Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Created by djhixx on Oct 13, 2007

53,855 votes

Click on an option to vote

yes

no

well, im not sure

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254583 Apr 3, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
You calling me a govie shill?
That makes you a liar and a fool. The government case has been closed for over ten years Twoofer shill. OTOH I can call you a Twoofer shill because you are still trying to pedal your conspiracy snake oil.
ROTFLMAO
TWOOFER SHILL
Ditto!

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254584 Apr 3, 2013
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?
Looney Tune analogies? That's appropriate considering the source
David

Anonymous Proxy

#254588 Apr 3, 2013
Chaumette wrote:
<quoted text>
Looney Tune analogies? That's appropriate considering the source
Defenders of the official 9/11 fiction seem to be fond of cartoons. Efforts have to be made often to point out that, in real life, there are laws of physics that cannot be circumvented.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254589 Apr 3, 2013
who cares if they acknowledged it, it is of no signifigance
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254590 Apr 3, 2013
WTC 7's collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
Heisenberg wrote:
<quoted text>
The discussion was about NIST's alleged acknowledgement of the free fall drop of the roof line in the draft report. Can you help your friend out by finding the quote?
Are you fond of "Road Runner" cartoons, where the characters just hang in mid-air even as the supporting ground beneath them has disappeared? Can you describe -- or quote NIST's description-- of the sequence of events that would cause the entire visible perimeter to accelerate from a standstill to 9.8 meters/second/second, while allegedly the supports for this visible perimeter are undergoing a gradual progressive failure?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#254591 Apr 3, 2013
Mr Opinion wrote:
To take a line from the movie "Cool Hand Luke "What we have here ..is a failure to communicate"
Good One!

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254592 Apr 3, 2013
thats funny coming from the guys who want to know why when an airplane slams into a re-enforced concrete building at 500mph the wings and tail don't survive ??
David wrote:
<quoted text>
Defenders of the official 9/11 fiction seem to be fond of cartoons. Efforts have to be made often to point out that, in real life, there are laws of physics that cannot be circumvented.
Harrit

Netherlands

#254594 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
who cares if they acknowledged it, it is of no signifigance
<quoted text>
The free fall drop of the WTC 7 roof is of no significance?! This demonstrates beyond all doubt that your unschooled opinion is of no significance!

Also, I take this as admission on your part that NIST did not acknowledge free fall in the draft report and that they were forced to concede this after the issue was pressed during the public questioning at the August 2008 Technical Briefing.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254595 Apr 3, 2013
So why dont you explain to us what the significance is
Harrit wrote:
<quoted text>
The free fall drop of the WTC 7 roof is of no significance?! This demonstrates beyond all doubt that your unschooled opinion is of no significance!
Also, I take this as admission on your part that NIST did not acknowledge free fall in the draft report and that they were forced to concede this after the issue was pressed during the public questioning at the August 2008 Technical Briefing.
Kcalberaswejlaer eht

Oklahoma City, OK

#254596 Apr 3, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
At least I looked at facts and evidence which proved my previous position wrong. You are plainly stuck on stupid. Why post this crap? It only makes you look all the more ignorant and misguided. Oh that's right.
You don't have a life.
He isn't lying. I remembered you saying to Charlie Sheen that you "like to mess with people" even if it means taking an unpopular position. This is proof that you were just faking your original stance of 911 being an inside job.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254598 Apr 3, 2013
why is it Twoof Twits can never tell us why free fall is significant ??
Trier

Höst, Germany

#254600 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
why is it Twoof Twits can never tell us why free fall is significant ??
The explanations are here but they leap over your head
McCloud

Glasgow, UK

#254601 Apr 3, 2013
Trier wrote:
<quoted text>
The explanations are here but they leap over your head
That is the truth! See for example www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TSBMT04T49GGG7...

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254602 Apr 3, 2013
So you don't know
Trier wrote:
<quoted text>
The explanations are here but they leap over your head
Don

Anonymous Proxy

#254603 Apr 3, 2013
When an object is in free fall, none of its gravitational potential energy is available for crushing or deformation or deflection or otherwise contributing to the destruction of or imparting of force and momentum to anything below the free-falling object. The structural integrity below was destroyed entirely by something else.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254604 Apr 3, 2013
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
Don wrote:
When an object is in free fall, none of its gravitational potential energy is available for crushing or deformation or deflection or otherwise contributing to the destruction of or imparting of force and momentum to anything below the free-falling object. The structural integrity below was destroyed entirely by something else.
Colette

Donetsk, Ukraine

#254605 Apr 3, 2013
YellowPissreality wrote:
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
<quoted text>
This is taught in primary physics class. It is basic Newtonian physics. You should study before demonstrating your ignorance in discussions!

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254606 Apr 3, 2013
The Pittsfield MA Truck Driving Institute
YellowPissreality wrote:
LMAO .... at what engineering school did you learn this ??
<quoted text>

Since: Jan 11

Cold Spring Harbor, NY

#254608 Apr 3, 2013
I bet you learned about it on a Twoofer website
Stephan wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservation of energy is a fundamental law of nature. I learned about it in high school... and probably middle school. And I'm sure I heard about it even before these classes.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

#254609 Apr 3, 2013
Can anybody explain why the 32 story land Mark Tower in Texas, the tallest building ever brought down by a CD, did not fall in free fall accleration ????

Did the CD company do something wrong ???
It took them over 4 months to wire the building???
Did the laws of physics take a day off ???
Why no free fall ???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Top Stories Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 6 min River Tam 765,119
Which is the Oldest Indian Language? Sanskrit V... (Jul '08) 8 min arabian 5,444
Why Topix is dying 30 min Protester 1
I wish homosexuals never existed...... 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 77
4 Powerful Steps to Permanently Dissolve Panic ... 1 hr Dissolve Panic 1
Bush is a hero (Sep '07) 1 hr Roberta G 175,050
Bacterial Vaginosis No More Review 1 hr Bacterial Vaginosis 1
Why Should Jesus Love Me? (Feb '08) 2 hr Black Thunder 42 603,706
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 4 hr Oxbow 555,079
Hot gays in Abu Dhabi (Nov '13) 13 hr Ayyan 1,187

Top Stories People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE