created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,273 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure

Comments (Page 11,827)

Showing posts 236,521 - 236,540 of255,490
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
R Feynman

Absecon, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254647
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>1) Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse.
I am certain that the "9.8" that appears in the Table is not a measure of acceleration. The words "free fall" or "gravitational acceleration" do not appear in the Table you indicate. There is no data showing acceleration, period. You are pretending to have accomplished something with this effort?

Here is the claim that you promised to refute:

Don:
There was a period of free-fall for the entire visible perimeter of WTC-7. This can be easily verified by anyone who understands how to determine free-fall acceleration in a video (and physics teacher David Chandler provides lessons to anyone who needs schooling -- including the NIST "investigators"!) Yes, even NIST has conceded a period of free fall for WTC-7.
Porkpie:
NIST never "conceded" anything. Free fall was evident in the draft report
Sierra:
Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?
Here is a link to the draft document:
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm...
Porkpie:
Of course I can but I'll do it from my laptop at home since opening PDF docs is too cumbersome on a phone.
Porkpie:
Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse.
The word "includes" is not properly used. There is no acknowledgement in that Table on page 39 of the period free fall acceleration.
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254648
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

YellowPissreality wrote:
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
<quoted text>
Google-Twoofer Institute of Technology, School of Advanced YouTube.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254649
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

YellowPissreality wrote:
Can anybody explain why the 32 story land Mark Tower in Texas, the tallest building ever brought down by a CD, did not fall in free fall accleration ????
Did the CD company do something wrong ???
It took them over 4 months to wire the building???
Did the laws of physics take a day off ???
Why no free fall ???
Exactly. Free fall is pure nonsense.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254650
Apr 4, 2013
 
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>1) Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse.
But the Twoofer claim is unconditional free-fall which is false.
Kcalberaswejlaer eht

Bixby, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254651
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Nigel wrote:
Attention Timestin/YellowPiss/etc.:
I, too, could give you an answer to your query regarding the relationship of freefall to demolition, but first I'd have to invent a time machine and go back in time and persuade your mother not to indulge in so much alcohol and drugs while she was pregnant with you. Otherwise my answer, like those already posted, would be meaningless to you.
Hey, good luck there, kid!
Lmao!!! Timestin/yellowpissreality is Radekt. Yet he accuses others of being sock puppets. Go figure.

“Truth is unthinkable.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254653
Apr 4, 2013
 
the 180 wrote:
<quoted text>you did a complete 180 turnaround on your position, that is plainly obvious. Why? Because you like 'messing with people'? Nigguh puleeze, you are a disinfo agent plain and simple, pretending to be a truther only to turn around and say you are completely wrong. Yeah right, we believe that. Your tactics are old and well known to everyone here, try not to be so obvious next time.
http://youtu.be/bWorDrTC0Qg

Hypocrisy and

Insults Are Easier
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254654
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I just found out where Insults, Doc and Fontaine use for their "academic research".

http://www.theonion.com/video/popular-childre...
oh the irony

Logan, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254655
Apr 4, 2013
 
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh the irony from a proxy wearing sock!
it's become pretty obvious that every time you can't come up with a clever comeback you respond with your old worn out "oh the irony" retort...you're like a broken record pork. You suck at this, can't you think of anything else to say, eh witless canadian?
onemale

Mattoon, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254657
Apr 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Free fall is pure nonsense.
The NIST report says building 7 fell at free fall speed.

63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254658
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

YellowPissreality wrote:
Can anybody explain why the 32 story land Mark Tower in Texas, the tallest building ever brought down by a CD, did not fall in free fall accleration ????
Did the CD company do something wrong ???
It took them over 4 months to wire the building???
Did the laws of physics take a day off ???
Why no free fall ???
The reason the tower in texas didn't fall @ "free fall" velocity is because before sept 11 buildings met resistance as each floor collapsed onto the next floor , this of course is explained in the next answer.
Yes the cd co. was wrong by using outdated equipment . Probably Did not use thermite, laser beam, terrorist flatulence, jet fuel with an office furniture accelerant,etc.... You know they didn't have access to the governments explosive supply..
Surely you're not as slow as the demolition co., are you? A demo co has to remove any harmful materials(asbestos , windows ,office equipment,etc...) Safety is an issue when you are responsible for American lives . That is Unless you are a member of a govt alphabet agency , they don't give a shit . Also the Demolition co in texas probably only had a couple of guys wiring the tower for its demise where as the govt. has lots of expendables for planting any destructive devices they see fit to use
The laws of physics were defiantly on vacation sept 11 2001 because three buildings were destroyed by jet fuel and office furniture from the top down. I do admit though whomever caused these buildings to collapse knew exactly what they were doing to bring three sky scrapers down so beautifully . Who would've thought stacks of papers , desks and chairs,and file cabinets , with a little jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel.

I guess you are as slow as the c.d. crew in texas , please refer to the first answer for the last question about "free fall" . Please ask your questions only once per post ,most people only need the answer one time .Unless your just an idiot and reading comprehension is not available .

Hope this helped .:p

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254659
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Why Yes, this did help ... it helped prove that you are a complete Imbecile .... Thank You
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason the tower in texas didn't fall @ "free fall" velocity is because before sept 11 buildings met resistance as each floor collapsed onto the next floor , this of course is explained in the next answer.
Yes the cd co. was wrong by using outdated equipment . Probably Did not use thermite, laser beam, terrorist flatulence, jet fuel with an office furniture accelerant,etc.... You know they didn't have access to the governments explosive supply..
Surely you're not as slow as the demolition co., are you? A demo co has to remove any harmful materials(asbestos , windows ,office equipment,etc...) Safety is an issue when you are responsible for American lives . That is Unless you are a member of a govt alphabet agency , they don't give a shit . Also the Demolition co in texas probably only had a couple of guys wiring the tower for its demise where as the govt. has lots of expendables for planting any destructive devices they see fit to use
The laws of physics were defiantly on vacation sept 11 2001 because three buildings were destroyed by jet fuel and office furniture from the top down. I do admit though whomever caused these buildings to collapse knew exactly what they were doing to bring three sky scrapers down so beautifully . Who would've thought stacks of papers , desks and chairs,and file cabinets , with a little jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel.
I guess you are as slow as the c.d. crew in texas , please refer to the first answer for the last question about "free fall" . Please ask your questions only once per post ,most people only need the answer one time .Unless your just an idiot and reading comprehension is not available .
Hope this helped .:p

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254660
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

You are shockingly stupid, old creep- but I'm sure you've been told that many times
oh the irony wrote:
<quoted text>
it's become pretty obvious that every time you can't come up with a clever comeback you respond with your old worn out "oh the irony" retort...you're like a broken record pork. You suck at this, can't you think of anything else to say, eh witless canadian?

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254661
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

R Feynman wrote:
I am certain that the "9.8" that appears in the Table is not a measure of acceleration. The words "free fall" or "gravitational acceleration" do not appear in the Table you indicate. There is no data showing acceleration, period. You are pretending to have accomplished something with this effort?

Here is the claim that you promised to refute:

Don:[QUOTE]There was a period of free-fall for the entire visible perimeter of WTC-7. This can be easily verified by anyone who understands how to determine free-fall acceleration in a video (and physics teacher David Chandler provides lessons to anyone who needs schooling -- including the NIST "investigators"!) Yes, even NIST has conceded a period of free fall for WTC-7."

Porkpie:[QUOTE]NIST never "conceded" anything. Free fall was evident in the draft report"

Sierra:[QUOTE]Can you quote the passage(s) from the draft report that acknowledge a period of free fall for the roof line of WTC 7?
Here is a link to the draft document:
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm... "

Porkpie:[QUOTE] Of course I can but I'll do it from my laptop at home since opening PDF docs is too cumbersome on a phone."

Porkpie:[QUOTE] Table 3-1 pg. 39 of the draft shows a table which includes the free fall portion of the collapse."

The word "includes" is not properly used. There is no acknowledgement in that Table on page 39 of the period free fall acceleration.
The reality is there's multiple indirect mentions to free fall in the NCSTAR 1-9 Vol 1&2 drafts for public comment.

Are they written in such a way that window licking crayon eaters such as yourself understand?

No, it's an engineering report.
Is it worth me wasting my time digging up and referencing them just so you can change the subject and fling more twoof sanctioned sh$t at the wall?

No.

Does free fall imply anything?

No, it's yet another twoofer myth with no qualification or meaning and just another of why,

[Your] Ignorance is [Your] Bliss

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254662
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>But the Twoofer claim is unconditional free-fall which is false.
I'm sure they're busily working on proving free fall is an inherent characteristic of all controlled demolitions....right;-)

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254663
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

oh the irony wrote:
<quoted text>it's become pretty obvious that every time you can't come up with a clever comeback you respond with your old worn out "oh the irony" retort...you're like a broken record pork. You suck at this, can't you think of anything else to say, eh witless canadian?
Umm, no junkie boy-sheep 20 pilots STREET CORNER JEEBUS, I was pointing out the massively hilarious irony of an imbecile who spreads the long debunked myths of twoof calling someone else disinfo.

Go back to sleep now junkie.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254664
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

onemale wrote:
<quoted text>The NIST report says building 7 fell at free fall speed.

63 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
No, it says the total collapse time shows it fell 40% longer than free fall but there was a 2.6 second period of free fall.

But you just keep clinging to easily debunked lies.

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254665
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>The reason the tower in texas didn't fall @ "free fall" velocity is because before sept 11 buildings met resistance as each floor collapsed onto the next floor , this of course is explained in the next answer.
Yes the cd co. was wrong by using outdated equipment . Probably Did not use thermite, laser beam, terrorist flatulence, jet fuel with an office furniture accelerant,etc.... You know they didn't have access to the governments explosive supply..
Surely you're not as slow as the demolition co., are you? A demo co has to remove any harmful materials(asbestos , windows ,office equipment,etc...) Safety is an issue when you are responsible for American lives . That is Unless you are a member of a govt alphabet agency , they don't give a shit . Also the Demolition co in texas probably only had a couple of guys wiring the tower for its demise where as the govt. has lots of expendables for planting any destructive devices they see fit to use
The laws of physics were defiantly on vacation sept 11 2001 because three buildings were destroyed by jet fuel and office furniture from the top down. I do admit though whomever caused these buildings to collapse knew exactly what they were doing to bring three sky scrapers down so beautifully . Who would've thought stacks of papers , desks and chairs,and file cabinets , with a little jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel.

I guess you are as slow as the c.d. crew in texas , please refer to the first answer for the last question about "free fall" . Please ask your questions only once per post ,most people only need the answer one time .Unless your just an idiot and reading comprehension is not available .

Hope this helped .:p
Free fall is just another meaningless twoofer canard.

Go ask an engineer.

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254666
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
Free fall is just another meaningless twoofer canard.
Go ask an engineer.
Glad all is well with you and yours. Life is good here in cowtown my friend , pretty weather and beautiful women. One of my clients just bought a house 3 miles from Padre Island so I'll be spending a good portion of my summer on the beach. Damn the luck!
No need to ask an engineer . I searched the NIST website there are about 97 references . Not only in the NIST NCSTAR 1-5A papers it's also used in the quantum physics division ,and here in weights and measures division http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/metric/mass.cfm Or if you look here it will save me a lot of typing ... http://www.nist.gov/search-results.cfm... .

Do you consider NIST a "twoofer" organization now ?

peace

“Dying 4 ur sins-so tell me”

Since: Jan 09

Fort Worth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254667
Apr 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

YellowPissreality wrote:
Why Yes, this did help ... it helped prove that you are a complete Imbecile .... Thank You
<quoted text>
Ouch that really hurt . Please feel free to call me anything you like as I understand your a little slow . Asking the same question twice in the same post is evidence of this . Please be more creative next time , imbecile is such an old word. My IQ is probably close to an imbecile though , I responded to you didn't I?

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254668
Apr 5, 2013
 
I bet you say that to your boyfriend every night
crucifiedguy wrote:
<quoted text>
Ouch that really hurt . Please feel free to call me anything you like as I understand your a little slow . Asking the same question twice in the same post is evidence of this . Please be more creative next time , imbecile is such an old word. My IQ is probably close to an imbecile though , I responded to you didn't I?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 236,521 - 236,540 of255,490
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

395 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 15 min Epiphany2 598,701
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 15 min Hidingfromyou 715,732
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 23 min Hidingfromyou 222,987
loan shark needed 28 min Benson 4
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 37 min pusherman_ 529,591
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 1 hr sexy boy 323
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 1 hr ocxz 114,504
Is homosexuality a sin? (Oct '07) 2 hr Jennifer 93,107
Does anyone do incest sex with your sister (Apr '12) 14 hr Carly 107
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••