created by: djhixx | Oct 13, 2007

Top Stories

53,028 votes

Was 9/11 a conspiracy??

Click on an option to vote

  • yes
  • no
  • well, im not sure

Comments (Page 11,816)

Showing posts 236,301 - 236,320 of250,282
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254129
Mar 16, 2013
 
because we all know that the ONLY thing that explodes in a fire is ..... Explosives

House Fire Triggers Massive Explosion - Firefighter Injured
FireFightingNews.com

(Oregon)- At 12:26 am on November 29th Canby Firefighters responded to a house fire located at 12777 S. Union Hall Rd. Upon arrival, firefighters found a home fully involved in fire. The home was located on an 18-acre rural home-site, which had a very long, very narrow, and very dark driveway that looked much like others driveways. Firefighters had to literally guess as to which driveway might lead them to the burning home, and fortunately, they chose the correct driveway the first time. Firefighters were forced to park their fire engine about 200 feet from the home and deployed an exterior defensive attack.

At 1:09 AM, 23 minutes after firefighters initially started fire-ground operations, a massive explosion rocked the fire scene. Within seconds, firefighters heard the ominous words over their radios, "Firefighter Down." Firefighter Raina Eshleman had suffered and injury, and her fellow firefighters, John Footman and Andrew Gordian rushed to her aid, and quickly removed her from the hazard area.
Erik wrote:
<quoted text>
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did
The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
van Eyke

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254130
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

YellowPissreality wrote:
because we all know that the ONLY thing that explodes in a fire is ..... Explosives
House Fire Triggers Massive Explosion - Firefighter Injured
FireFightingNews.com
(Oregon)- At 12:26 am on November 29th Canby Firefighters responded to a house fire located at 12777 S. Union Hall Rd. Upon arrival, firefighters found a home fully involved in fire. The home was located on an 18-acre rural home-site, which had a very long, very narrow, and very dark driveway that looked much like others driveways. Firefighters had to literally guess as to which driveway might lead them to the burning home, and fortunately, they chose the correct driveway the first time. Firefighters were forced to park their fire engine about 200 feet from the home and deployed an exterior defensive attack.
At 1:09 AM, 23 minutes after firefighters initially started fire-ground operations, a massive explosion rocked the fire scene. Within seconds, firefighters heard the ominous words over their radios, "Firefighter Down." Firefighter Raina Eshleman had suffered and injury, and her fellow firefighters, John Footman and Andrew Gordian rushed to her aid, and quickly removed her from the hazard area.
<quoted text>
This is a red herring, yes? What does this have to do with explosions that are many many meters from the fire, and in some cases <<BEFORE>> the airplains hit the building?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254131
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Erik wrote:
<quoted text>
What is wrong is, number one, it is not a "fact",
and number 2, the Towers did not "fall" - they were blown apart violently, as is obvious in the news footage
and number 3, the airplanes were not "fully fueled"
and number 4, the Towers were designed to sustain airplane impacts, as they obviously did
The fires in the impact zones were burning out. However, there were explosives detonating on other floors of the Towers, as we could hear on the fireman radios and as we learned from testimony of firefighters who survived blasts that had nothing to do with the plane impacts. It is quite obvious from the way the Towers were being blown very quickly apart that these were not structural failures from fire and impact!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
It is a fact unless you can prove otherwise. So far there are many far fetched opinions but no evidence to back any of those claims.

The towers stood for a little over two hours before metal fatigue and truss bolts sheared causing them to collapse.

The two airplanes had just taken off from nearby airports. They had plenty of fuel on board to reach their destinations.

The towers did sustain the immediate impact but were not designed to be flown into at full speed with fully fueled planes of that size. Besides, this is the test of the engineering. They actually held up pretty well.

There were no explosives. What was heard was structural failure. I see you have no experience with things letting go under pressure, I have.

The firefighters spoke of undetermined secondary explosions common in fires of that size.

It is obvious the towers failed. It is equally obvious there was no evidence of explosive devices.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254132
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

ZERO explosions before plane impacts
van Eyke wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a red herring, yes? What does this have to do with explosions that are many many meters from the fire, and in some cases <<BEFORE>> the airplains hit the building?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254133
Mar 16, 2013
 
Convar wrote:
Hard disks that were recovered from the ground Zero and cleaned in a sophisticated procedure revealed evidence of financial crimes
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Could be. Opportunists often take advantage of chaotic situations. Does this prove anything?
Navigator

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254134
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
It is a fact unless you can prove otherwise.
Maybe in your world...
WasteWater wrote:
So far there are many far fetched opinions but no evidence to back any of those claims.
Only in your world...
WasteWater wrote:
The towers stood for a little over two hours before metal fatigue and truss bolts sheared causing them to collapse.
The Towers did not "collapse." It is quite apparent from video that masses are being ejected horizontally (perpendicular to gravitational force) with tremendous force. Everything is being pulverized before it even can impact the ground or anything else! Hundreds of tiny human bone fragments are ejected hundreds of feet onto neighboring building roofs instead of being trapped between "collapsing" floors. You are blind.
WasteWater wrote:
The two airplanes had just taken off from nearby airports. They had plenty of fuel on board to reach their destinations.
You stated that the planes were fully fueled. This is a false statement.
WasteWater wrote:
The towers did sustain the immediate impact but were not designed to be flown into at full speed with fully fueled planes of that size. Besides, this is the test of the engineering. They actually held up pretty well.
Again, you say "fully fueled." Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.

The Towers survived the plane impacts and fires, just as they have survived a serious fire before, and a bombing in the basement, and huricane winds. They did not survive explosive demolition.
WasteWater wrote:
There were no explosives. What was heard was structural failure.
Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.
WasteWater wrote:
I see you have no experience with things letting go under pressure, I have.
I imagine that the force of your cranium imploding with every serious instance of cognitive dissonance can be very painful. I do not envy you.
WasteWater wrote:
The firefighters spoke of undetermined secondary explosions common in fires of that size.
The firefighter in the video said: "People don't understand. There may be more! Any one of these [effing] buildings can blow up! This aint done yet!" Listen carefully -- http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Navigator

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254136
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

YellowPissreality wrote:
ZERO explosions before plane impacts
<quoted text>
Lady: "The bomb hit the lobby first. Then a couple of seconds later the first plane hit" -- http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Also reported by William Rodriguez
Navigator

Amsterdam, Netherlands

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254137
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Could be. Opportunists often take advantage of chaotic situations. Does this prove anything?
Evidence of FOREKNOWLEDGE of the attacks... dismissed by the government September 11 Commission.

Ignoring evidence is fraud.

Since: May 10

YOUR MOM'S HOUSE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254138
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

You must be exhausted you were on here all day yesterday with your other account now your back all day today using your sock puppets ... why don't you go to bed and get some rest ?
Navigator wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe in your world...
<quoted text>
Only in your world...
<quoted text>
The Towers did not "collapse." It is quite apparent from video that masses are being ejected horizontally (perpendicular to gravitational force) with tremendous force. Everything is being pulverized before it even can impact the ground or anything else! Hundreds of tiny human bone fragments are ejected hundreds of feet onto neighboring building roofs instead of being trapped between "collapsing" floors. You are blind.
<quoted text>
You stated that the planes were fully fueled. This is a false statement.
<quoted text>
Again, you say "fully fueled." Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.
The Towers survived the plane impacts and fires, just as they have survived a serious fire before, and a bombing in the basement, and huricane winds. They did not survive explosive demolition.
<quoted text>
Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.
<quoted text>
I imagine that the force of your cranium imploding with every serious instance of cognitive dissonance can be very painful. I do not envy you.
<quoted text>
The firefighter in the video said: "People don't understand. There may be more! Any one of these [effing] buildings can blow up! This aint done yet!" Listen carefully -- http://www.youtube.com/watch...
guest

Anonymous Proxy

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254139
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

YellowPissreality wrote:
You must be exhausted you were on here all day yesterday with your other account now your back all day today using your sock puppets ... why don't you go to bed and get some rest ?
<quoted text>
What, don't you like having your a22 kicked by Navigator? It's the only reasonable explanation for why you return to these forums over and over, every day, weeks, months...

“Don't believe the Dis-Info”

Since: Dec 10

Pittsfield , MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254140
Mar 16, 2013
 
It was a mini nuke planted on the 92nd floor of the North Tower and the 86th floor of the South Tower that brought down the buildings. They were planted by govie agents possing as workers during the power down the weekend before 9/11
Hercule Poirot

Tonawanda, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254141
Mar 16, 2013
 
Interesting thread.

Though this may have already been mentioned:

Steel is melting, concrete collapsing and yet paper is flying in pristine condition.

I never did understand that.

Replies Welcome. Thanks.
onemale

Mattoon, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254143
Mar 16, 2013
 
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
The law of physics works fine. If you watch some of the footage of the towers collapsing, you will see big chunks flying out as the structure fails. Those chunks descend at a much faster rate than the building. What this means is the chunks are free falling; the building is descending at a slower rate of speed proving successive structural failure rather than the Twoofer free fall claim. The NIST report is correct.
In other words you know more about physics that physicists.
Say the Truth

North Wales, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254144
Mar 16, 2013
 
Navigator wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe in your world...
<quoted text>
Only in your world...
<quoted text>
The Towers did not "collapse." It is quite apparent from video that masses are being ejected horizontally (perpendicular to gravitational force) with tremendous force. Everything is being pulverized before it even can impact the ground or anything else! Hundreds of tiny human bone fragments are ejected hundreds of feet onto neighboring building roofs instead of being trapped between "collapsing" floors. You are blind.
<quoted text>
You stated that the planes were fully fueled. This is a false statement.
<quoted text>
Again, you say "fully fueled." Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.
The Towers survived the plane impacts and fires, just as they have survived a serious fire before, and a bombing in the basement, and huricane winds. They did not survive explosive demolition.
<quoted text>
Repeating a falsehood does not make it true.
<quoted text>
I imagine that the force of your cranium imploding with every serious instance of cognitive dissonance can be very painful. I do not envy you.
<quoted text>
The firefighter in the video said: "People don't understand. There may be more! Any one of these [effing] buildings can blow up! This aint done yet!" Listen carefully -- http://www.youtube.com/watch...
"Repeating a falsehood does not make it true. "

But Smith, that doesn't stop you from trying anyway...
Say the Truth

North Wales, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254145
Mar 16, 2013
 
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
What, don't you like having your a22 kicked by Navigator? It's the only reasonable explanation for why you return to these forums over and over, every day, weeks, months...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/stilwell-ok/T...

BWAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAa .... you STUPID sock!!!
Say the Truth

North Wales, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254146
Mar 16, 2013
 
onemale wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I don't claim to have all the answers.
But I do know the alleged hijackers are not on any airline flight lists on 9-11. And I do know it is impossible for fiberglass and aluminum to knife through massive steel beams like hot butter. Physicists have said you have two choices, believe the laws of physics or the NIST report.
If any "physicist" doesn't understand Newtonian Physics they should return their diplomas.
onemale

Mattoon, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254147
Mar 16, 2013
 
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Coincidences don't count. Facts and evidence do.
It is understandable you want to ignore the coincidences since there are around 100 all totaled. 9/11 was the first time for so many things that NEVER happened in history.
onemale

Mattoon, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254148
Mar 16, 2013
 
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
If any "physicist" doesn't understand Newtonian Physics they should return their diplomas.
In other you know more about physics than physicists
Doctor REALITY

Little Rock, AR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254150
Mar 17, 2013
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch... Look,all you have to do is carefully watch the fire coming from this mysterious 'projectile',STRAIGHT INTO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING....AT 'GROUND LEVEL'...to know that whatever it is,it's NOT an American Airlines Boeing 757! o.k.?! This country is run by some of the most lying,morally and spiritually corrupt people in the world when it comes to just telling the truth sometimes!! If that had been a 757 jet,it would have swooped down from the sky,and,more than likely,because the wtc hijack pilots crashed those planes at an 'angle' to cause a wider swath of destruction,the same would have likely occurred here with the plane swooping down from the sky,with one of the wings 'tilted',as the hijack pilot opened the throttles wide open once he realized he was going in. LOOK,we KNOW what happened,O.K.?? Once they saw that wild,crazed islamic terrorists were in the process of perpetrating a mind-boggling air assault on this country,they knew they had to stop any other attacks that were about to happen. Did they WANT to shoot down American Airlines flight 77,and United Airlines flight 93?? Of course not. But in their minds,and they were actually correct,all of the passengers on those two planes were going to die ANYWAY. They were totally EMBARASSED that those wild,angry wahabi extremists had gotten into the cockpits of those planes like venomous snakes,but now they had to stop the others who had gotten control of two other planes. Now they had to protect hundreds,and possibly even thousands of innocent people on the ground. They had to protect buildings that they knew would be likely targets. More than likely,fightjets blazed up alongside of flights 77 and 93 the same way they shadowed Payne Stewart's runaway jet. They let the hijack pilots know they were there. They tried to talk with them,plead with them to abandon their insane plans. But the wild-eyed terrorists,shocked as they were to see that they were being shadowed by fightjets,refused to abort their mission. Allah,Mohammed,eternity in paradise,and 72 virgins awaited! There was no way they would abort! No way they they would land and face life in a federal prison in the land of the infidels!! They left the 'infidels' following them no choice: They chose....THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS.
Marie

Luxembourg

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#254151
Mar 17, 2013
 
Say the Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
If any "physicist" doesn't understand Newtonian Physics they should return their diplomas.
Should this be a requirement for engineers as well? I think it should. The NIST needs competent scientists, not these political tools.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 236,301 - 236,320 of250,282
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

504 Users are viewing the Top Stories Forum right now

Search the Top Stories Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 9 min Mandela 109,434
Prove there's a god. (Mar '08) 15 min eternalrock 679,475
Say hello to everyone and I am new here 26 min Cisco Kid 5
Opposite Of Truth 27 min Cisco Kid 6
In Mexico City, where can I get hold of Nembutal? (Sep '10) 30 min Cisco Kid 11
American Soldiers - Duty, Honor, Country (Jun '11) 34 min -USA-1 37,817
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 54 min Aura Mytha 216,398
Roman Catholic church only true church, says Va... (Jul '07) 2 hr marge 511,740
teen snapchat nudes 4 hr casher_98 105
Girls snapchat names?(dirty) 6 hr Jturner4643 217
•••
•••
•••