Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

54,539 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Expert in all things

Cottonwood, CA

#254790 Apr 9, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The last time Mt. Ararat erupted was 6,000 years ago. It is a well known fact that the Biblical time line is less than 10,000 years.
You keep claiming that but provide no argument to support your false assumptions. Typical coward.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254791 Apr 9, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep claiming that but provide no argument to support your false assumptions. Typical coward.
I already explained that, you weren't paying attention. Get lost.
Expert in all things

Cottonwood, CA

#254792 Apr 9, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I already explained that, you weren't paying attention. Get lost.
Tell them how smart you are,

wastewater said, "Since Mt. Ararat is a fairly recent volcanic formation, we can easily ascertain the Bible is less than 10,000 years."

tell them how it is...lol

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254794 Apr 9, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep claiming that but provide no argument to support your false assumptions. Typical coward.
What false assumptions fucktard?
Expert in all things

Cottonwood, CA

#254795 Apr 9, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
What false assumptions fucktard?
Your's ya closet gerbil molester.
Expert in all things

Cottonwood, CA

#254796 Apr 9, 2013
Tell them how smart you are,

wastewater said, "Since Mt. Ararat is a fairly recent volcanic formation, we can easily ascertain the Bible is less than 10,000 years."

tell them how it is...lol

ferret freak boy...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254797 Apr 9, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
Tell them how smart you are,
wastewater said, "Since Mt. Ararat is a fairly recent volcanic formation, we can easily ascertain the Bible is less than 10,000 years."
tell them how it is...lol
ferret freak boy...
U Mad Bro?
Expert in all things

Cottonwood, CA

#254798 Apr 9, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
U Mad Bro?
Disappointed in your poor effort, just think your a little off your game, that's all.

You feeling under the weather today?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254799 Apr 9, 2013
Notice this add? Must be aimed at half-wits who want something for nothing. It is pure snake oil. Shame on Topix for even posting this crap.

There is no weird trick. It's bull shit.

Power Companies Fear Him
47yr old man discovers 1 "weird" trick to slash electricity bill. See video now before it’s gone.
www.Power4Patriots.com

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254800 Apr 9, 2013
Expert in all things wrote:
<quoted text>
Disappointed in your poor effort, just think your a little off your game, that's all.
You feeling under the weather today?
Here is one especially for you.

Power Companies Fear Him
47yr old man discovers 1 "weird" trick to slash electricity bill. See video now before it’s gone.
www.Power4Patriots.com

“Twoof, a true act of ignorance”

Since: Jun 09

Edmonton, Canada

#254803 Apr 10, 2013
who wrote:
<quoted text>Hello Porky.
I see that you (unlike NIST) now accept that there was molten steel under those buildings for many weeks.
Well that only took a decade....what would you like to talk about for the next ten years?
I reckon space aliens would be a nice change.
But space aliens aside I think that the presents of molten steel, pulverized concrete and multiple reports of secondary explosions should have warranted a check for explosives.
This guy seems to think so.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =uor8NhUr_90XX

Oh well, you crack on Porky.
I've never had an issue with there being molten steel who. The only thing I've argued to that effect is that you can't tell what a molten material is by sight alone, particularly given the far less than pristine conditions of ground zero and I've shown many times that reports of molten steel are very common in many different kinds of fires so to claim its presence has some sort of nefarious meaning is fallacious at best.

Secondary explosions are the same. Things explode in fires, no one is surprised by that revelation. NIST indirectly tested for explosives when they had a third party do positive material identification on coupons taken from the WTC steel. The steel was also visually examined.

What I find truly funny is that twoofers imply if NIST had tested for explosives, this argument wouldn't be happening where had the done it, twoofers would just claim it was faked like they do with everything else.

Space aliens, Bigfoot, flat earth and controlled demolition at the WTC are all cut from exactly the same cloth and in 11+ years not one twoofer has went back to the fire fighters who made reports of molten steel to ask one very pertinent question: "How did you determine the molten material to be steel?"

That really does say it all.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#254804 Apr 10, 2013
Porkpie Hat wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never had an issue with there being molten steel who. The only thing I've argued to that effect is that you can't tell what a molten material is by sight alone, particularly given the far less than pristine conditions of ground zero and I've shown many times that reports of molten steel are very common in many different kinds of fires so to claim its presence has some sort of nefarious meaning is fallacious at best.
Secondary explosions are the same. Things explode in fires, no one is surprised by that revelation. NIST indirectly tested for explosives when they had a third party do positive material identification on coupons taken from the WTC steel. The steel was also visually examined.
What I find truly funny is that twoofers imply if NIST had tested for explosives, this argument wouldn't be happening where had the done it, twoofers would just claim it was faked like they do with everything else.
Space aliens, Bigfoot, flat earth and controlled demolition at the WTC are all cut from exactly the same cloth and in 11+ years not one twoofer has went back to the fire fighters who made reports of molten steel to ask one very pertinent question: "How did you determine the molten material to be steel?"
That really does say it all.
Exactly.
911 was inside job

Pittsfield, MA

#254805 Apr 10, 2013
who

Reading, UK

#254808 Apr 10, 2013
Sam wrote:
<quoted text>
NIST lead investigator denies witness claims of molten steel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =wcqf5tL887oXX
FDNY firefighters are surprised by secondary explosions in their staging area, far from the fire and impact zones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Editor in Chief Bill Manning of "FIRE ENGINEERING", a respected trade journal, rips official "investigators" for tossing the evidence!
http://web.archive.org/web/20110917121835/htt...
An excerpt:
<quoted text>
-----
Former NIST Fire Science Division Chief rips NIST in Congressional testimony (echoing "Fire Engineering" and ripping a few new orifices...)
http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/...
An excerpt:
<quoted text>
Exactly.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#254809 Apr 10, 2013
LOL, Another youtube scientist that offers up nothing that has not been explained or is irrelevant.
Sam wrote:
<quoted text>
NIST lead investigator denies witness claims of molten steel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =wcqf5tL887oXX
FDNY firefighters are surprised by secondary explosions in their staging area, far from the fire and impact zones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Editor in Chief Bill Manning of "FIRE ENGINEERING", a respected trade journal, rips official "investigators" for tossing the evidence!
http://web.archive.org/web/20110917121835/htt...
An excerpt:
<quoted text>
-----
Former NIST Fire Science Division Chief rips NIST in Congressional testimony (echoing "Fire Engineering" and ripping a few new orifices...)
http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/science/...
An excerpt:
<quoted text>
Amy

Anonymous Proxy

#254810 Apr 10, 2013
Charlie Sheen wrote:
LOL, Another youtube scientist that offers up nothing that has not been explained or is irrelevant.
<quoted text>
Meet some of the 9/11 whistleblowers

www.corbettreport.com/meet-the-911-whistleblo...
FoxNews

AOL

#254811 Apr 10, 2013
.

**ISRAEL Discoveries PROVE JESUS' RETURN -----

http://youtu.be/JO2gm1pFtrs


.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#254812 Apr 10, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
Meet some of the 9/11 whistleblowers
www.corbettreport.com/meet-the-911-whistleblo...
Max? Jennings?, LOL, More out of context quotes edited by twoofers to mislead.
Charlie Sheen

Lincoln, NE

#254813 Apr 10, 2013
Sam wrote:
<quoted text>
Editor in Chief Bill Manning of "FIRE ENGINEERING", a respected trade journal, rips official "investigators" for tossing the evidence!
YAWN!

THE TAINTED BRUSH OF 9/11 POLITICS
BY BILL MANNING

In early August it was revealed by New York Newsday that New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a month before the final 9/11 Commission Report, dispatched a strong memo lobbying the Commission for language that would cast a more favorable light on the city—and, by extension, on city management, past and present. With respect to the hottest hot-button issues surrounding the 9/11 response—radio inoperability, lack of police-fire cooperation and coordination, and the city's poor excuse for a new, "integrated" incident management system—Bloomberg's wish was granted. The Commission's final report coats the three issues with a layer of political honey.

City management had almost three years to circle the wagons to deflect obvious ineptitude and irresponsibility for which it could and should have been held accountable. Capitalizing on an accommodating and docile press, they've controlled critical information, dismissed many concerns of 9/11 families/survivors groups as grief-driven hysteria, and, with great cunning, used the firefighters who perished in the Towers for political cover...
http://fe.pennnet.com/Articles/Article_Displa...

Yes, he thinks there was a cover-up, but not of the type suggested on most 9/11 sites. Manning’s saying it’s down to politicians covering up their responsibility in terms of the emergency services response to the events, the failure of firefighters radios to carry the vital evacuate order, and so on. A point worth bearing in mind, especially with sites that use the “damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel was not enough” quote without any context.
Say the Truth

Lansdale, PA

#254814 Apr 10, 2013
Wonder wrote:
I don't know about all this 911 conspiracy but one thing is sure a lot of people knew about this before it happened. Why do I think this? Because of a personal experience that happened the day before. It was my husbands Aunt's birthday, we were all at my sister in laws house in California. It was close to sunset and we were getting ready to leave. I was standing out by my car when I noticed a house across the street, two doors down, there were a couple packing a car and moving van. My I laws walked out to say goodbye when I mentioned that one of their neighbors was moving away. I also noticed that they looked Middle Eastern. They told me that it was strange, both of the parents were from the Middle East but grew up in the USA, and all their children were all born in the USA, but rather abruptly they had pulled their kids out of school and were moving back to the Middle East, a country they haven't been back to since they were babies, and their children never had been there and were Americans. My inlaws children were friends with their kids and told them that they were very upset their parents were doing this to them. The next day the 911 attacks. And these Middle Eastern neighbors have never been seen again. I have always wondered how many American-Middle Eastern people knew ahead of time?
".. one thing is sure a lot of people knew about this before it happened."

And you reached this conclusion based on one family, who "looked" middle-eastern, moving?

Clouseau, you are fired!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 1 min Stilgar Fifrawi 877,168
The Christian Atheist debate 1 min too lazy to log in 3,773
*** All Time Favorite Songs *** (Dec '10) 1 min Halle Berry Sister 2,856
Poll If you're Christain what kind are you? (Oct '07) 1 min WasteWater 7,867
News Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 1 min June VanDerMark 603,081
White Lives MATTER 1 min USaWORLDWARMONGERER 149
Ever give your boss head? 1 min Hispanicprincess 3
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 4 hr Soon Armagedon Day 613,065
More from around the web