Saying they didn't check? THEY DIDNT CHECK. They 'visually' checked?
GOOD GRIEF!
nothing but morons out in the world.
No wonder elites can conspire to do what they will.
You people are dumb as shit
I'd like to point out a logical error in your post. You were responding to a person goes by the name of "Porkpie Hat." You can make a case that this "Hat" person is dumb as shit, but you have no basis for generalizing that this conclusion applies to ALL people.

“9/11 Twoof = STUPID ”

Since: Jun 07

Manhattan, New York

#255046 Apr 22, 2013
required by who ?!?!?!
anon wrote:
<quoted text>
Good grief!
"Visually examine steel" for explosives.
"Nist didn't directly test for explosive residue" which is REQUIRED in all fires in buildings.
Saying they didn't check? THEY DIDNT CHECK. They 'visually' checked?
GOOD GRIEF!
nothing but morons out in the world.
No wonder elites can conspire to do what they will.
You people are dumb as shit

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255047 Apr 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Where are the videos showing a 757 hitting the Pentgon???
What happened to the 100 ton aircraft? With a length of 156', with a wing span of 124' and a tail section four stories high.
With indestructible landing gear, indestructible titanium engines???
The initial hole in the Pentagon was only 16' in diameter, most people don't know that because that video was only aired once.
The wreckage at the Pentagon ls totally inconsistent with the wreckage at the twin towers.
BS. You are still looking at the hole in the Pentagon courtyard.

Please don't embarrass yourself any more.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255048 Apr 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Where are the videos showing a 757 hitting the Pentgon???
What happened to the 100 ton aircraft? With a length of 156', with a wing span of 124' and a tail section four stories high.
With indestructible landing gear, indestructible titanium engines???
The initial hole in the Pentagon was only 16' in diameter, most people don't know that because that video was only aired once.
The wreckage at the Pentagon ls totally inconsistent with the wreckage at the twin towers.
The pilot of the C-131 say the plane hit the Pentagon as well as many others who also saw the plane just before it hit. Ted Olsen's wife died on that plane.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255049 Apr 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
It does show how the Bush Administration lied. Bush wanted to sell us on a war with Iran, after Iran asked to negotiate with the U.S. If Bush is that corrupt, what else are they hiding??? He (and Obama) has lost all credibility. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. The Bush family is blood thirsty satanists.
Still doesn't alter the fact that the hijacked airliners caused the buildings to collapse.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255050 Apr 22, 2013
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
In addition too... firefighters reported tons of molten steel. While a NIST spokesperson said their were none. I know these were real firefighters because just before 9/11 a reporter was doing a documentary about the New York firefighters and I recognized the faces.
So what? I doubt they reported "tons of molten steel." We do know that the fires were very hot and melted the floor trusses.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

#255054 Apr 22, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
You might want to know what an FEA is before hand waving it away as simply an educated guess.
If that's the case then every engineered product produced after about 1975 was based on nothing more than a guess that it would stand/work/operate.
Obviously a ridiculous statement.
Please show me in the nist ncstar 1 report where The investigators state the "absolute collapse sequence" and not the "probable collapse sequence " and I'll concede . Using the fem or fea for the mathematical solution is still an approximate answer. Manipulation of variables to find a predetermined outcome isn't the same as designing a prototype. The final solution is already known .
I stand by my statement citing the ncstar 1 report as an educated guess. Simulations on a computer do not qualify as factual events.

anon

Minneapolis, MN

#255055 Apr 22, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The pilot of the C-131 say the plane hit the Pentagon as well as many others who also saw the plane just before it hit. Ted Olsen's wife died on that plane.
The same wife that supposedly made 2 cell phone calls from a plane travelling hundreds of miles per hour?

Yea and I'm your Daddy bitch.
anon

Minneapolis, MN

#255056 Apr 22, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So what? I doubt they reported "tons of molten steel." We do know that the fires were very hot and melted the floor trusses.
Must suck to try so hard to deny the undeniable.
your parents must be proud you are a puppet with no self determination.

Then again... I'm sure your parents were brainless puppets also.
Aka slaves who fear taking orders from themselves.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255057 Apr 22, 2013
anon wrote:
<quoted text>
The same wife that supposedly made 2 cell phone calls from a plane travelling hundreds of miles per hour?
Yea and I'm your Daddy bitch.
Cell phones often work on planes. The airline phones and other communications work at cruising speed don't they? Many people online have also used their cell phones and had them work in some areas, particularly populated areas which many cell phone towers.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#255058 Apr 22, 2013
anon wrote:
<quoted text>
Must suck to try so hard to deny the undeniable.
your parents must be proud you are a puppet with no self determination.
Then again... I'm sure your parents were brainless puppets also.
Aka slaves who fear taking orders from themselves.
Ad hominem reply dismissed.

NEXT
onemale

Pana, IL

#255059 Apr 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
So what? I doubt they reported "tons of molten steel." We do know that the fires were very hot and melted the floor trusses.
Look at the twin tower construction, the floor trusses did not hold up the buildings, 247 vertical beams held up the buildings. Every floor could have pancaked all the way down but the vertical beams would still be standing.
onemale

Pana, IL

#255060 Apr 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
BS. You are still looking at the hole in the Pentagon courtyard.
Please don't embarrass yourself any more.
1.) Once again every inch of the Pentagon in under surveillance, where are the videos showing a 757???
2.) Once again how does a 100 ton jet disappear into a 16' diameter hole???
3.) Once again, why is the wreckage at the Pentagon totally inconsistent of the wreckage at the towers???
onemale

Pana, IL

#255061 Apr 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Cell phones often work on planes. The airline phones and other communications work at cruising speed don't they? Many people online have also used their cell phones and had them work in some areas, particularly populated areas which many cell phone towers.
While it might be possible to make a cell phone call while in flight, the bottom line is that chances are the call quality won't be very good, if you are able to connect at all. That may be changing, though. Cell phone companies are in the process of developing equipment that can handle calls from the air.

Read more: Do Cell Phones Work on Airplanes?| eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_5065930_cell-phones...

Therefore if cell phone work so well why are cell phone companies spending the money to develop equipment to make it possible?
onemale

Pana, IL

#255062 Apr 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The pilot of the C-131 say the plane hit the Pentagon as well as many others who also saw the plane just before it hit. Ted Olsen's wife died on that plane.
Have you checked out Ted Olsen's new wife???
Looks like the same woman.
cell phones

Clay City, KY

#255063 Apr 23, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Cell phones often work on planes. The airline phones and other communications work at cruising speed don't they? Many people online have also used their cell phones and had them work in some areas, particularly populated areas which many cell phone towers.
driving through West Virginia and Kentucky you can't get enough signal for a cell phone to work so how the hell would it work at 30,000 ft travelling 500+mph, and back in 2001 there weren't as many cell phone towers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 4 min nanoanomaly 855,626
avandia 2014 (Jan '14) 6 min WRM4 365
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 7 min Dan 596,635
Poll Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 12 min DebraE 100,766
Play "end of the word" (Jan '11) 12 min WasteWater 6,155
No one should blaspheme Prophet Mohammad, peace... 13 min WasteWater 664
Cat Lovers (Aug '07) 20 min Kelly Joanne Cannon 4,406
The Christian Atheist debate 25 min Lbj 1,054
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Rider on the Storm 177,216
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr New Age Spiritual... 612,646
More from around the web